Culture The 'R-word,' embraced by Joe Rogan and Elon Musk, inches back into the mainstream


May 8, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT
By Pilar Melendez
In a recent episode of his highly influential podcast, Joe Rogan declared what he sees as the latest triumph in the cultural battle over language: the return of the “R-word.”

“Every time I see people that disagree with any that’s happening, any gigantic world events, it’s one of these retarded shows where they’re screaming,” he said April 10 on an episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience,” before he interrupted himself to go on a quick rant about the word.

“The word ‘retarded’ is back, and it’s one of the great cultural victories that I think is spurred on, probably, by podcasts,” he added.

Rogan is right, at least to those in some circles.

Once relegated to the cultural dustbin, the so-called R-word has made a resurgence in recent months, used most commonly by people in right-leaning and anti-political correctness worlds, some of whom have tried for years to bring the slur from the social media undercurrents back into the mainstream.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk now frequently uses the word on X to disparage everyone from a Danish astronaut to Ben Stiller. In March, Ye, the rapper formerly known as Kanye West, used it in questioning the mental capacity of Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s twins, only to later issue an apology. The FX show “English Teacher” included a bit about how “the kids are not into being woke” and they’re “saying the ‘R-word’ again.” And a recent Netflix comedy special invoked the word repeatedly.

While its use has percolated in the comedy world for years, only recently has the word — and discussion of its return — become more normalized. That is fueled in no small part by a sense that the tide has turned both culturally and politically against those seeking to keep the word out of the popular lexicon. But the battle lines are not as clear as one might think, with even some on the left softening their stance on the slur’s rebrand while some on the right — most notably former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — decry its return.

Timothy Shriver, the chairman of Special Olympics International, noted that the word is used across the political spectrum.

“People on the left and people on the right have treated people with intellectual disabilities in subhuman ways, historically,” Shriver said.

Still, there are some political dynamics at play. Kenneth Luna, a linguistics professor at California State University, Northridge, who teaches a course on forbidden language, said the word has emerged as a cultural signifier, used by people on the cultural and political right to reinforce a group allegiance — and create further division.

“There’s this term, the politics of cruelty,” Luna said. “It’s a political ploy to marginalize opponents. But it also reinforces, if you think about it, this kind of in group loyalty.”

And it is not just right-leaning voters who are using the word. Business Insider reported that some liberal-identifying people are using it, among other canceled words, in response to feeling overly self-censored by the fear of saying something non-inclusive.

Robbie Goodwin, 33, a comedian and podcaster who identifies as an anti-Trump social Democrat, said he has used the word in his comedy to describe something dumb but never to describe a disabled person or to hurt anyone’s feelings.

But in the last year, Goodwin said, he has noticed people abusing the word, and he believes the joke is going away, partly because Rogan and Musk are using it as a signifier of their culture war.

“I never try to offend anyone, and it feels like they are getting off on the fact that it’s offending someone and triggering the libs,” Goodwin said in an interview, adding that he is “grossed out” by Rogan’s comments about the word’s supposed cultural victory. “I found myself using it less now, because I see unfunny people using it. It’s so cringe.”

Some high-profile people have pushed back. Palin, not one to usually embrace the policing of language, criticized Ye in March for using the word.

“BTW, he & everyone else (especially ‘Christian conservatives’) thinking it’s hip to ramp up use of the ‘R’ word… please unfollow me & know that my disrespect for you is insurmountable,” wrote Palin, whose son Trig has Down syndrome.

The word’s return has also been particularly hurtful to people with intellectual disabilities.

“It’s frustrating, and it upsets me beyond words to hear anyone use the R-word. That word isn’t in style; it’s hurtful,” said Novie Craven, a Special Olympics athlete and host of the podcast “Inclusion Revolution Radio.” “When that word is used, you’re telling the world that people like me, people with intellectual disabilities, don’t belong, can’t achieve or aren’t worth respect.”

Craven added: “But you don’t know us. You don’t live our lives. If you did, you’d understand how wrong that word is. You should get to know us before you speak about us.”

Before it became an insult, the term “mental retardation,” derived from the Latin for “to slow,” was adopted in the mid-1990s by the medical community and the government to replace words like “moron,” “idiot” and “imbecile” in describing people with intellectual disabilities. The term was shortened and sent into the mainstream lexicon, and by the 1990s and the early 2000s, it had become an insult.

