The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

I guess start writing code and make it yourself
Do you write code and commit it to repos of packages that you use when you find a bug in them? No? Then it's not my problem, someone else should make a distro like that.
I don’t want to make any big mistakes like deleting system32 or fucking up my computer in any way
Then run Mint in a VM. It's the best way to have a rough idea of how Linux is like without risking formatting your hard drive. If your Windows isn't on the Home version then I'd recommend reading into setting up Hyper-V, it has the best performance out of all VM software under Windows.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vesperus
Do you write code and commit it to repos of packages that you use when you find a bug in them? No? Then it's not my problem, someone else should make a distro like that.

Then run Mint in a VM. It's the best way to have a rough idea of how Linux is like without risking formatting your hard drive. If your Windows isn't on the Home version then I'd recommend reading into setting up Hyper-V, it has the best performance out of all VM software under Windows.
wait, when it comes to code, what can I do to make Linux my own? Is it User-Friendly for anything relating to productivity? I understand that some things are compatible with Linux but I’m still skeptical on how much it can help me in the long run.
 
wait, when it comes to code, what can I do to make Linux my own? Is it User-Friendly for anything relating to productivity? I understand that some things are compatible with Linux but I’m still skeptical on how much it can help me in the long run.
What is productivity?
Art?
Writing / Business Documents?
Audio?
Video?
 
I’m still skeptical on how much it can help me in the long run
It won't. The only reason people have a hard-on for switching from Windows to Linux is because Windows 11 is a mess, it's current direction is a mess and people want off of it, but the only direct alternative is Linux. That's basically your only concern about having to switch to Linux. Do you actually want to make the switch? Or are you pressured by the current state of Windows?

If it's the latter, Linux is not some magical OS that's superior in every way to everything else. If you believe that, you've bought into what the Linux cultists spew. People who give zero shits about your end user experience, what you do with your computer and what you want to do on your computer. They only care about whether or not you use Linux. If you don't, you have to use it now and they'll go above and beyond to convince you to make the switch, but the more your Windows use cases are incompatible with Linux, the more they'll start to try and convince you to go through fifteen steps to do something that just works under Windows and make it seem like a good thing. They will also do a rudimentary search on AlternativeTo to find something that kinda sorta fits the description of what it is that you're using on Windows but can't on Linux and try to push it as "the same if not better" even though if you used it for five minutes you'd be able to tell it's not even a candidate for an alternative. They don't use what you use, they don't know what it is that you want, but will confidently say that you can totally make the switch and you won't notice it even if that's not the case.

A normal person would just tell you that you'd be better off with Windows since what you want to do would be more hassle on Linux than it's worth. A cultist, AKA a mentally ill person that treats their OS as a religion and not as a tool will never admit to any faults or shortcomings of Linux. If you spot a cultist, ignore their "advice" and try to look for someone that's actually objective about Linux, someone that had on-hands experience with it and isn't afraid to call it shit when it clearly is shit.

So, depending on what it is that you're doing on Windows:

The absolute basics: web browsing, saving files, playing local media, doing basic office work. Linux Mint will be a better experience than Windows and you won't have to touch the command line, it's the distro for most.

Vidya: for the most part it's now a "just works" situation thanks to Valve making a ton of effort for the sake of being able to sell their own products without being reliant on Microsoft.
-If you only play Steam games, perfect, plug and play.
-Multiplayer with anticheat: forget it, Windows only.
-Older games you install raw: you'll either have a premade community package to make it seamless or you'll have to tinker to get it running.

Media creation uses: this is where you'll have to make sacrifices.
-Adobe suite doesn't work on Linux but it's the golden standard. You'll have to find alternatives, but frankly, you should even if you're under Windows and you pirate that shit, just so that you don't get locked into their ecosystem.
-There is a solid free alternative for Premiere and After Effects, which is DaVinci Resolve. Runs on Windows, Linux and macOS.
-Photoshop has no good alternative, it's either PhotoPea that's online only, or Affinity Photo that's Windows only but with the ability to tinker around and run under Linux.
-Out of the FOSS stuff, Krita is decent if you're a digital artist.
-Forget about using GIMP for anything that's not "image manipulation" as the name says, it's a technical program, not a creative one. Anyone suggesting it as a serious alternative to Photoshop is an aforementioned cultist.
-Vector graphics and CAD software: Inkscape and FreeCAD are both enthusiast toys like GIMP and not serious work software. Though if you were doing light vector/CAD work on Windows you probably already used these two. But if you do it professionally then you're stuck on Windows.
-3D graphics: Blender got a metric fuckton of funding from absolutely every major company so it's the most mature piece of FOSS around and there's no point in being a slave to Autodesk's antiquated garbage.

Very purpose specific software that doesn't even have Windows alternatives: it's a 50/50. Maybe it's a file manager that you're really fond of but all the Linux alternatives are half-assed imitations of it and not real alternatives, or maybe it's some program from the 90's or 2000's for doing something very specific. Might run under Wine just fine or it might be so specific that it won't work at all.

Needless to say, it's not a 1:1 alternative, never was and never will be, no matter how much the cultists will try to convince you that it is. The more specific your needs get, the more you'll have to mess with the command line, the more you'll have to understand how the guts of Linux work, and the more you'll have to bumblefuck around to get shit working.

Though if your needs aren't that in-depth then Mint should suffice. It's very handholdy, just works, install and use distro. Which is not a bad thing, quite the contrary. You want to spend more time using your computer than setting it up, it's the main drive behind people wanting to switch to Linux because Windows is so shit nowadays you need to do voodoo magic to make it usable. If anyone scoffs at you for using a user friendly distro like Mint, feel free to tell them to eat shit since that's the only good response.

Don't listen to people suggesting Arch and Gentoo, those are for Dunning-Kruger douchebags with no personality where they think wasting time on fucking around with a command line to do what Mint does OOTB makes them cool, which is a good chunk of the Linux community unfortunately. They are not beginner friendly distros and are targeting enthusiasts that like to do more in-depth Linux tinkering, something that practically no one who is looking to move from Windows to Linux is interested in. They're interested in Windows but Linux, where Mint is the best choice.

If someone recommends Manjaro, don't buy into it. Manjaro is based on Arch, and Arch isn't meant to be a beginner friendly distro, so by it's nature Manjaro has too many issues for it to be a beginner friendly distro.
Mint is way more bulletproof as it's based on Ubuntu, which in turn is based on Debian. This lineage is more tried and true. Ubuntu itself is dogshit, but Mint removes everything bad about it and makes it better.
Don't install raw Debian either, it has a nice GUI installer and it's easy to get it going, but it has badly outdated packages by design and you will be more reliant on the command line as it does less for you OOTB.

MX Linux is another one of those recommendations that I also would advise avoiding as it's one of those distros that doesn't use systemd. systemd is a very controversial project in the Linux community that serves as a core component of the OS, but everything uses systemd, so it's best to use systemd so that you won't run into an issue that throws you into a loop because something wanted systemd, you didn't have it so your first experience with Linux was something not working because of Linux. Avoid that hassle on your first contact, go with Mint.

Very important: just because a distro is beginner friendly doesn't mean it takes control away from you. What it means is that it comes preinstalled and preconfigured in such a way that you, as the average user, won't have to touch the command line to do 99.9% of what it is that you want to do. But make no mistake, you can still fuck around in Mint as you can in any other distro. There are also those atomic distros like Bazzite that don't let you fuck around with the core OS but Mint is not one of them. Mint is more traditional and it's a good starting step.


tl;dr: just install Mint in a VM, ideally Hyper-V so that it runs smoothly. Not Ubuntu, not Debian, not MX Linux, not LMDE, not Manjaro. Plain old Linux Mint with Cinnamon, that's what you want for your first experience. Don't listen to any other suggestions if you've never had any Linux experience and you're only looking to escape Windows. Fuck around in it. See what stuff you do on Windows you can do on Mint, and if you can't, see if there's a way to do it easily. If you massively fuck it up, no biggie, it's a VM so it's like clearing a mine instead of stepping on it, learn from your mistakes, reinstall and keep learning.

Art and audio, possibly video editing too
Though now that you've specified it, then to wrap back to what I was saying: it is possible, but you will have to retrain yourself to use a different software suite. The good news is that all the alternatives worth a shit you can run under Windows, so you can first readjust to the new workflow, and then decide to make the full switch to Linux once you decide that yes, you can make the switch and it can be painless for you.

It's basically what James Lee went through and talked about in this video.
You will have to change your habits and break up with Adobe. That'll be your first step to breaking up with Windows.
 
The only reason people have a hard-on for switching from Windows to Linux
Or they care about foss even a little. Moving from windows and mac. Even if you aren't cutting out every bit of proprietary software. Is a lot better for data privacy than any of the proprietary operating systems. I would even trust Ubuntu more with my data than Microsoft.
 
Or they care about foss even a little
I care about FOSS even a little and whenever I look for software, I first look at FOSS options. I already use Betterbird, qBittorrent, Syncthing, KeePassXC and KDE Connect even though there are proprietary alternatives to them. The reason why I use them is because they're good pieces of software that are FOSS. Yet I still use it all under Windows, and I use FOSS that is Windows only, like Rainmeter, ShareX, System Informer, Notepad++ and AutoHotkey.

I also tried to look for cross platform FOSS alternatives for other proprietary software, only to find out that it's complete and utter dogshit that's inferior in every way, and the only reason I'd be forcing myself to use it is because it's FOSS. Except I'm not an ideologue first, so I don't put myself up to it, nor will I tell someone who has no idea about FOSS or Linux to go with FOSS no matter what because I had enough personal experiences with FOSS to know that is the surefire way to make people hate it. By telling the newbies all the shortcomings of FOSS and Linux instead of selling them lies about how perfect it is, you'll have a way better chance of them accepting Linux and moving to it instead of getting burned and staying on Windows.

But going back to what I was talking about, yes, people who want to switch to Linux don't do it because they want to. They were perfectly fine with Windows until it became unbearable for them to use, which led to the reaction of "I need to get off of Windows fast". That's the main drive behind people wanting to switch to Linux and asking how to do it while having zero idea about Linux. If you've read harakirikun's post and came to conclusion that he's looking to switch to Linux because he's actually interested in FOSS and listened to even a minute of Stallman's seminars on FOSS, then I'm afraid you need to go outside a bit more to realize that you're not everyone.
 
I care about FOSS even a little and whenever I look for software, I first look at FOSS options. I already use Betterbird, qBittorrent, Syncthing, KeePassXC and KDE Connect even though there are proprietary alternatives to them. The reason why I use them is because they're good pieces of software that are FOSS. Yet I still use it all under Windows, and I use FOSS that is Windows only, like Rainmeter, ShareX, System Informer, Notepad++ and AutoHotkey.

I also tried to look for cross platform FOSS alternatives for other proprietary software, only to find out that it's complete and utter dogshit that's inferior in every way, and the only reason I'd be forcing myself to use it is because it's FOSS. Except I'm not an ideologue first, so I don't put myself up to it, nor will I tell someone who has no idea about FOSS or Linux to go with FOSS no matter what because I had enough personal experiences with FOSS to know that is the surefire way to make people hate it. By telling the newbies all the shortcomings of FOSS and Linux instead of selling them lies about how perfect it is, you'll have a way better chance of them accepting Linux and moving to it instead of getting burned and staying on Windows.

But going back to what I was talking about, yes, people who want to switch to Linux don't do it because they want to. They were perfectly fine with Windows until it became unbearable for them to use, which led to the reaction of "I need to get off of Windows fast". That's the main drive behind people wanting to switch to Linux and asking how to do it while having zero idea about Linux. If you've read harakirikun's post and came to conclusion that he's looking to switch to Linux because he's actually interested in FOSS and listened to even a minute of Stallman's seminars on FOSS, then I'm afraid you need to go outside a bit more to realize that you're not everyone.
It was 4 sentences. And you wrote a wall of text, seemingly without making it past the first one. Because In the second I said, even if you aren't completely cutting out proprietary software.

Honestly I love the Linux thread. Nothing as fun as pissing off other Linux users for no reason.
 
Art and audio, possibly video editing too

I do this type of productivity. Just saying that so you're aware it's doable on Linux.

What are your current daily use programs for these tasks?
Do you know if the hardware you use has a windows TPM?
Do you want the OS/Software to install with a GUI or are you willing to try something a little more difficult?
 
Honestly I love the Linux thread. Nothing as fun as pissing off other Linux users for no reason.
Linux users arguing over the most useless things, like which init system is the best (its systemd), which Desktop is the best (its KDE), or whether X or Wayland is better (both suck donkey shit).
 
I do this type of productivity. Just saying that so you're aware it's doable on Linux.

What are your current daily use programs for these tasks?
Do you know if the hardware you use has a windows TPM?
Do you want the OS/Software to install with a GUI or are you willing to try something a little more difficult?
I typically use GIMP (the art software), Audacity and DaVinci resolve. I know these can run on Linux. And yeah, I’ll see how it’ll work out if I try something harder
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harry Kuntz
I typically use GIMP (the art software), Audacity and DaVinci resolve. I know these can run on Linux. And yeah, I’ll see how it’ll work out if I try something harder
If you have a spare machine lying around, I would recommend installing Linux on it and use it like your main workstation (same apps etc), treat it as a playground where you can get used to how it functions.
If not, then you can always play around with it in a VM. Same deal as I said above with the real machine one.
Whatever you do, don't try and use Wine or Virtual Machines to run Windows stuff. You will only give yourself an extreme amount of pain and suffering.
Try using native apps, or native alternatives for stuff not available on Linux. A lot of it does have feature parity to Windows stuff, but is usually quite different. Its not perfect, and you do sometimes hit a roadblock where Linux alternatives are shit. This point isn't any different then if you were going to switch to Mac OS for example.
The best distro for you is Mint, please ignore any other suggestions people may give you until you get at least used to Linux and its quirks a bit.
 
I typically use GIMP (the art software), Audacity and DaVinci resolve. I know these can run on Linux. And yeah, I’ll see how it’ll work out if I try something harder
you can always hook up and old drive and install it there, some distros even have a live cd version (although that might not necessarily be a 1:1 comparison to how it would work on bare metal). extra drive has the advantage that windows doesn't mess with it.

personally like opensuse, but mint is among the usual recommendations.
 
ishygddt.webp>using a de
 
openrc, and xfce or kys.
OpenRC is only used in the most turbo autistic distros imaginable (Alpine and Gentoo) otherwise it is quite nice.
Xfce is quite comfy too. Although until it gets Wayland support I probably won't use it as my main desktop. I've also gotten too used to the KDE apps, and Qt apps under GTK environments are always shit. Inverse is not true.
Shoutouts to Framework for only giving you HiDPI displays which don't work very well under X.
>using a de
Imagine being so autistic you cannot wrap your head around the concept of windows behind other ones, and need to tile them to see them all the time.
 
Back