The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Miriam Margoyles said:
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I believe we were so autistically oversold into hating Jews by retarded /pol/fags, to whom hating Jews is basically a fucking meme at this point, that we allowed the streetshitters to completely get the drop on us.
Click to expand...
Imagine being such a lower race that even jews are disgusted by and want nothing to do with you.
1698933788951.png
 
Miriam Margoyles said:
You're joking, right? Indians are way worse.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, I believe we were so autistically oversold into hating Jews by retarded /pol/fags, to whom hating Jews is basically a fucking meme at this point, that we allowed the streetshitters to completely get the drop on us.
Click to expand...
I understand your position but let’s not kid ourselves - Jews and Pajeets are both negatives on western society. Jews pretend to be White and promote pornography and open borders. At least Pajeets admit they’re brown

Beyond that both groups are a drain on our societies with their nepotism and corrosive propaganda. Indians more recently because there’s over a billion of them.
 
Revuelto said:
Over the past few years, India has been in the limelight for a variety of reasons I’ve noticed. Their large overseas communities are one, their astroturfing into high tech sectors but most importantly their vile societal practices of street shitting, insane politics, their love of a retarded sport such as Cricket, their smells, the rife amount of scams and of course their corrosive influence on Western society but at the same time promoting a Hindu nationalist agenda back home. Not to mention the endless amounts of silly claims by Hindu nationalists that “India will be a Pooperpower Saar 2030”
Click to expand...
It is even worse than that. Pajeets fill in almost of all of the niches you associate with the undesirable minority or foreigner.

Whatever criticisms and accusations labelled at China true or false are almost all true when applied to India. Examples include trade protectionism, occupation of (South) Tibet, being rude and dirty, oppression of minorities, gunning down protestors when Trump visited New Delhi, horrible pollution, interference in Western politics, spying and sending agents to go after Western politicians, expansionist policy and annexing her neighbours, taking away jobs, being a rogue nuclear power and the list goes on. I would really like it if the West devotes half of its energy going against China and redirect it towards India because India has objectively infiltrated the West.

However, no one is paying attention and the West signed Faustian pacts with India, like letting Pajeets take over Western corporations and governments, squandering money in India letting Pajeets make literally shitty iPhones in hopes of taking down China. This won't end well knowing how Pajeets have the reverse Midas touch. Rather be an enemy of India than be its ally for it will be too incompetent to do you real harm as an enemy yet it will be so incompetent that it will drag you down as an ally.

Cheap but unproductive labour you associate with the spic? Well, the Pajeet fills that niche.

Rapey and unhygienic like a nigger? The Pajeets fills that niche too. Look at Kousik insisting that cow piss has antiseptic properties and should be scattered around. See how Meesala, a supposedly educated Pajeet professional started slathering his saliva on the hands of a complete stranger then soliciting her for sex. He was dragged to court and defended himself saying that this is Pajeet culture.

Screenshot_20231103-023937_Discord.jpg


Most concerning if you are in the West is that the Pajeet is also filling the niche of the kike, running your corporations and countries. Of course, some say the kikes dominate now but I see a trend of Pajeets steadily asserting control over the English speaking West. Can you name an ethnic Russian or Chinese equivalent to Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswarmy, Rishi Sunak and Humza Yousaf? Pajeets like to brag about how successful they are running Western corporations. If I were from the West, I should be concerned about why Pajeets are running my companies. Glass ceilings are rightfully erected for people born overseas. You don't see that many Chinese, Filipino, Russian CEOs running Western companies but why aren't these ceilings erected for the Pajeet? I don't believe the Indian is particularly smarter than people of other ethnicities. Case in point, the number of India Forbes 500 companies pales in comparison with the number of Chinese ones.

Screenshot_20231103-030323_Samsung Internet.jpg

Let's face it. The West especially its English speaking parts have a Pajeet Problem. India or rather the people the West blindly imports from India poses an existential threat if only because the West is allowing Pajeets to take over.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20231103-023937_Discord.jpg
    Screenshot_20231103-023937_Discord.jpg
    230.4 KB · Views: 225
Last edited:
raspberry mocha said:
The only Indians I've ever liked were Muslims and I hate Islam. South Asians are swine.
Click to expand...
I was an Islamophobe during the War of Terror and I still believe that Islam is warlike, expansionist and incompatible with modernity. However, Hinduism is somehow so backward and regressive that it makes Islam look appealing! And that is saying something. I would say that the Muslim conquest of the Pajeet subcontinent in the early second millennium is somehow a positive.