The first big move against the word came in 2003, when President George W. Bush renamed the President’s Committee on Mental Retardation as the President’s Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities. Seven years later, President Barack Obama signed “Rosa’s Law,” which changed the term to “intellectual disability” in federal language.

For a time, the pejorative against the millions of people in the United States who have intellectual or developmental disabilities was largely deemed socially taboo thanks to movements like “Spread the Word to End the Word.” However, the word never quite disappeared the way some others have, and the rise of social media in the 2010s provided a new way to observe its use and its growing embrace by those particularly on the right as political polarization grew.

Now, Musk is arguably doing more to bring the slur back than anyone else.

Musk, as leader of the administration’s efforts to shrink the federal government, also has a direct influence whenever he invokes the slur, which he recently hurled at Yale history professor Timothy Snyder and used in a derisive nickname for Trump adviser Peter Navarro.

“I’m tempted to call this guy a retard but I won’t because I’ve used that word too many times,” Musk wrote Feb. 22 on X in response to Snyder.

A study in January by Montclair State University found a 207.5% increase in posts on X using the slur four days after Musk used it in a post, or 312,642 posts using the term.

Musk did not respond to a request for comment.

Daniela Peterka-Benton, an associate professor of justice studies at Montclair State, said in the study’s news release that the increase in the slur’s use after Musk is an “example of how hate content has been normalized and boosted in the online space.”
“The online space has always held potential dangers for marginalized communities, and it appears to be getting worse,” she said.

And while Luna, the linguist, believes “all bets are off” in this political environment, he does not think the slur’s return to the mainstream will last as long as Rogan might hope.

“It’s pretty bad, but I don’t think it’s going to get worse in the sense that I don’t see people widely using it at all times because it violates linguistic social norms,” he said. “We just have to combat it right away.”
 
Last edited:
This is something that has always annoyed me about the left. They seem to genuinely believe that if you change the name of something, that will change the thing itself. Being retarded is a bad thing. Changing the name doesn't make that go away. You can call it moron, retard, "intellectually disabled", etc. It will never be a good thing to be, and people will always compare things and people they find stupid to that. The underlying condition is where the stigma comes from, not the word itself. Instead of accepting this, they insist on following the euphemism treadmill in a futile attempt to deny reality.
There was a push a decade ago to end ableism by attempting to stigmatise anyone who used an intelligence based insult - stupid, idiot, dumb, even just commenting on someone being unintelligent or low iq - and suggested instead criticising them for being "uninformed", "ignorant", "poorly read" etc, on the grounds that people can't help their intelligence but they can help the quality of their arguments.

This failed spectacularly because telling someone "you're uninformed" doesn't actually work as an insult in the same way as calling them "a fucking idiot", and then also because it got into a purity spiral about gatekeeping information, the working class not having the same access to education, something about white supremacy...
 
There was a push a decade ago to end ableism by attempting to stigmatise anyone who used an intelligence based insult - stupid, idiot, dumb, even just commenting on someone being unintelligent or low iq - and suggested instead criticising them for being "uninformed", "ignorant", "poorly read" etc, on the grounds that people can't help their intelligence but they can help the quality of their arguments.

This failed spectacularly because telling someone "you're uninformed" doesn't actually work as an insult in the same way as calling them "a fucking idiot", and then also because it got into a purity spiral about gatekeeping information, the working class not having the same access to education, something about white supremacy...
It was subject to the same issue of the underlying fact being what people react to, like for several years the people shilling the COVID state used the words "misinformation" and "disinformation" all the time even while actively misinforming and disinforming you, so ironically it turned into that anyone using those words was announcing themselves as a liar and propagandist, and anyone being hit with those words was probably telling the truth
 
Wow, these retards never realized the only two things they accomplished are making everybody hate them and somehow making “retard” more fun to say?
 
Giving any word this much power over your emotions is a telltale sign of a retard. It ain’t what you’re called but what you answer to that defines you. Retards will always let you know they’re retarded.
 
it got into a purity spiral about gatekeeping information, the working class not having the same access to education, something about white supremacy...
Who could have ever imagined an ideological effort centered on highroading others and purity testing would fall victim to highroading and purity testing? There is no one the left hates more than themselves. A whole lot of Retarded Faggots ™️
 
  • Like
Reactions: LilShotaBoy
CNN: The ‘r-word’ is back. How a slur became renormalized (archive) (lite)

By Scottie Andrew, CNN
Sat May 31, 2025

r-slur.webp
The r-word, which has long been used to denigrate people with disabilities, is surging in popularity online among some celebrities and their fans. The implications of its resurgence are bigger than one word, experts say. (Illustration by Leah Abucayan/CNN)

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article features language that may be hurtful to readers.

