The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS said:
Pakistan is 100% Islam.
Click to expand...
On the topic of Pakistan, the global menace known as Pakistan did not need to happen.

When the British were preparing to grant India its independence in the aftermath of World War II, there was a group called the All-India Muslim League that sought to create an independent state for Indian Muslims. Despite opposition by the All-India Azad Muslim Conference, which argued for a unified India and had the support of figures like Nehru, the All-India Muslim League gained a lot of influence over the British authorities thanks to the politicking of its leader, Muhammad Ali Jinnah. To intimidate the British into toeing his line, he would use his position as head of the AIML to provoke Indian Muslims into strikes and pogroms, most infamously the Day of Direct Action in 1946, where Indian Muslims went full Kristallnacht on Hindus in Calcutta, killing over 4000 people. To quote the man himself, Jinnah wanted "either a divided India or a destroyed India." When the time for independence came in 1947, the last Viceroy of India, Lord Louis Mountbatten, felt he had no choice but to grant the Muzzies their own country, despite Nehru and Gandhi's protestations.

Towards the end of his life, Lord Mountbatten said his greatest regret was allowing the creation of Pakistan. Had he known Jinnah would have keeled over dead from tuberculosis less than a year after the Partition, he would stalled independence until the man died, thus taking the India Muslim League's momentum with him.

Because of the Partition, over a million people died over the span of 5 years and we now have to deal with a failing nuclear-armed state that sponsors and protects terrorists. Way to go, Jinnah.
 
It's okay tho. Their nukes are pajeet level shit anyway. Will do us a favour by killing a billion pajeets somehow and lay waste to their shithole. Thank earth.
 
Falcos_Commisar said:
There are very few Indian foods that are suitable for a drive through setting.

Somosas, Momos (dumplings), and naan/roti/chapati (all are bread)

Basically everything else is a rice + curry + meat/vegetable dish that is not appropriate for on car eating.
Click to expand...
I was wondering a while back why Indian drive-thru restaurants don’t exist but then I realized that most of their cuisine is too stewy to be able to eat comfortably in the car without sloshing it all over the place or smelling up the cabin. Also the profit margins would be pretty slim considering cooking Indian food is pretty time-consuming and the amount of spices they use doesn’t make it cheap.
CHARizard said:
Imagine hot Tikka Masala spilling all over your dash as you shit yourself on the way home.
Click to expand...
god damn it I did not need that image in my head :cryblood:
 
People feared China back in 2000s.

India on the other hand still a shithole and now a shit menace to the world.

People can shittalk about China all they want but still infinitely better than pajeets somehow. It will take another 2000 years before pajeets are considered humans.
 
IMG_9589.jpegIMG_9588.jpeg
 
I was just watching this on YouTube:


Chilling. I can't imagine what it must be like. You know, to be just going about your day, and all of a sudden these seemingly numberless hordes of disgusting, stinking subhuman creatures just keep pestering you and pawing at you and trying to attack you and no matter how many times you chase them away or say "No!" or whatever, it's no good, they just keep trying and coming back, over and over again...
 
Miriam Margoyles said:
I was just watching this on YouTube:


Chilling. I can't imagine what it must be like. You know, to be just going about your day, and all of a sudden these seemingly numberless hordes of disgusting, stinking subhuman creatures just keep pestering you and pawing at you and trying to attack you and no matter how many times you chase them away or say "No!" or whatever, it's no good, they just keep trying and coming back, over and over again...
Click to expand...
The set up and subtlety of this was fucking great
:story:
I want to steal it to make a meme ala "pic unrelated"
 
Miriam Margoyles said:
Chilling. I can't imagine what it must be like. You know, to be just going about your day, and all of a sudden these seemingly numberless hordes of disgusting, stinking subhuman creatures just keep pestering you and pawing at you and trying to attack you and no matter how many times you chase them away or say "No!
Click to expand...
And that’s before the monkeys show up.
 
