The Rise, Fall, and Return of Kiwi Farms After Deplatforming Efforts - Pseudo intellectual article attempts to frame the farms deplatforming as authoritatively retarded as possible

Authors:
(1) Anh V. Vu, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Cybercrime Centre (anh.vu@cl.cam.ac.uk);
(2) Alice Hutchings, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Cybercrime Centre (alice.hutchings@cl.cam.ac.uk);
(3) Ross Anderson, University of Cambridge, and University of Edinburgh (ross.anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk).

2.1. Related Work

Most studies assessing the impact of deplatforming have worked with data on social networks. Deplatforming users may reduce activity and toxicity levels of relevant actors on Twitter [28] and Reddit [29], [30], limit the spread of conspiratorial disinformation on Facebook [31], reduce the engagement of peripheral members with hateful content [44], and minimise disinformation and extreme speech on YouTube [32]. But deplatforming has often made hate groups and individuals even more extreme, toxic and radicalised. They may view the disruption of their platform as an attack on their shared beliefs and values, and move to even more toxic places to continue spreading their message. There are many examples: the Reddit ban of r/incels in November 2017 led to the emergence of two standalone forums, incels.is and incels.net, which then grew rapidly; users banned from Twitter and Reddit exhibit higher levels of toxicity when migrating to Gab [33]; users migrated to their own standalone websites after getting banned from r/The Donald expressed higher levels of toxicity and radicalisation, even though their posting activity on the new platform decreased [45], [46]; the ‘Great Deplatforming’ directed users to other less regulated, more extreme platforms [47]; the activity of many right-wing users moved to Telegram increased multi-fold after being banned on major social media [34]; users banned from Twitter are more active on Gettr [48]; communities migrated to Voat from Reddit can be more resilient [49]; and roughly half of QAnon users moved to Poal after the Voat shutdown [50]. Blocking can also be ineffective for technical and implementation reasons: removing Facebook content after a delay appears to have been ineffective and had limited impact due to the short cycle of users’ engagement [51].

The major limitation of focusing on social networks is that these platforms are often under the control of a single tech company and thus content can be permanently removed without effective backup and recovery. We instead examine deplatforming a standalone website involving a concerted effort on a much wider scale by a series of tech companies, including some big entities that handle a large amount of Internet traffic. Such standalone communities, for instance, websites and forums, may be more resilient as the admin has control of all the content, facilitating easy backups and restores. While existing studies measure changes in posting activity and the behaviours of actors when their place is disrupted, we also provide insights about other stakeholders such as the forum operators, the community leading the campaign, and the tech firms that attempted the takedown.

Previous work has documented the impacts of law enforcement and industry interventions on online cybercrime marketplaces [20], cryptocurrency market price [52], DDoSfor-hire services [14], [15], the Kelihos, Zeus, and Nitol botnets [53], and the well-known click fraud network ZeroAccess [54]; yet how effective a concerted effort of several tech firms can be in deplatforming an extreme and radicalised community remains unstudied.

2.2. The Kiwi Farms Disruption
KIWI FARMS had been growing steadily over a decade (see Figure 1) and had been under Cloudflare’s DDoS protection for some years.[2] An increase of roughly 50% in forum activity happened during the COVID-19 lockdown starting in March 2020, presumably as people were spending more time online. Prior interventions have resulted in the forum getting banned from Google Adsense, and from Mastercard, Visa and PayPal in 2016; from hundreds of VPS providers between 2014–2019 [55]; and from selling merchandise on the print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble in 2016. XenForo, a close-source forum platform, revoked its license in late 2021 [56]. DreamHost stopped its domain registration in July 2021 after a software developer killed himself after being harassed by the site’s users. This did not disrupt the forum as it was given 14 days to seek another registrar [57]. While these interventions may have had negative effects on its profit and loss account, they did not impact its activity overall. The only significant disruption in the forum’s history was between 22 January and 9 February 2017 (19 days), when the forum’s owner suspended it himself due to his family being harassed [58].[3]

The disruption studied in this work was started by the online community in 2022. A malicious alarm was sent to the police in London, Ontario by a forum member on 5 August 2022, claiming that a Canadian trans activist had committed murders and was planning more, leading to her being swatted [23]. She and her family were then repeatedly tracked, doxxed, threatened, and generally harassed. In return, she launched a campaign on Twitter on 22 August 2022 under the hashtag #dropkiwifarms and planned a protest outside Cloudflare’s headquarters to pressure the company to deplatform the site [59]. This campaign generated lots of attention and mainstream headlines, which ultimately resulted in several tech firms trying to shut down the forum. This is the first time that the forum was completely inaccessible for an extended period due to an external action, with no activity on any online places including the dark web. It attempted to recover twice, but even when it eventually returned online, the overall activity was roughly halved.

The majority of actions taken to disrupt the forum occurred within the first two months of the campaign. Most of them were widely covered in the media and can be checked against public statements made by the industry and the forum admins’ announcements (see Figure 2). The forum came under a large DDoS attack on 23 August 2022, one day after the campaign started. It was then unavailable from 27 to 28 August 2022 due to ISP blackholing. Cloudflare terminated their DDoS prevention service on 3 September 2022 – just 12 days after the Twitter campaign started – due to an “unprecedented emergency and immediate threat to human life” [24]. The forum was still supported by DDoSGuard (a Russian competitor to Cloudflare), but that firm also suspended service on 5 September 2022 [25]. The forum was still active on the dark web but this .onion site soon became inaccessible too. On 6 September 2022, hCaptcha dropped support; the forum was removed from the Internet Archive on the same day [60]. This left it under DiamWall’s DDoS protection and hosted on VanwaTech – a hosting provider describing themselves as neutral and noncensored [61]. On 15 September 2022, DiamWall terminated their protection [26] and the ‘.top’ domain provider also stopped support [27]. The forum was completely down from 19 to 26 September 2022 and from 23 to 29 October 2022. From 23 October 2022 onwards, several ISPs intermittently rejected announcements or blackholed routes to the forum due to violations of their acceptable use policy, including Voxility and Tier-1 providers such as Lumen, Arelion, GTT and Zayo. This is remarkable as there are only about 15 Tier-1 ISPs in the world. The forum admin devoted extensive effort to maintaining the infrastructure, fixing bugs, and providing guidance to users in response to password breaches. Eventually, by routing through other ISPs, KIWI FARMS was able to get back online on the clearnet and remain stable, particularly following its second recovery in October 2022.

(Link/Archive)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Formatting was fucked from the website so I'm not transferring any of the images. If this has already been posted then help me figure out how I can't find it on the site.

Edit: Sorry if it wasn't clear. This is not the entire article. I just posted over the part where they talk the most about the farms disruption. Check out archive link to see the full autistic hate of the farms on display!
 
Last edited:
Cambridge uni academics are pissed that you can't get law abiding forums taken down by abusing LEO power and perhaps people need to find ways to "incapacitate" internet forum admins when they say shit "we" don't agree with.
>Can't we just drone this guy?
1754692240189.webp
 
I love explaining the TV license to Southern US residents.
Do they find it incomprehensible that there is such a thing in the world, or do they just suddenly understand why it was so easy for us to kick them the fuck out of our country in the Revolutionary War?
Does anyone have the tldr? not reading this shit
Literally nobody has actually read this unintelligible niggerbabble. This is how they keep re-titling it and hauling it out against us, because it is a "peer-reviewed article" or whatever, even though it's utter gibberish based in zero facts.

It gets featured in some gay "symposium" or re-issued as somehow being proof of the utter lies whoever presents it claims to be true.

Nobody has ever read it. But it totally proves whatever insane lies and bullshit any liar has to say about us. Because it's like "peer-reviewed" n sheeeeit.
 
Do they find it incomprehensible that there is such a thing in the world, or do they just suddenly understand why it was so easy for us to kick them the fuck out of our country in the Revolutionary War?
To me, from out of the south, I'd say it's incomprehensible. Southernness is defined by jeffersonian yeomen farmer values and later, huey longesque ideas of "every man a king".

It doesn't make sense that someone can demand licensure for something I hold inside of my own home in private use, because in american legal thought, my home is my "castle". I'm lord there in a sense of total sovereignty. It's not comprehensibly legal, since in my own home, the state doesn't have rights without public evidence or proven suspicion of a crime having happened.
 
Reading all that nonsense reminds me of the words of a friend of my family, who was one of the most intelligent and best educated men I've known in my entire life (the kind of person that gets degrees in their spare time for fun), that he used all the time when he talked about his dealings with people in academic circles:
"There's a very special kind of stupidity reserved for those who study all their life to reach it."

