You put it into way better terms than I would, well done. That's really why I oppose the deification of homosexuals: because it's inherently subversive and deconstructive.
If only they were normal! If only!
You too have dyslexia and can't read for shit. I said ACTED normal as in acting like most everyday people, for example Blaire White acts normal. We can argue whether it is normal to be trans or whatnot, but even then I have said again and again that I don't care of whatever people do behind closed doors. I can tolerate trannies who aren't madly histrionic on the internets and I think you can too.
Nobody outside of SJWs think that way because you need to have your own head far up your ass to even begin to think that being a certain way or living a certain way is "brave and stunning", those words only exist together to mean "challenge the status quo", otherwise we would all be "brave and stunning" in our own ways.
Normal is always relative. For example, you have been socialized to believe that celebration of ass sex is "normal."
Focus on the root of the problem. What you described here is almost entirely caused by social justice.
I repeat what I said earlier: what gives you the authority to divide homosexuals and social justice? They're VERY intertwined and I'd go as far as saying most homosexuals ascribe to social justice rhetoric.
No, a fag living across the street affects me a lot. It means faggotry is acceptable in the community I live in, and I don't want to raise children in a community where faggotry is tolerated. I said fags existing somewhere out there in the world isn't necessarily a problem, so long as I don't have to live with them, like if they are over in Israel doing their orgies and exhibition marches. If I have to live with them next door to me now it's my problem. If I have to live in a country where they are voting to promote more faggotry, that is a problem for me as well.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
First he says I can't read. Emphasizes the acting normal part and then precedes to name a person who does all the things I said wasn't normal as if said person is normal... White is a man who wears dresses and has sex with other men. If it wasn't for his instance on being a "woman", he would be just another gay.
Except their not doing it behind closed doors. In fact they say trying to keep it there is homophobia.
And so can everyone else. Its the internet.
Fuck off with the fed posting bro.
You're conflating fags with trannies. Being gay has nothing to do with crossdressing, or wanting to be the opposite sex. You act like fags are just closeted troons that are held back by muh normality. Gays are men, and want to stay men. Just like lesbians are women, and want to stay as women.
No, we do not. In fact, most 'Social Justice' is propagated by straight people who want to virtue signal because they're fucking cucks.
I agree, homosexuality isn't something to be deified, most gay people will agree with that. I also agree that children shouldn't be exposed to idea of faggotry until they're old enough to understand people like that do exist. However no amount of propaganda is able to 'turn someone gay'. It isn't something you're indoctrinated into, it's something you're born with.
Gay people can't change who they're attracted to. They can change how they behave when dealing with their sexuality, and they can act responsibly when discussing their sexuality. I understand that you can make the same argument with other degenerates like pedophiles, however humans have this thing where they can consciously make decisions, and consciously deciding not to have sex with children is extremely easy. I believe that homosexuality is a form of mental illness, but it isn't detrimental to anyone, unlike pedophilia, which actively harms everyone involved. There's a reason to kill a pedophile, there isn't a reason to kill a fag.
While I do agree homosexuality doesn’t have direct negative effects, it also seems to be a gateway to more perverse behavior, which is why (like I stated previously) there is an abnormally higher amount of homosexual child predators compared to heterosexual child predators (11:1). This point is reinforced even more when you consider only 6% of Americans identify as gay, bisexual, or trans.
Even if they were equal this still doesn't emphasize the root of the problem which is the theme of the thread. The official line is this doesn't happen. The statistics paint a very different picture. From my anecdotal experience there is also a much more rampant but even less acknowledged problem of vulnerable teens being preyed upon by gay adults decades older than them.
Claims I can't read, then fails to read my words. Go back and reread what I wrote.
Never said it did. You said gays act normal and thus why you accept or tolerate them.
I don't think the regular queer wants to be a troon. However there isn't much distance between the two.
I should hope so. Their insane enough already just being homosexuals.
