US The President’s Executive Order on Hong Kong Normalization


Issued on: July 14, 2020


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-393), the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116-76), the Hong Kong Autonomy Act of 2020, signed into law July 14, 2020, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. In late May 2020, the National People’s Congress of China announced its intention to unilaterally and arbitrarily impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. This announcement was merely China’s latest salvo in a series of actions that have increasingly denied autonomy and freedoms that China promised to the people of Hong Kong under the 1984 Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (Joint Declaration). As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. On May 29, 2020, I directed the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to begin the process of eliminating policy exemptions under United States law that give Hong Kong differential treatment in relation to China.

China has since followed through on its threat to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Under this law, the people of Hong Kong may face life in prison for what China considers to be acts of secession or subversion of state power –- which may include acts like last year’s widespread anti-government protests. The right to trial by jury may be suspended. Proceedings may be conducted in secret. China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. At the same time, the law allows foreigners to be expelled if China merely suspects them of violating the law, potentially making it harder for journalists, human rights organizations, and other outside groups to hold the PRC accountable for its treatment of the people of Hong Kong.

I therefore determine that the situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the PRC to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency with respect to that threat.

In light of the foregoing, I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. It shall be the policy of the United States to suspend or eliminate different and preferential treatment for Hong Kong to the extent permitted by law and in the national security, foreign policy, and economic interest of the United States.

Sec. 2. Pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5722), I hereby suspend the application of section 201(a) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended (22 U.S.C. 5721(a)), to the following statutes:
(a) section 103 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1152 note);​
(b) sections 203(c), 212(l), and 221(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1153(c), 1182(l), and 1201(c), respectively);​
(c) the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.);​
(d) section 721(m) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. 4565(m));​
(e) the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.); and​
(f) section 1304 of title 19, United States Code.​

Sec. 3. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the heads of agencies shall commence all appropriate actions to further the purposes of this order, consistent with applicable law, including, to:

(a) amend any regulations implementing those provisions specified in section 2 of this order, and, consistent with applicable law and executive orders, under IEEPA, which provide different treatment for Hong Kong as compared to China;​
(b) amend the regulation at 8 CFR 212.4(i) to eliminate the preference for Hong Kong passport holders as compared to PRC passport holders;​
(c) revoke license exceptions for exports to Hong Kong, reexports to Hong Kong, and transfers (in-country) within Hong Kong of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR Parts 730-774, that provide differential treatment compared to those license exceptions applicable to exports to China, reexports to China, and transfers (in-country) within China;​
(d) consistent with section 902(b)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101-246), terminate the export licensing suspensions under section 902(a)(3) of such Act insofar as such suspensions apply to exports of defense articles to Hong Kong persons who are physically located outside of Hong Kong and the PRC and who were authorized to receive defense articles prior to the date of this order;​
(e) give notice of intent to suspend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Surrender of Fugitive Offenders (TIAS 98-121);​
(f) give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong for the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (TIAS 99-418 );​
(g) take steps to end the provision of training to members of the Hong Kong Police Force or other Hong Kong security services at the Department of State’s International Law Enforcement Academies;​
(h) suspend continued cooperation undertaken consistent with the now-expired Protocol Between the U.S. Geological Survey of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science of the Chinese University of Hong Kong Concerning Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Earth Sciences (TIAS 09-1109);​
(i) take steps to terminate the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong;​
(j) give notice of intent to terminate the agreement for the reciprocal exemption with respect to taxes on income from the international operation of ships effected by the Exchange of Notes Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Hong Kong (TIAS 11892);​
(k) reallocate admissions within the refugee ceiling set by the annual Presidential Determination to residents of Hong Kong based on humanitarian concerns, to the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law; and​
(l) propose for my consideration any further actions deemed necessary and prudent to end special conditions and preferential treatment for Hong Kong.​

Sec. 4. All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
(a) Any foreign person determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:​
(i) to be or have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the coercing, arresting, detaining, or imprisoning of individuals under the authority of, or to be or have been responsible for or involved in developing, adopting, or implementing, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Administrative Region;​
(ii) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following:​
(A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Hong Kong;​
(B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, or autonomy of Hong Kong;​
(C) censorship or other activities with respect to Hong Kong that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Hong Kong, or that limit access to free and independent print, online or broadcast media; or​
(D) the extrajudicial rendition, arbitrary detention, or torture of any person in Hong Kong or other gross violations of internationally recognized human rights or serious human rights abuse in Hong Kong;​
(iii) to be or have been a leader or official of:​
(A) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (a)(i), (a)(ii)(A), (a)(ii)​
(B), or (a)(ii)(C) of this section; or​
(B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section;
(v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or​
(vi) to be a member of the board of directors or a senior executive officer of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section.
(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.​

Sec. 5. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 4 of this order.

