The HBO Max/Discovery Griefing Thread - look how they massacred my boys

New guy by the name of Zaslav is in charge and they're going with the pretty simple mindset of HBOMax having mostly appealed to men with stuff like their DC properties and Discovery mostly appealing to women with their reality TV shows.

He seems like he's wanting to lean into that while also giving up the idea of direct to streaming movies that cost a fortune like was done with Suicide Squad 2 and the Matrix sequel, since it skips out on the opportunity to earn money at the box office.

Dumping the kid's cartoons seems like them abandoning the idea of having programming for people of all ages, probably a result of them actually looking at the numbers regarding how often the stuff was watched. Stuff like Doom Patrol is probably safe as it's aimed at adults and fits with the goal of appealing to the comic book crowd.

The sperging going on is because the shitty bean mouth cartoons had gotten to be kept alive on the platform and let idiots make believe that these cartoons were extremely popular even though kids would likely rather watch more Teen Titans Go.

This was a slide that came out that revealed a bit about their thinking.

View attachment 3625203

Also checking some of the cartoons tossed I noticed the Aquaman thing, which was yet more bean mouth. Looks like all calarts is being banished in favor of more normal stuff.

View attachment 3625250
Kids dont want to watch anything on HBOMax other than Harry Potter from my first hand observation.

Whats worse is they dont have a great curation. If they have a kids mode like netflix has i havent seen it. So parents have to make if they are watching Cartoons they dont get recommended to watch more adult crap
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBG
Kids dont want to watch anything on HBOMax other than Harry Potter from my first hand observation.

Whats worse is they dont have a great curation. If they have a kids mode like netflix has i havent seen it. So parents have to make if they are watching Cartoons they dont get recommended to watch more adult crap
Surprised they hell out of me hearing of the cancellations as I didn’t know the service had all that kid stuff. Never saw it advertised that it existed there and mostly seemed like the dumpster fires of Cartoon Network.
 
I'm wondering if there is some of that (in)famous Hollywood accounting going on with Batgirl and any other movies they just outright cancel. Some factor they aren't talking about because it'd draw too much attention to something they'd rather not disclose. IDK, it's really, really weird to completely cancel a movie this expensive without even trying to recoup the investment.
I think it ties towards the massive cold feet Warner Brothers is having, especially with the new management in charge, towards the plans to out-SJW Disney/Marvel by LITERALLY MURDERING SUPERMAN AS A BABY AND ERASING HIM FROM EXISTENCE!!!!!

As part of the plan for the post-Flashpoint reboot, Superman was going to be killed as an infant on Krypton before it exploded and replaced in history by his cousin Kara, who was now a Latina for diversity points. Supergirl was now Earth's chief champion and hero and unlike Clark, was universally loved by the world over.

Adding to this, Ben Affleck's Batman would be erased and replaced with OG Keaton Batman, who is now retired and also never killed Joker and that the Batgirl film would revolve around Keaton setting up a Batman Beyond type relationship with the Batgirl, with the establishing of an all female Trinity (Batgirl, Supergirl, and Wonder Woman) as the premiere heroes of the DC Universe and the new face of the DC Movie-verse. And that the only Superman to be allowed in TV/movies going forward would be the incoming Coates/Abrams Black Superman, with it implied that Superman TV show on CW will be canceled once Black Superman started filming so Black Superman would be the only Superman allowed.

Supposedly the new management is all "WHAT THE FUCK????" and pissed the fuck off, while people inside Warner who have been trying (and failing) to get Warner to back the fuck off on this murder of Superman, finally had allies to force the issue; especially since it's well known that Disney has been courting Cavill to jump ship to Disney/Marvel, with roles from Hyperion (evil Superman) to Wolverine (flagship character for the X-Men) and Captain Britain (British Superman) dangled to Cavill to make him forsake DC.

Cancelling Batgirl seems to indicate the pro-Superman side winning and that Flash will most likely have those scenes cut to preserve Cavill's Superman going forward.
 
I think it ties towards the massive cold feet Warner Brothers is having, especially with the new management in charge, towards the plans to out-SJW Disney/Marvel by LITERALLY MURDERING SUPERMAN AS A BABY AND ERASING HIM FROM EXISTENCE!!!!!

As part of the plan for the post-Flashpoint reboot, Superman was going to be killed as an infant on Krypton before it exploded and replaced in history by his cousin Kara, who was now a Latina for diversity points. Supergirl was now Earth's chief champion and hero and unlike Clark, was universally loved by the world over.

