The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Vim absolutely wasn't virtue signaling
Yes, that was the contrast I was trying to point out. You could tell he really cared about the issue and was directly doing something helpful and in an unobstructive way. Sorry if it didn't come across.

Damn, I haven't heard he passed, rest in peace.
 
I haven't heard he passed
Yeah, two years ago. Some further undisclosed health condition. Though now that I'm reading into it, ICCF Holland was something Bram himself founded, and now that he is no longer with us, it's planning to be closed by the end of this year.
1764017570506.png
 
I am having an issue with games. Mostly due to the scaling that I have set to work on Linux. 100% is too far, 200% makes everything too close. I have set it up for 150% but the payback is most games aren't rendered correctly to set scaling.

Any suggestions? No Steam prompt works to resolve this issue so far. I found out that Wayland renders properly but it comes with artifacts on Linux Mint. At least on my machine.
 

Attachments

  • Zrzut ekranu z 2025-11-24 22-55-19.png
    Zrzut ekranu z 2025-11-24 22-55-19.png
    4.3 MB · Views: 76
I am having an issue with games. Mostly due to the scaling that I have set to work on Linux. 100% is too far, 200% makes everything too close. I have set it up for 150% but the payback is most games aren't rendered correctly to set scaling.
I would tell you to use gamescope and see if that helps, but it seems Ubuntu (and by extension Linux Mint) doesn't have it still. You can try the flatpak version of steam and gamescope to see if it works though. Fractional scaling is a pain, even on the big DEs.

I found out that Wayland renders properly but it comes with artifacts on Linux Mint.
Yeah wayland is very experimental on every Desktop Environment mint supports.
 
I am having an issue with games. Mostly due to the scaling that I have set to work on Linux. 100% is too far, 200% makes everything too close. I have set it up for 150% but the payback is most games aren't rendered correctly to set scaling.

Any suggestions? No Steam prompt works to resolve this issue so far. I found out that Wayland renders properly but it comes with artifacts on Linux Mint. At least on my machine.

1) Fractional scaling on Linux is, unfortunately, dogshit for all practical purposes. The implementation is slightly better under Wayland than X11, but only a little better.

2) All the desktop environments that Mint ships with are X11-focused. Cinnamon, MATE, and Xfce are all excellent environments but you must run them under X11 instead of Wayland unless you wanna roll the dice with experimental support. Unless you’re rolling GNOME Shell under Fedora or some Hyprland setup under an Arch variant, Wayland will generally be shittier than Xorg.
 
I installed windows 10 on a laptop. Someone was going to buy it, so I put it back together, wiped a drive I wasn't using and installed that. They fell through on buying it so I decided to just mess around a bit with it. To see how it fared. I wanted to just see how close I could get it to being something I could use.

For one thing. Out of the gate. I had driver issues. The touchpad was fucked immediately. It wouldn't let me scroll with the touchpad. I installed the driver for it, and it broke the mouse buttons. Literally never had anything like that happen on any linux distro on my laptops. Funny with it being a thinkpad, that literally came with windows 10 I'm pretty sure. Eventually I fixed it. That was before the buyer fell through.

Tonight I decided to actually mess around with it. A nice reminder of how frustrating windows was before I decided to never use it again. It didn't take long to refresh my memory. I decided to try using the terminal on it. Since at this point at least half of what I do on my computer is in the terminal if not more on linux. I immediately noticed how slow it was. Just absolutely sluggish. I'm not a power-shell user so I didn't expect to just know everything about the commands in it. So i'm not holding any of that against it. It was just laggy and shitty for no apparent reason.

It reminded me of the video Casey Muratori did making a barely optimized terminal emulator for windows, just to shit on the ones that are there. And show that it wouldn't even be that hard for someone competent to blow what's available out of the water. And yeah. I can see why he felt the need to make that video now.


The video for reference. I want to say, the normal windows terminal is literally 1000x slower than this, unoptimized version he made in a few days, or maybe a few weeks (i think it was days but I can't remember), just to make this video to prove his point.

On the other stuff using it. Coming from linux, it just felt like everything was the same but worse. It felt like it had fewer settings exposed to me as a user than gnome even. I couldn't change things I wanted, through the time using it I saw adds, and window trying to up sell me on random shit. Just generally speaking, everything felt more delayed than anything I do on linux. I'm so used to instant feedback when moving the mouse, clicking on things. etc. It stuck out to me a lot, and it was actually running faster than some installs I've seen.
Installing software felt slow and tedious compared to what I'm used to, besides having to open a browser, find the site to download it, downloading the wizard, then installing/downloading the actual program being a retarded process in my opinion. It literally was just slow, the actual install was slow. I'm used to opening a terminal, typing the command on the distro I'm using, starting to type the package name, and hitting tab, then it tab completes, and just about anything is downloaded and installed in less than 10 seconds.

But having a desktop that feel sluggish, on top of not having the control I would normally want, for some arbitrary reason, packed full of their bullshit AI, onedrive, cortana, nonsense. It's sad. I honestly don't know how people can think that's the way a computer should be. I was half way expecting it to just be like mint, where I could basically replicate a decent set up, and I would have say to myself windows isn't THAT bad. I somehow can manage to do that, it would take waaaaay more work than is reasonably necessary to put in, especially when I can use just about any linux desktop, and be pretty close to happy out of the box, at most needed to open up the settings and change a few things to fit my taste.Then that has all the benifits of not being a windows product (privacy, potentially security, no ads, no programs that I have to jump through hoops to uninstall (edge), no ai integration.)

Another smaller gripe. All the older microsoft programs for doing sysadmin type tasks. They all have a similar look to how I remember them. Which would be fine, if it wasn't for the fact that they stick out like a sore thumb. How are you as a billion dollar company, not able to just make your own applications fit well together with a cohesive look? I mean, obviously when they are literally only spending effort making things THAT THEIR USERS ALL SAY THEY DON'T WANT, Or filling their codebases with jeet vibe coded slop. It would have been shocking if they spent the time to just make everything look like its supposed to fit together.

The one thing I can hand to windows, the WSL thing they added in the time since I last used it, is actually pretty good. That's the only positive thing I can think of. Literally, idk if I can think of anything else. Maybe the alt-tab? but that's something literally everything has, and it's implemented basically the same way everywhere, so it's not like it's something they did that stood out. Really, I hate microsoft, but I somehow expected it to not be as bad as it was. Especially since it was 10, not 11. The driver issue stood out ot me especially. I never got it to fully work like it normally does on linux. I'm disappointed, I thought it might be a fun little thing, to try making a Windows setupt that works like my linux installs.
 
So I got this video from one of LTT's subchannels titled "Come On, Ditch Windows. It’s EASY" recommended to me, and clicked on it out of morbid curiosity. Spoiler alert: it's not bad, funny or even on topic, it's just a news round-up with a clickbaity title. I'm gonna post it anyway to expose you to this faggot's face.
preservetube
 
I thought about doing this, many years ago.


I actually did this back in 2022 with FreeBSD 13 and posted about it in this thread. I've been meaning to give FreeBSD 14 a whirl for a while, but now FreeBSD 15 is right around the corner. Might as well wait a little bit longer. Anyway, this is all from memory, take what I say with a grain of salt.

- Base system installation was painless. I'm on a desktop with a wired connection, networking was easy to get up and running, and ZFS is just *chef's kiss.*

- Skill issue on my part, but the only FreeBSD groups I know by heart are "wheel" and "games." Spent a lot of time hunting down correct group information to add my user account into.

- Important choice every FreeBSD user must make on first install: compiling from source through the Ports tree or using binary package tools. You must pick one over the other and never mix unless you have no other option (some proprietary software binaries can only be installed through the Ports tree because of EULAs and stuff like that).

- If you opt for binary packages, make sure you edit /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf and change the "url" from "quarterly" to "latest" (shown below)

Code:
         FreeBSD: {
         url: "pkg+https://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest",
         enabled: true,
         signature_type: "fingerprints",
         fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg",
         mirror_type: "srv"
         }

- By default, FreeBSD does quarterly binary package updates and releases. It is a server OS, after all. Switching to Latest is necessary if you're a desktop user. "Latest" in this case is "latest stable update that hits the ports tree and gets turned into a binary package." So roughly at the same update cadence as Fedora or Arch for all the stuff you install going forward. Just remember: /etc is for base system files, and /usr/local/etc is for binary/ports files. That hard separation between "operating system" and "everything else" will screw with you when you're getting your feet wet.

- You can go with Wayland if you so choose, but why inflict more pain on yourself when you can just go with tried and true Xorg with literally any desktop environment. I went with Plasma 5 at the time, but I think Plasma 4 is still available in the Ports tree, as is MATE, Cinnamon, LXQt, Lumina, i3, Openbox, Fluxbox, IceWM, even friggin GNOME Shell until the GNOME team decided to make systemd a hard dependency. You'll need to make edits to /etc/rc.conf and /boot/loader.conf for stuff like dbus, but that should be second nature to you if you've ever gotten a text console up to a graphical environment at least once in your life.

- All the standard FOSS apps you could ever want are available. Firefox works, LibreOffice exists, mpv, ffmpeg, the whole nine yards. NVIDIA even makes drivers for FreeBSD that you can install from the Ports tree.