Mojo Thief said:
On the topic of Pakistan, the global menace known as Pakistan did not need to happen.

When the British were preparing to grant India its independence in the aftermath of World War II, there was a group called the All-India Muslim League that sought to create an independent state for Indian Muslims. Despite opposition by the All-India Azad Muslim Conference, which argued for a unified India and had the support of figures like Nehru, the All-India Muslim League gained a lot of influence over the British authorities thanks to the politicking of its leader, Muhammad Ali Jinnah. To intimidate the British into toeing his line, he would use his position as head of the AIML to provoke Indian Muslims into strikes and pogroms, most infamously the Day of Direct Action in 1946, where Indian Muslims went full Kristallnacht on Hindus in Calcutta, killing over 4000 people. To quote the man himself, Jinnah wanted "either a divided India or a destroyed India." When the time for independence came in 1947, the last Viceroy of India, Lord Louis Mountbatten, felt he had no choice but to grant the Muzzies their own country, despite Nehru and Gandhi's protestations.

Towards the end of his life, Lord Mountbatten said his greatest regret was allowing the creation of Pakistan. Had he known Jinnah would have keeled over dead from tuberculosis less than a year after the Partition, he would stalled independence until the man died, thus taking the India Muslim League's momentum with him.

Because of the Partition, over a million people died over the span of 5 years and we now have to deal with a failing nuclear-armed state that sponsors and protects terrorists. Way to go, Jinnah.
Click to expand...
Pakistan was essentially capitulating to the Muslim hordes in India. It and the circumstances around it's creation are almost the exact same as Israel except kikes have some history with the levant while Pakistan was essentially surrendering a chunk of India to be assimilated into the middle East because Muslims invaded 1000 years ago, colonized india and the diasphora demanded they get a share of the region thinking they're actually ethnic to the Indian subcontinent. The funny thing is even after they were given east and west Pakistan ie Pakistan and Bangladesh, they still won't leave India the fuck alone and call it a fascist Hindu theocracy when they could just fucking go back to the middle East where they belong.
EDIT: Also Gandhi was not opposed to Pakistan, he was friends with Jinnah and went along with Pakistan on the condition that it wouldnt become a Muslim majority theocracy. The First Supreme Court Justice of a free India was Muslim and of Pakistan was a Hindu who were involved in the constitutional drafting of both, symbolic pact between both on the part of Jinnah and Gandhi. Couple years after Gandhi died the Hindu Lawyer who was court justice for Pakistan left the country and came back to India, saying "This country is not meant for Hindus anymore" after witnessing how exclusionary muslims were when they started consolidating power. People today view Pakistan as an extended arm of the Middle East and an extension of terrorism which it never should have been if we didnt let Muslims get the better of us. The Partition which came as part of the Pakistan split was also a massive cluster fuck with Muslims essentially stealing land and resources from the people who were forcefully evicted and immigrated to India, most of whom Hindu and some who were Sikh who were left penniless and in some cases familyless in the process.
CECA Loather said:
I suppose he is referencing Pajeets who took up arms against the Britbongs and tend to end up as Jap collaborators in WWII like Chandra Bose as opposed to Congress types like Gandhi who think a revolution can be achieved by behaving like a lazy Pajeet sitting down on their arses doing hartals which is a quaint way of saying doing eff all. The latter tended to be even more British than the British. Nehru comes to mind.

For better or worse, Gandhi ruined a lot of wannabe revolutionaries with his delusion that a revolution can be achieved with non-violence. Gandhi only succeeded because he was a better alternative in the eyes of the Britbongs than say Bose and the more militant ones.

