US The President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization


Issued on: July 14, 2020


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-393), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-76), the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020, signed into law July 14, 2020, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. In late May 2020, the National People’s Congress of China announced its intention to unilaterally and arbitrarily impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. This announcement was merely China’s latest salvo in a series of actions that have increasingly denied autonomy and freedoms that China promised to the people of Hong Kong under the 1984 Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (Joint Declaration). As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. On May 29, 2020, I directed the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions under United States law that give Hong Kong differential treatment in relation to China.

China has since followed through on its threat to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Under this law, the people of Hong Kong may face life in prison for what China considers to be acts of secession or subversion of state power –- which may include acts like last year’s widespread anti-government protests. The right to trial by jury may be suspended. Proceedings may be conducted in secret. China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. At the same time, the law allows foreigners to be expelled if China merely suspects them of violating the law, potentially making it harder for journalists, human rights organizations, and other outside groups to hold the PRC accountable for its treatment of the people of Hong Kong.

I therefore determine that the situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the PRC to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat.

In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. It shall be the policy of the United States to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong to the extent permitted by law and in the national security, foreign policy, and economic interest of the United States.

Sec. 2. Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes:
(a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note);​
(b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c), respectively);​
(c) the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.);​
(d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m));​
(e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and​
(f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code.​

Sec. 3. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall commence all appropriate actions to further the purposes of this order, consistent with applicable law, including, to:

(a) amend any regulations implementing those provisions specified in section 2 of this order, and, consistent with applicable law and executive orders, under IEEPA, which provide different treatment for Hong Kong as compared to China;​
(b) amend the regulation at 8 CFR 212.4(i) to eliminate the preference for Hong Kong passport holders as compared to PRC passport holders;​
(c) revoke license exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Parts 730-774, that provide differential treatment compared to those license exceptions applicable to exports to China, reexports to China, and transfers (in-country) within China;​
(d) consistent with section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246), terminate the export licensing suspensions under section 902(a)(3) of such Act insofar as such suspensions apply to exports of defense articles to Hong Kong persons who are physically located outside of Hong Kong and the PRC and who were authorized to receive defense articles prior to the date of this order;​
(e) give notice of intent to suspend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Surrender of Fugitive Offenders (TIAS 98-121);​
(f) give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TIAS 99-418 );​
(g) take steps to end the provision of training to members of the Hong Kong Police Force or other Hong Kong security services at the Department of State’s International Law Enforcement Academies;​
(h) suspend continued cooperation undertaken consistent with the now-expired Protocol Between the U.S. Geological Survey of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences (TIAS 09-1109);​
(i) take steps to terminate the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong;​
(j) give notice of intent to terminate the agreement for the reciprocal exemption with respect to taxes on income from the international operation of ships effected by the Exchange of Notes Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong (TIAS 11892);​
(k) reallocate admissions within the refugee ceiling set by the annual Presidential Determination to residents of Hong Kong based on humanitarian concerns, to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law; and​
(l) propose for my consideration any further actions deemed necessary and prudent to end special conditions and preferential treatment for Hong Kong.​

Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
(a) Any foreign person determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:​
(i) to be or have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the coercing, arresting, detaining, or imprisoning of individuals under the authority of, or to be or have been responsible for or involved in developing, adopting, or implementing, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Administrative Region;​
(ii) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following:​
(A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Hong Kong;​
(B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or autonomy of Hong Kong;​
(C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or​
(D) the extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention, or torture of any person in Hong Kong or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or serious human rights abuse in Hong Kong;​
(iii) to be or have been a leader or official of:​
(A) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii)​
(B), or (a)(ii)(C) of this section; or​
(B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section;
(v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or​
(vi) to be a member of the board of directors or a senior executive officer of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section.
(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.​

Sec. 5. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 4 of this order.

Sec. 6. The prohibitions in section 4(a) of this order include:
(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4(a) of this order; and
(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 7. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 4(a) of this order, as well as immediate family members of such aliens, or aliens determined by the Secretary of State to be employed by, or acting as an agent of, such aliens, would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions). The Secretary of State shall have the responsibility of implementing this section pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Secretary has established or may establish pursuant to Proclamation 8693.

