EU The right to bear arms in self-defense is embedded in the Czech constitution - Finally some uncucked news out of Europa

Article (Archive)

Prague, July 21 (CTK) - The Senate, the upper house of Czech parliament, has approved the right to use arms to defend oneself and others under legal conditions to be embedded in the constitution as a reaction to the EU's pro-regulatory stance on firearms acquisition and possession.

This right was included in the Senate-proposed amendment to the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, which is part of the constitution. Senators, therefore, passed the amendment as expected.

Based on the amendment, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms will include a new article saying that 'the right to defend one's own life or the life of another person even with the use of a weapon is guaranteed under the conditions set by the law.'

According to the authors of the bill, this constitutional change will prevent the right to bear arms from being restricted by common law and will strengthen the position of the Czech Republic in the debates on further EU regulations.

Now President Miloš Zeman must sign it into law. The president cannot veto a constitutional bill against common pieces of legislation.

"The proposal is not only symbolic in nature but can also serve as insurance for the future," said Senator Martin Červíček (ODS) who point out the tendency of some EU countries to ban the carrying of any objects that could be used as a weapon. According to Červíček, the disarmament of the population will not bring greater security, as criminals will obtain weapons illegally.

Vice-President of the Senate Jitka Seitlová (KDU-ČSL) and Pirate Senator Adéla Šípová publicly opposed the amendment saying that it is unnecessary with regard to the constitutional right to life and legal rules. Senator Jan Holásek objected that the interpretation of the right to life may change.

The amendment comes as a reaction to a petition signed by 102,000 people, including a number of top elected officials. It was launched by hunters and other arms owners in reaction to the European Commission's effort to limit the possession of arms, including legally possessed ones.

The reasoning behind its weapon regulations, the has EC said, is that it is necessary to take measures against terrorism. The critics, on their part, say terrorists mostly use illegally acquired weapons and that the Czech law in this respect is sufficient.

The amendment to the document will take effect on the first day of the second calendar month following the day of its publication in the Collection of Laws, which means no earlier than August 1 and no later than September 1.
 
Way to go Czechs. Although I shudder to think of what this will do to prices in the USA if they start buying just as much as we are right now.
Ammo prices are fucked here as well.

Also, this doesn't change anything in practice, you still need a license. The amendment is just a middle finger to the EU and a great way to make lefties screech their heads off.
 
Yet another example of member nations slowly but surely dismantling the EU's unelected, unwarranted, unwanted control of the various member nations' governments.

The best way for member nations of the EU to do this is to enshrine the rights of their own people within their own borders similarly to how the US enshrines the rights of its own citizens. Right to keep and bear arms, right to free speech, etc.

Nations who refuse to do so out themselves as dystopian shitholes with nothing of real value to contribute and deserve to be erased.
 
Yet another example of member nations slowly but surely dismantling the EU's unelected, unwarranted, unwanted control of the various member nations' governments.
So they want the benefits of being in the EU, without fulfilling the obligations of being an EU member? Another proto-brexit in the makings, mayhaps? Or a rethinking and down-scaling of what the EU is.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Population: 10 million. A little less than Georgia. It won't have much effect.
Yeah, but they're all going to be buying Czech-made weapons. Good stuff, period. The Czechs are like all the best parts of the Germans without the worst parts, so you get good engineering without the need to slap the price with the German Premium.
 
Ammo prices are fucked here as well.

Also, this doesn't change anything in practice, you still need a license. The amendment is just a middle finger to the EU and a great way to make lefties screech their heads off.
I would add another thing.
It should be now less of headache when you have shoot someone in selfdefence.
So they want the benefits of being in the EU, without fulfilling the obligations of being an EU member? Another proto-brexit in the makings, mayhaps? Or a rethinking and down-scaling of what the EU is.
Few things EU changed lot since we joined. And in most cases not for better.
Why should Germans, French , Italians...
Have say in our laws and politics?

Since start of Illegals crisis in 2015 situation here is: EU pushes shit we decide it is shit and do 180° turn against it.
EU copes seethes and dilates , but is powerless to do anything about it without losing member.
Our goverment Is too cucked however to leave on its own.
Simillar situation is in our Visegrád 4 allies (Poland, Hungary and Slovakia)
 
I presume possession of firearms without loicense is still illegal.

>conditions set by the law.

Weasel words that defer to arbitrary future legislation, explicitly giving up the usual need for amendment to it are not constitutional.

t. chechen jew
 
I presume possession of firearms without loicense is still illegal.

>conditions set by the law.

Weasel words that defer to arbitrary future legislation, explicitly giving up the usual need for amendment to it are not constitutional.

t. chechen jew
Yeah, nothing changes on that front. You can own some firearms without a license but nothing really useful.

The amendment isn't even specifically about firearms, everyone's hung up on them but it's about self-defense with *any weapon*, so in theory you should be fine if you get mugged and pull out a broadsword.

46319_155159534515298_7542043_n.jpg
 
  • Informative
Reactions: MrJokerRager
So they want the benefits of being in the EU, without fulfilling the obligations of being an EU member? Another proto-brexit in the makings, mayhaps? Or a rethinking and down-scaling of what the EU is.

Nah just Svejking we will wield bureocracy against them, Veto in diplomatic matters is particulary powerful due to Federalist rats being obssesed with turning it into single state.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: MrJokerRager
The czech republic is the model example of how to run a country.
They suffered under nazism and communism and they turned their economy around, surpassing places like Spain or parts of former East Germany.
They have low taxes, good gun laws, a thriving tech sector, and a healthy society.
They are probably the most liberal country in Europe, liberal meaning that the government doesn't tyrannically keep people from speaking their mind, owning a firearm or keeping most of their income.
 
Back