And even after the British left, they still had a lot of say in Pajeet foreign policy as evidenced by how Britbongs advised Nehru to pick a fight with China. Even the post mortem of that 1962 disaster was written by Britbongs. You can tell from its name the Henderson-Brookes report. So much for independence.
Click to expand...
Not quite accurate. Gandhis goals were to prove to the British that the Indian people were capable of self governance as the British had the aristocratic attitude of taming the savages and claimed that their administration was for the benefit of Indians despite all the heinous shit they did (mass resource extraction, violation of religious norms, ethnic land seperations, violent law enforcement, export of soldiers, mishandling of systemic starvation, extreme taxes etc etc). It was not quite Nazi Germany as people today like to throw around words but it was still pretty bad, a classic case of "we will keep you satiated, you won't have responsibility but you won't be free" with associated ill intent. Gandhi was British educated and worked as a lawyer in South Africa and participated in the struggle against apartheid before he became a revolutionary, there is even the apocryphal story of him "turning the other cheek" to apartheid officers. His plan was to prove self governance by creating a parallel economy which doesn't depend on the British ie local unregulated production and distribution and appealed to British decency by protesting their practices non violently (if they were made out to be violent and villainous, they wouldnt look so good). This in turn led the British to clamp down harder because they didn't want such things to be made an example of, ironically making an example of such things. This is in contrast to people like Bose who didn't want to necessarily build a better country but was more bent towards making the British pay for their crimes. It was not completely out of altruism it was a lot more sour which is why he was more militaristic.

This is in complete contrast to modern day cause the left wing party is a lot more globalist and biased towards corporations running the country with a ton of soros funded staffers while the right wing party wants to make a self sufficient economy (everything made and distributed locally) and preserve the cultural demographics.
CECA Loather said:
Factually untrue. Kerala at the southern tip has a majority Muslim population I think and there are significant numbers of Muslims at Tamil Nadu.

Muslims have long been traders so you can find Muslim Pajeets along the coasts and of course at its far south which straddle the ancient maritime trade routes.
Click to expand...
HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS said:
More north you go more islamic it gets.
Click to expand...
It's half true. The more north you go the more islamic it gets cause particular places in the north have had historic islamic settlements but the south also has a ton of muslims from the southern sultanates. Kerala does not have a Muslim majority, it has a Christian majority owing to the second century Syrian and levantine immigrants who setup shop in the place. Tamilnadu does have a significant Muslim population but it's still third highest after Hindu and Christian. There are very few Christians in the north, tons of them in the south considering coastal trade, abundance of hillstations which were made British tourist spots and levantine settlers. Funnily enough there was a historic Jewish population in both Tamilnadu and Kerala due to coastal trade, especially of gold and diamonds which they dabbled in. They've since left once Israel was formed.
 
Last edited:
Miriam Margoyles said:
I was just watching this on YouTube:


Chilling. I can't imagine what it must be like. You know, to be just going about your day, and all of a sudden these seemingly numberless hordes of disgusting, stinking subhuman creatures just keep pestering you and pawing at you and trying to attack you and no matter how many times you chase them away or say "No!" or whatever, it's no good, they just keep trying and coming back, over and over again...
Click to expand...
How do you think threw the first piece of shit? The Indians or the monkeys?
 
Miriam Margoyles said:
Chilling. I can't imagine what it must be like. You know, to be just going about your day, and all of a sudden these seemingly numberless hordes of disgusting, stinking subhuman creatures just keep pestering you and pawing at you and trying to attack you and no matter how many times you chase them away or say "No!" or whatever, it's no good, they just keep trying and coming back, over and over again...
Click to expand...
I can't tell if your talking about the Indians or the monkeys.
 
Rome's rightful successor said:
I can't tell if your talking about the Indians or the monkeys.
Click to expand...

Sometimes, when constructing a joke, a person may, for comedic effect, make it so that it appears they are talking about one thing, when in fact, they are talking about another. They may signal this to their audience through subtle context clues and the use of specific language littered throughout the joke itself. The audience can then, through inference, understand and appreciate the punchline even if the punchline remains unspoken.

You may wish to attempt this technique yourself when constructing a joke in future, but it is quite advanced, so you may have to ask a grown-up or your handler to help you. 😊
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom