That gun control cannot stop or prevent insane lunatics from trying to shoot or kill you. Not that Japan is "full of gun crime". Japan is yet another sad example of a place with extreme gun control laws where gun control still doesn't stop insane weirdos.
So because it's only 99.99% and not 100% effective, it's useless?
A respected political figure got assassinated and the first thing you want to do is get brownie points at your local fruit forum thread? Sad
It's useless because criminals get guns illegally most of the time. Study after study after study shows that the more restrictive the gun control laws, the more guns are aquired illegally to commit crimes (or self-made) and it at best has no effect at reducing crime, and at worse the gun bans greatly increase crime. I have been consistent on this issue, and have posted studies and data to support this earlier in the thread. This incident is just another example of how laughably easy it is to bypass even the strictest of gun laws if one wants to.
First of all, I'd like to point out that you don't need to get extremely mad. Neg-ratting all my posts won't make your argument better, just makes you look petty and angry.
A very rare incident of someone getting shot is just an example of how getting shot is very rare there.
The fact that you keep missing the point should not be suprising. Oh well, I said what I wanted to, so it's all good, I suppose
You don't really seem to have a point with the Japan thing, though.
He's a furry, they seldom have the capacity to argue efficiently to things that don't involve questionable topics about animals.
Probably something along the lines of "We need to regulate muh ghost guns and gun building materials" You know, the same shit over and over expecting shit to change.
Just is a petty bastard. A few days ago, someone mentioned him on the BreadTube thread and he showed up and began to spout bullshit. All his arguments are either whataboutisms, goalpost moving, and other fallacies. Whenever he is confronted with anything that disproves the gun control narrative, he firstly gives the post a neg-rating and then proceeds to engage in a fallacious argument using the aforementioned tactics. Truly sad.
Mad lol. I don't know much about him, I don't follow foreign politics, but he seemed cool. RIP was genuine.
Mass killings will still occur without guns, you're delusional. Shooting sprees get a lot of publicity but they account for very few murders anyway.
Heck, there's been around 30 vehicle attacks in the US in the last 20+ years, with around 400 injuries and over 50 deaths. That's pretty similar numbers to the larger school shootings and related "workplace incidents" since Columbine. The main reason the death toll is under 200 is that paramedics actually treat car attack victims immediately, but wait around for police to clear the scene of a mass shooting before treating shooting victims, leading to around a 50% fatality rate for mass shootings. However, the injuries from being ran over by a truck are generally more life-changing (amputations, brain damage, paralysis) than survivable small caliber rifle wounds.Mad lol. I don't know much about him, I don't follow foreign politics, but he seemed cool. RIP was genuine.
Mass killings will still occur without guns, you're delusional. Shooting sprees get a lot of publicity but they account for very few murders anyway.
Scary rifle go boom
@Kosher Snake Started complaining about me in a non-related channel. And he made the bitch move not even to tag me. And Chuck, stop projecting. It's y'all who are doing "whataboutisms, goalpost moving, and other fallacies."
I don't rate you poorly because I'm mad; I'm just being objective about you being dumb and Mad at the internet. And about the KF being too mean for me; well let's just say I'm sad more people don't get my new profile pic reference. I drew it myself.
Oh, I'm sure you are. Totally
What do you mean by "removing assault rifles", exactly? In the US assault rifles are already ridiculously difficult to acquire legally, and basically priced outside the market for anyone but a collector. To my knowledge, the only crimes involving assault rifles since the late-80's were all illegally imported weapons (typically AK's brought over the border from Mexico) and are almost solely used by drug gangs against other gangs, not by spree shooters (who seem to prefer handguns).
And Uvalde, Sandy hook, Las Vegas, Pulse, Stoneman Douglas to name a few?
Is that why you followed Snake to the BreadTuber thread? It ain't a "bitch move" to not tag someone in a different thread, so don't use that excuse. We're the ones that are "projecting"? Bitch please, your ass is the one who's talking a bunch of horseshit even after being shown a bunch of sources that contradict your point of view. It be nice if you took the time to shut up and listen.
Let the little bitch moan. I'm sure mommy and daddy are proud of their "Gun Control Warrior" fighting "ebil school shooters" on Kiwi Farms.
Hey, let's forget all about this topic. I'm getting scared getting teamtagged like this by gun owners. I will go aways and you guys can go back to tending your alpacas. Please don't hurt me or send me threatening pictures of yourself no more.
If by assault rifles he means automatic ones, they are only 0.001575% of all US guns, and pretty rare
Several of these used handguns like Sandy Hook (Glock 20SF), Las Vegas (.38-caliber Smith & Wesson Model 342), Pulse (Semi-automatic Glock). There's no evidence they wouldn't have used other semi-automatics, and data suggests they would have gotten the weapons illegally. Several of these people already couldn't legally own or purchase weapons. Also, like I said before, most shootings happen in places where guns are illegal. Weird how it didn't stop them.
He is so objective he goes out of his way to neg rate every single one of my recent posts here, no matter what they say.
None of those involved an assault rifle (though Las Vegas was probably a machinegun, admittedly, but hardly legal). The Pulse nightclub shooting was a literal ISIS terrorist armed with a SIG MCX, a glock handgun (used after the rifle jammed and was abandoned) and some unknown number of very illegal explosives. I don't see how any amount of laws would've prevented that attack.
Data suggests that if you can't tell how much more dangerous and AR platform is compared to a handgun, then it's highly likely people will think you are dum-dum and sticker you accordingly. Also why do you forget that in those cases almost all the killings was done with AR platforms ( Pulse- SIG MCX, Sandy hook-Bushmaster XM-15, Las Vegas- an arsenal of rifles, Douglas school-S&W MP15)
He genuinly hates statistics.
You neg-rate me on anything and everything, most not even AR related. Neg-rate me all you want, just stop pretending that you are doing it for any other reason then being mad.
And yet again, you missed the point. Please reread my comment.