On an April episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience,” the host used a slur within the first 45 seconds of the show.

“The word ‘retarded’ is back, and it’s one of the great culture victories,” Rogan said with a laugh in the April 10 episode of his über-popular podcast. “Probably spurred on by podcasts.”

A few months earlier, on January 6, Elon Musk used the word in response to a Finnish researcher who called Musk the “largest spreader of disinformation in human history.”

Use of the slur more than doubled on X, the platform Musk owns, in the two days after he made that January post, researchers from Montclair State University found. More than 312,000 subsequent posts made on X in that span contained the r-word, wrote co-author Bond Benton, a professor of communication at the New Jersey university.

The buck didn’t stop there, Benton said. Throughout 2025, influential public figures like Rogan, Musk and Kanye West have used the r-word on platforms where millions can see and hear them. (West most recently used the term in March to refer to Jay-Z and Beyoncé’s twins, though those X posts are now deleted.)

Since Musk’s January post, the online prevalence of the r-word is “absolutely getting worse,” Benton told CNN.

Rogan, Musk and West are likely using the word to get a rise out of people and draw more eyes to their content, Benton said. But by using a term that has historically been used to disparage and diminish people with disabilities, they’re renormalizing the slur among followers and fans who interact with their posts, he said.

Musk, Rogan and West haven’t responded to CNN’s requests for comment.

The resurgence of the r-word is symptomatic of a graver problem — the “apparent death of empathy,” said Adrienne Massanari, an associate professor at American University who has studied how the far-right uses tech to grow its influence.

“What you’re seeing now, people’s masks are off,” Massanari said. “This is not just misunderstanding but the mischaracterization and demonization of communities. The use of that kind of language is signaling a shift, a desire to sort of push the envelope.”

Push the envelope too far, she said, and the harm spills out into all marginalized communities. The r-word’s surging popularity is just the latest effort in a movement to normalize hate, she said.

How the r-word became a slur​

2024-04-14t052841z-145944095-mt1usatoday23022355-rtrmadp-3-mma-ufc-300-weili-vs-xiaonan.webp
Joe Rogan used the r-word in an April episode of his popular podcast, calling the word's return "one of the great cultural victories."

The r-word has never really gone away, Massanari said — many people still use the word in private, and controversial far-right influencers and some members of the former “dirtbag left” podcast scene alike have used it for years to rile up followers and appeal to edgy comedic styles.

But most people “were comfortable with the word retreating from normal discourse,” after years of campaigns designed to end use of the slur, Benton said.

“There was a reason these words are no longer being used,” Massanari said. “They weren’t productive. They weren’t helping. They are actively harming communities.”

The r-word, initially, was meant to replace words that had become pejoratives. Introduced in 1895, “mental retardation” became the preferred term among psychologists, supplanting the diagnostic labels “imbecile,” “moron” and “feebleminded,” said Lieke van Heumen, a clinical associate professor in disability and human development at the University of Illinois, Chicago.

The r-word was intended to be a “neutral” term, van Heumen said. But people with disabilities then were still largely disregarded and treated as lesser members of society, regularly institutionalized in dangerous environments and even forcibly sterilized without their consent. Under those conditions, the r-word eventually warped into a slur and an insult, she said.

“When disability is framed as a lack, limitation or loss, it reinforces the idea that people with disabilities are inherently incapable,” van Heumen told CNN. “This framing is used to justify their exclusion from everyday life, as if they are missing what it takes to participate. Such language is not harmless — it influences public attitudes, informs policy decisions and ultimately affects how people with disabilities are treated.”

The chorus to retire the r-word grew louder in the 1970s, van Heumen said, as people with disabilities advocated for their right to participate fully in society and end the use of ableist language. Nearly 40 years later, the “Spread the Word to End the Word” campaign encouraged young people in particular to quit using the slur to insult their peers.

The federal government signaled its support to end the use of the r-word with 2010’s “Rosa’s Law,” named for a young girl with Down syndrome, which updated all federal laws to use “intellectual disability” in place of “mental retardation.” The legislation stated that the term and its “derivatives,” including the r-word, were “used to demean and insult both persons with and without disabilities.”

