Science The Science Behind the Return of the Dire Wolf

1744040892851.png

Nature gave the world the dire wolf 2.6 million years ago, and then, through the hard hand of extinction, took it away—some 10,000 to 13,000 years ago when the last of the species died out. Now, the dire wolf is back, brought bounding into the 21st century by Colossal Biosciences, a Dallas-based biotech company. On April 8, Colossal announced it had used both cloning and gene-editing based on two ancient samples of dire wolf DNA to birth three pups, the six-month-old males Romulus and Remus and the two-month-old female Khaleesi.

“Our team took DNA from a 13,000 year old tooth and a 72,000 year old skull and made healthy dire wolf puppies,” said Colossal CEO Ben Lamm in a statement that accompanied the announcement of the births. “It was once said, ‘any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.’ Today, our team gets to unveil some of the magic they are working on.

So what, exactly, does that work involve?

Traditional cloning—the kind that famously resulted in Dolly the sheep in 1996, and has since been used to create clones of pigs, cats, deer, horses, mice, goats, gray wolves, dogs and more—is a relatively straightforward, if invasive, process. First, a single cell is taken from a tissue sample of the animal to be cloned. That cell’s nucleus—which contains the individual’s entire genetic code—is then extracted and inserted into a donor ovum from the same species whose own nucleus has been removed. The ovum carrying the new genetic material is allowed to develop into an embryo and then transferred into the womb of a surrogate, which ultimately gives birth to an exact duplicate of the animal from which the donor cell was taken.

Colossal says its dire wolf work had key differences. Scientists first analyzed the genome of the dire wolves contained in the ancient tooth and skull. Comparing those genomes to that of the gray wolf—the dire wolf’s closest living relative—they identified 20 differences in 14 genes that account for the dire wolf’s distinguishing characteristics, including its greater size, white coat, wider head, larger teeth, more powerful shoulders, more-muscular legs, and characteristic vocalizations, especially howling and whining.

Next, they harvested endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), which form the lining of bloodvessels, from the bloodstreams of living gray wolves—a less invasive procedure than taking a tissue sample—and edited the 14 genes in their nuclei to express those 20 dire wolf traits. This is trickier than it seems, since genes often have multiple effects, not all of them good. For example, as the company explains in its press release, the dire wolf has three genes that code for its light coat, but in gray wolves they can lead to deafness and blindness. The Colossal team thus engineered two other genes that shut down black and red pigmentation, leading to the dire wolf’s characteristic light color without causing any harm in the edited gray wolf genome.

Once this was finished, the edited nuclei were next extracted from the cells and inserted into denucleated gray wolf ova. The ova were left to grow into embryos and 45 were transferred into the wombs of two domestic hound mixes. One embryo in each surrogate mother took hold, and after 65 days of gestation, Rolulus and Remus were born. A few months later, the procedure was repeated with a third surrogate who ultimately gave birth to Khaleesi. All three births were conducted by scheduled cesarean section to minimize the chances of injury during delivery. No surrogate dogs had a miscarriage or stillbirth during the process.

Colossal plans to use similar techniques to bring back the Ice Age woolly mammoth in 2028, editing living cell nuclei from Asian elephants—the mammoth’s closest living kin—to express mammoth traits preserved in nearly 60 sets of Ice Age remains. In early March, the company announced that it had successfully tested its methods in laboratory mice, producing 38 woolly mouse pups which bear the mammoth’s signature shaggy coat. Now it says it’s on track to have a surrogate elephant pregnancy in 2026 (elephants take nearly two years to gestate).

Other work in Colossal’s labs involves not bringing back extinct animals but attempting to save endangered ones. Endangered species can suffer from several issues, including a lack of genetic diversity—known as a “genetic bottleneck.” The relatively few animals left repeatedly mate with one another, and the inbreeding results in birth defects, sterility, and health problems proliferating through the species. Colossal has targeted some species with these problems, and is working to genetically edit more diversity into their populations.

One such project involves the all-but vanished pink pigeon. The pink pigeon species is indigenous to the island nation of Mauritius and once thrived there, until it lost its habitat as more and more of the island was given over to sugar plantations. Humanity’s introduction of rats and cats—which attack pigeon nests—drove the bird’s numbers down to just ten individuals. With the help of captive breeding programs, more than 650 pigeons were hatched and raised and released back on Mauritius. But with so few birds from which the captive population was bred, the species is experiencing high levels of infertility because of the genetic bottleneck.