Don't ask why, but I have some experience with research papers and theses. Even ignoring the biased and unsourced claims, if this were to be graded or fairly peer-reviewed, this would be instantly dismissed on basic structure alone, regardless of content or political bias. The abstract is amateurish garbage that has little to do with the actual paper's objective ("Drawing on several quantitative data sources, we show that deplatforming an active community to suppress online hate and harassment, even with a substantial concerted effort involving several tech firms, can be hard." Look forward to my future award-winning thesis on mathematics: "Oh boy, equations sure as fuck are hard"). They go out of their way to address, several times, that deplatforming is fairly useless and counterproductive for their stated objectives and mathematically "prove" that it makes things worse, but by some incredibly stupid pant-stealing gnomes logic they conclude that, for some reason, that magically wouldn't be the case if only they could get the police to "incapacitate" people who haven't broken the law. No, they won't explain why or how this objectively hypothetical solution would solve this very real problem when everything else hasn't worked; it isn't even part of the actual paper until it spontaneously appears in the conclusion, just trust me bro. That's not how academic papers, even bogus ones, work.
I suspect that this was a much more pessimistic (for them) research about the fact that deplatforming is ultimately pointless, but it was changed into something more palatable for pseudo-intellectual pearl-clutchers at the last moment, with the abstract being the worst victim of the rewrite.
The number-crunching, while ultimately pointless (what's the point of monitoring an effort that you preemptively deemed useless), is pretty impressive and, if used to actually make a point could be interesting. The actual timeline of events is the only part where something close to actual research was involved, and the structure and readability are pretty good, for brain-rotted navel-gazer standards at least. If this was a paper about, say, the relative growth rate of mold on different kinds of fancy cheese instead of a very politically charged topic, it would be instantly sent back to the drawing board, with a very stern note from the reviewer attached. I know academics are exempt from their own rules once they enter the rabbit hole of current-day bullshit, but even in those circles, it's considered polite to at least try to keep appearances up.

The really funny part for me was every time Null was indirectly mentioned as the Farm's "operators" (sic). Before today, I didn't know you could be Tsundere in a research paper, but here we are. I had a hearty chuckle each time that the researcher praised that damn Ooperator's persistence and technical prowess and how they would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn't been for those meddling kids and their slobbermouthed dog ; In my mind, the whole writing process went along something like this, but with the wikihow mutt:
1754692501141.webp
 
Last edited:
It's not comprehensibly legal, since in my own home, the state doesn't have rights without public evidence or proven suspicion of a crime having happened.
Just the fact the government claims there is this thing where you need to have a "loicense" just to watch TV from an antenna, and people just don't instantly chop off their heads, is probably incomprehensible to most Americans.
 
The only people who defame, discredit or dislike the farms are people who have never even browsed a single thread on the forum. They are afraid of a boogeyman they've heard described in mainstream media, a site that allegedly DAHXES and bully people into suicide.
That couldn't be further from the truth.

It's like believing 4chan of old was this hacker network of 2edgy5me scriptkiddies when it was just an imageboard that let you be somewhat anonymous. The internet isn't made of tubes, there is no hacker known as 4chan and KF aren't the reason that Chloe Sagal killed himself.
909.webp

Keep laughing at the tyrants, this is the way we will win the war.
 
Just the fact the government claims there is this thing where you need to have a "loicense" just to watch TV from an antenna, and people just don't instantly chop off their heads, is probably incomprehensible to most Americans.
yeah, I'd say 100%. I mean, shit, we flipped the tables and told the brits to go fuck themselves over the stamp act, which was basically a license to have paper to write legal documents on. A "screen tax" for every screen in my own house just seems too similar, and I'd think american brains are calibrated to not let that happen again lol.

I mean, we have things like PBS and the corporation for public broadcasting, but from my knowledge, that was funded as-needed from normal taxation, and not from the irritating system of licensure.
 
Clearly null needs to be on the lookout for this phenotype waddling towards him in Florida whenever he answers the door or goes on a walk(unlikely) since he would probably be brandishing a sigsauer that has bullet with his name on it prematurely firing off towards him, since I think the new british approach beyond arresting their own citizens and writing smug letters is just murdering jannies to forums that say mean words.
NORF.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stephanie Bustcakes
This sort of thing is starting to make me feel sick to the stomach tbh.

The conjunction of YouTube bringing the AI age verification thing in, and the UK implementing the same for porn sites (not to mention the Offcom fuckery)...it all seems to have happened overnight. And even talk of trying to ban VPNs.

Kiwi bro's - I don't feel too well.
Sometimes I wonder if the UK is begging for an war on terror styled intervention. They already imported sand niggers, their policies are very pro-sand nigger and on top of that it has Nuclear weapons... which will very well land into the hands of said sand niggers. Who once they get their hands on will definitely use it on either the US or its greatest ally, Israel.
 
