The Schizo Conspiracy Thread - The conspiracies that will get you laughed out of your friend groups and subreddits

NoBueno said:
It's got a link to the website on the video.
What does 666 really mean?
View attachment 7161092
Does this mean the elite worship the god that can grant them things on the physical plane?
Click to expand...
remind me more of a god type r dog type.. humhm people still mused by popes wind up toy still. still go by pope work sigcal. still modday that sort. thor day https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/pagan-gods-and-naming-days-001037/ .i be happy when kinda riped away/ and new age start put that way
 
Bonesjones said:
That has no logical basis at all, it's pure speculation with no definitive proof.
Click to expand...
You can see how telescopes make planets appear very very close. Stars don't do that. Planets also have very different orbits. That's the first thing that people noticed about them.
So you think planets and the other stars are all the same, just most of them are much, much further away than those close ones?
Bonesjones said:
Astronomy, the cuck chair of science. Always speculating and watching with zero hands on evidence.
Click to expand...
I'd tell you how humans have landed probes on other planets, but you don't believe in that.
Bonesjones said:
There you go making giant leaps of logic to defend the official narrative again.
Click to expand...
How is that a giant leap of logic? What's the fundamental difference between Earth/our solar system and all trillions of others we can see? It's entirely logical to assume that the same laws of physics apply there and life could exist there. Certainly less of a logical leap than higher dimensions, which again, have never been observed at all.
Bonesjones said:
Just like any evidence we went to the moon. Why else would they hand out fake moon rocks? Why else would they need to constantly create new cover stories?
Click to expand...
That is based on the assumption that it is false. I mean, if we just assume everything ever said by any government or source accepted by more than one person is fake, then there isn't really any point in talking about anything, as there can't be any consensus on anything.
Bonesjones said:
So the absence of evidence means something doesn't functionally exist? Funny how you don't apply that process universally.
Click to expand...
It's not just the absence of evidence for it, it's how it doesn't fit in with any observation so far. Other dimensions where "living" beings could dwell would poke a hole in so many observations and experiments and require so many additional steps that it just becomes hilariously unlikely. If we go by that we can assume literally anything to be true.
Bonesjones said:
Yes that's literally what that means. You aren't a scientist if you don't do science. You clearly don't do science while claiming to be one.
Click to expand...
I meant that you can't reject everything completely out of principle. Of course you always have to doubt the veracity of everything and be open to new evidence, but at some point things are considered reasonably proven and accepted, and further rejection is just pathological.
You can go and buy a cheap telescope and view the other planets in this solar system in pretty good detail. You can observe the orbits, just like Kepler did. You can use Newton's gravity to derive the same laws. But I guess that would mean accepting Newtonian gravity, so maybe not.
Bonesjones said:
See the old equipment doesn't work and the new equipment is too expensive to build, so we shouldnt do it. The same useless song and dance from a retard on a string.
Click to expand...
They're gonna build new (moon) rockets when there's a need for them. Right now the costs outweigh the benefits. I'd love to see some development on the Moon in my lifetime, but sadly, I don't control the budgets and can't convince those who do.
Bonesjones said:
You knew it but didn't mention it until after I brought it up. Funny how that works.
Click to expand...
I didn't mention it because it wasn't part of the argument. I also didn't mention the Earth's core, because the origin of the magnetic field wasn't part of the argument.
Bonesjones said:
Yeah nothing I say makes sense when you need to remain ignorant.
Click to expand...
Enlighten me, please.
Bonesjones said:
Yeah the crowning achievement of all of human kind just wasn't worth keeping around. You'll believe any horseshit as long as it's got an official badge on it. The fact you remain ignorant about how the moon landing being doubted since day 1 says it all. You just post to pretend like you know what you are talking about and steer the conversation in the way you hope. Unfortunately for you I'm more autistic than you are retarded.
Click to expand...
They had the broadcasted footage after conversion and deemed it good enough. Stupid, but they didn't foresee that better conversion technology would be available at some point.
 
