🐱 The MAP and the MOP, the debate on these groups that seek to normalize pedophilia

CatParty

(Translated)

The cyber police have warned of the risks of abuse against minors online and citizens have managed to lower profiles of people who promote pedophilia, considered a mental disorder


They are associated with a flag to identify themselves, they celebrate one day a year, and affirm that their practices are not an abuse: it is about people who claim to feel sexual and loving attraction to children .

Those who identify with these practices have allegedly constituted a movement under the acronym: MAP (Minor Attracted Persons) or MOP (Movement Pride Pedophile) .

They are people who maintain that their attraction to minors, especially boys and girls at puberty, is not related to sexual abuse and even equates it with a sexual orientation.


In Mexico, the cyber police have warned about the risks that minors are more often exposed to pornographic content because with the “new normal” they spend more time on the Internet, especially to take classes.


Every week , at least 10 reports of profiles, messages or web pages with contents of sexual incidents against minors are received, according to figures from the cyber police. To stop these profiles, the authorities call to denounce and not to share the contents or click on them , according to a statement.

These practices are part of what is known as pedophilia, which is considered a "sexual disorder" by the World Health Organization(WHO). "(Pedophilic disorder) is described as a sustained, focused and intense pattern of sexual arousal, manifested by thoughts, fantasies, intense desires or persistent sexual behaviors that involve prepubescent boys or girls," according to the organization.


Even WHO it includes pedophilia in its International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in force and which come into force in 2022 that status will continue, according to WHO sources quoted by the agency EFE.

The MAP and the MOP seek to have their practices accepted socially and have allegedly asked the WHO to remove pedophilia from that list of mental disorders. However, according to EFE, there is no evidence that a social movement of "people attracted to minors" has asked the WHO to normalize pedophilia .


In recent months, the social network Facebook lowered the profiles of pages that identified with the MAP and the MOP. A group of people signed a petition on the change.org platform to request that social network delete these types of profiles.

“Lately in the social network FACEBOOK there have been several pages» MAP »(Minor-Attracted Person) that is to say pages that are asking for the normalization of PEDOFILIA and clearly we all agree that this movement should NOT have the slightest support for Therefore, we ask that Facebook remove all MAP pages from its platform as they try to normalize pedophilia and pedophilia ”, reads the petition.


The WHO "strictly prohibits sexual activity with children (persons under 18 years of age), regardless of the minimum age of free consent or the age at which the majority is reached in the country in question," the organization states in its code of ethics.

The MAP has a colored flag to identify itself. Blue represents boys, pink represents girls; white indicates that their relationship is not impure and yellow, referring to the fact that they are developing people, according to the NGO Common Cause cited by UNO TV.


However, there are organizations like The Global Prevention Project that cares for people with this disorder, which clarify that MAP is the way in which people attracted to minors are named in the research community.

The NGO told EFE that it is not aware of a MAPmovement asking the WHO to remove pedophilia from its list of mental disorders.


The Global Prevention Project is an organization specialized in preventing child abuse through mental health treatments and psychoeducational assistance to people with sexual behaviors that are illegal but have not reached physical contact.

The organization B4U-ACT, specialized in providing psychological assistance to adults and adolescents attracted by minors, told EFE that "there is not a single MAP movement, but rather many."

In Mexico, complaints about crimes of abuse of minors online can be reported to the Public Prosecutor's Office at this link: https://mpvirtual.fgjcdmx.gob.mx/CiberDenuncia/terminosCondiciones.aspx, where they will follow up and provide the necessary attention.
 
It's no secret that I am a vocal advocate for killing all offending pedophiles and producers of child pornography. I have several personal life reasons that I won't go into here that are behind my hatred of pedos. Of all sex offenders, pedophiles are the ones who are least likely to be rehabilitated and most likely to re-offend once they've served their time in prison. Even pedophiles who were truly remorseful and have undergone chemical or physical castration have gone on to molest children again. We simply cannot allow these monsters in our society.

I say that the laws be changed so that pedophiles who have molested or raped children and the producers of CP be given mandatory execution. They get ONE appeal, and if they aren't able to prove their innocence then as soon as that gavel comes down on their second guilty conviction, they are immediately removed from the court and executed with a .45 to the back of the head. The execution should be either out in the public, or filmed and played on TV as a warning to "virtuous pedophiles" to never cross that line. No endless cycle of appeals while they sit on death row, no burdening the tax payer by paying for them to have three hots, a cot, and medical care for life, no more threat of them being released back into society when they get parole to ruin another child's life. Just immediate removal of a monster from society. They have nothing to offer humanity that is worth keeping them alive.
 
