🐱 The King of the Hill Revival Must Ditch Buck Strickland

CatParty


King of the Hill is known for colorful protagonists, but its potential revival can survive without Buck Strickland's offensive and tired antics.
Animation has come a long way since shows like Looney Tunes and characters like Mickey Mouse. While it was initially geared towards a more adolescent audience, animation has grown in its maturity and been used to tackle far more mature themes in a medium easily accessible to anyone. A great example of this is the hilarious series King of the Hill, which is potentially coming back after it originally aired from 1997 to 2010. While fans are excited to possibly see their favorite characters like Hank Hill's sarcastic neighbor Kahn return, there's one who should definitely be left in the past -- Buck Strickland.

Buck was Hank's manager at Strickland Propane and often King of the Hill's center of depravity and ill-intent. While he was the manager throughout the course of the series, Hank (whose hatred of Adam Sandler makes total sense) was the one who kept the business afloat and his employees happy while also trying to keep Strickland's head above water -- something his boss exploited regularly. But in an era of television that has no room or tolerance for characters who have committed the terrible acts Buck has, there's no real place for his character.

Some of Buck's worst acts were often to himself; he was a heavy drinker and drug user with an addictive personality prominently showcased through his gambling habits. He was also a womanizer who would repeatedly cheat on his wife and visit strip clubs during his downtime. To him, women were an object, and he had no shame in showcasing his beliefs out in public. He was also a scam artist and swindler who wasn't afraid to cut costs by firing employees or even making them suffer when the company tried to go green to avoid negative PR in the Season 13 episode "Earthy Girls Are Easy."

Buck's vices have even jeopardized the Hill family on more than one occasion. He put Hank's son Bobby in a dangerous situation involving illegal gambling was in Season 5's "The Buck Stops Here," when Bobby is Strickland's caddy at the local country club. Buck also tried to frame Hank for the accidental death of Buck's mistress in Season 4's "High Anxiety." He did these things without hesitation and only further proved why his presence is no longer needed. But how would getting rid of him fit into the King of the Hillrevival's narrative?

There's an opportunity for the balance of power in Strickland Propane to take a logical shift should Buck be out of the picture. In terms of writing off the character, Buck had a history of heart problems and bad habits that only put further strain on his health. Since he was already nearing 70 when the show was airing, it would be logical to kill the character off in the hiatus between the series finale and the revival. Buck has written a lot of checks he never cashed, and his untimely fate would be fitting for his history. This would also open the door for Hank to finally have a leadership role as manager of Strickland Propane.

Buck Strickland isn't a good person in terms of his characterization; he's worse than Mr. Burns on The Simpsons. While he's had some funny moments in the past, he's ultimately the product of a bygone era. Writing him off so the transition of power benefits Hank would be a great start to a new story point. Plus, even if he isn't present, Strickland's shady business from the past could always pop back up, creating more drama and showing his choices caused lasting issues for his business. King of the Hill would still survive and thrive even more without Strickland in the picture.
 
Actually given some scenes I suspect Hank really is VP of Strickland. But he likes to work sales to stay in touch. ("The best master the basics.")

The show was actually rather subtle in how Hank felt towards Buck. He clearly "thought the best" of the man but also showed signs that he knew of Buck's flaws and wasn't as blind to them as he let on. There could be a compelling backstory there (maybe Buck's gave Hank his first job & really mentored the kid). There was more complexity and nuance to their relationship as the show went on.

Also FUCK YEAH on the entrepreneur stuff. A lot of problems in this country could be solved by every voter spending a year trying to run a business.
Hank's official title was Assistant Manager, but in practice he really ran the main branch. Buck promoted him to General Manager once, but then Hank blurted out publicly that he loved him and Buck retracted the promotion.

They do show a bit of Hank's back story and how he met Buck in one episode. A young Hank was working selling jeans and Buck came in to buy some. Buck was impressed with Hank's dedication to excellent service and ended up offering him a job. So it kind of makes sense that Hank would look up to him, especially when you figure Hank was probably in his mid 20s or so when they met.
 
Monkey, duh. There might be monkeys to be made using an old IP and ruining a show even further.

Those last KOTH seasons will look great next to the crappy SJW season.

@Beavis what is your take on KOTH's revival and the Beatrice and But-ted movie?

View attachment 3144851d
KOTH is legit my favorite cartoon of all time. I'm sure the revival is going to suck and be pozzed to hell. If there's a new beavis and butthead movie it will probably be very average.
 
Hank's official title was Assistant Manager, but in practice he really ran the main branch. Buck promoted him to General Manager once, but then Hank blurted out publicly that he loved him and Buck retracted the promotion.

