The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Well, I hope a live boot will still be able to fix this.
You're triggering my ptsd from the time I updated a machine remotely, and that machine didn't have a keyboard attached, so the update didn't bother to include keyboard drivers with the kernel (!). I went onsite to reboot the machine, and it wanted a LUKS password, but it wouldn't allow keyboard input even after I plugged one in. That was neat. Luckily, I was able to get back in with a live distro. Remember you can always install packages into the live environment if it doesn't ship with LUKS or LVM or whatever you need.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Zeftax
No matter how much I use Vim, I always confuse J and K when navigating.
If it ever comes up I can't remember which is up/down but if my brain is turned off and I'm typing away then none of it even crosses my mind.
Fucking shit. So I turned off the computer yesterday. Today it got stuck right after decryption. The hardware for my server onto which I intended among other things to do more regular and complete backups will arrive tomorrow. I think some of the more important data is backed up on other computers, but some data that has only sentimental value isn't. Well, I hope a live boot will still be able to fix this. The timing at least makes for a funny story if nothing else... (:_(
View attachment 7684175
Any data you care about should always be backed up somewhere. At the very least, get an external hard drive and periodically move everything over, easy to alias/script with rsync.
 
Sick of Windows and I'll be switching. Did a little research and Fedora KDE seemed like a nice sweet spot. Why does Fedora get hate besides the gay name? And are the troon allegations just the typical tranny - software dev correlation?

Seems like Red Hat packages have good support, and otherwise Fedoras a good mix between configurable/modern and usable/stable. Is upgrading kernels really a nightmare, or would that only be the case if Im fucking with the kernel all the time?

I just built an amd system with a 9070 and other newish parts, and I read that Mint might have problems with that. I also need Wayland since I have monitors with different refresh rates. Would Mint still be a better option even with my hardware reqs? Any insight would be appreciated.
 
It's been a long time since I've used a linux live CD but my experience was that it was really slow, and did not persist storage. Maybe that's changed, but having a VM open while able to google errors in your "main/dailydriver" OS is a huge plus to me.
it will depend on hardware on how fast or slow it is. Since, iit's basically loading a filesystem in memory, and then you are running on that while using it. If you barely have enough memory to handle whatever you are using, you will probably see some lagging. For me, it tends to be pretty fast on a system with 16gb or more of memory. 4gb, depending on the distro, and desktop, might be starting to cut things a bit close since everything is getting moved there.

All that said. it not being persistent, and not being, and not dealing with vm's is the exact reason I think it's great for this use case. Since it's a new user wanting to just play around with linux. It's simple to set up, you don't have to worry about ruining anything. And for me it performs better than a vm. Which whatever I do, vm's have always felt laggy and wierd. Maybe if I do hardware passthrough. But that's a lot of set up to just play around with linux. When they can get that by design from just plugging in an iso.
Reproducible builds are not an 'innovation'. For example, F-Droid, which anyone who isn't insane already uses as much as possible instead of Google Play, does that shit.

This is the most Google-retarded shit possible. Here's my favorite part. It's written in Go because Google.. but none of the documentation mentions supporting whatever clusterfuck is Go packaging
Go has had a real problem over the last few years. With malicious packages getting added. It seems like it's happening constantly. And with the way go, and these other languages work, people could be pulling those in accidentally for normal non-malicious programs, that used those libraries before they were altered to contain the malicious code.

Hopefully that's what they are addressing when they are saying "supply chain attacks" because it's a big problem for anything using go, that uses outside libraries.


No matter how much I use Vim, I always confuse J and K when navigating. Then again, I only treat Vim as a CLI text editor for simpler jobs like config editing, I much more prefer GUI editors like Sublime Text for most work. I don't think I'd ever get used to using Vim as a full blown IDE, and that is without trying to turn it into one with those Neovim conversion packs. I want to keep my shit simple.
Where vim really gets good isn't the hjkl movements. Those are nice, and like someone else mentioned they become muscle memory on which way they move, rather than actually remembering. But where you really see the benefits of vim is when you start getting into text objects, and doing things like dap yap diw using the { and } to move around full paragraphs, using f to search forward for a character or F to go backwards then you can use ; to repeat that motion, and one of the biggest things is cntrl+v for visual block.

And the more you learn about it, the faster you get. It starts to really compound how much time you save doing editing work. And if people are spending time in editors for work that really adds up. Something I just learned recently. is when you do visual select more. after you highlight something, you can hit :s/foo/bar then do the normal sed style search and replace, for the instances of foo in the text you selected, and replace them with bar. like you might do for a full buffer using :%s/foo/bar. There are so many things you can do with vim to save time. It's crazy what it can do.

And for development work, if someone takes the time to set up an lsp, like they may be using in another ide. but also know, and can take advantage of all the other time saving things vim has. It's really hard to go back to any other editor, you just won't get the things you can from vim from almost any other editor out there
 
Sick of Windows and I'll be switching. Did a little research and Fedora KDE seemed like a nice sweet spot. Why does Fedora get hate besides the gay name? And are the troon allegations just the typical tranny - software dev correlation?

Seems like Red Hat packages have good support, and otherwise Fedoras a good mix between configurable/modern and usable/stable. Is upgrading kernels really a nightmare, or would that only be the case if Im fucking with the kernel all the time?

I just built an amd system with a 9070 and other newish parts, and I read that Mint might have problems with that. I also need Wayland since I have monitors with different refresh rates. Would Mint still be a better option even with my hardware reqs? Any insight would be appreciated.
If you need Wayland mint might not be the best place yet. Most of their desktops are pretty new to Wayland support. You will probably be better off using kde or gnome's Wayland sessions.

Which one between kde and gnome will depend on what you prefer. Generally kde is more flexible and configurable, and a bit more bleeding edge. So if you care about that. Pick kde. If you want something simpler, with a lot less choice out of the box. with a different UI than the windows style way of doing things use gnome.

As far as distro. Anything supporting those will be fine. Fedora gets shit because it's basically ran by redhat. But if you just want a working system. I say try that. Make sure the drivers work correctly with your hardware, and if so. You should be fine to just stick with it.

If you end up having a weird issue from the beginning with your hardware. It might be easier as a complete new comer to just move to a different distro, before sinking time into fixing things. Depending on what the problem you have is.
 
I just built an amd system with a 9070 and other newish parts, and I read that Mint might have problems with that. I also need Wayland since I have monitors with different refresh rates. Would Mint still be a better option even with my hardware reqs? Any insight would be appreciated.
Just a heads up that X11 can technically handle multiple refresh rates, but only if they are multiples of each other (eg 60hz and 120hz). That's probably not the case in your setup
 
Just a heads up that X11 can technically handle multiple refresh rates, but only if they are multiples of each other (eg 60hz and 120hz). That's probably not the case in your setup
Its still janky compared to Wayland in my experience, but you can usually get it working with xrandr moon runes.
The best reason to switch to Wayland if you use dual monitors is to use individual scaling, rather then a single scaling option.
I just built an amd system with a 9070 and other newish parts, and I read that Mint might have problems with that. I also need Wayland since I have monitors with different refresh rates. Would Mint still be a better option even with my hardware reqs? Any insight would be appreciated.
Thankfully almost every Linux distro has a live environment you can play around with, which includes Fedora and Mint. So you can give both distros a test drive before picking one to install.
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: The Noise
Sick of Windows and I'll be switching. Did a little research and Fedora KDE seemed like a nice sweet spot. Why does Fedora get hate besides the gay name? And are the troon allegations just the typical tranny - software dev correlation?

Seems like Red Hat packages have good support, and otherwise Fedoras a good mix between configurable/modern and usable/stable. Is upgrading kernels really a nightmare, or would that only be the case if Im fucking with the kernel all the time?

I just built an amd system with a 9070 and other newish parts, and I read that Mint might have problems with that. I also need Wayland since I have monitors with different refresh rates. Would Mint still be a better option even with my hardware reqs? Any insight would be appreciated.
Play around with Mint, Fedora KDE and anything else in a virtual machine or on a spare computer. Whichever one you like the most is probably the one to install.
No, upgrading the kernel isn't a nightmare, on most distros, it takes care of itself. If you manually switch kernel versions or configs then you might have issues but you can switch between kernel versions so it's not a big deal.
I'm not aware of Mint having issues with modern AMD hardware but I haven't looked around either, I'd be surprised if that was the case.

If you decide you don't like the distro you chose, you can pretty much copy everything out of the home directory (/home/username) and place it back on a fresh install of anything else and more/less be back up and running.
 
Sick of Windows and I'll be switching. Did a little research and Fedora KDE seemed like a nice sweet spot.
I'm more familiar with Debian-based distributions but have experimented with CentOS (now CentOS Stream), another Red Hat derivative, in a VPS setting and it was fun. The good news is that, the more you learn about Linux fundamentals including the shell (by default typically bash but I now use fish + oh-my-fish), the easier it will be to move from one system to another.
And the more you learn about it, the faster you get. It starts to really compound how much time you save doing editing work. And if people are spending time in editors for work that really adds up. Something I just learned recently. is when you do visual select more. after you highlight something, you can hit :s/foo/bar then do the normal sed style search and replace, for the instances of foo in the text you selected, and replace them with bar. like you might do for a full buffer using :%s/foo/bar. There are so many things you can do with vim to save time. It's crazy what it can do.
Don't forget macros
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: prollyanotherlurker
just learned that hyprland premium is a thing. I found it funny because a lot of people seemingly misunderstand what licenses like BSD actually allow. It’s also a great reminder of why UNIX philosophy is so important. You don’t see the suckless people selling a “dwm premium” (even though they could), because their code is so simple it doesn’t require a full-time job to maintain.Hyprland, on the other hand, is a bloated mess for the sake of being one.
 