At least Islam does not have an obsession towards cow piss and shit, or treat its adherents as subhuman Dalits or conducts human sacrifices to appease Mother Kali or have widows burnt to death or place the lives of cows, monkeys, rats and other beasts above that of human beings and the list goes on.

Those who think that Hinduism is cute and cuddly and non-violent should ask themselves why Buddhism has all but disappeared in the subcontinent except at Sri Lanka. Even the Muslims and Chinese emperors and the Red Guards couldn't have stamped out Buddhism the way the Hindus did.
 
Last edited:
CECA Loather said:
Those who think that Hinduism is cute and cuddly and non-violent should ask themselves why Buddhism has all but disappeared in the subcontinent except at Sri Lanka. Even the Muslims and Chinese emperors and the Red Guards couldn't have stamped out Buddhism the way the Hindus did.
Click to expand...
...? "The furious massacres perpetrated in many places by Muslim invaders were more efficacious than orthodox Hindu persecutions, and had a great deal to do with the disappearance of Buddhism in several provinces. But the main cause was the gradual, almost insensible, assimilation of Buddhism into Hinduism” (Hazra, The Rise and Decline of Buddhism in India).
 
Pajeet123 said:
...? "The furious massacres perpetrated in many places by Muslim invaders were more efficacious than orthodox Hindu persecutions, and had a great deal to do with the disappearance of Buddhism in several provinces.
Click to expand...
Hindoos get all defensive when people point out that Hindoo persecution or "assimilation" is the main reason for the disappearance of Buddhism. I can see why. How can you go around claiming that Buddhism is Indian or even Nepali when neither India nor Nepal of today is Buddhist? Even China is easily more Buddhist than India (and nothing ticks the Pajeet off more than being compared to China and losing out)

I agree that Muslims like other adherents of Abrahamic religion are intolerant towards heathens but between the Buddhist and the Hindoo, wouldn't they go after the Hindoo first? At least I know I would.

Why is the subcontinent Hindoo dominated then? From my understanding, the Hindoo went after the Buddhist only to be put in place by the Muslim. The British Raj came and invented Hinduism by codifying many of the pagan beliefs to suppress Islam which of course was the religion of the subcontinental ruling class before their arrival.

And come on, any impartial observer would tell you that Hindus are as predisposed to violence as the Muslim, especially in today's India under a Hindu nationalist government. We don't even need to go that far in the past with Gandhi's assassination by Hindu zealots who thought the loincloth wearing Gandhi who slept with naked women to somehow prove he can suppress lustful desires didn't go far enough. The unrest in Manipur between the Hindoo Meiteis and Christian Kukis is another example.

Whatever the case, the West and indeed the world outside of India should expect these silly religious problems to be imported together with the Pajeet. A lot of attention has rightfully been focused on subcontinental Muslims but the same or even more attention should be paid to the Hindoo.
 
Last edited:
CECA Loather said:
Hindoos get all defensive when people point out that Hindoo persecution or "assimilation" is the main reason for the disappearance of Buddhism. I can see why. How can you go around claiming that Buddhism is Indian or even Nepali when neither India nor Nepal of today is Buddhist? Even China is easily more Buddhist than India (and nothing ticks the Pajeet off more than being compared to China and losing out)

I agree that Muslims like other adherents of Abrahamic religion are intolerant towards heathens but between the Buddhist and the Hindoo, wouldn't they go after the Hindoo first? At least I know I would.

Why is the subcontinent Hindoo dominated then? From my understanding, the Hindoo went after the Buddhist only to be put in place by the Muslim. The British Raj came and invented Hinduism by codifing many of the pagan beliefs to suppress Islam which of course was the religion of the subcontinental ruling class before their arrival.

And come on, any impartial observer would tell you that Hindus are as predisposed to violence as the Muslim, especially in today's India under a Hindu nationalist government. We don't even need to go that far in the past with Gandhi's assassination by Hindu zealots who thought the loincloth wearing Gandhi who slept with naked women to somehow prove he can suppress lustful desires didn't go far enough. The unrest in Manipur between the Hindoo Meiteis and Christian Kukis is another example.

