The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

  • 🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I get paid a lot of money to look at the source and debug the problems myself. Entire careers are based around this. You are either someone who contributes and fixes things for themselves or the type of person who calls support, or looks to a "community".

Its clear who the professionals and who the hobbists are in thread.
Again with the snobby attitude Slav was pointing out earlier. Linux community is more guilty of it than any other community out there.

If you were such a professional as you make yourself out to be you would understand all these problems with Linux instead of chimping out about lawnmowers
 
But, for some reason, the Linux community is full of retards like you
Seethe and dilate :)
Only on Linux users get gaslit that they're the idiots for having an issue. That's why those decades old stereotypes live on and why people are reluctant to try Linux. They don't want to be lied to over something they know damn well is not their fault.
Nobody cares. Useless whiny faggots can hire Certified Technicians or go back to windows. Consoomer presence in the ecosystem only makes it more attractive for FAGMAN to infiltrate. Having those people around to support is a net loss, the community is large and healthy enough without them. Importing infinity faggots doesn't work, neither for nations nor foss.
 
I get paid a lot of money to look at the source and debug the problems myself. Entire careers are based around this. You are either someone who contributes and fixes things for themselves or the type of person who calls support, or looks to a "community".

Its clear who the professionals and who the hobbists are in thread.
My rule is simple, if I can't fix it before RedHat's paid support then I'm not doing my job very well.
 
You're definitely not the professional if you keep appealing to your apparent seniority and knowledge, yet you keep coming off as someone insecure that has to assert that they're smarter than everyone else on the matter.
Never asserted as much, this is your constant insecurity you repost over and over.

Plus, no one here is really talking about workstations and servers and corporate use cases of such systems. This is the hobbyist thread about desktop GNU/Linux distributions for daily use at home. Primarily that is. This wraps around to the issue of defining what "Linux" is and what "The Linux Thread" entails.
This is "The Linux Thread" theres a user debugging the firmware on his ancient TV here, some of the best posts. Nothing to do with the desktop. Since when does the guy who regularly gets put on timeout get to dictate what the thread is or isn't?

Three fags came in and started sperging about community and coooooonsumers and ruined the thread.
 
I could count the amount of times I've met people online that would tell me with a straight face that "GNU/Linux is great, but the desktop distros are so awful I prefer Windows/Mac" on the fingers of one hand. That's the type of people I believe to be the silent minority, while people like in this thread are the loud majority. The gaslighting, arrogant assholes that are driven by emotions and ideologies first, then pragmatism and software second. The worst kind of people you could be dealing with as an IT guy.

The types of people that are even more radical than Stallman. Even Stallman can admit why people prefer to use proprietary software, and he's fine with that as long as the user is aware what it is that they're sacrificing by doing so instead of using free software. That's something I can 100% get behind, yet I have never met an apparent FOSS ideologue who would be as reasonable on this topic as Stallman is. That's what gets me. He's meant to be this radical nutjob, yet I find him as one of the most agreeable people in the space.
Since when does the guy who regularly gets put on timeout get to dictate what the thread is or isn't?
Look, I tried to not get personal and emotional, yet around page 1122 I got people focusing on me and pointing me out. Apparently infighting is a bad thing on this forum, yet it keeps happening even if I try my best to not start pointing out users by name and saying that this and this guy have a grudge with me. Of course, those users never even get a slap on a wrist but I catch a thread ban. I tried my best to not be petty like this only for someone else to be this petty. Is this where you want to drive this conversation? If so, I'm out, and you should know better.

Like I said before, this thread should be put under a special written rule set like the Russo-Ukrainian war threads and the gender war threads. It desperately needs the moderation if it's users can't ignore certain posters.
 
Please, ask a mod to threadban you from this thread so you don't have to feel so agitated about knowing Linux users exist.
Only if I won't see a post mocking me despite me being thread banned. I mean, last time that happened it got swiftly deleted after I reported it, but still.
Ideally XenForo would have an "Ignore thread" option, but alas, it's too shit to have nice features like this.
 
Only if I won't see a post mocking me despite me being thread banned. I mean, last time that happened it got swiftly deleted after I reported it, but still.
Well we appreciate that our opinions matter so much to you that it’s physically painful that a random stranger on the internet says mean things about you in a thread you weren’t posting in.
 
Well we appreciate that our opinions matter so much to you that it’s physically painful that a random stranger on the internet says mean things about you in a thread you weren’t posting in.
That's not the point. The point is that posts like these show that posters here take this personally and will gladly rant about me, which last I checked is instigating infighting that is apparently not allowed. So everyone is taking this personally in the end. Which is stupid.
 
I get paid a lot of money to look at the source and debug the problems myself. Entire careers are based around this. You are either someone who contributes and fixes things for themselves or the type of person who calls support, or looks to a "community".
And yet, you fail to see and admit the most obvious things.

