The Hill: Judge deems DOGE takeover of US Institute of Peace ‘null and void’ - The judge looks like how you'd expect her to look.

Source/Archive

by Ella Lee - 05/19/25 1:52 PM ET

beryl howell.webp

A federal judge on Monday ruled that the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) takeover of the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) was unlawful, deeming it “null and void.”

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell found that President Trump and his subordinates used “brute force” to take over USIP’s headquarters and dissemble the independent institute, despite warnings that it did not fall within the executive branch.

The judge invalidated the removal of USIP board members and its president, meaning they retain their positions and the individuals installed by DOGE must be removed, and nullified the transfer of USIP’s headquarters to the General Services Administration (GSA), returning control to the USIP. Any USIP financial assets transferred to the GSA were also deemed void.

She also barred DOGE and other Trump administration officials named in the suit from further “trespass” on USIP’s property or within its systems.

“The President’s efforts here to take over an organization outside of those bounds, contrary to statute established by Congress and by acts of force and threat using local and federal law enforcement officers, represented a gross usurpation of power and a way of conducting government affairs that unnecessarily traumatized the committed leadership and employees of USIP, who deserved better,” the judge wrote in a 102-page opinion.

The independent institute and several removed board members sued DOGE and the other Trump officials in March, claiming they sought to unlawfully dismantle the institute and block it from completing the peace promotion work tasked to it by Congress.

Institute lawyer Andrew Goldfarb said at the time that DOGE moved at “lightning speed” and sought to reduce the organization, which was established to help resolve and prevent violent conflicts, “essentially to rubble.”

In March, the Trump administration fired much of USIP’s board and installed Kenneth Jackson, a State Department official, as its new president. Then, DOGE took over its headquarters.

In court papers, the institute and fired board members said DOGE first sought to enter the building with two FBI agents, but when they weren’t let in, agents showed up at the private residence of the institute’s chief of security to attempt to gain access. The institute’s outside counsel was also threatened with criminal investigation over the refusal.

Days later, three sets of law enforcement — D.C. Metropolitan Police, Department of State police and the FBI — showed up to help DOGE get into the building, they said. An official from a private security firm once contracted by USIP provided a key to access the building despite that contract having been revoked, aligning with DOGE under the apparent threat of losing its other government security contracts.

Howell called Congress’s restrictions on the president’s removal power of USIP board members “squarely constitutional,” making the removals and replacements completed by DOGE at the direction of Trump’s executive order undertaken by “illegitimately-installed leaders who lacked legal authority to take these actions.”

The judge noted that “no court before” has addressed exactly where USIP falls within the constitutional structure. The answer to that question could have implications for whether Trump’s removal power extends to the independent institute. She determined the institute must be considered part of the federal government but does not exercise “governmental, let alone executive” power.

USIP said in a statement that its board, management and staff look forward to restarting its programs to promote and facilitate peaceful conflict resolution around the world.

“Today’s ruling allows USIP to continue that work,” the statement read.

The institute was one of several small agencies targeted by the Trump administration. The Inter-American Foundation and U.S. African Development Foundation, which were also mentioned in a Feb. 19 executive order to downsize the bureaucracy, have also sued.

This story was updated at 4:50 p.m.
 
This judge hates Trump

She wrote a 109 page screed that contained maybe 4 pages of judgment and 105 pages of Orange Man Bad coping. In any other professional writing up something so nakedly political and biased would get you removed but she's a DC judge so she's perfectly safe to do so.

Really Musk and Co shut down US Peace, fired everyone, moved the funds to another agency and closed down the office so what does this judge expect to happen now?

Trump will just re-open, re-hire and undo everything immediately just because some DC Democrat judge wrote a 109 page screed?

I know the judge is aware of many legal terms but I wonder if she understands the term

fait accompli?

I bet not.
 
When do we reach the point of no return where the Trump Admin rightfully tells these federal judges to fuck off and that they have no power over executive actions. If they want to bitch and moan take it up with SCOTUS instead of happily taking whatever case the rot in government drags around to finding the ideologically motivated judges who support them.
 