To get around that, the scientists first tap into the fertilized egg of a pink pigeon and extract what are known as primordial germ cells (PGCs)—the cells that eventually become sperm and egg. In the lab, scientists then genetically edit the PGC genome to introduce greater genetic diversity—though at the moment Colossal is still studying the pink pigeon alleles and doesn’t yet know what traits that more-diverse coding will produce. Then, using the fertilized egg of a common chicken—which is far more plentiful than a pink pigeon egg—they inject the PGCs into the embryo. Once there, the cells travel to the gonads and create an embryo that, after it hatches, grows, and reaches sexual maturity, will produce not chicken chicks, but pigeon chicks. Eventually, those pigeons would be released into the wild population, producing genetically diverse young and helping to fortify the species.

None of this is easy and none of it comes cheap—though with a valuation of $10.2 billion, Colossal has the resources to pursue the science without too much concern about the price. And the company is not going it alone. It is partnering with conservation organizations such the American Wolf Foundation, The Mauritian Wildlife Foundation, Save the Elephants, and Conservation Nation. The company worked with the indigenous MHA Nation tribes (Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara) on the dire wolf project, and the tribes have expressed a desire to have dire wolves live on their lands in North Dakota. Colossal also says it's in advanced negotiations with the government of North Carolina to use its conservation strategies to help strengthen the endangered red wolf population there.

The company also believes that the new EPC cloning technique will allow them to save blood samples of existing species in a biobank as a hedge against their ever becoming endangered in the future. Romulus, Remus, and Khaleesi, the most conspicuous of the animals to emerge from Colossal’s labs, will surely not be the last.

https://time.com/7275439/science-behind-dire-wolf-return/ (Archive)

 
Two wolves, made with the genes of an extent species, named fucking Romulus and Remus, were born to carry on the legacy of the dire wolves.
They don't carry shit. The more I read about this, the more it sounds like a publicity stunt. These are basically just two GMO wolves with at best one or two phenotypic characteristics of Dire Wolves, and that's if they even tried to remake the actual Aenocyon dirus and not some stupid fictional thing from GOT (which seems to be the case).

There is more distance, both genetic and evolutionary, between the Grey Wolf and the Dire Wolf than between humans and Chimps, to the point that the DW had to be reclassified into it's own genus. This is without considering how incomplete the knowledge of DW genetics is, and thus how orthologs (=different versions of the same genes in the two species) might have worked. For example, the gene which supposedly gave dire wolves a white coat causes deafness in dogs and wolves, so Colossal had to tweak a different one. That alone should indicate the gene probably didn't work in Aenocyon the same way it does in Canis and might not have given DWs a pure white coat like colossal claims. And in any case, the colour of fur in wild animals is controlled by the interaction of several genes, rather than just one.

They also can't replicate Dire Wolf behaviour, which was very likely different from that of other modern canids. What these hacks are doing is basically like making a hairy human with a tail and claiming it's a baboon.
 
and that's if they even tried to remake the actual Aenocyon dirus and not some stupid fictional thing from GOT (which seems to be the case).
I'm from the area of study in question and I've watched multiple interviews from them about this whole thing and, theoretically, if the process went exactly as they described, these animals should indeed be close genetic "copies" of dire wolves (akin to copying someone else's homework on your own paper). And to their credit the wolf pups don't really look like GOT wolves (they are the size of horses in GOT).

Problem is, until they release the full genetic mapping of both the fossils and the pups, we only have their word to take for it. It could absolutely be a big publicity stunt .

Dire and grey wolves have a difference on their dna of about 0.5%. That was enough for them to classify into Aenocyon instead of Canis. It should be easy to prove the puppies are closer to the Aenocyon genetically if they want to, but as you said it might be just a big blunder or something of the sort to attract investors.
 
The technology will eventually have useful applications in health and agriculture obviously, but otherwise there's really no point bringing back species that were so unfit for the changing times that they all died out, nor trying to preserve all species that currently exist as if nothing should ever go extinct again.
 
Dire and grey wolves have a difference on their dna of about 0.5%
That is a lot more than it sounds like. It's in the order of tens of thousands of genetic differences. Colossal's wolves basically only have at most 20 tweaks to their genes and that's it, it's less than the natural mutation rate.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: klarine
That is a lot more than it sounds like. It's in the order of tens of thousands of genetic differences. Colossal's wolves basically only have at most 20 tweaks to their genes and that's it, it's less than the natural mutation rate.
I agree in parts. Yes that translates to a huge difference in fenotype, but that doesn't necessarily mean there are tens of thousands different genes they would need to change. I still think your concerns are real and until colossal provides us with their mapping there's no way to know this is real in any way.
 