Adding to this, Ben Affleck's Batman would be erased and replaced with OG Keaton Batman, who is now retired and also never killed Joker and that the Batgirl film would revolve around Keaton setting up a Batman Beyond type relationship with the Batgirl, with the establishing of an all female Trinity (Batgirl, Supergirl, and Wonder Woman) as the premiere heroes of the DC Universe and the new face of the DC Movie-verse. And that the only Superman to be allowed in TV/movies going forward would be the incoming Coates/Abrams Black Superman, with it implied that Superman TV show on CW will be canceled once Black Superman started filming so Black Superman would be the only Superman allowed.

Supposedly the new management is all "WHAT THE FUCK????" and pissed the fuck off, while people inside Warner who have been trying (and failing) to get Warner to back the fuck off on this murder of Superman, finally had allies to force the issue; especially since it's well known that Disney has been courting Cavill to jump ship to Disney/Marvel, with roles from Hyperion (evil Superman) to Wolverine (flagship character for the X-Men) and Captain Britain (British Superman) dangled to Cavill to make him forsake DC.
Is there any proof for all of this?
 
Is there any proof for all of this?
Most of it is speculation. The plot with superman dying as a child in alt reality was rumored however rumors also said the worlds merge in the end or something along those lines. Also same rumors said Ben Affleck Batman would send Barry a note in the after credits saying he needs their help. But the Black Superman movie was meant to be stand alone, and what is said about Batgirl doesn't match up with the leaks and what we know about that movie outside Kenton being in it.

Here is some of what we do know, mostly business wise

1. Batgirl was canceled, reasons given quality not there, didn't fit their new streaming plan nor was cinematic enough for cinemas

2. Batgirl tested about the same as Black Adam prior to that getting reshoots.

3. Lots of talk that Batgirl also no longer fits in the DCU plan, however no one knows the plan and from insiders it seems that 10 year plan right now is just a plan to make a 10 year plan.

4. The Flash movie is testing really well, and the head of WBD doesn't want to get rid of it no matter what. However other on the board think it's unreleasable due to Erza Miller

5. Prior to the Erza Miller apology they were floating around three options, 1. he gets help and then does a interview later down the line about his issues, 2. Still put out the movie but he plays no part in marketing and will get recast, 3. Kill the movie for tax write off.

6. The Flash did have some level of reshoots during the summer with Erza Miller taking part.

7. Ben Affleck was called in for reshoots of Aqauman a movie he was not meant to be a part of. He said prior to this he was done with the role and took Flash as a way to say goodbye to the role.

8. Superman is seen as a key brand for WBD, with it along with Batman and Wonderwoman highlighted. We don't know the plans for Superman yet but they clearly have some.

9. Blue Beetle has not been canceled, this movie was planned for HBO Max however prior to filming was moved over to a cinematic release

10. Joker 2 is in the works, so stand alone DC movies aren't off the table. However the Batman 2 has yet to be greenlit but the first movie was held up by David Zaslav as being a hit. Worth noting the Penguin show is still moving forward.

11. Press reported Walter Hamada nearly left after Batgirl was canceled, however will least now stay on until after Black Adam releases. The heads of WB films are also reported to want to keep him around.

12. Hollywood report claims Hamada's plans included a Crisis on Infinite Earths movie which will no longer be made. Other projects reported to no longer be in the works or had development slowed down include Black Superman, Supergirl, Green Lantern Corps and Static Shock.

13. Despite places reporting the HBO Max Green Lantern show is dead, it has now been confirmed that it is moving forward still.

14, Peacemaker season 2 is still moving ahead, James Gunn is meant to be working on other DC HBO Max shows however been no information since.
 
Most of it is speculation. The plot with superman dying as a child in alt reality was rumored however rumors also said the worlds merge in the end or something along those lines. Also same rumors said Ben Affleck Batman would send Barry a note in the after credits saying he needs their help. But the Black Superman movie was meant to be stand alone, and what is said about Batgirl doesn't match up with the leaks and what we know about that movie outside Kenton being in it.

Here is some of what we do know, mostly business wise

1. Batgirl was canceled, reasons given quality not there, didn't fit their new streaming plan nor was cinematic enough for cinemas

2. Batgirl tested about the same as Black Adam prior to that getting reshoots.

3. Lots of talk that Batgirl also no longer fits in the DCU plan, however no one knows the plan and from insiders it seems that 10 year plan right now is just a plan to make a 10 year plan.

4. The Flash movie is testing really well, and the head of WBD doesn't want to get rid of it no matter what. However other on the board think it's unreleasable due to Erza Miller

5. Prior to the Erza Miller apology they were floating around three options, 1. he gets help and then does a interview later down the line about his issues, 2. Still put out the movie but he plays no part in marketing and will get recast, 3. Kill the movie for tax write off.

6. The Flash did have some level of reshoots during the summer with Erza Miller taking part.

7. Ben Affleck was called in for reshoots of Aqauman a movie he was not meant to be a part of. He said prior to this he was done with the role and took Flash as a way to say goodbye to the role.

8. Superman is seen as a key brand for WBD, with it along with Batman and Wonderwoman highlighted. We don't know the plans for Superman yet but they clearly have some.

9. Blue Beetle has not been canceled, this movie was planned for HBO Max however prior to filming was moved over to a cinematic release

10. Joker 2 is in the works, so stand alone DC movies aren't off the table. However the Batman 2 has yet to be greenlit but the first movie was held up by David Zaslav as being a hit. Worth noting the Penguin show is still moving forward.

11. Press reported Walter Hamada nearly left after Batgirl was canceled, however will least now stay on until after Black Adam releases. The heads of WB films are also reported to want to keep him around.

12. Hollywood report claims Hamada's plans included a Crisis on Infinite Earths movie which will no longer be made. Other projects reported to no longer be in the works or had development slowed down include Black Superman, Supergirl, Green Lantern Corps and Static Shock.

13. Despite places reporting the HBO Max Green Lantern show is dead, it has now been confirmed that it is moving forward still.

14, Peacemaker season 2 is still moving ahead, James Gunn is meant to be working on other DC HBO Max shows however been no information since.
Seems like there is no plan to hire better writers.
 
Seems like there is no plan to hire better writers.
David Zaslav did say during the last earning call that they will get the best talent but who the hell knows what that means. Would he call the Russo brothers top talent because they made three movies that made over $1 billion even if those movies were always going to make that much and the quality of those movies has more to do with the marvel machine than any talent Russo brothers may or may not have. Or does he mean top talent meaning someone like Paul Thomas Anderson, whose movies are always some of the best the years they came out but box office wise more than likely will flop.
 
I mean no matter what Zaslav is an idiot to think a superhero cinematic universe would even be worth investing in given the high amount of superhero fatigue. It honestly would be better to stick to stand alone films
Having them set in the same universe I don't think is a bad idea, but each move should still be able to stand alone and they shouldn't build on each to set the next movie up in the cinematic universe.

You can do a Justice League movie that works as a stand alone movie despite having the cast of the solo movies. Hell can even do team up movies which work as stand alone, shit movie but you can watch Alien vs. Predator without watching any of the others in those series before hand.

But who the fuck knows what Zaslav plan is anyway, if it's to mimic the MCU but have a few movies like Joker outside of it then it dumb as fuck.

What I would is create a 10 year plan which is open to change but the goal is to outline characters that have box office potential, giving yourself a deadline to get the movie ready at the quality needed and making sure that character is safe from being used as a throwaway in another movie. May do some small cross over such as having a Black Adam vs Shazam movie at some point, but avoid making movies like Aqauman 3 or a Superman lead into Justice League 2 or some other big crossover or cinematic phase.

But you are 100% right in superhero fatigue, while still lot of money to be made and I think the big heroes like Batman or Spiderman will always make money, you really want to avoid what Marvel is doing with 4+ movies and 4+ tv shows a year which all tie into each other.
 
Last edited:
Owen Dennis, creator of Infinity Train, made a post on his site talking about how and why Infinity Train got canned, in the form of a FAQ.
(Archive)

TL;DR: He has no idea what the fuck is happening, and neither does anyone anywhere in any company previously under Warmer; pirate Infinity Train and spread the word, as he may have plans to take the show elsewhere if CN will play nice.

Infinity Train Taken off HBOMax​

The announcement on Wednesday of Infinity Train, OKKO, Summer Camp Island, The Fungies and many other shows being taken off of HBOMax was a shock to all of us. Not just to fans, but to the creators and artists that made the shows as well. I had no idea it was coming, neither did any other show creator I’ve talked with, nor any of their representatives.

People have been working behind the scenes for days now trying to figure out what’s going on. A thousand phone calls, texts, and emails have been sent, but the problem is that the entirety of Warner and Discovery is undergoing a merger. This means that people who you would normally talk to have been fired, moved, or quit, so no one has any idea how to get the information they need right now. This is the same thing that happened in the early months of the merger with AT&T. Never cheer for a corporate merger, they help about 100 people and hurt thousands.