Sophie Stern, a 22-year-old choreographer and actress from Arizona, has Down syndrome and is a member of the Arizona Developmental Disabilities Planning Council. For years, she’s confronted classmates who’ve said the r-word in front of her, even petitioning to have the word removed from a script.

But she’s hearing the word more often now than she did in school, she told CNN. And it doesn’t make her any less upset to hear it, even if it’s not directed at her.

“It still hurts my feelings,” she said.

Why it’s coming back​

gettyimages-2216312549-20250528155834174.webp
Elon Musk has used the r-word several times since January on X, the platform he owns.

Celebrities used to apologize when they were “caught” using the r-word. Khloe and Kim Kardashian both issued statements when they used the slur in clips shared on Instagram in 2018. LeBron James apologized at least twice for letting the r-word slip in postgame interviews in 2011 and 2014. Author John Green said in 2015 that he shouldn’t have used the word in his popular YA novel “Paper Towns,” in which it appears in a quote from a teenage character.

Today, whether it’s “Silicon Valley tech bros” or far-right figures, people who use the r-word online appear to share a motivation — “the appeal of transgression,” said Julie Ingersoll, a professor of religious studies at the University of North Florida. Many people who use the r-word know it will anger people who disagree with them, Ingersoll said — it’s a way of “owning the libs.”

“I think that they are flaunting their ability to offend and confront,” she said. “Why do you need that word? If it bothers other people, why wouldn’t you just pick a different word?”

Content designed to provoke outrage is often more likely to court engagement — from both supporters and those who disagree, Benton said. Engagement guarantees visibility, and if the r-word is more visible online, it’ll eventually become less jarring for users to encounter, he said.

“Clicks are the currency in the commerce of social media,” Benton said. “And if I put up content where the r-word is prominently used, I can just guarantee there’s going to be a few thousand replies.”

Platforms can end up “rewarding” controversial content that draws sustained attention, said Brandon Harris, an assistant professor at the University of Alabama who studies content creators, especially those in the “manosphere.”

“Being controversial is more profitable than being kind to people,” Harris told CNN.

Inconsistent guidelines and enforcement on what constitutes hate speech also makes it easier to get away with using hurtful terms, Harris said.

X and Spotify didn’t respond to CNN’s requests for comment on their hate speech guidelines, but neither platform allows attacking other users based on disability, among other characteristics. Content that violates these rules is sometimes removed, demonetized or made less visible, both companies have said. X does allow users to post “potentially inflammatory content” and encourages users to block or unfollow other users whose content offends them.

Spokespeople for Meta and YouTube said their platforms do not allow the r-word to be used to mock a person’s disability, but the word is not banned outright on either platform.

The agitators using such language don’t necessarily need to believe the things they say, Harris said — intent doesn’t matter when the outcome normalizes the casual use of a hurtful term.

How the r-word came to represent a movement​

gettyimages-1408512382.webp
People are resisting the r-word's return when they see it, pointing out its history of harm. (Pictured, students and teachers in San Francisco rally to protest the use of the r-word in 2017.)

A spike in online use of the r-word would be harmful on its own. But even more concerning is what the slur’s return represents, Massanari said.

“These are never just about the words,” she said. “The words are standing in place for a whole symbol.”

What’s happening now, where notable people are using the r-word in posts on X or on podcasts, is a “classic testing of the waters,” Massanari said, when influential people who get paid to agitate see how far they can push the line.

“These communities come out to denigrate, to make fun of, to demonize the most marginalized,” she said.

The r-word will almost certainly not be the last slur to reemerge on popular platforms, from popular users, Benton said. And when the line is continually pushed, it can take people to “the worst spaces imaginable,” he said.

“The term itself — the casual use of it — is a problem,” he said. “The normalization of it will allow even more problematic terms to be normalized.”

Other hurtful words are already being used to harm other marginalized people, Harris pointed out. Republican Rep. Nancy Mace earlier this year repeatedly used an anti-transgender slur in a House Oversight Committee hearing. CNN reached out to Mace about her use of the word. In response, her communications director said, “While you tiptoe” around hurting feelings, the congresswoman “is standing up for women and girls.”

“We’re now using language that promotes cruelty, and not just cruelty but casual cruelty — where you just offhandedly don’t think about it and dismiss someone’s humanity,” Harris said of using slurs like those lobbed at trans people and people with disabilities.