Meriasek said:
You can see how telescopes make planets appear very very close. Stars don't do that. Planets also have very different orbits. That's the first thing that people noticed about them.
So you think planets and the other stars are all the same, just most of them are much, much further away than those close ones?
Click to expand...
Why are we worried about the stars and planets when we are stuck on our own rock? Are we going to talk about how doing things in space is useless because you don't see the need until some retard in a NASA uniform does a press conference to convince you? As you've said before.
Meriasek said:
I'd tell you how humans have landed probes on other planets, but you don't believe in that.
Click to expand...
Yeah because they aren't independently or externally verifiable. Which is a term you find impossible to understand. It doesn't matter what they say if they can't prove they actually did it.
Meriasek said:
What's the fundamental difference between Earth/our solar system and all trillions of others we can see? It's entirely logical to assume that the same laws of physics apply there and life could exist there. Certainly less of a logical leap than higher dimensions, which again, have never been observed at all.
Click to expand...
Everything to do with space is pure speculation. Until it can be physically proven and verified it's speculation. Don't worry though if you get enough cucks with a telescope to build a consensus, you can keep getting funding. The good news is you'll never have to actually do any hard work because it's all impossible anyways.
Meriasek said:
That is based on the assumption that it is false. I mean, if we just assume everything ever said by any government or source accepted by more than one person is fake, then there isn't really any point in talking about anything, as there can't be any consensus on anything.
Click to expand...
Yeah that's how verifiability works, congrats you did it.
Meriasek said:
It's not just the absence of evidence for it, it's how it doesn't fit in with any observation so far. Other dimensions where "living" beings could dwell would poke a hole in so many observations and experiments and require so many additional steps that it just becomes hilariously unlikely. If we go by that we can assume literally anything to be true.
Click to expand...
So if it takes more steps, experiments and observations, it's more and more unlikely? So if I go to the moon, delete all the information about how I did it, refuse to do it again despite having the capability, refuse to take definitive proof, its still completely true I did so. Funny how your logic only works on the levels you want it to. Or maybe you are just a retard shilling propaganda?
Meriasek said:
I meant that you can't reject everything completely out of principle.
Click to expand...
Yes you can. That's literally the basis of science.
Meriasek said:
Of course you always have to doubt the veracity of everything and be open to new evidence, but at some point things are considered reasonably proven and accepted, and further rejection is just pathological.
Click to expand...
No, science requires constant and repeat verifiable testing. That's literally how you prove things. You make zero assumptions. Jesus you are a fucking idiot.
Meriasek said:
You can go and buy a cheap telescope and view the other planets in this solar system in pretty good detail.
Click to expand...
Yet with all our technology and advancement in 80 years the best they can do to show how real the moon landing is, is a blurry smudge with labels on it telling you what you see.
Meriasek said:
They're gonna build new (moon) rockets when there's a need for them. Right now the costs outweigh the benefits. I'd love to see some development on the Moon in my lifetime, but sadly, I don't control the budgets and can't convince those who do.
Click to expand...
And they keep pushing it back every time, not even a hint of curiosity or doubt in your brain. Just trust them! THEY know what they are doing.
Meriasek said:
I didn't mention it because it wasn't part of the argument. I also didn't mention the Earth's core, because the origin of the magnetic field wasn't part of the argument.
Click to expand...
Yeah sure. You just conveniently left out the primary driver for our protection from solar particles until I brought it up, so you can talk about how you totally would have if it was relevant.
Meriasek said:
Enlighten me, please.
Click to expand...
I have, yet you remain steadfastly ignorant.
Meriasek said:
They had the broadcasted footage after conversion and deemed it good enough. Stupid, but they didn't foresee that better conversion technology would be available at some point.
Click to expand...
That's not the only data they "lost" you absolute faggot nigger. Also in their own words they projected the original transmission on a wall and filmed that with broadcast cameras adding in even more loss to help hide any details they wouldn't want to show up.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
Bonesjones said:
Math isn't beautiful to real people, it's like saying music theory is beautiful. There's no beauty in it at all, just like any music PhD, the results are awful garbage because they got obsessed with the structure and forgot what it's for.
Click to expand...
I disagree with this and I ‘get’ what’s meant by truth being beautiful. It’s hard to explain, but there’s a ‘feeling’ to things, like a rightness. I’ve had a few moments where I’ve been watching , for example, an embryonic heart start to beat and just felt that overwhelming rightness, elegance, whatever you want to call it. Blows you away, seeing the structure and elegance of living things .
The opposite happens when I see ‘wrong’ things. Trannies for example, or people causing pain and harm, Autists may understand what I mean by some things having a rightness or wrongness to them. You can’t explain it really, it’s a feeling that you’re tapping into the rules of the universe somehow. I dont pretend to understand maths or music beyond any very basic pleb level, but since maths is the most fundamental level of ‘objective’ building block we have, and music is maths, I’ll bet it’s like a crack hit.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Johnny Apple Sneed, Jhonny Jhon, Core Theorist and 9 others
AnsemSoD1 said:
The plot of Kingdom Hearts is real, I'm not kidding.
Click to expand...
Elaborate on this, I am genuinely curious and will listen.

