The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
For me. I do generally have a better time with openresolv. But I hate dealing with dns at all. I swear half the time when I have issues with internet, it comes down to some dns thing. I can't think of anyone, using any OS, doing anything that likes dealing with dns though.

Also. I do really recommend mullvad, or at least something that works through wireguard if not. You might be able to set that up with your current VPN.

I'm changing ISPs, bought a Flint 2 (OSS modem router, with native VPN functionality for OVPN and WG), and using the paid version of ProtonVPN for the WG support, p2p servers, VPN relay servers, and "stealth mode" whatever the fuck that is. It's certainly more feature-rich than ExpressVPN. If all else fails I'll either go mullvad (really don't want to) or private via my homelab.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wDRCQfV-Hp0
Funny how things work out. This happens to be on topic. Also. Luke Smith finally uploaded a video again.
Going off the thumbnail alone, you would never have to ask and he'd never have to tell you that he uses Linux.
I'm changing ISPs, bought a Flint 2 (OSS modem router, with native VPN functionality for OVPN and WG), and using the paid version of ProtonVPN for the WG support, p2p servers, VPN relay servers, and "stealth mode" whatever the fuck that is. It's certainly more feature-rich than ExpressVPN. If all else fails I'll either go mullvad (really don't want to) or private via my homelab.
Nowadays there's no good reason for a VPN not to let you configure OpenVPN or Wireguard yourself to use them. If they don't support that then they're not worth using.
 
Getting a new (to me) gaming PC tomorrow! Very excited. Not sure what distro to install on it. I'm kinda dreading it to be honest. I have classes and work and shit to do, and I wish I had more time to set it up. I haven't really distro hopped in years, my laptop is running a 4 y/o install of Fedora + AwesomeWM, and I use a steamdeck for gaming. I guess now is as good a time as any to finally give a new distro, wayland, and hyprland a try. I'm thinking something Arch or Fedora based. Any last minute suggestions before I spend my weekend screaming at my terminal emulator?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wDRCQfV-Hp0
Funny how things work out. This happens to be on topic. Also. Luke Smith finally uploaded a video again.
The real question is "what does the Luke Smith think about Pewdiepie switching to Arch?"

@Nothing Is Written (tagging bc I cant quote in an edit) I've been eyeballing their travel routers for a while now, but I see they just released a new one that has a touch screen. That's awesome how did they make me excited over a damn router? I run openWRT on my current home router and I'm very pleased with it.
1747276221159.webp
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking something Arch or Fedora based.

EndeavourOS (the Linux Mint of Arch-based distros). I've never used Fedora so I can't help you there.

I've been eyeballing their travel routers for a while now, but I see they just released a new one that has a touch screen. That's awesome how did they make me excited over a damn router? I run openWRT on my current home router and I'm very pleased with it.

Yeah they've just only recently popped up on the radar for me - surprised I've never heard of them. Apparently my Flint 2 can act as a travel router as well which is neat.
 
I'm thinking something Arch or Fedora based. Any last minute suggestions before I spend my weekend screaming at my terminal emulator?
If you have to go for best gaymin compatability and dont care about selling your soul Ubuntu. If not a retard run linux of your choice (Mine's Gentoo) with wangblows in a VM with GPU and I/O passthrough.

If using Nivdia graphics card suggest checking distro libc and kernel versions, because nividia drivers only work with certain versions of libc/kernels.
 
If you have to go for best gaymin compatability and dont care about selling your soul Ubuntu. If not a retard run linux of your choice (Mine's Gentoo) with wangblows in a VM with GPU and I/O passthrough.

If using Nivdia graphics card suggest checking distro libc and kernel versions, because nividia drivers only work with certain versions of libc/kernels.

How's Garuda and POP!_OS going these days? Still meme distros?
 
How's Garuda and POP!_OS going these days? Still meme distros?
Pop OS is only really good if you want cosmic-de, outside of that just use mint and its the same exact thing.

Garuda has always and will continue to be a meme Pajeet distro. It even got BTFOed out of its "Gamer" status by CachyOS. It literally has nothing going for it.
 
Anyone tried installing DaVinci Resolve w/ MakeResolveDeb here before?
The install works fine, right up until I try launching the application. For some reason it just doesn't want to run unless I run it with sudo in the terminal. otherwise running without it returns a segmentation fault.
 