Seeing how the r-word proliferates offline is the “next threshold” to cross, Benton said. Some people likely never stopped privately using the r-word, he said, but if people who aren’t protected by wealth, fame or political affiliations use the word at their workplace or in social settings, they could face punishing consequences.

Many people are actively pushing back against the r-word when they encounter it. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who has a son with Down syndrome, earlier this year called out Kanye West, “‘Christian conservatives’” and “popular newbie-conservative women” for “thinking it’s hip to ramp up use of the ‘R’ word.”

“Please unfollow me & know that my disrespect for you is insurmountable,” she wrote on X in March.

“The Brady Bunch” star Maureen McCormick, who’s also a Special Olympics ambassador, said that Joe Rogan celebrating the resurgence of the r-word “ignores the terrible hurt” the slur causes people with disabilities.

“This is not a victory,” she wrote on X, prompting more than 8,000 replies from supporters and detractors alike. “It is a regression.”

Engaging with users who post the r-word to court outrage and online engagement can cause well-meaning people to fall into a trap of rage bait, Benton, Harris and Massanari cautioned. But there must still be resistance against reintegrating the r-word into regular speech, they said — a conversation most effective when it’s had offline, person to person.

“We have to continue to have courage, to have these conversations and these moments of resistance to say, ‘We don’t appreciate what you’re doing, we don’t share your values,’” Harris said.

Sophie Stern, the dance teacher from Arizona, has a word of guidance for anyone who wants to pick up the r-word: “Don’t.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: ForgedBlades
The only people offended by the word retard are the moms with retarded kids that now have to take care of a spaz for the next 30-50 years before their inevitable early demise, progs who want to police language, and downies that are smart enough to know what that means.

You know who's not offended? Actual retards because they can barely comprehend what you're saying. Is something even offensive if the targeted audience isn't even offended by it? I mean imagine a world where no black people care about nigger. Chances are people would start to find something else to ruffle their feathers.

But go on retards, keep giving the words more power by your reaction. It'll keep being used 500 years from now at this rate.

Also despite the fact I say retard all the time I'm not "cruel" to those unfortunate enough to be retarded. Progs still don't understand you can say "offensive" things about a group and not actually hate them. I say chink all the time but I like Chinese people far more than I like say niggers or poojeets.

EDIT: One thing I wanted to touch up on is how these mongs believe if you just stop saying retard any negative words insulting peoples low IQ will just go away. Lets say somehow everyone stops using the word retarded. (good luck getting flips to stop saying mongoloid)

OK so now we use "profoundly disabled person" or some BS like that. What's the difference in me calling someone retarded or saying "bro you're disabled" besides the fact ones less immediately impactful?

I still have the same insulting meaning behind my words, I just changed them. So what? I'm still indirectly calling you a retard. It literally changes nothing.
 
Last edited:
These people just don't even bother considering that in turning "retard" from meaning "mentally incapacitated human with IDD issues" and being an insult from those people into people who are deliberately stupid or ignorant of reality, we've actually been more progressive than ever. Like downs syndrome people, autistics (us), sub70 IQ people and others are basically never referred to as "retards" anymore and none of them I've met has had issues with the word in years. We took a "slur" and redirected it to a more appropriate target, like I feel about niggers/blacks. You can't choose to be or not be born mentally stunted any more than you can choose your race, but you can choose whether you act retarded just like you can choose whether you act like a nigger.
 
There was a push a decade ago to end ableism by attempting to stigmatise anyone who used an intelligence based insult - stupid, idiot, dumb, even just commenting on someone being unintelligent or low iq - and suggested instead criticising them for being "uninformed", "ignorant", "poorly read" etc, on the grounds that people can't help their intelligence but they can help the quality of their arguments.
Is that why we cant say nigger anymore?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlosDanger
There's nothing worse you can do in the modern world than try to make it impossible to use a word, any word, you'll be drowned in it by people using it purely to spite you for the hubris.

Might as well put a big red button on your back that administers an electric shock if touched and then tell everyone "you are FORBIDDEN to touch this!"
 
What a retarded article. How did the nigger that wrote it not know that pretty much everyone who wasnt a faggot never stopped using it profusely in the first place?

Edit: Apparently i replied to this article with the same response as above, but two weeks ago. Must have forgot. Who's retarded now? Me, apparently.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BulkForceFive
Back