The Rise, Fall, and Return of Kiwi Farms After Deplatforming Efforts - Pseudo intellectual article attempts to frame the farms deplatforming as authoritatively retarded as possible

Authors:
(1) Anh V. Vu, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Cybercrime Centre (anh.vu@cl.cam.ac.uk);
(2) Alice Hutchings, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Cybercrime Centre (alice.hutchings@cl.cam.ac.uk);
(3) Ross Anderson, University of Cambridge, and University of Edinburgh (ross.anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk).

2.1. Related Work

Most studies assessing the impact of deplatforming have worked with data on social networks. Deplatforming users may reduce activity and toxicity levels of relevant actors on Twitter [28] and Reddit [29], [30], limit the spread of conspiratorial disinformation on Facebook [31], reduce the engagement of peripheral members with hateful content [44], and minimise disinformation and extreme speech on YouTube [32]. But deplatforming has often made hate groups and individuals even more extreme, toxic and radicalised. They may view the disruption of their platform as an attack on their shared beliefs and values, and move to even more toxic places to continue spreading their message. There are many examples: the Reddit ban of r/incels in November 2017 led to the emergence of two standalone forums, incels.is and incels.net, which then grew rapidly; users banned from Twitter and Reddit exhibit higher levels of toxicity when migrating to Gab [33]; users migrated to their own standalone websites after getting banned from r/The Donald expressed higher levels of toxicity and radicalisation, even though their posting activity on the new platform decreased [45], [46]; the ‘Great Deplatforming’ directed users to other less regulated, more extreme platforms [47]; the activity of many right-wing users moved to Telegram increased multi-fold after being banned on major social media [34]; users banned from Twitter are more active on Gettr [48]; communities migrated to Voat from Reddit can be more resilient [49]; and roughly half of QAnon users moved to Poal after the Voat shutdown [50]. Blocking can also be ineffective for technical and implementation reasons: removing Facebook content after a delay appears to have been ineffective and had limited impact due to the short cycle of users’ engagement [51].

The major limitation of focusing on social networks is that these platforms are often under the control of a single tech company and thus content can be permanently removed without effective backup and recovery. We instead examine deplatforming a standalone website involving a concerted effort on a much wider scale by a series of tech companies, including some big entities that handle a large amount of Internet traffic. Such standalone communities, for instance, websites and forums, may be more resilient as the admin has control of all the content, facilitating easy backups and restores. While existing studies measure changes in posting activity and the behaviours of actors when their place is disrupted, we also provide insights about other stakeholders such as the forum operators, the community leading the campaign, and the tech firms that attempted the takedown.

Previous work has documented the impacts of law enforcement and industry interventions on online cybercrime marketplaces [20], cryptocurrency market price [52], DDoSfor-hire services [14], [15], the Kelihos, Zeus, and Nitol botnets [53], and the well-known click fraud network ZeroAccess [54]; yet how effective a concerted effort of several tech firms can be in deplatforming an extreme and radicalised community remains unstudied.

2.2. The Kiwi Farms Disruption
KIWI FARMS had been growing steadily over a decade (see Figure 1) and had been under Cloudflare’s DDoS protection for some years.[2] An increase of roughly 50% in forum activity happened during the COVID-19 lockdown starting in March 2020, presumably as people were spending more time online. Prior interventions have resulted in the forum getting banned from Google Adsense, and from Mastercard, Visa and PayPal in 2016; from hundreds of VPS providers between 2014–2019 [55]; and from selling merchandise on the print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble in 2016. XenForo, a close-source forum platform, revoked its license in late 2021 [56]. DreamHost stopped its domain registration in July 2021 after a software developer killed himself after being harassed by the site’s users. This did not disrupt the forum as it was given 14 days to seek another registrar [57]. While these interventions may have had negative effects on its profit and loss account, they did not impact its activity overall. The only significant disruption in the forum’s history was between 22 January and 9 February 2017 (19 days), when the forum’s owner suspended it himself due to his family being harassed [58].[3]

The disruption studied in this work was started by the online community in 2022. A malicious alarm was sent to the police in London, Ontario by a forum member on 5 August 2022, claiming that a Canadian trans activist had committed murders and was planning more, leading to her being swatted [23]. She and her family were then repeatedly tracked, doxxed, threatened, and generally harassed. In return, she launched a campaign on Twitter on 22 August 2022 under the hashtag #dropkiwifarms and planned a protest outside Cloudflare’s headquarters to pressure the company to deplatform the site [59]. This campaign generated lots of attention and mainstream headlines, which ultimately resulted in several tech firms trying to shut down the forum. This is the first time that the forum was completely inaccessible for an extended period due to an external action, with no activity on any online places including the dark web. It attempted to recover twice, but even when it eventually returned online, the overall activity was roughly halved.

The majority of actions taken to disrupt the forum occurred within the first two months of the campaign. Most of them were widely covered in the media and can be checked against public statements made by the industry and the forum admins’ announcements (see Figure 2). The forum came under a large DDoS attack on 23 August 2022, one day after the campaign started. It was then unavailable from 27 to 28 August 2022 due to ISP blackholing. Cloudflare terminated their DDoS prevention service on 3 September 2022 – just 12 days after the Twitter campaign started – due to an “unprecedented emergency and immediate threat to human life” [24]. The forum was still supported by DDoSGuard (a Russian competitor to Cloudflare), but that firm also suspended service on 5 September 2022 [25]. The forum was still active on the dark web but this .onion site soon became inaccessible too. On 6 September 2022, hCaptcha dropped support; the forum was removed from the Internet Archive on the same day [60]. This left it under DiamWall’s DDoS protection and hosted on VanwaTech – a hosting provider describing themselves as neutral and noncensored [61]. On 15 September 2022, DiamWall terminated their protection [26] and the ‘.top’ domain provider also stopped support [27]. The forum was completely down from 19 to 26 September 2022 and from 23 to 29 October 2022. From 23 October 2022 onwards, several ISPs intermittently rejected announcements or blackholed routes to the forum due to violations of their acceptable use policy, including Voxility and Tier-1 providers such as Lumen, Arelion, GTT and Zayo. This is remarkable as there are only about 15 Tier-1 ISPs in the world. The forum admin devoted extensive effort to maintaining the infrastructure, fixing bugs, and providing guidance to users in response to password breaches. Eventually, by routing through other ISPs, KIWI FARMS was able to get back online on the clearnet and remain stable, particularly following its second recovery in October 2022.

(Link/Archive)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Formatting was fucked from the website so I'm not transferring any of the images. If this has already been posted then help me figure out how I can't find it on the site.

Edit: Sorry if it wasn't clear. This is not the entire article. I just posted over the part where they talk the most about the farms disruption. Check out archive link to see the full autistic hate of the farms on display!
 
Last edited:
However, we lack ground-truth data about reallife events, which cannot be solely observed from forum discussions. Investigating doxxing-related posts that share real-victim information would be a good start, but the main challenge is validating data posted by untrusted users at scale, in the absence of a robust way to identify users.
I don't think it's what they're suggesting here, but for future research I strongly encourage them to set up a Bully Hunters style tip line where people can call or email in to provide data on how they've been negatively impacted by the Farms.

I think they would get a lot of robust data out of that, and definitely not terabytes of Goatse and TubGirl.
 
Wait so the tracking and research ends 3 years ago?
Dude... DropKiwiFarms was 40 years ago...
skeleton.webp
 
This sort of paper and spinelessness fits right in.
IMG_4221.webp
Link | Archive
One of them is on sabbatical for the whole year. Perhaps a bit scared of being around when the paper came out. Maybe needed a mental health break from all the emotional harm of reading the forum. I don't blame her, we Kiwis are quite fearsome:
IMG_4222.webp
 
Leftist Authoritarians mald that a coordinated grassroots movement could not take down a website with an insane webmaster who will not give up.

Their usual internet activist cancelation tools did not work, so therefore their last resort must be to call for government-sanctioned assassination.
 
But deplatforming has often made hate groups and individuals even more extreme, toxic and radicalised. They may view the disruption of their platform as an attack on their shared beliefs and values, and move to even more toxic places to continue spreading their message.
What message am I trying to spread? Also any of the examples dont care about you attacking shared beliefs and values its the fact that you try to keep people from attacking YOUR shared beliefs and values by censoring and silencing them.

Which is insanity considering this is being talked about in a college, arent the purpose of colleges is to discuss many different perspectives and point of views to progress as a species? Ofcourse you are going to get a few screw loose but thats why they get laughed at, bullied, made fun of. If theres more people that share the same opinion or God forbids change thier opinions" to more right leaning/traditional whos fault is that??????
 
Extremist? Today on the farms I have asked for advice on a new handbag, talked about the work of the Brontë sisters and mused on the psychosomatic nature of migraine, with a chuckle about piss towels.
Am I missing the provisional arm where we discuss making bombs?
(Oxford is the superior university and always has been…)?
Actually we are all talking in code. All that stuff you mentioned was really us discussing ways to commit heinous crimes and violent acts. Like swap Balldo’s coffee with PCP and give Fuentes rabies.
 
calling yourself an academic while missing the mark this hard is pathetic.
I think I was pretty lucky when I was an academic because I was purely STEM and working on fairly useful things. Even then (and this was the turn of the century) it was obvious that academia was heavily subverted and that the labs and a few other obscure areas were a little bubble in a wider cesspit. There are still good academics who deserve the title, rummaging around in Sumerian manuscripts and all that, but these guys, what they’re doing isn’t academia. It’s cult behaviour.
I still know a lot of academics, and I speak to them and they are fully committed to this stuff. I have to get that point across - they really, really believe this stuff. They believe it with the kind of zealotry you’d associate with cults. They will not engage with any kind of conversation that challenges any of their beliefs. Now again, STEM is more pozzed now but back in the day it was seen as a thing that you HAD to do, to face criticism and questions and to be able to argue and show data to make your point. But these people? They do not work like that. There is no opposition to them in their lives. I had a run in with one a while back at a party and she was literally spitting with rage at a very benign criticism. It was obvious she faces no criticism at all,
This isn’t what people think of as academia, it’s a cult, and it’s every bit as nasty and destructive and violent as any cult.
They are very dangerous people. They have the ear of people with significant influence, they are listened to at high levels, and what they are preaching is monstrous. Papers like this are created as the first step in Policy, and they WILL use happenings and self reference such papers into reality.
You cannot hate them enough
 
Extremist? Today on the farms I have asked for advice on a new handbag, talked about the work of the Brontë sisters and mused on the psychosomatic nature of migraine, with a chuckle about piss towels.
Am I missing the provisional arm where we discuss making bombs?
(Oxford is the superior university and always has been…)?
Having used this site for a couple months now it's noticeably less dangerous than people make it out to be. I have no interest in being violent to anyone or hacking into someone's bank account or whatever these authors are trying to imply happens here. 99% of the posts I read do not either. Giving commentary about funny internet people isn't illegal where I live, I just have to do it on here because the larger platforms for some reason feel a need to ban stuff that is perfectly within the legal boundaries of acceptable speech.
 
Suffah academoscum
Academics
activist academics: get fucked
then the academics/scholars say
Modern Academia
evil intent in high sounding academic words
This commie academics wanting to silence anti-revolutionary ideas is the creepy bit.
The """academics""" ARE cult members
The academics are literal Angloids
you dont hate Intellectuals/Academics enough
calling yourself an academic while missing the mark this hard is pathetic.
cries the 'academic'
All of this seethe from academia
Pol-Pot knew how to handle (((academics)))
There are still good academics who deserve the title
I would love to hear what the the authors have to say in reply to our discussion of their work.

In other words...

 
Back