Because of all this confusion, I thought I’d share what I know as of today, Saturday, August 20.

So far, everything related to or mentioning Infinity Train has been removed from:
  • HBOMax
  • Cartoon Network
  • HBOMax and Cartoon Network’s Twitter accounts
  • HBOMax and Cartoon Network’s Youtube accounts
  • All music streaming services
Currently, it is still available on:
I do not know how long it will stay on any of those services. No one does. As of yesterday evening, I was assured by Warner that it would not be taken down from any pay-per-season/episode services.

I’m pretty sure that, if iTunes is no longer allowed to have the show, they won’t take it away after you’ve already paid for it. However, I don’t know for a fact about any of this, much less the other providers. This is the scary part about no longer using physical media.

I was also assured late yesterday evening that the show is not being used for that tax write off loophole that is now so overwhelmingly associated with Batgirl and Scoob!: Holiday Haunt. Will this continue to be true? I also don’t know, but the end date for the tax write off is the beginning of September, so maybe that will give us a hint.

How did this chaos happen?​

No idea. I’m told from various sources that this wasn’t supposed to happen until next week sometime so that Cartoon Network/HBOMax/etc could have time to tell all the show creators and artists what’s going on. That’s obviously not what happened, and now this is where that disorganization has gotten us. Cartoon Network warned them not to do this as it would hurt relationships with creators and talent, but they clearly do not care what any of this looks like publicly, much less about how we feel about it.

Why did they do this?​

No one knows, but we do know it was a direct order from Discovery, and it’s about saving money somehow. The general consensus is that it has something to do with paying animators and artists their residuals that they’re owed for their work. You will sometimes see an argument online of “well they were already paid the artists to make it, so what are they complaining about?” Do not listen to someone who says this because they either don’t understand or don’t care about what our pay structure is.

Our pay is not complete without the ongoing residuals. Those residuals aren’t paid directly to the artists, they actually go to our union to pay for our healthcare. So not paying artists residuals on their work means they are indirectly defunding our healthcare.

This also means that music and actor residuals will stop. For reference, the first quarter of this year I made $388.45 off of residuals from voicing One-One. We’re not talking about a whole lot of money here, that’s the equivalent of the studio accidentally buying an extra office chair.

CNBC has estimated that this will likely save Discovery somewhere in the tens of millions of dollars. A very small drop in the bucket of the 3 billion that David Zaslov has said he wants save by 2023.

CNBC also says “Everything getting pulled from HBO Max was infrequently watched, according to people familiar with the matter.” First off, no one is familiar with the matter, because the entire industry has been trying to reach people that are familiar with the matter for three days and haven’t been able to do so.

That said, it’s hard to believe that Shock Corridor, Mystery of the Wax Museum, The X From Outer Space, Ice Station Zema, Red Sonja or Captain Blood, while all fantastic movies in their own rights, are being “frequently watched”. So clearly, it’s not frequency, therefore it must be something else.

However, if they WERE able to find someone familiar with the matter and it WAS about frequency, Discovery has failed to show statistics or provide what metrics they’re using. By all publicly available metrics, Infinity Train was in the 91st percentile in children’s media, at it’s height* was 17x more popular than the average TV show, as of yesterday evening was #1, #2, #3, and #5 on itunes for kids and family, and in the top 20 on iTunes overall.

Or maybe it was underperforming. No way to know for sure, as they haven’t provided anyone with the actual numbers or metrics they’re using, not even their own shareholders.

*iirc, I’m not gonna pay for a parrot analytics account to double check what it was a year+ ago just for a newsletter.

Is the Show Gone Forever?​

I don’t believe so.

As I said, it’s apparently still available on those sources listed above, though I do not know for how long. The problem is that I can’t be entirely sure if the information I’m getting is truthful or if it’s just to placate us so we’ll stop pestering them with so many questions. They certainly haven’t earned anyone’s trust with the way they’ve handled all this, so obviously take all of this with a grain or two or a million of salt (though I’m sure you’re feeling plenty salty already).

In the meantime, I’ll be working with my management team on figuring out some other kind of fate for the show.

Why did they delete all the social media talking about it if it’s not gone forever?​

No clue. I can’t even expand on this in any way, that’s how little of a clue I or anyone else has.

How are you feeling?​

Shitty. I was just going about my life driving home from a work meeting, listening to the Bad Animals album by Heart, when all of the sudden my phone started blowing up. It interrupted my song!

