Nigger, what the fuck am I supposed to give you? My IP address? We're not the same person and if you actually fucking read my post history, you'd see it.
Theres no one else it could be
Archeology and history as a field in general seems rather full of themselves a lot of the time. It's a sadly common sentiment in other fields like physics as well, actually. The attitude that their field has it all figured out and perfect authority on everything, and anyone who questions anything is an uneducated pleb.
It's impossible that I'm literally any other person but fuckin Taylor Swift?
You are too smart to be not Taylor Swift
Thanks, but I'm just a regular nerd with a decent education, but nothing special.
people underestimate the passages of time. We got lucky and found a bone of a possible dinosaur that was possible 60 million years old. It's a needle in a haystack. If every human died tomorrow, in 3,000 years there would be little left. In 10,000 years there would barely be a trace. 100,000 years+ and all you'll find is a few mouldy, ape-like bones which may have been an off-shoot of some long-extinct ancestor to chimps.
Nobody knows what the pyramids were for, so i'm open to hearing even the wackiest suggestion. What they were not for, is a tomb for a couple of pharaohs.
It's funny how so many people have seen the "Life after People" documentary or read "The World Without Us", but somehow they think we should easily be able to trace stuff from thousands of years ago. We barely know how people lived 2000 years ago whenever they weren't using stone as a building material, and metals corrode away surprisingly fast.
I never used a Mac. Ok that's not quite true. I had a Power Mac G4 that my sister saved from the trash of her old work, still running OS 9.2. Fun machine.
And Doggerland was a conspiracy theory for the longest time.
Yes I understand, being identified as 4chan/Elderscrolls girl would hurt your brand. Just saying that when you unconsciously relax you shift into the posture that is most comfortable to you, being on the computer
When? The Doggerland hypothesis came out of the field of geology in the 1960s and it was formalized in the 90s by an archeologist. If you want to go back, the first inklings of the theory are from the 10s when fossils were being found by fishermen or they washed up on Eastern beaches of England.
Personally I think the Garden of Eden story is allegory for the Divine blueprint. Adam/Eve represents the Masculine/Feminine duality of creation. The Serpent represents the outsider of corruption. You can place whichever stand-in you like. Cthulu, Agent Smith, Sauron, The Void Lords, The Illithids. It seems too common a theme to ignore
It was discovered, discussed and wrote about. Most refused to believe it was there. I remember in the 90s school telling us it wasn't real it was just a continental shelf and it was never above sea level.
No clue what type of shithole you went to school in. Guess that elementary schools indeed teach outdated information but you shouldn't base your worldview on them. Coles' Doggerland paper was published in 1998 for example with zero problems and is relatively highly cited. She has publications going back to 1992 about the topic if I'm not mistaken. Similarly, the English Channel is commonly accepted to have been above the water level during the Quaternary period. Sanjeev Gupta has been publishing about it for like two decades. Here's a fairly recent paper and the one from 2007. But sure, you absolutely cannot discuss it and it's some type of forbidden knowledge. Not like the paper can literally be downloaded for free.
I did go to a shit hole school. It wasn't a shit hole in the first year there, but it was taken over by an academy and it became a testing ground for social experiments.
It's literally published in Nature. That's as establishment approved as it gets.