The judge noted that “no court before” has addressed exactly where USIP falls within the constitutional structure.
If this is true, how can this taxpayer funded organization exist at all. How was it created? Was it Congress? Was it the President? Was it some dipshit judge? Was it a spinoff of a spinoff? It was created by one of the three regardless.

The fact that this is even mentioned shows that the bureaucracy is entirely out of control and should be immediately shut down because it has no legitimacy to begin with.

Edit:
She determined the institute must be considered part of the federal government but does not exercise “governmental, let alone executive” power.
WTF DOES THIS EVEN MEAN????
 
WTF DOES THIS EVEN MEAN????

She is trying to invent a new legal standard by which the executive branch and the powers of the president are divided into:

- (1) Parts of the executive branch which exercise "executive authority"
- (2) Parts of the executive branch which do not exercise "executive authority or executive powers" in their operation.

She is trying to say that a President's powers over agencies in (2) is constitutionally far less than the agencies in (1). And that congress can through law control decisions concerning type (2) agencies that would not be allowed for type (1) agencies.

She is essentially saying that the president's constitutional powers over the executive branch only apply to the parts of the executive branch that are making, interpreting or enforcing laws.

Its historically and legally an absurd argument. It goes against the constitution and all SCOTUS precedent. And it will eventually be thrown out by a higher court.
 
That determination that an institute exclusively funded by the federal government and run by an executive board appointed by the president is actually part of the government should have finished the case. But the judge here is advancing the rather novel theory the the powerless and useless nature of the agency protects it.
I'm more concerned by the fact that by this judge's reckoning whatever power it does wield is apparently non-governmental despite the fact that it is a governmental agency. Its a Heisenberg Agency given that the Uncertainty Principle is in full effect.
 
The fact this is all being done to save a do-nothing department that spends millions a year just redecorating the office to ease their torpor because they have literally nothing else to do is the absolute cherry on top of the shit sundae.

I know Judges are supposed to stick to letter of the law, but, this one clearly doesn't, and feels that an Executive Department being shut down by the Executive Branch is a greater moral outrage than the fact it spends the lifetime tax contributions of a thousand citizens a day just to keep the downtown D.C. cafe' and interior design studios in business......
 
The fact this is all being done to save a do-nothing department that spends millions a year just redecorating the office to ease their torpor because they have literally nothing else to do is the absolute cherry on top of the shit sundae.

I know Judges are supposed to stick to letter of the law, but, this one clearly doesn't, and feels that an Executive Department being shut down by the Executive Branch is a greater moral outrage than the fact it spends the lifetime tax contributions of a thousand citizens a day just to keep the downtown D.C. cafe' and interior design studios in business......
What I can't get over is how this judge looks like such a humorless cunt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Howell called Congress’s restrictions on the president’s removal power of USIP board members “squarely constitutional,” making the removals and replacements completed by DOGE at the direction of Trump’s executive order undertaken by “illegitimately-installed leaders who lacked legal authority to take these actions.”

The judge noted that “no court before” has addressed exactly where USIP falls within the constitutional structure. The answer to that question could have implications for whether Trump’s removal power extends to the independent institute. She determined the institute must be considered part of the federal government but does not exercise “governmental, let alone executive” power.
The only thing more insidious than the 'penumbras' the Judiciary has used to transmute the 14th Amendment into a Philosopher's Stone of 'Rights' is the notion that Congress or the President can create organizations that, after their creation, lie forever beyond the power of Congress or the President to destroy by the same process.
 
The only thing more insidious than the 'penumbras' the Judiciary has used to transmute the 14th Amendment into a Philosopher's Stone of 'Rights' is the notion that Congress or the President can create organizations that, after their creation, lie forever beyond the power of Congress or the President to destroy by the same process.
What's deeply amusing about the "penumbras" thing was that was the Supreme Court at the time telling everyone not to bother them with the abortion thing ever again. Then the liberals kept noodging and got an obvious outcome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pentex
What's deeply amusing about the "penumbras" thing was that was the Supreme Court at the time telling everyone not to bother them with the abortion thing ever again. Then the liberals kept noodging and got an obvious outcome.
Weren't there some "emanations" in there as well?
 
Back