I think the way that Discovery went about this is incredibly unprofessional, rude, and just straight up slimy. I think most everyone who makes anything feels this way. Across the industry, talent is mad, agents are mad, lawyers and managers are mad, even execs at these companies are mad. I can’t think of a single person who works in animation and entertainment that, when you bring this all up, doesn’t say “What the fuck are they doing? How do they plan to have anyone ever want to work with them again?”

Because why would we? What is the point of making something, spending years working on it, putting in nights and weekends doing their terrible notes, losing sleep and not seeing our families, if it’s just going to be taken away and shot in the backyard? It’s so incredibly discouraging and they’re definitely not going to be getting their best work out of whoever decides to stay.

We’re working at the intersection of art and commerce, but the people in charge have clearly forgotten that they’ll have no commerce without the art.

What can I do?​

First off, I’ve been told people are posting addresses of the executives in charge of this decision online. Do NOT do that! It is dangerous. You have no idea who is reading what you’re typing at any given moment and what that could motivate them to do. I’m telling you, I’ve restricted how much I interact with fans in general for a reason. I’ve met a few people that are right on the edge and they project all of their issues onto a show I made or onto me. It can get very weird, and you have no idea what they’re going to do.

Posting their addresses will not bring the show back. It’s one thing when we do that to people like judges or lawmakers who are actually restricting people’s rights to their own bodies, but to an exec because they took away a cartoon? No. There are different degrees of protest and taking away a cartoon does not reach the degree necessary for doxxing someone or worse (as I said, there are some real nutso people out there).

On a more positive note, people talking about the show increases the value of it. So the fact that Infinity Train trended on twitter for 3 days after all this? That adds value. The fact that Infinity Train is now topping the charts on iTunes? That adds value. If it has more value, that means the people in charge will want to keep it or license it.

So honestly, just keep doing what you’re doing. With my current contract at my current job (which I can’t disclose right now) I have a carve out for Infinity Train. If Infinity Train is picked up again somewhere, I can work on that at the same time that I’m working for the company I’m currently working for. I think I get less money or something, I don’t remember, but whatever.

If the show ends up licensed on some other streaming platform, the best thing you can do is watch it there. Again, as of now, you can still buy it on those services mentioned above, and maybe step aboard a ship sailing the high seas to keep an extra copy for yourself.

This might, ironically, have become the best advertising the show has ever gotten.

Is pirating a movie or TV show ethical?​

That’s up to you.

We’re talking about art here. Art is for people to see and experience. Art makes up our culture, it’s the most human thing that humans do. No other animal makes art except for us. That’s fascinating right? Our culture is preserved through our art. The most popular kind of art we have currently is television and movies, which means that those are the greatest and most widely seen depictions of our culture at the moment.

The issue we have right now is that our most well known art is, for the most part, owned by about five gigantic, multinational corporations. That means they also own our culture. If you own our culture, then you also own our history and our access to it. Should a handful of companies own that, much less have the monopoly they have on it right now? I don’t think so.

So the question you have to ask yourself becomes: if a giant corporation has stopped me from having the ability to access my own culture, is it ok for me to watch a copy that doesn’t funnel any money toward them, doesn’t create scarcity of the art, and doesn’t make a mark on some algorithm’s metrics?

Only you can answer that for yourself.

I don’t believe you should pirate something just because you don’t have money. That’s essentially saying “Yes, you artist, you made something and now I get to have it for free. You don’t get to be paid, you don’t get to have your health insurance, all because I wanna see something you worked for years on for free this evening while I eat a frozen pizza.” That’s very selfish and I would consider that to be theft of labor.

However, if you’re no longer given any chance to access or pay for the art? We’re now talking about restricting you from seeing and experiencing your culture and history, purely because someone is creating artificial scarcity. Now we’re talking about preservation of our history.

I often own multiple copies of media that I care about. A digital version that I can quickly access on my TV, and a physical or pirated copy for myself with no DRM rights attached to it. Basically I own one for convenience, and one for preservation during the apocalypse (or the corporate equivalent of an apocalypse).

Does this logic hold true on every kind of art and in every instance? No, absolutely not. That’s why I say this is something for you to choose. Just make sure you’re doing it for the right reasons and not just because you don’t feel like paying a couple dollars to someone who labored to make something. Artists need to pay their rent, artists need healthcare, and artists have a right to show their work in the way they intended. Remember, a percentage of that money DOES go to them, so just think about what you’re doing ethically and don’t try to justify it post hoc.