The only downside about anti pedophilia is how the word and concept can be abused for unsavory ends. Think how the word "racist" gets used as a bludgeon these days and you'll get the idea what I mean.

Oh, I agree. I'm talking about where there is actual proof to get a conviction in a court of law. Photos, physical/DNA evidence, caught in the act, etc.
 
What really, truly pisses me off about MAP's and 'virtuous paedophiles' (ffs there is nothing brave and laudable about you, you are fucking nonces) is when they bleat about how they do no harm, they don't personally abuse children, they 'just look'
Well Einstein, to produce the content you 'look' at, real live children ARE being abused- in the grand scheme of things it doesn't much matter who is physically doing the abusing, demand fuels supply and those poor kids are going to be screwed for life (that's if they make it out from the abuse alive in the first place)

I'm not going to be told I'm 'kink-shaming' for saying that if you want to fuck things that can't consent (children or animals) then you are essentially wired up wrong and are a danger to all said categories of life you are attracted to... it's a very short step from wanting to, to actually doing so, at which point there is one punishment/treatment I'd advocate...a bullet is too quick and painless

 
HAH the roman empire thought sex with young boys was the most beautiful kind of love there was, try again.
Official Roman morality did not approve of pederasty. It just, like with Trajan, did not consider it too important; a mix of disapproval and indifference, particularly if the catamite was a slave. Perhaps the ancient Greeks (Gayreeks?), or least the Athenians, but not really Romans.

Concerning the topic generally:

The only semi acceptable nonce is one getting psychiatric treatment and a better moral formation. How can someone consider kiddie fiddling right?
 
Half of the lolcows we discuss only exist because of sexual abuse/trauma early on in life.

To these weirdos, it's an orientation, 'it's just sex.'

A child is not physically, mentally or emotionally equipped to consent to sexual activity, and the repercussions of child abuse reverberate throughout the rest of their adult life, damaging their ability to have meaningful sexual relationships with other people, encouraging addictions, mental health problems, suicide, the list goes on and on. Everyone has met someone abused in childhood, and you know how it plays out. Without powerlevelling, I narrowly avoided some of these individuals in my childhood and even the brief encounter I had has had an impact on me as an adult and on my relationships.

These people are absolutely abhorrent to even try to normalise peodophilia.

However I really wouldn't be surprised if it happens. In less than 100 years, most of the world will be POC and many from Africa, the Middle East etc are very comfortable with the concept of the 'child bride.'

A shameful step back society is even attempting to take. Who let these poisonous sociopaths into academia?

It's well known that peodos are basically impossible to rehabilitate into normal society, and that they are very good at manipulation. The successful ones learn early on to manipulate families, schools, places of work etc so that they can gain access to children. Then they need to repeatedly manipulate the child. They are very good at coming across as empathic, compassionate, kind and charming. They are also excellent at bringing up feelings of pity, shame or guilt in other people - 'oh he's such a nice man, I really think you must be remembering it wrong. He just wouldn't do that.' They are dangerous people who masquerade behind innocent facades.

Look at how Michael Jackson polarised public opinion. A man robbed of a childhood, who adored children and related with them and just wanted to live the childhood he'd never been allowed to have, raping and sexually abusing young boys.
 
Last edited:
I would just like to point out "MAP" or "Minor attracted person" doesn't mean they are a non-offending pedophile. "NoMAP" means they have the attraction and don't act on it. So when they claim "MAP" they are specifically making the distinction in their own pedo dog-whistle acronyms that they ARE offending. Let that bounce around in your head for a bit.
 
I would just like to point out "MAP" or "Minor attracted person" doesn't mean they are a non-offending pedophile. "NoMAP" means they have the attraction and don't act on it. So when they claim "MAP" they are specifically making the distinction in their own pedo dog-whistle acronyms that they ARE offending. Let that bounce around in your head for a bit.

I’d like to point out many don’t see jerking it to kid rape to be offending. Maybe with clown world in full swing we will see peaceful protest for child rapist.
 
MAPs need to be left brain-dead and quadraspazzed on a life-glug.
Yes. If we can't kill them, we need to lock them all up in some capsules like they did in Minority Report with the criminals.

images (3).jpg
 
Yes. If we can't kill them, we need to lock them all up in some capsules like they did in Minority Report with the criminals.

View attachment 1580786

Why waste the money developing that kind of tech, wasting real estate for the buildings to house them, when they offer nothing to society? Better to just fly them all out to the Alaskan tundra by helicopter in the middle of winter and push them out fifty feet up. Leat the bears and wolves take care of the problem. Or, y'know...my earlier solution.
 
ook at how Michael Jackson polarised public opinion. A man robbed of a childhood, who adored children and related with them and just wanted to live the childhood he'd never been allowed to have, raping and sexually abusing young boys.