- Linux compatibility, once enabled, is basically "set it and forget it." There's just one glaring flaw with hindsight: they based the Linux compatibility off CentOS and eventually Rocky Linux. If you have any need or desire for 32-bit Linux applications, you'll need to rely on the CentOS 7 module, and as of 2025? Shit's been EOL'd by Red Hat and won't receive any further updates. With the current Rocky Linux module, 32-bit is long gone. You do have a workaround, in that you can set up Linux compatibility using debootstrap to install either Debian or Ubuntu. It's a touch fiddlier though because you're no longer running things through /compat/linux, you're running stuff through /compat/debian.

- Xbox 360 controllers and PS4 controllers are 100% supported as of FreeBSD 13, but you'll need to set up device rules, add yourself to the games group, and add some stuff to /boot/loader.conf. The man page doesn't mention any of this configuration stuff last time I checked, and I really had to hunt down obscure mailing lists and forum posts to learn what to do and how to do it. Unfortunately, it is the Year of Our Lord 2025, and FreeBSD still doesn't have a proper Xbox One controller driver support. I'm lucky because I have a piece-of-shit Logitech F310 gamepad that looks ugly as sin, feels weird to use, but it's detected as an Xbox 360 controller (oh and some dusty old DS4 controllers.

- Citra played all my 3DS games at the proper 30fps with 4x rendering resolution, xBRZ texture filters, and my Logitech controller plugged in. Same also goes for melonDS, Mednafen, and I think mGBA too? AMDGPU means everything runs like a dream on FreeBSD, so I ain't complaining.

- I could comfortably use a web browser for long stretches of time, play my emulated games, even fire up LibreOffice to type out and print something (CUPS, gotta love it!) using FreeBSD. I didn't bother testing Steam at the time because I was still daily driving Windows 10 LTSC in 2022. My oh my, how the times have changed

- If I ever become an anti-systemd luddite who rejects Windows, abandoned all hope on Linux, and needed a new place to call "home," FreeBSD is definitely a very usable option. GhostBSD definitely works as a "Linux user's first BSD" but it just doesn't feel "right." I was autistic enough to actually try PC-BSD back in high school, and it was really cool stuff. It was the first KDE4-focused experience I ever had that didn't feel like shit in the slightest. Unfortunately, PC-BSD rebranded as TrueOS, stopped focusing on "Linux user's first BSD," and tracked FreeBSD-CURRENT, only to die an unceremonious death in 2018 because surprise surprise: very few people ultimately gave a shit. GhostBSD came a long way, it's very usable, but it just doesn't hold a candle to PC-BSD. At least not to me.
 
Last edited:
Good news:
You can get smug and satisfied and I get to be irrationally angry and seethe.

Even though despite the usual "RIP Windows" circlejerk Steve still made it abundantly clear that gaming on Linux is still buggy and that these results are not directly comparable to Windows.
 
People go into Linux thinking they're going to "rice" their tranny desktop with anime girls and play mainstream vidya.

A year later they're playing NetHack and browsing KiwiFarms like this
neofarms.png
 
I got fed up with GNOME Shell and Wayland on Fedora 43. It's "usable," it gets the job done, but I just couldn't handle waiting like 30 seconds after clicking the icon to load up a Terminal, Firefox, or Nautilus window before the damn thing actually appears. This is a problem that is 100% unique to Wayland. I know this because Fedora spins that still use Xorg like MATE, Cinnamon, and Xfce don't have this problem. Behold! A fresh install of Fedora 43 MATE.

1764101944719.png

You wanna know the best part? It actually comes with Compiz! Holy shit, I have not laid eyes on CompizConfig since I was like... 15 years old fiddling with the Compiz options on Ubuntu 10.04. The Fedora 43 MATE spin feels almost identical to the GNOME 2 session that Fedora used to ship with before F15 and the onset of GNOME 3. I'm so hideously out of practice, odds are I might bork something along the way, but I just love the fact that I have a desktop cube and wobbly windows again.

1764102315346.png
 
Since this is basically the general FOSS thread, what's been your experience with GIMP 3? I haven't experienced any issues and I found it to have a lot of QoL improvements like not having to do the whole pasted layer anchoring juggle so it feels like a proper modern editor and I've ditched 2.9 from my system. It's no Photoshop and it's still heavier than Paint.NET but I've been finding myself using it more and more recently.

Shame there are no good "opens instantly and can do a decent amount of editing" options to have something to replace MS Paint with. Just about every other alternative takes a while to load up and I need something that loads instantly to fill that niche.
 
Shame there are no good "opens instantly and can do a decent amount of editing" options to have something to replace MS Paint with. Just about every other alternative takes a while to load up and I need something that loads instantly to fill that niche.
Have you considered any of the online image editors that are out there
 
Back
Top Bottom