Last thoughts?​

I’ve also seen all the thoughtful, wonderful things people have said about Infinity Train online and I’m very touched. My friends and I and many of the former members of the Infinity Train crew have been sharing images, texts, and emails they’ve received about the show with each other and every one of them is absolutely appreciated. Thank you so much, and I will continue to try and get more made somehow.

The Musical Car​

Obviously I’m gonna put Bad Animals by Heart as a whole album to listen to. It’s a perfect album, one of my favorites, and it has a real good flow through each song into the other.

I’ve also added a few new songs to the Musical Car playlist:

-Owen

**Updated 9:33pm: Earlier version of this referred to “royalties” but was supposed to say “residuals”. Corrected.
Not so TL;DR: this news hit for everyone at the same time. CN execs told Zaslav to wait a week as it could result in them burning a lot of bridges very quickly, but they ended up going through with it anyways, due to direct orders from Discovery.

Nobody can figure out what’s going on because pretty much anyone they tried to contact who would know was either fired or they quit. As for pay? Well…
Owen Dennis said:
Our pay is not complete without the ongoing residuals. Those residuals aren’t paid directly to the artists, they actually go to our union to pay for our healthcare. So not paying artists residuals on their work means they are indirectly defunding our healthcare.

This also means that music and actor residuals will stop. For reference, the first quarter of this year I made $388.45 off of residuals from voicing One-One. We’re not talking about a whole lot of money here, that’s the equivalent of the studio accidentally buying an extra office chair.
Any claims from news sites like CNBC saying the reason for them pulling everything was due to “infrequent watches” is bull because everyone everywhere in the industry is trying to contact Discovery to figure out the reason as we speak, and are being met with silence.

Nobody has any clue why the show’s been purged from all social media, that one they’re completely in the dark on.

People have been doxing the execs responsible. Owen says not to do that, as that could have a massive ripple effect on the employment of a lot of CN/WB staff. Especially so as said doxers have been sperging over why they’re doing this, and for whom (i.e. “I’m doxing you because you took down Infinity Train you monsters! Give Owen Dennis and his team their show back or suffer!”). Owen goes on to reneg that anything on public record through law is different, doxing over a cartoon is bad news for everybody.

In short, keep doing what people are doing now. Pirate Infinity Train if you have to, ending in a big thank you to everyone for giving the IT staff former-"present" some much needed support, stating he'll try and get more made somehow (possible under the current company he's working at that he cannot disclose due to an NDA).
 
Last edited:
Serious question. Why do I care about Infinity Train? Gave me standard cartoon network wokeshit vibes and Ive never heard of any actual child watching it.
I have 0 interest in any of the shows pulled and haven't watched cartoon network since I was kid, but this whole thing is still super interesting to me from a business and industry point of view.

Nothing like this has ever happened before, truly is crazy shit.
 
Having them set in the same universe I don't think is a bad idea, but each move should still be able to stand alone and they shouldn't build on each to set the next movie up in the cinematic universe.

You can do a Justice League movie that works as a stand alone movie despite having the cast of the solo movies. Hell can even do team up movies which work as stand alone, shit movie but you can watch Alien vs. Predator without watching any of the others in those series before hand.

But who the fuck knows what Zaslav plan is anyway, if it's to mimic the MCU but have a few movies like Joker outside of it then it dumb as fuck.

What I would is create a 10 year plan which is open to change but the goal is to outline characters that have box office potential, giving yourself a deadline to get the movie ready at the quality needed and making sure that character is safe from being used as a throwaway in another movie. May do some small cross over such as having a Black Adam vs Shazam movie at some point, but avoid making movies like Aqauman 3 or a Superman lead into Justice League 2 or some other big crossover or cinematic phase.

But you are 100% right in superhero fatigue, while still lot of money to be made and I think the big heroes like Batman or Spiderman will always make money, you really want to avoid what Marvel is doing with 4+ movies and 4+ tv shows a year which all tie into each other.
If I remember correctly, Zaslav stated that his plan would be in a similar vein to the model that Disney and Marvel are doing. Which given how retarded people are at WB on the corporate level, it’s going to do badly especially with their insistence to release the Flash which is looking like a bomb dead on arrival.
 
yeah as someone who has never watched any of the shit being pulled and doesn't have an HBO sub (but does have a 90TB NAS, neat!) it is absolutely hilarious to watch all this shit go down.

I'm hoping its the beginning finally of a widespread rebalancing of talent in Hollywood, the last 5 years has been basically "You want to write and make anti-white shit? COOL YOU ARE HIRED" and no one is watching any of that shit, but its all subsidized by stuff people are watching like Squid Game, Better Call Saul, Obi-Wan, The Taylor Sheridan universe, Succession, Barry, Peacemaker, etc.