You can't deny that the "gay community" is overwhelmingly aligned with the left and in bed with the corresponding SJW ideology. It's true that #NotAll of you are, in the same way that not all black people are, but the trend is overwhelming.
Being gay has a ton to do with crossdressing. Source: Before trooning really took off, "drag queens" were a gay phenomenon. The overlap between LGB and T is huge. The amount of troons who also had some type of LGB identity before/while trooning is wildly disproportionate and we both know it. That's why they are seen as a single community/political movement. And it's basic common sense that it would turn out this way as being prone to one form of sexual deviancy means you are far, far more prone to become interested in/explore others.
The irony is that the whole concept of gay as 100% genetically pre-determined has been implanted into you by propaganda. It is nature/nurture both like any other complex behavior. There are cases of identical twins with one of them turning out gay and the other not, which is the hardest disproof of the genetic determinism theory one could possibly ask for. No, you probably won't be "turned gay" by watching SJW videos on youtube or some shit, but you clearly can be by sexual trauma like molestation as a child. Likewise people can be "gay" then swing back towards bisexual or even straight, especially women (it's true that it is harder for men who tend to be more rigid in this respect).
It's detrimental to you and the person you are fagging with. Admitting it's a mental illness then pretending it's fine to indulge in it is quite a cope. Faggotry and alcoholism/drug abuse are excellent analogues. Just like being gay, drug abuse has a high risk factor based on genetics, but is not fully determined by them. It's a complex behavior where environment also massively affects outcomes. And likewise it isn't violent and doesn't directly harm anyone else but is obviously detrimental to the person suffering from it, and the proper course of action is for them to try and minimize their drug consumption not blindly indulge in it. Faggotry I would say is worse since it harms your fellow fags that you are fagging with and likewise has a huge correlation with pedophilia.
this is a very scary thought, something to keep in mind 100% when starting a family
The push for homosexual acceptance was (and still is) very successful. Everyone who has propaganda pushed on them for their entire lives will accept it to some degree. It doesn’t matter how based you think you are; a constant onslaught of homosexual rhetoric will affect you, which is why so many on this board who are quick to play “Guess the race” will hesitate to call a faggot what they are.
As for homosexuality itself, there is no ”good” version of it. At best, it is a cope for people who have (in most cases) experienced some sort of sexual trauma/severe deviancy in their lives, and at worst, it is a sexual deviancy with no causality that is a gateway for more perverse behavior. After all, it’s no mistake that heterosexual child predators are outnumbered 11:1 by homosexual child predators.
The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study - PubMed
Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against male children is approximately 2:1, while the ratio of gynephiles to androphiles among the general population is approximately 20:1. The present study investigated whether the...
Of course, this sort of information isn’t spread nearly as wide as the completely abstract (and severely autistic) concept of “being yourself”. It’s this disconnect between reality and the message being pushed on us that homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality that gives many the impression it’s of no concern. “Live and let live”, “as long as you’re not hurting anyone else”; some of the excuses people give as to why they don’t concern themselves with the deviancy of others are a part of the larger problem at hand: apathy; a quality which will give way to acceptance of further perversions. If you think it stops at transsexuals, you are dead wrong.
Again sorry for my scepticism, but if this was very widespread I'd see more of it being brought up on social media, particularly on right-wing circles, but every single time the grooming comes from trannies.
@Kiwi & Cow Here's a blog that talks about it as it is acceptable to discuss today. This was part of the LGB movement's platform in the 70s the same way pederasty that gave us NAMBLA was part of it. Publicly it is disavowed and largely unacknowledged because they know how terrible it looks. In many ways it is treated as a rite of passage instead of the predation it is. Like I said it's not even so much a matter of rate. When discussion of it is verboten the only acceptable rate is it never happening. You won't find studies or articles taking a stand because people like their careers. It's similar to the way a lot of valid TERF/Detrans points are shouted down even when they are objectively true. It requires me to think about why even those supposedly uninvolved are closing ranks and zealously protecting them.