Paying Linux freaks was a mistake.
 
The Linux community is a real thing, based on the belief in free and open software.
Firstly, there are many people that believe in free and open-source software that might not use Linux. Some even like open source and just use it on Windows or Mac OS.

Secondly, the way the word "community" is used these days really irks me. There are Linux users. I am a Linux desktop user. I've been using Linux as a desktop (on and off) user since 2001.

Never have I felt there is a community. People like to say there is one, but I've never gone to a LUG. I've maybe met 3 people that use it other than myself IRL, and that was by happenstance.

I was interested in using Linux because I saw these IRIX and Red Hat machines at university and found them interesting. So I downloaded this thing called "Red Hat Linux".
Also, "Look at the source? Debug the problem yourself?" — Nigger, do you hear yourself talking? Go outside and touch grass.
This is the horseshit argument that you guys always go to. "You shouldn't learn how anything actually works, nerd."

As @hog cranking frog alludes to here:
Yesterday I actually had my john deere break. Threw a belt. Got under it, used my brain, started taking pins out until I had the deck off and the belt back on in no time.
Sometimes you need to look under the hood to understand what is going on, and poking or prodding is good enough. Other times you need to read manuals. This is often how people who aren't impotent solve their problems.

Sometimes that might be tailing log files, sometimes that might be looking at config files, and other times you will need to look at source code. Nobody is saying you should be doing this all the time; what is being communicated is there is an expectation that you are at least prepared to do this or at least ask questions intelligently.

If you don't want to do that, this is fine, but don't belittle us because we wish to know how things work.
 
Last edited:
If you don't want to do that, this is fine, but don't belittle us because we wish to know how things work.
The difference is that you're expecting other people to have the know-how that you have, then belittle people when they don't. Likely subconsciously since not one poster seems to be aware that's what they end up doing.
 
Secondly, the way the word "community" is used these days really irks me. There are Linux users. I am a Linux desktop user. I've been using Linux as a desktop (on and off) user since 2001.

Never have I felt there is a community. People like to say there is one, but I've never gone to a LUG. I've maybe met 3 people that use it other than myself IRL, and that was by happenstance.

I was interested in using Linux because I saw these IRIX and Red Hat machines at university and found them interesting. So I downloaded this thing called "Red Hat Linux".
Being part of a community can also mean to have the qualifications needed to be an active participant of that community. Such as how any Jew is in effect a part of the Israeli community, because all Jews get automatic citizenship.
 
Being part of a community can also mean to have the qualifications needed to be an active participant of that community. Such as how any Jew is in effect a part of the Israeli community, because all Jews get automatic citizenship.
So far it seems that to be a participant of this thread, you need to:
-have two decades worth of professional Linux experience
-berate anyone who's not like you
-insist that there is no mafiacommunity
 
Never asserted as much, this is your constant insecurity you repost over and over.


This is "The Linux Thread" theres a user debugging the firmware on his ancient TV here, some of the best posts. Nothing to do with the desktop. Since when does the guy who regularly gets put on timeout get to dictate what the thread is or isn't?

Three fags came in and started sperging about community and coooooonsumers and ruined the thread.
The context of the discussion was always the desktop, nobody is talking about the thread topic.
But given the abhorrent state of it and the Linux community I can understand why Linux users would avoid this topic
 
Because with Linux you're expected to have some basic want to get your hands dirty and go mucking about the innards of your OS.

I thought it was about having a clitty leak to a site admin over the state of any one community, like a main character or something.
 
Because with Linux you're expected to have some basic want to get your hands dirty and go mucking about the innards of your OS.
And I do? I muck about system internals all the time? But that doesn't mean I have to waive away my right to complain about the ways Linux sucks and could be better? But I know how it is, the moment I complain, every regular automatically assumes I'm the type of midwit that doesn't even know you can disable the weather widget on Windows in three mouse clicks. And what is this thread if not a community? Other threads have their own microcommunities of thread regulars, yet here it's like the mafia where there isn't one.
I thought it was about having a clitty leak to a site admin
You've ran to the site's admin over three posts after half a year of absence that you could've simply ignore. It's not my fault you lack the impulse control needed to ignore one wall of text post. By all means, run to the admins on every occasion, seems like this is one of those threads that needs active moderation due to it's regulars lacking self control.
 
The gaslighting, arrogant assholes that are driven by emotions and ideologies first, then pragmatism and software second. The worst kind of people you could be dealing with as an IT guy.
Nigger I do not want to be your IT guy. Indeed, go find a better kind of person for that. :story:
Even Stallman can admit why people prefer to use proprietary software, and he's fine with that as long as the user is aware what it is that they're sacrificing by doing so instead of using free software.
To benefit from the army of IT guys (paid developers, designers, product management) they employ? And that using free software usually means sacrificing that army of paid support? I agree with him, that's fine, keep using windows if those are your priorities.
 
Back
Top Bottom