Oh yeah.
I predicted this way back in the 2010's that, because of how invasive the left is being, when the pendulum swings, the right will do the exact same authoritarian censorious bullshit but they will give different reasons for it.
It's already starting to happen but 5 years from now, you will really see them go after freedom of speech and various human right.
They already have the template of how to do it from the woke lefties.
I dunno. I don't think the right can turn into your boomer dad again without losing to the left. People vote Left for comfy while losing out of individual rights. If the Right starts doing that they'll abandon them.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FunPosting101
What Europe wants to do is what the US did 150 years ago. They want immigration with the hopes the economy will bloom. But it hasn’t and it won’t.

They want it to boom so they can usher in the Soclist and Communist ideologies that some of the Middle East rooted for.

Why do I say this? Well these people who wrote this are angry because the Kiwifarms is not empathetic to their ideology. To them they believe in a fair society which will never be true. So in order to plug that sentiment they are willing to destroy everything that hinders their wold belief. The belief that being anti racist, anti capitalism and anti-anti anything that holds them to this utopia.

It’s all about control and stopping liberties. It’s what socialism does, if it doesn’t work then you need control of liberties. Cambridge and other UK places of academia is poisoned with Marxist ideology; it’s happening to the oldest democracy and it will happen to everywhere else eventually.

They want to stop free thinking, they want to stop free liberties and want a complacent society.

This is just another cog and when the UK falls, Europe will fall and so will America.

I hope America is listening. Europe and the UK need America.
 
I don't think I read anything in that study that mentioned certain threads or really anything pertaining to site as a source. It's all second hand sources from journoscum articles, snyposiums and the most reliable narrator Keffles ( Power word: Lucas Roberts). They went in with an agenda, and their conclusion; arrest a guy who hasn't broken the law.

I hope those Cambridge researchers didn't get sore throats from sucking themselves and each other off so much.
 
We believe the harm and threats associated with online hate communities may justify action despite the right to free speech. But within the framework of the EU and the Council of Europe which is based on the European Convention on Human Rights, such action will have to be justified as proportionate, necessary and in accordance with the law. It is unlikely that taking down a whole community or arresting its maintainer because of a crime committed by a single member can be proportionate.
"The EU is not tyrannical enough for our tastes" is a hell of a take.
 
The use of descriptors such as “harrasment forum” & “toxic levels of various site members” was just silly. How did they determine such? What a poseur hit piece based on opinion & no facts. Utterly unserious yet it will be treated seriously by other poseurs & extremist on the far left (& right,) especially those with threads. That this shitty hit piece suggested assassinating :null: & DDOSing the site but still gets referenced & republished with minor additions, is ridiculous & shows the absolute cretins who abide by this obvious propaganda for what they are. That anyone would ever site such unscientific nonsense is proof of an unserious thought process & lack of critical thinking skills. The authors need only look inward to describe a harrasment cult.
Gaylords Projecting.webp
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
What Europe wants to do is what the US did 150 years ago. They want immigration with the hopes the economy will bloom. But it hasn’t and it won’t.
I don't think this is quite sensible. 150 years ago when we started bringing in the irish and italians and all, we still had a vibrant native force. That is, if we wanted to simply maintain our economy, we had it. We wanted to EXPAND. We brought in the whops and micks to grow, not to just be the same.

The europeans have shoved IUDs up so many of their women that they've stopped having a vibrant population base. They're post industrial, and say fuck all even post agricultural. The europeans don't want to EXPAND DONG like america did learning about pizza and blarney stones. It wants to bring in muslims to make the last few bucks of the pension funds they owe to people who might want to kill them all when they fuck up.

Europe is like Ouchii. That jap who got rad poisoning and died miserable like months and months later. He died on that first day exposed to the radiation, but didn't finally succumb until months later. Europe was probably already dead in the 90s or early 2000s, but is just now figuring out how to write it's own will for it's most real and seen death.

Europe injects niggers and muslims because it needs a blood transfusion. America took in whops and micks because it needed an energy drink. There is a a stark difference in these.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Marvin and SIMIΔN
These people are so fucking hellbent on stopping dissent and they still keep losing. Sorry controlling the mod teams on reddit, owning all the tech companies besides X and controlling the mainstream media wasn't enough for you fuckers. You can't stop the signal. If KF falls, others will follow Null's example and internet juche will be the bane of all left-liberal authoritarian governments.
 
Back