Sec. 6. The prohibitions in section 4(a) of this order include:
(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 4(a) of this order; and
(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 7. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 4(a) of this order, as well as immediate family members of such aliens, or aliens determined by the Secretary of State to be employed by, or acting as an agent of, such aliens, would be detrimental to the interest of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions). The Secretary of State shall have the responsibility of implementing this section pursuant to such conditions and procedures as the Secretary has established or may establish pursuant to Proclamation 8693.

Sec. 8. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.​

Sec. 9. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

Sec. 10. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;​
(b) the term “entity” means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization;​
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States; and​
(d) The term “immediate family member” means spouses and children of any age.​

Sec. 11. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to section 4 of this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 4 of this order.

Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of the Treasury. All departments and agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 13. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency; or​
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.​
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.​
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.​

Sec. 15. If, based on consideration of the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration, I determine that changes in China’s actions ensure that Hong Kong is sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the PRC under United States law, I will reconsider the determinations made and actions taken and directed under this order.

- - -

Jesus fucking Christ, okay. I guess the gloves are completely coming off and we're just going to start trading straight-up dick-punches with the CCP.
 
And the fascinating thing is how dead silent the US media is on this speech. This speech is literally an iron curtain speech. It is not diplomatic at all and is essentially a stated declaration of absolute opposition. From the Attorney General. Barr has basically said we are all but at war with China and if you "American Company" do not fall into line I, the Attorney General, will fuck you. In the ass. With no lube.

This should be huge news. But they are dead silent. And the chosen presidential candidate to unseat Trump is Joe fucking Biden, the guy with massive business and personal ties to China. I have questions here.
And all throughout this I keep remembering seven words that echo in my head more and more each day: Donald Trump was never supposed to win. The MSM is a foreign agent at this point with only one or two talking heads pushing against the grain. Tucker Carlson's one of them, and I could see Fox taking this absence to completely cut him loose. The GOP only begrudgingly took Trump on, and the Neocucks in the GOP are fighting alongside the Neolibs to get him out the way so they can sell the rest of the country down the river.

On the chance that Trump gets reelected through the blatant upcoming thievery he needs to get a crew of hatchet men - the MSM and Congress in that situation will 100% paint him as a lame duck and do the same thing in his second term that they all but successfully did in the first term.
 
Why do you think that?

I’m pretty sure the Vietnamese people hate the Chinese more than they hate the Americans. The Chinese tried to invade them during the liberation of Cambodia and they’ve had a lot of border disputes since then, including disputes in the South China Sea.

They do more or less, Vietnam has actually established relatively cordial relations with us because we're united in our hatred of China. China has tried to lay claim to Vietnam for centuries and that's not something soon forgotten plus China still wants to conquer them today. We've even had to send in ships to escort and protect Vietnamese fishing vessels from Chinese ships that harass them and in some cases even ram them and sink them. They're basically hyper aggressive bullies to every other country in SEA because they're under the grand delusion that all of that land is theirs.

Probably why they want Biden.

Very much so, Biden has been noted to be pretty soft on China and his son Hunter has financial ties in China as well. Speaking of Biden he made another oopsie doopsie a few days ago when he favorably quoted Chairman Mao in during a campaign speech.


And this article, also from The Federalist, offers up some pretty fun questions for Biden to answer about China.




And as for the executive order it's good to see Trump putting the screws into China even harder, they've spent decades going relatively unchallenged so now that they're taking a hit to the jaw they find out what happens someone decides to stand up to you for once.
 