Sec. 8. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.​

Sec. 9. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 10. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;​
(b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization;​
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States; and​
(d) The term “immediate family member” means spouses and children of any age.​

Sec. 11. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to section 4 of this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 4 of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 13. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; or​
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.​
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.​
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.​

Sec. 15. If, based on consideration of the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration, I determine that changes in China’s actions ensure that Hong Kong is sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the PRC under United States law, I will reconsider the determinations made and actions taken and directed under this order.

- - -

Jesus fucking Christ, okay. I guess the gloves are completely coming off and we're just going to start trading straight-up dick-punches with the CCP.
 
What did people expect to happen?

China is a fundamentally opposed to Western values and methods and is the last real "baddie" on the world stage.

Did they think the US would just turn a blind eye and allow China to use HK as a back door into western economies and technology? No, Hong Kong is China now, they are one. Ruled by Winne the Pooh in Beijing. Trump is right to cut off Hong Kong before China wedges too far into its government.

Any HK citizen that didnt take advantage of the warnings and offer by much of the Commonwealth nations have no one to blame but themselves when Pooh man craks down on the freedoms the are used to under the British flag.

Hell, as of a few days ago any criticisms of the CCP is punished by life imprisonment! No joke. Its a "legal" law pass 100% by the newly "elected" HK parliament body 🙄

They had 20 years of warnings but the lure of the money and property they owned are the very nails in the coffin the people of Hong Kong made for themselves. Your freedom and very life isn't worth a single penny, when a totalitarian state takes over your country, one who has a record of massive human right issues why would you think its OK to stay?

GTFO dumbass.

The Jews in 1930's Germany also saw the writing on the wall but they too stuck around because of money and property. There was a quote from a holocaust survivor; when asked why he never fled while he had the chance he answered " when you have a grand piano its hard to think about moving. So we dithered and waited, assured that Hitler was just another politician. We'd weathered worse storms in the past. How bad could it get? No, best to stay and ensure our wealth was protected."

If the writings on the wall...GTFO. Money's no use to a person sitting in a "re-education" camp or a gulag.


Chink and Jews....both equally money obsessed, both equally blind to the on-coming storm. Both will suffer for their stubbornness.
I have family that, as soon as HK was no longer a British colony, fled to America. They were forced to leave their nanny behind, and the kids were very sad. So some people had seen the signs even then.
 
Can't imagine Apple suddenly not making iPhones in China so I'm wondering what all companies would seriously give up their business partnerships with China over this rather than eat the cost.
Some companies have been moving their manufacturing to India and/or Vietnam in the last year or so. Not a ton, just a few. SE Asia is still a big manufacturing hub too.
 
Of course HK has to be treated the same as China since China removed HKs autonomy. What exactly did China think was going to happen? Unless their response is due to all the other things in the EO but I can't tell.

Also, considering the other port cities in China not HK have been doing fairly well the past few years economically speaking not sure why China cares so much. Does this EO effect the other port cities as well?
 
If the writings on the wall...GTFO. Money's no use to a person sitting in a "re-education" camp or a gulag.

The problem with that is everyone is always saying the writing is on the walls. How many times have you heard "I'm literally voting for my life because if Trump is elected I'll 100% die!"? How Hillary would have brought us into WWIII and killed us all? How Trump is committing MASS MURDER by how he handled the pandemic/riots? How Obama/the democrats made COUP ATTEMPT by impeaching/setting up the impeachment of Donald Trump? Everyone calls every politician Hitler or Stalin, so spotting the actual Hitlers and Stalins is like spotting a tree in an artificial Christmas tree factory.
 
Of course HK has to be treated the same as China since China removed HKs autonomy. What exactly did China think was going to happen? Unless their response is due to all the other things in the EO but I can't tell.