just learned that hyprland premium is a thing. I found it funny because a lot of people seemingly misunderstand what licenses like BSD actually allow. It’s also a great reminder of why UNIX philosophy is so important. You don’t see the suckless people selling a “dwm premium” (even though they could), because their code is so simple it doesn’t require a full-time job to maintain.Hyprland, on the other hand, is a bloated mess for the sake of being one.
And X protocol parity will soon be reached, but locked behind Wayland Pro Plus subscription. Source: crackpipe.
 
just learned that hyprland premium is a thing. I found it funny because a lot of people seemingly misunderstand what licenses like BSD actually allow. It’s also a great reminder of why UNIX philosophy is so important. You don’t see the suckless people selling a “dwm premium” (even though they could), because their code is so simple it doesn’t require a full-time job to maintain.Hyprland, on the other hand, is a bloated mess for the sake of being one.
The only things it unlocks are a forum (read: circlejerking zone) and some pre-made "official" configurations. It's far from necessary... or useful. Just a way to capitalize on all the traction it is currently getting. Personally I used hyprland for a bit out of curiosity: It does the job but it's not something I would willingly subject myself to daily. The animations do nothing for me, they're just distractions, so I disable them. What's left is a bog-standard tiling window manager, with support for a bunch of other eyecandy applications I won't ever use. For me i3 works better, partially because it's more familiar, but also because it has the 3 things I actually care about (tabbed layouts, tiling, run-or-raise - raiseorlaunch in this case).

I think customization/ricing has its place. Better navigation and faster app switching, for example, make interfacing with the steel behemoth on my desk less cumbersome. But Hyprland seems to be emblematic of this widely popular "style over substance" (ricing) culture. If I fullscreen their website so much shit is happening that my web browser begins lagging. It being written in C++ makes it at least serviceable, but for many other popular apps, e.g. Groomcord, that's just not the case. I'm not saying that we should go back to exclusively using cli tools, but most developers now use so much memory and processing power that I might as well fry an egg on my computer's heat sink. A lack of gradients never killed anybody, but at this point it seems that the price we paid for gradients is about to kill my computer.
 
Saw a guy on #artix/Libera claim faster boot with Runit than S6 in particular. On my test config, just got 16 seconds (Mate-S6) vs 18 seconds (Mate-Runit), so I don't agree. In the process, I generated a brief (little over 3 minute) video of an artix-mate-runit install. Figured I'd share that here. This is from an ISO on an SSD onto a RAID1 pair of spinning rust drives on QEMU-KVM, so your install is likely even faster.

 
Last edited:
I generated a brief (little over 3 minute) video of an artix-mate-runit install.
LMAO. Tried this with Devuan. At around 38 minutes of install, it asked me to choose my init system. I chose Runit. It told me to insert the medium I was using. I will not be attempting this again. Sorry for the bad crop, but this shit pissed me off so much you just get my Artix crop parameters.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: SCV
I hate the default menu logos for all of the DEs so I should probably make some sort of custom icon I just move from install to install and use for the menus for all of them.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Belisarius Cawl
I also need Wayland since I have monitors with different refresh rates. Would Mint still be a better option even with my hardware reqs? Any insight would be appreciated.
You've been taken in by wayland propaganda FYI. I am at this moment using Xlibre (and last week was using Xorg) with 3 monitors all with different refresh rates.

Why does Fedora get hate besides the gay name? And are the troon allegations just the typical tranny - software dev correlation?
Because it is from redhat a giant corporation that is the source of a lot of awful shit including pushing troon shit and trying to kill Xorg by doing things like spreading propaganda like it doesn't support multiple monitors with different refresh rates.

Would Mint still be a better option even with my hardware reqs? Any insight would be appreciated.
"Drivers" for graphics cards are going to come from mesa so whatever distro you pick basically just needs to have a new enough mesa version for your card. I don't know how old mint's mesa package is so you would need to check. If you need new hardware support the obvious suggestion would be a rolling release distro to have the newest packages.

I would recommend Artix but I shill them constantly as it's what I use. I would strongly recommend against fedora. Going from one megacorp to another slightly-less-bad-for-now megacorp seems kinda pointless.
 
Back