Last edited:
The lines have been drawn.
-UK has finally agreed to cut out Huawei from its 5g network.
-Australia announced an extra 270 billion in defence spending to help counter Chinese influence in the south china sea. ASIO has been knocking down the doors of dirty politicians in bed with the chinks
-The five eyes (except for New Zealand but fuck New Zealand, bunch of pussies) have condemned China and are ending treaties or opening ways for HK citizens to escape while they can
-India is kicking out and banning anything Chinese after 40 of their soldiers were killed
-16 countries (Including the US, Australia, Japan, Switzerland, the UK , those glorious Czech bastards and for some reason Uganda) have formed The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance against China alongside the entire EU to push anti-China policies
-62 countries have backed the Australian led probe into the coronavirus.

The straws have become too much and the camel's spine has finally snapped. It seems the world has had enough of bugmen bullshit and is lining up to try to contain China instead of playing softball with them like we all seemed to be doing. Cold War 2 indeed. I wonder where Russia will stand in this. They may be cordial with China but they must be pissed off about the Vladivostok thing. Will Putin team up with the orange man to kick the shit out of the yellow bear?
 
Side's not as clear when the MSM is already in China's pocket and has every reason to make sure that the American public never has that message on the evening news.
This was a speech directed at the heads of these companies. I am pretty sure that the heads of these mayor institutions are listening to this right now. This is not meant for Joe Sixpack to hear. This speech is directed at Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Jack Dorsey, Tim Cook, Bill Gates, Bob Iger, and Sundar Pichai. Barr is telling them that the game is over and everyone better pack their bikes and go back home because that neighboorhood troublemaker Xi Jinping is going to get into some shit with the law and it's in their best interest to not get involved.
 
China might be the one thing that brings the world together in unity. At least for a few fleeting moments. WuFlu was the final straw and countries are getting pissed. Its like in Who Shot Mr. Burns where all of Springfield is tired of his shit and ready to beat the shit out him.

The lines have been drawn.
-UK has finally agreed to cut out Huawei from its 5g network.
-Australia announced an extra 270 billion in defence spending to help counter Chinese influence in the south china sea. ASIO has been knocking down the doors of dirty politicians in bed with the chinks
-The five eyes (except for New Zealand but fuck New Zealand, bunch of pussies) have condemned China and are ending treaties or opening ways for HK citizens to escape while they can
-India is kicking out and banning anything Chinese after 40 of their soldiers were killed
-16 countries (Including the US, Australia, Japan, Switzerland, the UK , those glorious Czech bastards and for some reason Uganda) have formed The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance against China alongside the entire EU to push anti-China policies
-62 countries have backed the Australian led probe into the coronavirus.

The straws have become too much and the camel's spine has finally snapped. It seems the world has had enough of bugmen bullshit and is lining up to try to contain China instead of playing softball with them like we all seemed to be doing. Cold War 2 indeed. I wonder where Russia will stand in this. They may be cordial with China but they must be pissed off about the Vladivostok thing. Will Putin team up with the orange man to kick the shit out of the yellow bear?
Two things

  • The UK still has Huawei 4g towers in their country. They're not uncucked just yet.
  • Russia is probably with the rest of us, about ready to cave China's skull in. StyxHexenHammer has brought this up in his videos but China fucked Russia out of a ton of money over oil. Russia built a pipeline to China, on their dime. Then China turns around after it was done and changes the deal so Russia gets less money for the oil. Putin and Pooh had a meeting around that time and Putin left early after this was annouced.
 
I wonder where Russia will stand in this. They may be cordial with China but they must be pissed off about the Vladivostok thing. Will Putin team up with the orange man to kick the shit out of the yellow bear?

Russia will hope all sides murder each other. Whatever clash is coming they don't stand to benefit no matter who wins the game. So they wont play at all.

And yeah. How the media is portraying this as telling as it is alarming.

Screenshot_20200717-012017_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Last edited:
Some companies have been moving their manufacturing to India and/or Vietnam in the last year or so. Not a ton, just a few. SE Asia is still a big manufacturing hub too.

Thought this was due to general trade agreements and rising cost of Chinese manufacturing.

I feel like there's a multitude of factors that go into how fucked China is at this point, so I'm not sure how big a factor the Hong Kong EO will be except for making decoupling easier politically here.

For example more companies are abandoning China's 5G, such as even Italy getting on the Fuck China bandwagon as they're going to abandon using Huawei 5G.
2020-07-17.png


Everything is falling apart for them which is why they're trying to start shit with every neighboring region, they need assets.
 