They do show a bit of Hank's back story and how he met Buck in one episode. A young Hank was working selling jeans and Buck came in to buy some. Buck was impressed with Hank's dedication to excellent service and ended up offering him a job. So it kind of makes sense that Hank would look up to him, especially when you figure Hank was probably in his mid 20s or so when they met.
It figures that the Kommie Kids Klub members who want to burn capitalism from their comfortable window seat at Starbucks have no concept of loyalty, or even simple appreciation, for your job.

You don't have to worship your boss, or even like him, but you do have to at least hold up your end and work for him for no other reason than they were willing to invest in you.

Though I never ate dinner or went on vacation with ANY of my bosses over the years, I'd always take a minute to chat them up if I bumped into them in public. Even if I no longer worked for them and likely never would in my life.

Why?

Because, everything else aside, they provided me with 5-8 years of stability in the sense that I NEVER had to worry about where money for food and gas would be coming from. They in turn never threw me a ticker-tape parade, but, they also never made unreasonable demands of me outside of my natural skills or reasonable job duties. And I was thankful for that.

I can already hear the booing and hissing from the red corner about how I've clearly internalized capitalist propaganda and have abandoned my fellow workers for modern slavery, yadda yadda yadda.... whatever.



The status of being an "employee" to another person is not something to be ashamed of.

Job stability is 75% of a working-class person's needs hierarchy, and as long as that is long or even medium-term guaranteed? They're going to be mostly happy most of the time. Pampered quasi-intellectuals don't get this as they can afford their pointless vanities and, frankly, insulting reduction of the concept of employment to little more than being a cleaner and better-dressed slave by either already being wealthy themselves or having so little to lose through personal sloth they might as well be lifelong NEETS.

Wondering why Hank won't walk out on a problematic boss (or have the creators cancel him if he won't) is indicative of this disconnect.

To them, employment stability is only a tertiary or even quintenary concern to making sure the correct pronouns are used all the time and that less-than-perfect white men SUFFER for it.
 
Last edited:
Who's going to voice Luann and Lucky?
I hope the show just has them moving away to live life elsewhere. Having a funeral in show or making it a part of canon that they died off screen is just too harsh.

(Or you know, take the hint and leave the show where it is.)

Wish Mike Judge could do something new.
 
I really, really want to trust Mike Judge but at this point I don't think any remake, revival, remaster or whatever other fucking re's you'd like to use can actually work out well in the current climate, because of re-tards. Whatever is being remade, revived or 'reimagined' will either try to cater to the new 'breed' of consoomer and fucking suck because characters you really enjoyed are bitching about microaggressions and trans rights, thus alienating the original fanbase, or it will maintain some semblance of its original character but not quite hit the highs, or it will remain exactly what it was and get cancelled because the network got a whiff of controversy and heard Twitter retards sobbing about it. Or it will just be hot, boiled-over dogshit in general. And pretty much all of these possible results will taint the memory of the original, whatever it was. Whenever someone says: "Man, imagine [media franchise] in the current day, wouldn't that be cool?" 99% of the time it's not cool at all. What we're likely going to get now is Hank Hill as a strawman and I can assure you Dale Gribble won't survive unscathed either. Nor Boomhauer since he's a career womanizer. Bill might get out mostly unscathed since they still like to shit on fat, white bald dudes.

It doesn't matter how good the original thing was. Futurama, King of the Hill, Saints Row, etc. If it comes back or releases a sequel in [CurrentYear] it's destined to suck ass because modern 'culture' is designed to thoroughly suck every last bit of joy out of your life. It'll always go the way of stand-up comedy or pen & paper roleplaying games. With the exception of a few hold-outs from previous eras, comedy is all but dead, satire is dead, etc. At this point you'd be better off buying boxsets [or just pirating all of it] of television shows from before 2012 [seems to be the cut-off for the most part] and just endlessly making your way through that backlog. At some point the majority decided they wanted movies about wheelchair-bound black trans-lesbians bitching about thoroughly first world problems that are oppression porn for career victims. It's either that or Mindless Capeshit Chapter #2893.

Oh yeah, PS: the Futurama reboot is going to suck dick too. The original run of the show was great but it was getting very tired by the time Comedy Central yanked it back from the dead, you could tell the writer's room was running out of ideas and they started doing more 'topical/flavor of the week' type comedy which only really works with South Park since SP's turnaround time is so short. With other animated shows by the time that 'topical' episode comes out, it's going to be old news and boring, like that fucking God-awful iPhone episode they made. KOTH started to do the same toward the end as well. And anything 'topical' is going to come bundled with fresh 2022 poz as well. It's 2022, everything has to suck.
 
Back