Anyone tried installing DaVinci Resolve w/ MakeResolveDeb here before?
The install works fine, right up until I try launching the application. For some reason it just doesn't want to run unless I run it with sudo in the terminal. otherwise running without it returns a segmentation fault.
Try running it under strace and compare as root and non-root?
 
FOSS & WINE related, it seems like ReactOS project has finally started to move again. From the gallery it looks like someone actually got a recentish non-FOSS game like Paper's Please to run on it last year. And a build from March by a dev on the right looks very different to where the system was just a few years ago:

1747316129900.webp 1747316327898.webp

Dunno if anyone here has messed with it recently, I assume it's still trash. It’s obviously still in alpha and unusable outside of novelty, but I am still sort of tempted to try to mess around with it again in a VM. Last time I did was half a decade ago and I couldn’t even get it to boot properly. I've checked in on the project periodically both before & since then and development has always been glacially slow, so if it is more energetic and it does seem to be then I also wonder what changed that. I suspect maybe it's the strides with WINE lately and them backporting stuff from the project?
 
I'm thinking something Arch or Fedora based. Any last minute suggestions before I spend my weekend screaming at my terminal emulator?

Fedora >>> Arch in this scenario. By leaps and bounds, if I may be so bold.

Here’s how I’m interpreting your post: you want the latest and greatest software, some degree of chaos to fuck around with, and you’re not necessarily too concerned about distinction between fixed and rolling releases.

Arch is many things, I’ve used it before, but it’s a massive ball ache to get up and running. Even with the reintroduction of archinstall, you still need to do the work to get X11, a desktop environment, Firefox, and insert applications here up and running. That’s not even getting into its rolling release nature. Breakages are rare, but they do happen and it’s really easy to get too comfortable, pacman -Syu, and suddenly you’re at a text prompt when rebooting because you didn’t check the Arch home page for news, didn’t skulk the forums for signs of trouble, and all that painfully boring but still necessary stuff.

Fedora, on the other hand, is about as close as you can reasonably get to rolling while still maintaining a fixed release cycle. New releases come out every 6 months, you’re normally able to stick around on a specific release for roughly a year before you must upgrade, and the upgrade process is surprisingly easy. You’re dropped into GNOME, KDE, or any of the other spin environments like Xfce, Cinnamon, etc, you have a modest amount of pre-installed software at your disposal, and away you go.

Unlike Arch, the Red Hat/Fedora ecosystem requires you to enable extra repositories for all the fun (re: proprietary or otherwise open-source but still problematic to redistribute by default) stuff, but Arch is a much smaller project with nowhere near as many eyes on it as the Fedora/Red Hat ecosystem. It doesn’t quite do everything for you out of the box like Baby’s First Linux™️ (ie Ubuntu, Mint, and derivatives), but you’re about 80% of the way there post-install, and all you need to do is put in just a touch more legwork.

Additional context: Since the Fedora Project is stewarded by Red Hat, do bear in mind that Fedora’s priorities tend to lean toward enterprise features and constant innovation for innovation’s sake. Wayland tends to be default on the GNOME/KDE editions and has been for years, systemd was implemented in Fedora first before radiating outward to other distributions in the early 2010s, and they’ve done tons of other shit before all of that. Back when Java was still proprietary and OpenJDK/OpenJRE didn’t exist yet, Fedora pioneered GCJ (GNU Compiler for Java) so that Linux users could technically make use of Java in some small fashion.
 
I'm changing ISPs, bought a Flint 2 (OSS modem router, with native VPN functionality for OVPN and WG), and using the paid version of ProtonVPN for the WG support, p2p servers, VPN relay servers, and "stealth mode" whatever the fuck that is. It's certainly more feature-rich than ExpressVPN. If all else fails I'll either go mullvad (really don't want to) or private via my homelab.
If it works with wireguard it should be fine.

Wish I knew more about routers and that kind of thing. Overall I keep my setup pretty simple, at least when it comes to that kind of thing.

Arch is many things, I’ve used it before, but it’s a massive ball ache to get up and running. Even with the reintroduction of archinstal
Do you? It lets you pick in the arch install what desktop or window manager you want to use, and all the extra software you want installed. Like I used to pick network manager to use for my network, so I wouldn't have to mess around with getting that set up after an install.
 
Do you? It lets you pick in the arch install what desktop or window manager you want to use, and all the extra software you want installed. Like I used to pick network manager to use for my network, so I wouldn't have to mess around with getting that set up after an install.

