The Ignore User function should also hide any ratings they give to posts. - attention kiwi farms users: please do not rate @crocodilian's posts dumb or autistic

Status
Not open for further replies.
81175A97-E7B3-4971-99F9-23E5F8B664DC.jpeg

Pedonazicroc.jpg
 
What kind of support for arguments are you expecting people to post? You're mad the ignore function which you don't use leaves notifications for stickers which you don't care about and don't receive notifications for. Does it really require an essay response to point out that making this thread made you look foolish?

I guess I came to an internet forum expecting to talk to people, essay or otherwise. The recurring message I'm getting in response is "stickers don't mean anything, just ignore them" and "stickers are important, they allow people to concisely respond to individual replies", at the same time. Then every so often the thread is punctuated by complete nonsense like

Don't talk with your mouth full.

At least it's slightly more interesting than reposting right-wing platitudes and getting generic, positive ratings.
 
I guess I came to an internet forum expecting to talk to people, essay or otherwise. The recurring message I'm getting in response is "stickers don't mean anything, just ignore them" and "stickers are important, they allow people to concisely respond to individual replies", at the same time. Then every so often the thread is punctuated by complete nonsense like



At least it's slightly more interesting than reposting right-wing platitudes and getting generic, positive ratings.
Every assmad post that you make is bringing me closer and closer to orgasm. Don't stop.
 
I guess I came to an internet forum expecting to talk to people, essay or otherwise. The recurring message I'm getting in response is "stickers don't mean anything, just ignore them" and "stickers are important, they allow people to concisely respond to individual replies", at the same time. Then every so often the thread is punctuated by complete nonsense like



At least it's slightly more interesting than reposting right-wing platitudes and getting generic, positive ratings.
Let me spell this out for retards: Stickers become important ONLY when you let them; You let them become important.
 
I guess I came to an internet forum expecting to talk to people, essay or otherwise. The recurring message I'm getting in response is "stickers don't mean anything, just ignore them" and "stickers are important, they allow people to concisely respond to individual replies", at the same time. Then every so often the thread is punctuated by complete nonsense like



At least it's slightly more interesting than reposting right-wing platitudes and getting generic, positive ratings.
Dude ,internet stickers are not helping you to face your irl problems.
 
Let me spell this out for retards: Stickers become important ONLY when you let them; You let them become important.

This thread is, quite literally, me suggesting the Ignore feature work better and everybody flinging garbage at the podium in response.

If you want stickers to 'mean anything', or appear at all, you can leave your Ignore list blank. If a user is the functional equivalent of a robot that downvotes without posting, you should have the freedom to stymie that. What's the argument against this?
 
I guess I came to an internet forum expecting to talk to people, essay or otherwise. The recurring message I'm getting in response is "stickers don't mean anything, just ignore them" and "stickers are important, they allow people to concisely respond to individual replies", at the same time. Then every so often the thread is punctuated by complete nonsense
This is altogether far too much caring about stickers.
 
Maybe you should stop being a massive fucking retard and maybe people will stop giving you trash cans.

Although you're the person that thinks that using Kiwi Farms for its intended purpose is stupid and literally only come here to give hot takes on how most adult men would be pedophiles were it not illegal, so I guess you're not the smartest of the bunch. But please, do keep embarrassing yourself even further, I'm enjoying the spectacle.
These past few weeks have been so blessed with natural, grass-fed halal threads. From that very first link:
Crocodilian said said:
The culture around chronicling "lolcows" has never made any sense to me. While the common judgments surrounding them are often accurate (if not intentionally unflattering or inflammatory), these people are, ultimately, devoid of any real-world influence. What benefit is there to picking on them? Other than nearly injuring somebody outside of a Gamestop, Chris-Chan — the biggest lolcow of them all — always struck me as a harmless loser who should be left to quietly rot. Meanwhile, a majority of the people who pay these outrageous individuals any mind (particularly with the mindset of "they are an lolcow") often fit a very specific description, shamelessly prodding their targets in the hopes they devolve into a more ridiculous, easily-ridiculed state. The end result of this parasitic relationship is a perpetual vortex of negativity, benefiting nobody. Least of all Null, if this essay he's written is honest.
@crocodilian , does your sympathy for CWC and issues with this website playing Kick the Autist stem from sharing a particular mental condition with him? Quick, what's your take on Dr. Hans Asperger?
 
These past few weeks have been so blessed with natural, grass-fed halal threads. From that very first link:

@crocodilian , does your sympathy for CWC and issues with this website playing Kick the Autist stem from sharing a particular mental condition with him? Quick, what's your take on Dr. Hans Asperger?

Considering the owner of this very website sympathized with CWC enough to try and handle his legal affairs, your post doesn't resonate with me.

What part of my quote above do you actually disagree with? Sincere question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back