Maybe finally retarded shit like "Rap shit" (a REAL TV show about about 2 black bitches who rap in miami), as if anyone actually believes women can rap, will be tossed off the air. Probably not though, the pedos and alphabet people retards who are pushing the destruction of American culture will just slink into the background and await their next chance.
 
Owen Dennis, creator of Infinity Train, made a post on his site talking about how and why Infinity Train got canned, in the form of a FAQ.

https://owendennis.substack.com/p/so-uh-whats-going-on-with-infinity
(Archive)

TL;DR: He has no idea what the fuck is happening, and neither does anyone anywhere in any company previously under Warmer; pirate Infinity Train and spread the word, as he may have plans to take the show elsewhere if CN will play nice.



Not so TL;DR: this news hit for everyone at the same time. CN execs told Zaslav to wait a week as it could result in them burning a lot of bridges very quickly, but they ended up going through with it anyways, due to direct orders from Discovery.

Nobody can figure out what’s going on because pretty much anyone they tried to contact who would know was either fired or they quit. As for pay? Well…

Owen Dennis said:
Our pay is not complete without the ongoing residuals. Those residuals aren’t paid directly to the artists, they actually go to our union to pay for our healthcare. So not paying artists residuals on their work means they are indirectly defunding our healthcare.

This also means that music and actor residuals will stop. For reference, the first quarter of this year I made $388.45 off of residuals from voicing One-One. We’re not talking about a whole lot of money here, that’s the equivalent of the studio accidentally buying an extra office chair.
Click to expand...
Any claims from news sites like CNBC saying the reason for them pulling everything was due to “infrequent watches” is bull because everyone everywhere in the industry is trying to contact Discovery to figure out the reason as we speak, and are being met with silence.

Nobody has any clue why the show’s been purged from all social media, that one they’re completely in the dark on.

People have been doxing the execs responsible. Owen says not to do that, as that could have a massive ripple effect on the employment of a lot of CN/WB staff. Especially so as said doxers have been sperging over why they’re doing this, and for whom (i.e. “I’m doxing you because you took down Infinity Train you monsters! Give Owen Dennis and his team their show back or suffer!”). Owen goes on to reneg that anything on public record through law is different, doxing over a cartoon is bad news for everybody.

In short, keep doing what people are doing now. Pirate Infinity Train if you have to, ending in a big thank you to everyone for giving the IT staff former-"present" some much needed support, stating he'll try and get more made somehow (possible under the current company he's working at that he cannot disclose due to an NDA).

Most creators do not own their own shows anymore, especially in the animation industry, as they basically have to sign them away in return for getting their shows produced, and this has become standard practice for years now, as most studios that have the budget to produce shows like Infinity Train or Adventure Time have that as standard practice for signing a contract with them.

That is why the 2016 reboot for the Powerpuff Girls and the recent reboot for Animaniacs are such shit, as they were not made by the original creators and they were never even asked for their input.

Can somebody explain to me, on how some show/movie creators like the guy behind Predator were able to negotiate a "use" clause in their contracts, I.e. if their creation is not being used for a certain period of time, the ownership would go back to the original creator, where this is almost unheard of in the animation industry? Is it simply because animators have less bargaining power/leverage when they negotiate with studios or is there more to it than that?

I am not a copyrightfag, so any enlightenment on this would be welcome.
 
Most creators do not own their own shows anymore, especially in the animation industry, as they basically have to sign them away in return for getting their shows produced, and this has become standard practice for years now, as most studios that have the budget to produce shows like Infinity Train or Adventure Time have that as standard practice for signing a contract with them.

That is why the 2016 reboot for the Powerpuff Girls and the recent reboot for Animaniacs are such shit, as they were not made by the original creators and they were never even asked for their input.

Can somebody explain to me, on how some show/movie creators like the guy behind Predator were able to negotiate a "use" clause in their contracts, I.e. if their creation is not being used for a certain period of time, the ownership would go back to the original creator, where this is almost unheard of in the animation industry? Is it simply because animators have less bargaining power/leverage when they negotiate with studios or is there more to it than that?

I am not a copyrightfag, so any enlightenment on this would be welcome.
Unsure about Predator but can explain some of them.