Why do you think that?

I’m pretty sure the Vietnamese people hate the Chinese more than they hate the Americans. The Chinese tried to invade them during the liberation of Cambodia and they’ve had a lot of border disputes since then, including disputes in the South China Sea.
A few years back there were anti-Chinese race riots in Vietnam. Chinese owned factories were burnt down. The rioters completely left factories with American flags alone. About a decade ago I read an article about Vietnam putting out feelers to buy modern western weaponry from France and America (!) to better destroy Chinese invading their waters in a potential war.
 
Thought this was due to general trade agreements and rising cost of Chinese manufacturing.

I feel like there's a multitude of factors that go into how fucked China is at this point, so I'm not sure how big a factor the Hong Kong EO will be except for making decoupling easier politically here.

For example more companies are abandoning China's 5G, such as even Italy getting on the Fuck China bandwagon as they're going to abandon using Huawei 5G.
View attachment 1453640

Everything is falling apart for them which is why they're trying to start shit with every neighboring region, they need assets.
Don't worry they got the best idea ever: corn filled cement
1594880455966.jpg
 
Western Nations and Companies fell under the illusion that there could be opportunities of equal trade and partnership with the CCP, that in return for accommodating the political will of the Chinese State, they'd be able to reap in the profits from a market of up to a billion people.

But they failed to understand, or come to the realisation that there is no fair partnership with China.
The Middle Kingdom has no equals, only Subjects (Vassals) and Barbarians (Those yet to be Vassalised).
 
I am always amused, however, when I watch a YouTube video that says Saigon in the title, but everyone in it says Ho Chi Min City while they're there.

I find it amusing that they even named the city Ho Chi Minh City. The use of Ho Chi Minh City as opposed to Saigon is more common among foreigners than Vietnamese though.

Australia might be in a better spot.
-Australia announced an extra 270 billion in defence spending to help counter Chinese influence in the south china sea. ASIO has been knocking down the doors of dirty politicians in bed with the chinks
-The five eyes (except for New Zealand but fuck New Zealand, bunch of pussies) have condemned China and are ending treaties or opening ways for HK citizens to escape while they can
For all the anti-China rhetoric coming from Australia, China makes up a huge portion of Australian imports and exports. Around 33% of Australian exports are to China, and 20% of imports are from China. Commodities trade with China drives the current Australia trade surplus. I think it’s still trending up, so I don’t know how Australia is able to really argue against China without risking a serious economic shock. I guess it comes down to how much China needs Australian ores? They’ve already threatened to cut off imports of Australian coals etc. recently by imposing new bureaucracy .
 
A few years back there were anti-Chinese race riots in Vietnam. Chinese owned factories were burnt down. The rioters completely left factories with American flags alone. About a decade ago I read an article about Vietnam putting out feelers to buy modern western weaponry from France and America (!) to better destroy Chinese invading their waters in a potential war.

I wonder how "Hanoi Jane" Fonda will react to this since she's pro-commie?
 
I wonder how "Hanoi Jane" Fonda will react to this since she's pro-commie?

Ree like a good old commie hoe!


trumpőtankDEv7JjWW0AYyqlh.jpg
TRUMP 2020! Get the coofing bugmen!

Mind Hungary still loves that chinkmoney and didn't get the memo, and neither did Italy nor Greece. I feel like these three will only get behind the US with some monetary "aid packages" . After all, my people are mercenaries by blood.
 
I'm guessing that Trump is treating Hong Kong AS an entity of China now? Not its own country?

Well, the Chinese are already treating Hong Kong that way . . .

Oh shit, I didn't even consider that angle. Yeah, if you were a company that was running an alternative server for China and you were censoring the platform in any way that benefited the CCP, you'd be on the chopping block under Section 4 wouldn't you?

Bye-bye Blizzard Activision!


So how is pro-Biden media gonna spin this? His record isn't endearing, and there's a collective sluggishness to reply to China, like it's all okay as long as everybody's making money.

It looks like Election 2020 isn't about the economy, or race relations, or free speech,or immigration, or coronavirus, or even Trump's record.
This is a vote on who our main rival is for Cold War 2. Vote Biden for Russia, Vote Trump for China.

Russia has been an enemy to the west since 2007.

Canada can't be ignored as it sits directly on the US borders. But true, internal matters first, then external ones.

Canada won't do shit. Trudeau has taken several donations from the PRC to the Trudeau fund in exchange for "favors". This is why he does nothing while two Canadians are held hostage over the Huawei executive being handed over to the United States for prosecution. A laundry list of nations have been banning Tik-Tok and banning PRC involvement in domestic G5 networks, yet Canada does neither.

Remember in 2017 when Canada was sanctioned by the US for being a backdoor route for Chinese steel into the US? Most people have forgotten. Or the Fentanyl "crisis" effecting both nations? The majority of that shit comes into North America directly from China into Canadian ports in Vancouver to go directly onto the illicit market. That's kept pretty hushed up by the MSM.

Canada has been a Chinese proxy for a long time, and it has only gotten worse since 2015.

On the chance that Trump gets reelected through the blatant upcoming thievery he needs to get a crew of hatchet men - the MSM and Congress in that situation will 100% paint him as a lame duck and do the same thing in his second term that they all but successfully did in the first term.

Well, this time he doesn't have to be worried about re-election.

Rather than be another lame duck, he could just retreat into the bunker and do literally EVERYTHING via executive order. I absolutely despise authoritarianism of any sort, but I honestly can't say I'd be too upset to see Trump "activate" Presidential Directive 51 and start over. Tear it all down and establish the New America. We are standing at the precipice as it is, may as well jump.

Fuck it.

For all the anti-China rhetoric coming from Australia, China makes up a huge portion of Australian imports and exports. Around 33% of Australian exports are to China, and 20% of imports are from China. Commodities trade with China drives the current Australia trade surplus. I think it’s still trending up, so I don’t know how Australia is able to really argue against China without risking a serious economic shock. I guess it comes down to how much China needs Australian ores? They’ve already threatened to cut off imports of Australian coals etc. recently by imposing new bureaucracy .

Seems like Aus has decided that an immediate pain is better than slow, long-term subjugation.

As another poster hinted at, this would explain the attempted land-grabs by PRC. Need to set up other supply lines that can't be challenged.
 
Last edited:
For all the anti-China rhetoric coming from Australia, China makes up a huge portion of Australian imports and exports. Around 33% of Australian exports are to China, and 20% of imports are from China. Commodities trade with China drives the current Australia trade surplus. I think it’s still trending up, so I don’t know how Australia is able to really argue against China without risking a serious economic shock. I guess it comes down to how much China needs Australian ores? They’ve already threatened to cut off imports of Australian coals etc. recently by imposing new bureaucracy .
The narrative down here is becoming more and more 'fuck China' and I cant believe it. You're right, China is our biggest trade partner, but;
a) China has burned us before on trade. In 2018 they wouldnt allow beef and wine exports into the country. In 2019 they did the same thing with coal. They've tried to coerce us before. Hell the 2019 coal fuckery was punishment for stripping the citizenship of one of their billionaire spies/manipulators. (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02...ip-chinese-businessman-huang-xiangmo/10784512)
b) It mightnt actually be as bad as you think if they did cut us off. The Conversation did a really interesting analysis on the subject (https://theconversation.com/australia-depends-less-on-chinese-trade-than-some-might-think-120423)
c) People are sick of China's shit down here and it didnt start with the WuFlu. It started years ago,

Anti-China sentiment has been festering in Australia and theres a long list of complaints. The Chinese are buying up our dairy industry. They're buying our real estate. They're buying our fucking ports. They're fucking with university prices. They're sending their warships into our harbours unannounced. They're threatening us. They're spying on us. They're subverting our state governments. They're in bed with our politicians. They caused a shortage in face masks and medical supplies by orchestrating massive buyouts in the middle of covering up the Wuflu. The fuckers treat us like vassals already and it god damn rankles.

Comes a point where the scales tip. No matter the cost.
 
Mind Hungary still loves that chinkmoney and didn't get the memo, and neither did Italy nor Greece. I feel like these three will only get behind the US with some monetary "aid packages" . After all, my people are mercenaries by blood.
And playing as Henry "the Cuman Remover" of Skalitz has been good fun in Kingdom Come: Deliverance. Mercenaries by blood, loose your blood.
 
Back