If MJ ever actually did rape young boys, why did the entire media go after him, even after a jury acquittal, while Roman Polanski is still celebrated by some people in Hollywood? The defense said they've never seen a case like it before, where the prosecution brought out witnesses, and the Defense were charging them since when they dug a bit into their backgrounds, it turned out they were felons. To me that whole thing as an astroturf. Not only does it draw attention away from their own pedophilia, but they take down a positive black role model. It's just like Cosby.

I mean you can go and take a casual browse of things right now that are ignored. Like Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore that run a childrens charity, going to parties with Epstein, Maxwell and Weinstein. You think that will ever be investigated like MJ was? Or even investigated at all? I doubt it.
ashton.jpg
 
It's no secret that I am a vocal advocate for killing all offending pedophiles and producers of child pornography. I have several personal life reasons that I won't go into here that are behind my hatred of pedos. Of all sex offenders, pedophiles are the ones who are least likely to be rehabilitated and most likely to re-offend once they've served their time in prison. Even pedophiles who were truly remorseful and have undergone chemical or physical castration have gone on to molest children again. We simply cannot allow these monsters in our society.

I say that the laws be changed so that pedophiles who have molested or raped children and the producers of CP be given mandatory execution. They get ONE appeal, and if they aren't able to prove their innocence then as soon as that gavel comes down on their second guilty conviction, they are immediately removed from the court and executed with a .45 to the back of the head. The execution should be either out in the public, or filmed and played on TV as a warning to "virtuous pedophiles" to never cross that line. No endless cycle of appeals while they sit on death row, no burdening the tax payer by paying for them to have three hots, a cot, and medical care for life, no more threat of them being released back into society when they get parole to ruin another child's life. Just immediate removal of a monster from society. They have nothing to offer humanity that is worth keeping them alive.
Yeah. Not sure there's much else to say on this topic. I have the usual death-penalty reservations about innocence, but if the evidence is certain that someone damaged a child for life, take the bastard to ride the lightning.
 
Yeah. Not sure there's much else to say on this topic. I have the usual death-penalty reservations about innocence, but if the evidence is certain that someone damaged a child for life, take the bastard to ride the lightning.

Nah, don't even protract their lives that long. As soon as the gavel comes down just take them outside the courthouse and put a .45 slug in their brainpan. One with a rapidly expanding hollow point for immediate results.
 
I personally believe that MJ was a paedophile, however that does not negate that Hollywood is rife with paedophilia and paedophilia adjacent people, those who turn a blind eye because they care more about fame, money and power.

You can argue that they went hard after MJ and Cosby because they were black, but that doesn't mean they weren't doing what they were accused of.

Most of the dirty elite will never be exposed but some are...Epstein, Weistein, Jimmy Saville, for every one ousted there's at least 20 more.

I don't know much about Cosby, but in Michael's case I think his odd public persona and parading of these boys didn't help his case. Michael never played ball with the establishment. It's possible people like Kutcher and others are on their good side...for now. Doesn't mean the tide won't turn.

If MJ ever actually did rape young boys, why did the entire media go after him, even after a jury acquittal, while Roman Polanski is still celebrated by some people in Hollywood? The defense said they've never seen a case like it before, where the prosecution brought out witnesses, and the Defense were charging them since when they dug a bit into their backgrounds, it turned out they were felons. To me that whole thing as an astroturf. Not only does it draw attention away from their own pedophilia, but they take down a positive black role model. It's just like Cosby.

I mean you can go and take a casual browse of things right now that are ignored. Like Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore that run a childrens charity, going to parties with Epstein, Maxwell and Weinstein. You think that will ever be investigated like MJ was? Or even investigated at all? I doubt it.
View attachment 1581220
 
I personally believe that MJ was a paedophile, however that does not negate that Hollywood is rife with paedophilia and paedophilia adjacent people, those who turn a blind eye because they care more about fame, money and power.

You can argue that they went hard after MJ and Cosby because they were black, but that doesn't mean they weren't doing what they were accused of.

Most of the dirty elite will never be exposed but some are...Epstein, Weistein, Jimmy Saville, for every one ousted there's at least 20 more.

I don't know much about Cosby, but in Michael's case I think his odd public persona and parading of these boys didn't help his case. Michael never played ball with the establishment. It's possible people like Kutcher and others are on their good side...for now. Doesn't mean the tide won't turn.

jack.jpg


heat.jpg


8698bd3d39e71e41fb148f1d9fd8751f.jpg
 
Back