Oh wow, I was thinking it was still an ncurses-based text installer that lets you install the “base” system, maybe the updates to the base while you’re connected to the network, and then you still had to build your way up to X11. The last time I used Arch Linux for any stretch of time was 2013-2014. Right around when systemd replaced the old BSD init scripts and when they nixed archinstall in favour of the Arch Install Scripts. Thanks for the heads-up.
 
Here’s how I’m interpreting your post: you want the latest and greatest software, some degree of chaos to fuck around with, and you’re not necessarily too concerned about distinction between fixed and rolling releases.
Sounds about right. The only thing I miss about Arch is the AUR. 3rd party repos + COPR is ok but slow and smaller, and I'm not a huge fan of playing with packages through 10 different package managers (shoutout to topgrade). I kinda want to start building my own packages, anyone have any experience with Fedora's COPR vs openSUSE's Open Build Service?
 
Oh wow, I was thinking it was still an ncurses-based text installer that lets you install the “base” system, maybe the updates to the base while you’re connected to the network, and then you still had to build your way up to X11. The last time I used Arch Linux for any stretch of time was 2013-2014. Right around when systemd replaced the old BSD init scripts and when they nixed archinstall in favour of the Arch Install Scripts. Thanks for the heads-up.
It is still a tui. But it does actually do a lot of the work for you. I actually do like the current arch install. If you are just wanting to get an arch system set up really quick to mess around with something. You can just pick a few options and basically in the time it takes to download the packages. You have a minimal system set up for you, to do whatever you want with it.

When I'm actually planning to keep an arch install. I will actually go through and do the whole thing manually because it's still easy for me to do it pretty quickly and I get more control. But archinstall gets you to a similar place with basically no effort. Just a bit less choice.
 
It is still a tui. But it does actually do a lot of the work for you. I actually do like the current arch install. If you are just wanting to get an arch system set up really quick to mess around with something. You can just pick a few options and basically in the time it takes to download the packages. You have a minimal system set up for you, to do whatever you want with it.
I haven't been able to use it yet because I've not had any excuse to reinstall. Seems like it makes enabling stuff like multilib, UKI and nvidia drivers very trivial to do before actually rebooting into the system and those were the things I disliked the most out of my manual installs. Not difficult, just annoying to have to do during the install or afterwards if forgotten. Next time I reinstall Arch on my desktop I am thinking of just manually setting up the partitions, then 'archinstall', choose a headless system w/ greeter, reboot and then build up my system from there. I can't see what else I personally would need to do manually that I can't do with the script.

I would still finish the install manually though, because I think if you choose the DEs it will pull in the meta packages which often includes stuff you don't want or make it tedious to remove packages that are part of the meta package set ala Discover in plasma-meta.
 
It even got BTFOed out of its "Gamer" status by Cachy

Isn't Cachy RedHat forked? I'd rather discover I was born female than run a RedHat distro.

@Akerman regarding partitioning - I only selected one SSD as the root and boot drive using btrfs, and didn't touch the others during install (I think I have ~4 others still formatted as either NTFS or exFAT from my previous W11 system. What's the best way to reformat them and use them in Arch, and would they be used as storage only, or can I specify certain binaries like Steam to be executed and run from them? I also heard you can combine them as a single "drive" in theory but I'm unsure how that would function in practise.

Also why does everyone hate systemd? Challenge mode: don't bring up philosophical differences between UNIX and Linux etc., I'm speaking about functionality.
 
Last edited:
If you haven't already tried that maybe that might help?
I suppose the quick way to test would be to create a new profile and see if the problem persists.
The unexplained writing BS is even if I use another version of Firefox so I don't think it's a profile thing. And the writing goes on even if I'm offline or browser is idle. Whatever it's writing it doesn't change the available space left on the drive, but what the hell is FF constantly writing and writing? And FF writes ~40x more than it reads.

I also tried those about:config tweaks which were suggested, but there is still that endless writing. Maybe I have to restart for that?

Oh yeah and the writing is worst when playing YT vid, less intense with visiting a new site, and least intense if just idling offline.

And why is whatever it is so huge in size? If that is some session thing, shouldn't it just be kilobytes at most because it's URLs? But no, it's like a gigabyte a day or so.

[wallpaper]
oh hey it's that Mita 🤔
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom