The Rise, Fall, and Return of Kiwi Farms After Deplatforming Efforts - Pseudo intellectual article attempts to frame the farms deplatforming as authoritatively retarded as possible

Authors:
(1) Anh V. Vu, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Cybercrime Centre (anh.vu@cl.cam.ac.uk);
(2) Alice Hutchings, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Cybercrime Centre (alice.hutchings@cl.cam.ac.uk);
(3) Ross Anderson, University of Cambridge, and University of Edinburgh (ross.anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk).

2.1. Related Work

Most studies assessing the impact of deplatforming have worked with data on social networks. Deplatforming users may reduce activity and toxicity levels of relevant actors on Twitter [28] and Reddit [29], [30], limit the spread of conspiratorial disinformation on Facebook [31], reduce the engagement of peripheral members with hateful content [44], and minimise disinformation and extreme speech on YouTube [32]. But deplatforming has often made hate groups and individuals even more extreme, toxic and radicalised. They may view the disruption of their platform as an attack on their shared beliefs and values, and move to even more toxic places to continue spreading their message. There are many examples: the Reddit ban of r/incels in November 2017 led to the emergence of two standalone forums, incels.is and incels.net, which then grew rapidly; users banned from Twitter and Reddit exhibit higher levels of toxicity when migrating to Gab [33]; users migrated to their own standalone websites after getting banned from r/The Donald expressed higher levels of toxicity and radicalisation, even though their posting activity on the new platform decreased [45], [46]; the ‘Great Deplatforming’ directed users to other less regulated, more extreme platforms [47]; the activity of many right-wing users moved to Telegram increased multi-fold after being banned on major social media [34]; users banned from Twitter are more active on Gettr [48]; communities migrated to Voat from Reddit can be more resilient [49]; and roughly half of QAnon users moved to Poal after the Voat shutdown [50]. Blocking can also be ineffective for technical and implementation reasons: removing Facebook content after a delay appears to have been ineffective and had limited impact due to the short cycle of users’ engagement [51].

The major limitation of focusing on social networks is that these platforms are often under the control of a single tech company and thus content can be permanently removed without effective backup and recovery. We instead examine deplatforming a standalone website involving a concerted effort on a much wider scale by a series of tech companies, including some big entities that handle a large amount of Internet traffic. Such standalone communities, for instance, websites and forums, may be more resilient as the admin has control of all the content, facilitating easy backups and restores. While existing studies measure changes in posting activity and the behaviours of actors when their place is disrupted, we also provide insights about other stakeholders such as the forum operators, the community leading the campaign, and the tech firms that attempted the takedown.

Previous work has documented the impacts of law enforcement and industry interventions on online cybercrime marketplaces [20], cryptocurrency market price [52], DDoSfor-hire services [14], [15], the Kelihos, Zeus, and Nitol botnets [53], and the well-known click fraud network ZeroAccess [54]; yet how effective a concerted effort of several tech firms can be in deplatforming an extreme and radicalised community remains unstudied.

2.2. The Kiwi Farms Disruption
KIWI FARMS had been growing steadily over a decade (see Figure 1) and had been under Cloudflare’s DDoS protection for some years.[2] An increase of roughly 50% in forum activity happened during the COVID-19 lockdown starting in March 2020, presumably as people were spending more time online. Prior interventions have resulted in the forum getting banned from Google Adsense, and from Mastercard, Visa and PayPal in 2016; from hundreds of VPS providers between 2014–2019 [55]; and from selling merchandise on the print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble in 2016. XenForo, a close-source forum platform, revoked its license in late 2021 [56]. DreamHost stopped its domain registration in July 2021 after a software developer killed himself after being harassed by the site’s users. This did not disrupt the forum as it was given 14 days to seek another registrar [57]. While these interventions may have had negative effects on its profit and loss account, they did not impact its activity overall. The only significant disruption in the forum’s history was between 22 January and 9 February 2017 (19 days), when the forum’s owner suspended it himself due to his family being harassed [58].[3]

The disruption studied in this work was started by the online community in 2022. A malicious alarm was sent to the police in London, Ontario by a forum member on 5 August 2022, claiming that a Canadian trans activist had committed murders and was planning more, leading to her being swatted [23]. She and her family were then repeatedly tracked, doxxed, threatened, and generally harassed. In return, she launched a campaign on Twitter on 22 August 2022 under the hashtag #dropkiwifarms and planned a protest outside Cloudflare’s headquarters to pressure the company to deplatform the site [59]. This campaign generated lots of attention and mainstream headlines, which ultimately resulted in several tech firms trying to shut down the forum. This is the first time that the forum was completely inaccessible for an extended period due to an external action, with no activity on any online places including the dark web. It attempted to recover twice, but even when it eventually returned online, the overall activity was roughly halved.

The majority of actions taken to disrupt the forum occurred within the first two months of the campaign. Most of them were widely covered in the media and can be checked against public statements made by the industry and the forum admins’ announcements (see Figure 2). The forum came under a large DDoS attack on 23 August 2022, one day after the campaign started. It was then unavailable from 27 to 28 August 2022 due to ISP blackholing. Cloudflare terminated their DDoS prevention service on 3 September 2022 – just 12 days after the Twitter campaign started – due to an “unprecedented emergency and immediate threat to human life” [24]. The forum was still supported by DDoSGuard (a Russian competitor to Cloudflare), but that firm also suspended service on 5 September 2022 [25]. The forum was still active on the dark web but this .onion site soon became inaccessible too. On 6 September 2022, hCaptcha dropped support; the forum was removed from the Internet Archive on the same day [60]. This left it under DiamWall’s DDoS protection and hosted on VanwaTech – a hosting provider describing themselves as neutral and noncensored [61]. On 15 September 2022, DiamWall terminated their protection [26] and the ‘.top’ domain provider also stopped support [27]. The forum was completely down from 19 to 26 September 2022 and from 23 to 29 October 2022. From 23 October 2022 onwards, several ISPs intermittently rejected announcements or blackholed routes to the forum due to violations of their acceptable use policy, including Voxility and Tier-1 providers such as Lumen, Arelion, GTT and Zayo. This is remarkable as there are only about 15 Tier-1 ISPs in the world. The forum admin devoted extensive effort to maintaining the infrastructure, fixing bugs, and providing guidance to users in response to password breaches. Eventually, by routing through other ISPs, KIWI FARMS was able to get back online on the clearnet and remain stable, particularly following its second recovery in October 2022.

(Link/Archive)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Formatting was fucked from the website so I'm not transferring any of the images. If this has already been posted then help me figure out how I can't find it on the site.

Edit: Sorry if it wasn't clear. This is not the entire article. I just posted over the part where they talk the most about the farms disruption. Check out archive link to see the full autistic hate of the farms on display!
 
Last edited:
The moral of the study is that you need to kill or arrest website administrators. The entire thesis is that industry censorship doesn't work and you need to go after the minds behind it. This is what they're laying groundwork for.
Why aren't they going for Partap Rapeape Davis? The defacto admin of 4chan. I've seen worse shit on /pol than I've seen on kiwi. Partap allows vids of people literally being stabbed to death and he seems indifferent to CP. Kiwi is free of such filth. How many nutters have posted manifesto's on 4chan before doing the deed? How many of Kiwi?

Seems like a real double ass standard going on with these "researchers."
 
Why aren't they going for Partap Rapeape Davis? The defacto admin of 4chan. I've seen worse shit on /pol than I've seen on kiwi. Partap allows vids of people literally being stabbed to death and he seems indifferent to CP. Kiwi is free of such filth. How many nutters have posted manifesto's on 4chan before doing the deed? How many of Kiwi?

Seems like a real double ass standard going on with these "researchers."
Davis is likely either a ruse or a fed, with no in-between.
 
Davis is likely either a ruse or a fed, with no in-between.
Davis is just an ordinary oldfag with no social life whatsoever. The proof is in the pudding (check out the 4chan threads for evidence.) He's no evil genius and he's no fed. Like most people slinging drugs he's a very typical shitty human being that needs a few doses of justice. 4chan is notorious for CP distribution and it continued during Partaps reign.
 
Deplatforming users may reduce activity and toxicity levels of relevant actors on Twitter [28] and Reddit [29], [30], limit the spread of conspiratorial disinformation on Facebook [31], reduce the engagement of peripheral members with hateful content [44], and minimise disinformation and extreme speech on YouTube [32]. But deplatforming has often made hate groups and individuals even more extreme, toxic and radicalised
Unpersoning has been shown to reduce the influence and seditious activity of relevant revolutionaries [32[ and activists [33] limit the spread of anti-party philosophies [34] [35] and minimize the harmful inspiration of pre-party folk legends [36]. But unpersoning has often made anti-party actors even more suspicious, extreme, and radicalized
 
Private companies must comply and remove illegal content from their infrastructure when directed to do so by a court order. However, deplatforming KIWI FARMS or any other customers does not violate the principle of free speech. It is essentially a contractual matter; they have the right to cease their support for a website that violates their policies. Infrastructure providers may occasionally need to work expediently with law enforcement in the case of an imminent threat to life. Most providers have worked out ways of doing this, but the mechanisms can be too sluggish. Cloudflare attempted to collaborate with law enforcement to sort out the case of KIWI FARMS, yet the process could not keep up with the escalating threats and it ended up taking unilateral action, relying on its terms of service [24]. In an ideal world, we would have an international legal framework for taking down websites that host illegal content or that promote crime; unfortunately, this framework does not exist.



The Budapest Convention [108] criminalises some material on which all states agree, such as child sex abuse images, but even there the boundaries are contested [109]. Online drug markets such as SILK ROAD and HANSA MARKET have been taken down because of other laws – drug laws – that also enjoy international standardisation and collaboration. Copyright infringement also gets the attention of international treaties and coordinated action by tech majors, though civil law plays a greater role here than criminal law. Then there is material about which some states feel strongly but others do not; ‘one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist’. And then there’s a vast swamp of fake news, animal cruelty, conspiracy theories, and other material that many find unpleasant or distressing, and which social networks moderate for the comfort of both their users and their advertisers. Legislators occasionally call for better policing of some of this content.
I think that this part in particular (it's not in OP, it's from going to the link and reading more.) is probably the most telling. The EU has already started heavily censoring for CSAM material in areas it doesn't exist on the clearnet.
 
Why aren't they going for Partap Rapeape Davis? The defacto admin of 4chan. I've seen worse shit on /pol than I've seen on kiwi. Partap allows vids of people literally being stabbed to death and he seems indifferent to CP. Kiwi is free of such filth. How many nutters have posted manifesto's on 4chan before doing the deed? How many of Kiwi?

Seems like a real double ass standard going on with these "researchers."
He's in on it/ a fed. There is a lot of hate in some of the very old communities that spawned or spun off from 4chan toward him l. #raperapeape for example. /f/ removal also made a lot of grognard mad, since it's a repository of internet 1.0. Basically he's a plant , and 4 chan lost most of it's "movers" 10 years ago
 
Pol Pot did absolutely nothing wrong. All the people he killed had it coming. Journalists. The intellectuals. The overnight bug class, khmer Rouge forever.

An interesting book on the subject is "Beyond the Horizon" by by Laurence Picq which is perhaps the only firsthand account of life inside the Khmer Rouge government in the capital while it was in power.
 
The legendary battle of the farms vs the troons
tenor.gif
 
All Keffals and his ugly troon friends manage to do was signal boost this site in the long run. It’s funny to think about how dead this site was a few weeks pre-Keffals, and these retards literally gave it a huge shot in the arm to rejuvenate it. A few years later, the site is in the best shape it has ever been in. It’s working better than ever, threads are the best they’ve ever been, and activity is booming.

I know it was a nuisance for Josh to deal with, but in the end, it made everything better. Phoenix from the flame type of situation.

And we are still dunking on ugly trannies and there’s nothing they can do about it lol
 
All Keffals and his ugly troon friends manage to do was signal boost this site in the long run. It’s funny to think about how dead this site was a few weeks pre-Keffals, and these retards literally gave it a huge shot in the arm to rejuvenate it. A few years later, the site is in the best shape it has ever been in. It’s working better than ever, threads are the best they’ve ever been, and activity is booming.

I know it was a nuisance for Josh to deal with, but in the end, it made everything better. Phoenix from the flame type of situation.

And we are still dunking on ugly trannies and there’s nothing they can do about it lol
The Streisand Effect, a tale as old as time.
 
For what it's worth, the failure to bring Kiwiflare into the market is a massive Jersh failure.
As I understand it, there's a bit of a security through obscurity effect there. Cloudflare needs very powerful ddos protection because it's a huge company with a lot of clients, and so hackers are incentivized to try hard to break them. Kiwiflare is a relatively low-value target, so with less attention Josh can keep it running well enough to protect KF (I forget if any other sites are using it).
 
Doesn't Keffals go by "they" not "she", naughty naughty, the authors misgendered him several times.
And it’s all because we say that men cannot become women.
Come on! Some of us heretically said it was wrong to give kids unsanitary made hormones or not to torture baby monkeys.
The academics are literal Angloids. Anything that comes from this rainy shithole island can instantly be disregarded.
Doesn't the UK have very strict libel laws. Have they said anything they shouldn't.
 
Back