Also, considering the other port cities in China not HK have been doing fairly well the past few years economically speaking not sure why China cares so much. Does this EO effect the other port cities as well?
China isn't used to real opposition internationally in the modern era. Since they've become a rising star, China has more or less been able to do whatever it wants and have it both ways. That era is coming to an end. They've realized this, hence their increasingly aggressive diplomatic stance which was meant to intimidate other powers out of pushing for fair treatment. But it is too late. China wanted to wear big boy pants so now they get to play hardball and work for their gains.
 
Vietnamese had a nice fight with the Americans for a few years. No big deal.

Vietnamese have been fighting the Chinese for thousands of years. Blood feud.

As I understand it, it's pretty much this. The Vietnamese don't really seem to have a grudge towards America. I am always amused, however, when I watch a YouTube video that says Saigon in the title, but everyone in it says Ho Chi Min City while they're there.
 
Why do you think that?

I’m pretty sure the Vietnamese people hate the Chinese more than they hate the Americans. The Chinese tried to invade them during the liberation of Cambodia and they’ve had a lot of border disputes since then, including disputes in the South China Sea.
A few years back there were anti-Chinese race riots in Vietnam. Chinese owned factories were burnt down. The rioters completely left factories with American flags alone. About a decade ago I read an article about Vietnam putting out feelers to buy modern western weaponry from France and America (!) to... better destroy Chinese invading their waters.
 
I have family that, as soon as HK was no longer a British colony, fled to America. They were forced to leave their nanny behind, and the kids were very sad. So some people had seen the signs even then.
yeah I don't really know what they expected, it's China, you see the shit they do to the populace they at least theoretically like
Vietnamese have been fighting the Chinese for thousands of years. Blood feud.
as far as I understand basically every Asian nation's list goes
Be In Charge Of Asia >>> Be America's Subordinate And Therefor Sorta Better Than Some Other Asian Nations >>>>>>> Treat The Rest Of Asia As Equals >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be Another Asian Nation's Subordinate
 
Canada is too cucked to survive. I consider them a lost cause. The Chinese are all over US real estate like shit on velcro, and that is something we can change if we wish.
Canada can't be ignored as it sits directly on the US borders. But true, internal matters first, then external ones.
Can't imagine Apple suddenly not making iPhones in China so I'm wondering what all companies would seriously give up their business partnerships with China over this rather than eat the cost.
Trump already gave them ample warning and encouragement to diversify. Any company stuck in China only has their greed to blame. That being said, I expect the divestment period to be years long, assuming that the gate doesn't slam shut quickly- there'll be plenty of lobbyists vouching for 'continued relationships'.
I’m pretty sure the Vietnamese people hate the Chinese more than they hate the Americans. The Chinese tried to invade them during the liberation of Cambodia and they’ve had a lot of border disputes since then, including disputes in the South China Sea.
Problem is that money speaks, and monetary 'acupuncture' (targeting powerful individuals so to speak), can have a massive impact, as the WHO demonstrates- the US funds most of it, but a few specific donations from China made them bend over. In fact, the SEA region is an area the US cannot ignore, as China already has a foothold in many of those countries' elites (i.e. Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar).
Yeah, I know, but it's very unfortunate the UK was a dying power by the time it came about.
They're in no position to do anything about it now, either. The west under estimated the genuine threat of China and focused solely on their pet oil wars.

The sad fact is, I think perhaps it was Alexander Downer, who flippantly said that no one is going to fight for HK or Taiwan, they aren't an important issue. Whilst true, letting China have that much sway is a massive loss.
I think the problem of the 90s was that so many liberal democrats were enamored with the whole Fukuyama End-of-History concept, that 1.) They assumed that China would naturally liberalize like Korea did with the introduction of capitalism; and 2.) China's market was too inviting to ignore- an element of greed was involved there.

For a period of time, from maybe the 1990s to 2008/12, that seemed entirely possible, as China back then was still more open than it is now. Of course, the Communist party saw threats to itself, and the entire country has been ideologically closing up ever since.

Any HK citizen that didnt take advantage of the warnings and offer by much of the Commonwealth nations have no one to blame but themselves when Pooh man craks down on the freedoms the are used to under the British flag.