Whatever the case, the West and indeed the world outside of India should expect these silly religious problems to be imported together with the Pajeet. A lot of attention has rightfully been focused on subcontinental Muslims but the same or even more attention should be paid to the Hindoo.
Click to expand...
I'm not denying that Hinduism has a lot of barbaric aspects (eg: Sati, some people in remote villages literally commit infanticide if their baby turns out to be a girl) but the thing is Muslim invaders played a much bigger role in crushing Buddhism than Hinduism did. As for why they didn't try to do the same to Hinduism.... well even violent Jihadists know that killing a billion people isn't exactly feasible. I don't know why Hinduism never really caught on in India but most of us are taught about the history of Buddhism and Jainism, even if we don't follow it ourselves.

As for nationalist retards lynching people for eating beef, that's bad and I condemn, but there's a reason for why that has gone up in the last decade. It's sort of a reaction to Muslims getting away with doing similar stuff. When you see people get bombed and have their hands chopped off for drawing an picture of their Prophet, some people go "Hey if they get to engage in that kind of barbarism just because someone drew a picture of their pedo prophet, then we should be able to do it too" hence the beef lynchings. I don't hate Muslims, some of the first friends I made in my life were Muslims, but I must say the religion needs a major reformation movement.
 
CECA Loather said:
Those who think that Hinduism is cute and cuddly and non-violent should ask themselves why Buddhism has all but disappeared in the subcontinent except at Sri Lanka. Even the Muslims and Chinese emperors and the Red Guards couldn't have stamped out Buddhism the way the Hindus did.
Click to expand...
How did the Hindus stamp out the Buddhists to that degree? I'm completely retarded on that subject.
 
Where I live there are very few of them (almost no Indians, no Pakis, but a few Bangladeshis). They're generally quiet and OK, timid. Most run to the West, bless their hearts.
I find it fascinating that if they did not stay in parks and other public places, all male, all 18-25, all sport-ish clothing, I wouldn't be able to tell them from gypsies. It's incredible how little their Indian ancestry has diluted after centuries of infecting Europe. Same facial features, same hair type, same brown skin shades, same eye colors.
I am dismayed with their sperging online, specifically their gayops to support Israel cause OMG, Muslims. Don't care. They are quite pro-Russian in average too. And they shit up Xitter like there's no tomorrow.
Also incredibly worrying is their massive population. Luckily, India is safe as of now.
But imagine a large scale war, with Pakistan most likely, both nuclear armed, so they have to stick to the conventional means.
The refugee waves would be INSANE considering the gorrrillions of people inhabiting these countries.
 
Shadfan666xxx000 said:
How did the Hindus stamp out the Buddhists to that degree? I'm completely retarded on that subject.
Click to expand...
Centuries of persecution as far back as after Asoka's death a couple centuries or so before Christ involving demolition of monasteries and the like and as our resident Pajeet, Pajeet123 says, "assimilation". Even Wikipedia has a section on this though it does not cover post Asoka's India.



By the way, reminding Pajeets that the Mauryan Empire is Buddhist not Hindoo or to be precise Brahmanist will send them foaming in the mouth too.

Of course, Hindoos and their supporters will dispute this and say Buddhism is no longer in India because of the evil Muslims. This raises the question then of why the Muslims went after everyone else in the subcontinent except for the Hindoo. Shouldn't the Hindoo go the same way as the Buddhist had the evil Muslims had their way of destroying the infidels, unbelievers and kuffar?

It makes more sense that it was the Hindoo or Brahmanist (for Hinduism as we know it today is really a British Raj era creation where the pagan Brahmanist beliefs are codified and packaged into Hinduism) that first went after Buddhists.

When Xuanzang of Tang China went to the subcontinent at the 7th century, Buddhism was already in the minority and that was way before the Muslim invasions of the subcontinent and their eventual domination in the early second millennium.
 

Currys are some of the creepiest men out there. Before covid a few of them got kicked out of my gym because a few were creep shooting women.
DDBCAE CBAADCBE said:
They’re still better than the Jews but I agree. Total Pajeet Death.