They don't carry shit. The more I read about this, the more it sounds like a publicity stunt. These are basically just two GMO wolves with at best one or two phenotypic characteristics of Dire Wolves, and that's if they even tried to remake the actual Aenocyon dirus and not some stupid fictional thing from GOT (which seems to be the case).

There is more distance, both genetic and evolutionary, between the Grey Wolf and the Dire Wolf than between humans and Chimps, to the point that the DW had to be reclassified into it's own genus. This is without considering how incomplete the knowledge of DW genetics is, and thus how orthologs (=different versions of the same genes in the two species) might have worked. For example, the gene which supposedly gave dire wolves a white coat causes deafness in dogs and wolves, so Colossal had to tweak a different one. That alone should indicate the gene probably didn't work in Aenocyon the same way it does in Canis and might not have given DWs a pure white coat like colossal claims. And in any case, the colour of fur in wild animals is controlled by the interaction of several genes, rather than just one.

They also can't replicate Dire Wolf behaviour, which was very likely different from that of other modern canids. What these hacks are doing is basically like making a hairy human with a tail and claiming it's a baboon.
All I wanted was a badass wolf, can’t have shit can we.
 
Dire and grey wolves have a difference on their dna of about 0.5%. That was enough for them to classify into Aenocyon instead of Canis. It should be easy to prove the puppies are closer to the Aenocyon genetically if they want to, but as you said it might be just a big blunder or something of the sort to attract investors.
Bit of a tangent-

If dire wolves were still extant, would they be close enough genetically to hybridise with anyof the Canis species?
 
Bit of a tangent-

If dire wolves were still extant, would they be close enough genetically to hybridise with anyof the Canis species?
That can be complicated. Usually species differentiate by their ability to breed and give birth to fertile individuals, but some animals from very different species are capable of hybridising (most of the time the cubs are infertile). Since they are from an entire different genus, I think not, but I can't say that with 100% certainty.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: glass_houses
So, in the end, these scientists did not practice paleolithic necromancy, but created a new beast altogether like some kind of flesh wizards. Cool! Now make giant sloths next, elephants had become boring as of lately.
 
I really want them to bring back the mammoth, the Siberian unicorn and the thylacine. And the dodo.
Imagine elasmotherium jousting.
Or retaking the country like Hannibal crossing the alps except it’s the M25 and you’ve got an armoured mammoth herd.
Dodo seem like prime livestock material.
 
Some claim the group who made the white doggos was financed by Peter Thiel. Make sense if you consider the fur color.
wolf2.webp
wolf.webp

5555.webp
QED!
 
It's just a big wolf. It's not that cool. I was way more interested in the dino chicken thing Jack Horner had going on.
 
It's just a big wolf. It's not that cool. I was way more interested in the dino chicken thing Jack Horner had going on.
That one's even more retarded. You could consider Jack Horner the founder of this kind of de-extinction grifting, actually.
 
It's just a big wolf. It's not that cool. I was way more interested in the dino chicken thing Jack Horner had going on.
That one's even more retarded. You could consider Jack Horner the founder of this kind of de-extinction grifting, actually.
They had chicken that had the beak turned back into a snout with teeth claws growing on the wings/arms and a tail that was growing. The problem was they couldn't figure out how to stop the tail from growing. I hope I get to see a Chickensaurus before I die.
 
They had chicken that had the beak turned back into a snout with teeth claws growing on the wings/arms and a tail that was growing. The problem was they couldn't figure out how to stop the tail from growing. I hope I get to see a Chickensaurus before I die.
Ah, sweet, man-made horrors beyond my comprehension!
 
Ah, sweet, man-made horrors beyond my comprehension!
It's not man-made exactly. It's something that used to exist in the past. People are just bringing it back into existence or at least trying to.
Chickens have all the genes needed for teeth, they’re just turned off. If you turn the Talpid2 gene back on you get literal hens teeth.
They couldn't get the tail to stop growing. I heard they were destroying them before they got too developed. Hopefully they get the tail issue solved and can actually let one hatch and grow into an adult.
 
Back