Hell, as of a few days ago any criticisms of the CCP is punished by life imprisonment! No joke. Its a "legal" law pass 100% by the newly "elected" HK parliament body 🙄

They had 20 years of warnings but the lure of the money and property they owned are the very nails in the coffin the people of Hong Kong made for themselves. Your freedom and very life isn't worth a single penny, when a totalitarian state takes over your country, one who has a record of massive human right issues why would you think its OK to stay?
The problem is that people have property, jobs and family there, and uprooting oneself is a tremendously disruptive process that doesn't guarantee success in the new country. It takes years to reestablish oneself in a new country, to get the new connections and accreditations, and to get used to the new culture and climate. You can understand why people were apprehensive about moving back during the 90s before the handover.

That being said, any HKonger who doesn't take advantage of asylum laws in the next few year or so only has themselves to blame. I personally think that China will pull back a bit on its crackdown to lull the population into a false sense of security while tightening up the borders, and that only a minority of the population to take up the offer, but it will be a crucial, educated minority that'll sap the city of needed skills and services.

Combine that with multinationals/foreigners redeploying to Singapore, and HK's status as a financial hub is essentially over (and all because because the CCP couldn't handle a little bit of free speech). I 100% think that the tycoons have already seen this coming, and have already stashed as much cash and assets overseas as they can.
 
Last edited:
Of course HK has to be treated the same as China since China removed HKs autonomy. What exactly did China think was going to happen? Unless their response is due to all the other things in the EO but I can't tell.

Also, considering the other port cities in China not HK have been doing fairly well the past few years economically speaking not sure why China cares so much. Does this EO effect the other port cities as well?
China thought they could have things both ways with Hong Kong, and IIRC a lot of Chinese influence was due to them having that Hong Kong backdoor. They want Taiwan next, though, and that only happens if the US eases up as the US is one of the few military forces that can bitchslap their zerg rush strategy.
 
China thought they could have things both ways with Hong Kong, and IIRC a lot of Chinese influence was due to them having that Hong Kong backdoor. They want Taiwan next, though, and that only happens if the US eases up as the US is one of the few military forces that can bitchslap their zerg rush strategy.

Probably why they want Biden.
 
Shit like this is why I sincerely hope Trump unfucka himself come election time, because I know for a fact the dems and RINOs will roll this back so quickly it'd make your head spin off.

We've in cold war for years and only a minutia of our ruling class seem to realize it, willfully or not.
Trump really does seem like the only one that wants to confront it. What the fuck has the CCP promised the ruling class?
 
Shit like this is why I sincerely hope Trump unfucka himself come election time, because I know for a fact the dems and RINOs will roll this back so quickly it'd make your head spin off.

We've in cold war for years and only a minutia of our ruling class seem to realize it, willfully or not.
Oh, they know. I go to Defense Contractor and Foreign Policy seminars where they talk about “managed decline” of the United States in between pumping their fists about new tank designs and next gen fighters. And where are the mechanical parts of these new weapons sourced from? Take a guess.

I guess they figure the public would rebel if their cheap phones and plastic toys went away, so there’s no point in even trying to fight.
 
They may not have a choice about ignoring. The Attorney General put all these companies, media, tech and sports on full blast today. The message is pretty clear, pick a side. And it had better be ours.

Side's not as clear when the MSM is already in China's pocket and has every reason to make sure that the American public never has that message on the evening news.
 
Side's not as clear when the MSM is already in China's pocket and has every reason to make sure that the American public never has that message on the evening news.

And the fascinating thing is how dead silent the US media is on this speech. This speech is literally an iron curtain speech. It is not diplomatic at all and is essentially a stated declaration of absolute opposition. From the Attorney General. Barr has basically said we are all but at war with China and if you "American Company" do not fall into line I, the Attorney General, will fuck you. In the ass. With no lube.

This should be huge news. But they are dead silent. And the chosen presidential candidate to unseat Trump is Joe fucking Biden, the guy with massive business and personal ties to China. I have questions here.
 
This should be huge news. But they are dead silent. And the chosen presidential candidate to unseat Trump is Joe fucking Biden, the guy with massive business and personal ties to China. I have questions here.

Wrong. It's not about Biden; it's about who his VP candidate is. Biden's just an empty suit.
 
Back