Holocaust 2.0 when?
Click to expand...
I don't know, I once had sex with an attractive Jewish girl and have wanted to suck on Abby Shapiro's Khazar milkers. Can't say that about Indian women.

Nixon was right.
Fields Of Rye said:
I’ve had some as roommates and while they were fine once you got over the love of curry, these ones were very rich and had thousands of horror stories about north India
Click to expand...
While in College my one Indian roommate refused to clean up after himself, all because he was a high caste fucker. So my compsci roommate would log onto his computer and just fuck with his schedule. We made him have a breakdown and he dropped out of college. probably the only time I've ever ruined someone's life but he was a fucking unbearable person.
Revuelto said:
At least Pajeets admit they’re brown
Click to expand...
Nah, many of them call themselves lightskinned and claim they're better, even though they're bleaching their skin.
 
The pajeet is a creature with no sense of honour whatsoever. Its religion (hinduism) being described as satanism by fundamentalist christians can only be described as accurate, in view that they display the lowest and most vile of human qualities. The pajeet is extremely conceited, and will make everything about himself. The pajeet is also extremely, appallingly indifferent, if not outright hateful, to all that is good and pure. The pajeet will argue everything and everybody to exhaustion, they will align with anything and anybody to further their goals. Like niggers, they are chaotic and destructive, but they have some grasp of order and function that fully makes them even more chaotic and destructive. The pajeet is, first and foremost, full of hate, starting with other pajeets. They will shriek "Racism!" while being one of the most disgustingly racist people that can be found, they will shout "Sexism!" while treating women in a way that would make the most radical of muslims look like Android Raptor. The pajeet doesn't have any qualms about lying, manipulating, backstabbing, raping or killing if necessary, for they have no esteem of any fellow human being. The pajeet is self-serving, slimy, manipulative and overall lacks a soul. The pajeet is nepotistic and nationalistic to its very core and, whenever he infects a place, he will try its best to take full control of the place (a business, a country) and fill it with other pajeets until they completely destroy it, and then they look for a new host. The pajeet will treat other pajeets like shit provided there are no non-pajeets, but in what regards to non-pajeets it's all inter-pajeet solidarity. The pajeet lives by and for money and wealth, and cares little about anything else. The pajeet shares many characteristics with other kinds of human parasites traditionally associated with Satan.

CECA Loather said:
Relevant.

So Yui, a Japanese native wanted to chat with native English speakers in Japan where she lives.

Native English speakers like Ramesh Raj from India and Muhammad Amir from Pakistan who are both working in Japan responded to her call.

Japan is doomed.

View attachment 5476745
Click to expand...

That app is choke full of thirsty shitskin. It's unreal.
 
I'm here to bitch about Indians some more. I'm a server guy who frequently works with our head programmer on various projects. He's a slightly eccentric middle aged white guy. When working together, we have discussions. As a full time programmer I don't expect him to know everything about networking, but he knows some. Sometimes he thinks of something I didn't, or points out that my idea sounds good in a vacuum but conflicts with something he's doing, or whatever. Point is, he can hold his own.

However due to him being pulled away for some high priority stuff, I've been assigned to work with a Pajeet instead. I could forgive that he doesn't have much networking knowledge, because again, he's a programmer. But he has absolutely no opinions on anything. No discussion, no alternate point of view, no devil's advocate. Just "yes sir I understand sir I will do the needful sir". And if something doesn't work as expected, instead of coming back and telling me so we can reevaluate, he just figures out some way to shoehorn it in even when it turns out to be an obviously bad idea.

Which brings me to my next point: In my entire life, I have met exactly two Indians with what I would call a personality. One was a Sikh, a subgroup that I have a somewhat higher opinion of. The other was just a regular Indian who seemed to have a brain and was pretty good at his job, even it it was a relatively low level position. They're the exceptions. The lack of personality isn't limited to low paid workers. Even C level Indians that I've interacted with seem to be some kind of mindless drones or automatons. They all have this same bland, inoffensive, corporate issue persona. They're like the Corporate Memphis of people.

I'm only slightly exaggerating when I say I'm not sure that Indians are sentient in the conventional sense. I'm not convinced they actually THINK. At best, I think they're like those people on Reddit who don't have an internal monologue.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom