- Joined
- Apr 11, 2023
OpenMandriva has landed an xlibre package, apparently? Any OpenMandriva stans in here?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really like OpenMandriva and use it on a few machines (still committed to Gentoo for my main machine), but its only in the Cooker branch for now which is for developers.OpenMandriva has landed an xlibre package, apparently? Any OpenMandriva stans in here?
Not used it for years, but I remember it being pretty solid.
OpenMandriva has landed an xlibre package, apparently? Any OpenMandriva stans in here?
Yes, you can do that fine, just make sure you avoid selecting the desktop profile in eselect to avoid the most normiefied setup. You could use "default/linux/amd64/23.0/split-usr/no-multilib/hardened" if you know what you're doing for example.Would it be more viable to try and run Gentoo with extremely restrictive USE flags that completely disable anything and everything systemd? OpenRC fetches like half the systemd tree for dependency resolution straight up, but perhaps through restricting it significantly, you can straight up prevent it from pulling them back in once purged? Or just do
``` USE ="-systemd -dbus -elogind -tmpfiles -ukify -systemd-boot -sysusers" emerge world ```
~ # equery w openrc
/var/db/repos/gentoo/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-0.62.3.ebuild
COMMON_DEPEND="
sys-libs/libcap
sys-process/psmisc
pam? ( sys-libs/pam )
audit? ( sys-process/audit )
selinux? (
sys-apps/policycoreutils
>=sys-libs/libselinux-2.6
)"
DEPEND="${COMMON_DEPEND}
virtual/os-headers"
RDEPEND="${COMMON_DEPEND}
bash? ( app-shells/bash )
sysv-utils? (
!sys-apps/systemd[sysv-utils(-)]
!sys-apps/sysvinit
)
!sysv-utils? (
sysvinit? ( >=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r6[selinux?] )
s6? ( sys-apps/s6-linux-init[sysv-utils(-)] )
)
virtual/tmpfiles
selinux? (
>=sec-policy/selinux-base-policy-2.20170204-r4
>=sec-policy/selinux-openrc-2.20170204-r4
)
"
virtual/tmpfiles
~ # equery g virtual/tmpfiles
* Searching for tmpfiles in virtual ...
* dependency graph for virtual/tmpfiles-0-r5
`-- virtual/tmpfiles-0-r5 amd64
`-- sys-apps/systemd-9999 (sys-apps/systemd) M[package.mask]
`-- sys-apps/systemd-utils-255.18 (sys-apps/systemd-utils) amd64 [tmpfiles]
[ virtual/tmpfiles-0-r5 stats: packages (3), max depth (1) ]
# /etc/portage/profile/package.provided/gentoo
virtual/tmpfiles-9999
Interesting. I was pretty dead set on ditching the 'too but you are making me reconsider. Might even be possible to rip Obarun's 66/s6 service system style to handle what tmpfiles does. The Obarun head (only?) dev does seem genuinely dedicated to rebuking systemd, but one man shows are always kinda iffy. Then again Artix's dev team is also pretty small, but the bus factor argument remains.
Oh wow it's moving faster then I anticipatedXlibre appears to be in the AUR now
no-multilib 4 lyfeYou could use "default/linux/amd64/23.0/split-usr/no-multilib/hardened
I don't really know about mint specifically but I feel like they aren't particularly known for being fast to adopt anything. A lot like debian. But who knows.Would Linux Mint Ubuntu Edition not have Xlibre when LMDE gets it, if the project gets that far?
Why would LMDE get it? Linux Mint in general wouldn't touch Xlibre with a ten foot pool since the contributor had a sperg out in the Readme. 1 way ticket to being excommunicated by every other tranny infested area in linux. At best you'll get a ppa since i dont believe cinnamon itself has to be compiled for xlibre.Would Linux Mint Ubuntu Edition not have Xlibre when LMDE gets it, if the project gets that far?
All of the commit are already there, so it going to have a stable release after bug testing probably by the end of next week minimum, a month max.Oh wow it's moving faster then I anticipated
There's some functionality that isn't just deleting files. The difficulty is parsing the fucky systemd syntax, some of the entries I have:Interesting. I was pretty dead set on ditching the 'too but you are making me reconsider. Might even be possible to rip Obarun's 66/s6 service system style to handle what tmpfiles does. The Obarun head (only?) dev does seem genuinely dedicated to rebuking systemd, but one man shows are always kinda iffy. Then again Artix's dev team is also pretty small, but the bus factor argument remains.
Can you think of any tmpfiles alternatives? Short of writing a bespoke script I can't really see anything that measures up. Maybe Antix's way of handling it through a very basic cron job for cleanup a la
find /tmp -type f -mtime +1 -delete
d /var/log/audit 0700 root root
d /var/log/clamav 0770 clamav clamav
#!/sbin/openrc-run
depend() {
need localmount
}
create_d(){
local mode=$1
local uid=$2
local gid=$3
local path="$4"
/bin/mkdir "$path" -m "$mode" || eerror "Failed to create $path"
/bin/chown "$uid:$gid" "$path"
}
start() {
ebegin "Creating tmpfiles"
create_d 700 root root /var/log/audit
create_d 770 root root /var/log/clamav
eend $?
}
Doubt it. Canonical are continuing to go full retard, so they'd have to do it all themselves.Would Linux Mint Ubuntu Edition not have Xlibre when LMDE gets it, if the project gets that far?
Certainly not immediately, but it's a good time to be window shopping for distros.With the whole X11/Wayland mess happening right now, do I have to ditch Linux Mint? Its currently at LM21.
Yeah. The project kind of fucked adoption mentioning anything outside of technical details in the very beginning.Why would LMDE get it? Linux Mint in general wouldn't touch Xlibre with a ten foot pool since the contributor had a sperg out in the Readme. 1 way ticket to being excommunicated by every other tranny infested area in linux. At best you'll get a ppa since i dont believe cinnamon itself has to be compiled for xlibre.
All of the commit are already there, so it going to have a stable release after bug testing probably by the end of next week minimum, a month max.

yes.With the whole X11/Wayland mess happening right now, do I have to ditch Linux Mint? Its currently at LM21.
Thanks. I just want a simple OS for my personal desktop. I'm not coming back to Windows (and if I have to, it will be a debloated Win10 LTSC).Certainly not immediately, but it's a good time to be window shopping for distros.
Fedora is still good, I think your issues 100% come from Gnome.What the fuck happened to Fedora?
Yeah, this was my first thought. Got the KDE spin and gave it a try, my network was still limited to about a quarter of its usual. I've never seen that kind of weirdness before.Fedora is still good, I think your issues 100% come from Gnome.
With Fedora 42 the KDE version has been promoted to a proper version as well, so even less reason to use Gnome (not like its used by anyone but masochists anyways).
Try a proper desktop like KDE or Xfce and see if your experience is different.
This project is hilarious, I found this issue (link/archive). GitHub has a stupid way of loading archives so all of the comments aren't there.Guy seems like a complete schizoposter moron, has been known to submit shitty patches which break stuff in the past, and...
https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/pull/56
I don't hold high hopes for this fork of Xorg but we shall see how it turns out.