The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Mint has Driver Manager, but how old is your kernal? When I installed Mint it came with all the drivers I needed.
I did some fuckery when installing my W10 LTSC dualboot, and I wiped a bunch of drivers including the network one. I downloaded all of them again from a USB after asking in the Windows thread but Mint doesn't have the network driver, so I can't use Driver Manager.
 
I used ranger before lf, so I get it, but it really helped me out a lot. It helps my setup is simple enough where mpv, kakoune, and aliases open 99.9% of my files. Lf just acts as a faster front end for coreutils really.
The one thing that slightly annoys me about ranger is that I can't get it to recognize .pdf.xz extensions. All my archived PDFs are compressed to save a little extra space. For now I have to enter r then atril. (Atril handles decompression on its own.)
 
The one thing that slightly annoys me about ranger is that I can't get it to recognize .pdf.xz extensions. All my archived PDFs are compressed to save a little extra space. For now I have to enter r then atril. (Atril handles decompression on its own.)
mpv can open archives, and I use it to open .cbz and .cbr files for reading manga as images. I also know there is a lua script, for mpv, that uses ImageMagick to convert pdfs to readable images too.
 
mpv can open archives, and I use it to open .cbz and .cbr files for reading manga as images. I also know there is a lua script, for mpv, that uses ImageMagick to convert pdfs to readable images too.
I'd rather just have the ability to load my PDFs in a document viewer that can automagically handle the .xz compression
 
ranger can show two panes like Midnight Commander (or even more than two) but you're not forced into it which can certainly be useful for long-ass filenames
You can switch just about any OFM into a vertical split, in mc it's Alt+Comma. Granted, TUI OFM's are rather limited when Total Commander has shown what can be done with a GUI. Tabs, using the target panel as a viewer, and many more features that everyone's been copying in software like Double Commander. A TUI file manager is only good when doing terminal work, not for every day work.
 
A TUI file manager is only good when doing terminal work, not for every day work.
I haven't needed to use a TUI file manager on a remote terminal session yet but am learning how to use ranger on the off-chance I won't be able to use SSH with Thunar or some other graphical file manager for whatever odd reason
 
I haven't needed to use a TUI file manager on a remote terminal session yet but am learning how to use ranger on the off-chance I won't be able to use SSH with Thunar or some other graphical file manager for whatever odd reason
IMO learning mc is a better idea since it's one of those unspoken standards with decades of legacy like vim that are used everywhere. Also, a big advantage of mc over ranger is that it's a CLI shell much like Norton Commander was. Meaning that you are always in the command line when using your file manager. At any time you can type and run a command, and if you hit Ctrl+O you hide the panels and see the terminal. I'm not sure ranger even has a command line passthrough like vim does.
 
I haven't needed to use a TUI file manager on a remote terminal session yet but am learning how to use ranger on the off-chance I won't be able to use SSH with Thunar or some other graphical file manager for whatever odd reason
I don't find myself using graphical file managers to do file management on remote machines but at that point I would expect you could use sshfs and then use any file manager normally or use sftp.
Not directly related but since you're exploring emacs, you may be interested in using TRAMP to edit remote files with some hassle removed. https://www.gnu.org/software/tramp/

I'm not sure ranger even has a command line passthrough like vim does.
In lf you can do it like vim. :!command args
edit: I got mixed up and thought it worked in ranger but should have tested it before saying anything. I default to ranger normally but lf may be worth exploring, I barely use these file managers though.
shell command args and !command args are the ranger equivalent.
 
Last edited:
Someone pointed me at Superfile which looks interesting but i don't know if it works over ssh as it puts images in the terminal
kitty's graphics protocol works over SSH (but tmux gets in the way):
Kind of a huge price to pay for a gimmick IMO
IMO learning mc is a better idea since it's one of those unspoken standards with decades of legacy like vim that are used everywhere.
God forbid I end up in an environment where I can't at least have small, well-known terminal programs installed by someone else
Also, a big advantage of mc over ranger is that it's a CLI shell much like Norton Commander was. Meaning that you are always in the command line when using your file manager. At any time you can type and run a command, and if you hit Ctrl+O you hide the panels and see the terminal. I'm not sure ranger even has a command line passthrough like vim does.
S drops into whatever shell you have in /etc/passwd. It's not exactly the same but it's adequate for me.
Not directly related but since you're exploring emacs, you may be interested in using TRAMP to edit remote files with some hassle removed. https://www.gnu.org/software/tramp/
Yes I have heard about TRAMP and how it's a highlight of Emacs like Org-Mode and Magit
 
I thought that was my mistake as well, so i double checked. I had disabled legacy boot and even when I re-enabled it my boot media bitched at me about not launching as UEFI. Also, Artix is the first time I've ever not had ISO mode work for writing an image. Rufus has to do it in dd for it to partition the USB correctly 🤔


Would you check if your drives are GPT just for the sake of my curiosity?
Yep, GPT. Might be a weird quirk with how rufus flashes the image? All my installation media has been created with dd in linux.

If you use anything but mc you're a queer.
>not emacs
Imagine not having your os be a bootloader for the TRVE CLI experience. Shiggy diggy my niggy
 
Kitty always felt slower to me than every other Terminal Emulator I have used, even compared to Xfce4-Terminal. I know there's a flag/option that's supposed to fix that but it wasn't consistent at all.
 
I've never cared that much about which terminal emulator I use and never understood why people do.
 
Back
Top Bottom