Some rights are bought by middle men companies pretty much, those companies normally have the rights until they hit the public domain depending on the contract. Companies that do this normally look for partners to license the rights out for set period of time, a set number of films or in most cases the contract doesn't run out as long as they make a movie so many years, this is done because the company that owns the right will make some profit per every film made so they have to have a way in incentive getting the movies off the ground.
Example J. R. R. Tolkien sold the movies rights to LotR to United Artists in 1968. They in turn sold them to The Saul Zaentz Company in 1976, in 1997 New Line made a deal with Saul Zaentz Company to development the films. Early this year there was a big deal about WB losing the rights to make films based on LotR due to amount of time that had past without anything in development, however they quickly put a animated film in development to avoid this.

The film studios them self can outright buy an ip, such as WB owning Harry Potter or in some case can buy some of the rights to an ips such as WB owning the film rights for Willy Wonka in perpetuity.

Within American some rights can revert back to the creator after 28 years however this is a legal headache and already made content will stay with the company, and this only impacts America. The whole Friday the 13th shitshow is a case of this and another would be Nightmare on Elm Street which whos American ownership is back to the Craven Estate. To keep this simple it's all about if the creator transferred their copyright or if they were a worker for hire.

Also case in Star Wars, where Lucas took a pay cut in return for the sequel rights and merchandising rights. With the move being a hit this was a huge win for Lucas however it also meant he never owned the original movie, nor did Disney until they bought FOX.

Some bigger creators can make deals where they own the ip but not the funded movies, Indiana Jones rights are now owned by Disney but the films already made are still under Paramount.

Why animators don't get the rights, would have to guess it is because they are clearly hired as contractors and seen as more replaceable.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Chocolate Wombat
Unsure about Predator but can explain some of them.



Some rights are bought by middle men companies pretty much, those companies normally have the rights until they hit the public domain depending on the contract. Companies that do this normally look for partners to license the rights out for set period of time, a set number of films or in most cases the contract doesn't run out as long as they make a movie so many years, this is done because the company that owns the right will make some profit per every film made so they have to have a way in incentive getting the movies off the ground.
Example J. R. R. Tolkien sold the movies rights to LotR to United Artists in 1968. They in turn sold them to The Saul Zaentz Company in 1976, in 1997 New Line made a deal with Saul Zaentz Company to development the films. Early this year there was a big deal about WB losing the rights to make films based on LotR due to amount of time that had past without anything in development, however they quickly put a animated film in development to avoid this.

The film studios them self can outright buy an ip, such as WB owning Harry Potter or in some case can buy some of the rights to an ips such as WB owning the film rights for Willy Wonka in perpetuity.

Within American some rights can revert back to the creator after 28 years however this is a legal headache and already made content will stay with the company, and this only impacts America. The whole Friday the 13th shitshow is a case of this and another would be Nightmare on Elm Street which whos American ownership is back to the Craven Estate. To keep this simple it's all about if the creator transferred their copyright or if they were a worker for hire.

Also case in Star Wars, where Lucas took a pay cut in return for the sequel rights and merchandising rights. With the move being a hit this was a huge win for Lucas however it also meant he never owned the original movie, nor did Disney until they bought FOX.

Some bigger creators can make deals where they own the ip but not the funded movies, Indiana Jones rights are now owned by Disney but the films already made are still under Paramount.

Why animators don't get the rights, would have to guess it is because they are clearly hired as contractors and seen as more replaceable.

Animation costs way more than live action to make and you need a syndicate (Warner Brothers and their animation subdivisions or Disney's division) to get a show on TV due to animation being ghettoized to a degree that without a major company fronting you, you'll never get on the airwaves let alone promoted.

Also, modern animation these days is a SJW mafia run joint with the Cal Arts gang having set themselves up as gatekeepers for non-adult animation. And the bulk of all modern cartoon showrunners are SJW brand whores.

Case in point, Owl House was run by a lunatic Disney fanatic who explicitly pitched Owl House to Disney because she wanted to her lesbian groomer witch show to be part of the Disney canon of shows produced by them for historical good girl points.

When Owl House got canceled and it began to sink into Dana's head that she done fucked up selling the show to Disney to get it made, that people inside the animation industry (those not part of the Cal Arts clique) started telling her that she brought it on herself because she truly fucking thought that being Alex Hirsch's cum dumpster would have protected her from premature cancellation and infinite unlimited control over her franchise once it ended. And started telling people following her online meltdown that instead of blindly signing the Mouse (or WB) contract, you should self-publish your cartoon in book or comic form first THEN start shopping around your show. Because if you self-publish, you can ensure you have 100% ownership of your creation and then can use the success of self-publishing it to set up a favorable licensing deal with the Mouse or WB to make it into a cartoon and retain ownership of the property in case the show gets canceled.
 
Back