I have never played those games, but I looked up a plot summary of the series and it seems like it started with a key being shattered into 20 pieces, and then the series' villain wanting to create balance between dark and light. This reminded me of the Lord of the Rings (3 rings for elves, 7 for dwarves, 9 for men, one for Sauron = 20). And Star wars (balance between dark and light being the focus of the 6 movies). Lord of the Rings is speculated by some to have been a retelling of real ancient history since Tolkien was a specialist in that field, and the Silmarillion has some very striking parallels to gnostic/hermetic/occult creation stories. And Star Wars is said by some (admittedly /x/ schizos) to be a retelling of actual space battles between Pleiadans and other species long ago. So Kingdom hearts having themes of both of these is interesting to me.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: NoBueno and AnsemSoD1
Althalus said:
Elaborate on this, I am genuinely curious and will listen.

I have never played those games, but I looked up a plot summary of the series and it seems like it started with a key being shattered into 20 pieces, and then the series' villain wanting to create balance between dark and light. This reminded me of the Lord of the Rings (3 rings for elves, 7 for dwarves, 9 for men, one for Sauron = 20). And Star wars (balance between dark and light being the focus of the 6 movies). Lord of the Rings is speculated by some to have been a retelling of real ancient history since Tolkien was a specialist in that field, and the Silmarillion has some very striking parallels to gnostic/hermetic/occult creation stories. And Star Wars is said by some (admittedly /x/ schizos) to be a retelling of actual space battles between Pleiadans and other species long ago. So Kingdom hearts having themes of both of these is interesting to me.
Click to expand...
The Heartless, Nobodies, Unversed, and Dream Eaters are all real as were the actual Keyblades, which you can clearly see held by St. Peter during the early years of the church. the above monsters are what are known as "Meta-Entities" and are all varying levels of demons, ghosts, poltergeists, elementals, etc. Holy Water is effective due to the nature of the Final World from KHIII, which is where "Land, Sea, and Sky" all meet as one, with the realm being close to the literal gates of Heaven.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Althalus
Althalus said:
And Star Wars is said by some (admittedly /x/ schizos) to be a retelling of actual space battles between Pleiadans and other species long ago. So Kingdom hearts having themes of both of these is interesting to me.
Click to expand...
/x/ was maybe interesting years ago. But now it's just filled with bots and the same 5 guys fucked on drugs spouting meth ideas.
Every major thing in the media is a psyop?
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Althalus and AnsemSoD1
I clicked through a bunch of lunar pictures (because shit is in interesting), and oddly enough, apparently they did actually capture Venus in some pics:
These apparently show Venus next to the antenna of the lander.
First I thought I saw a lot of stars in many pictures, but they're dust or internal reflections. Similar types of extremely bright spots, always showing up in similar areas, and also in pictures of shadows? Not stars after all, which makes sense, the dynamic range was simply too low.
They got lucky to even get Venus (which is comparatively bright af) in a picture with Earth, I'd say. Good thing Earth was crescent.
Venus is probably the only one you could ever hope to catch at all with their regular cameras.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fuck Bankers
The early computer scientists were just into death metal?

gfdf43.jpg
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hannibal Lecter
NoBueno said:
You should watch him more closely. He avoids things on purpose
View attachment 7179067
View attachment 7179068
View attachment 7179066
Click to expand...
AJ (the fella in the picture) often gives hints to things he can't say on youtube. Like in that episode where they mention the epstein files ("release the client list") and jokes about not saying anything about the clintons.

I've watched this channel for years and I agree with him and his findings; both debunking and saying it's true, 99% of the time. He's on the money with a lot of stuff and doesn't trust government, believes there's a shadow government who controls the planet and hates the intelligence community.

In certain episodes, he will lead you to a conclusion but will stop short of saying it because of youtube. He has started doing separate podcasts where he can say more without breaking the rules.

Watch his shows, he's great. The CIA episode on remote viewing is mind blowing.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gintoki's Sweet Tooth, Male Idiot and Nuclear Poisoning
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back