- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
So close to being accurate, and then it goes all "Muh Soggy Knees".
Inactive The SJWiki
- Thread starter Piga Dgrifm
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2014
Transmisogynoir
"Transmisogynoir (or trans-misogynoir) is the oppression of trans women of color, and trans feminine people of color, more generally."
This is my new favorite SJW neologism.
Whoa, so if I mash some random characters together and the context makes it sound social justicey then it automatically becomes a word? Tumagitransstuckgyny is the systematic oppression of tucute magigirl transspecies trans-racial otherkin whose kintype is a character from Homestuck. I'm making history, everybody!
Paradoxically the "usefulness" section isn't actually useful at all in helping readers understand the concept. For one thing it doesn't outline what these "forms of oppression" even are. The SJWiki is so helpful.
I just realized I just quoted the whole article.
"Transmisogynoir (or trans-misogynoir) is the oppression of trans women of color, and trans feminine people of color, more generally."
This is my new favorite SJW neologism.
Whoa, so if I mash some random characters together and the context makes it sound social justicey then it automatically becomes a word? Tumagitransstuckgyny is the systematic oppression of tucute magigirl transspecies trans-racial otherkin whose kintype is a character from Homestuck. I'm making history, everybody!
Paradoxically the "usefulness" section isn't actually useful at all in helping readers understand the concept. For one thing it doesn't outline what these "forms of oppression" even are. The SJWiki is so helpful.
I just realized I just quoted the whole article.
R
RP 520
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I like how the article for "white" doesn't exist. You would think that as much as they ramble on about white people that it would be a top priority page so they could put an explanation as to why white people are such a problem.
I would imagine, like many of the other pages, it would be nothing but hateful vile if it did exist though.
- Joined
- May 24, 2014
man every time i read "kyriarchy" my brain translates it to kike-archy (thanks 8ch)
it makes these articles way more fun to read when you imagine the author ranting about the jews
it makes these articles way more fun to read when you imagine the author ranting about the jews
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
Considering Tumblr SJ's unchecked antisemitism problem, that would be more likely than you think.
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2014
The Young Turks
... I actually agree with this. Stopped clock?
Lena Dunham
Lena Dunham
The Young Turks made a video defending Lena Dunham against allegations that she sexually abused her sister[18] Most importantly, sexual abuse is not solely a political issue. Those attempting to frame Dunham's critics as right-wing reactionaries are doing little to help survivors of sexual abuse and are instead engaging in erasure and silencing of valuable and coherent criticisms of Dunham's abuse.
What Dunham did as a prepubescent child was her parents' responsibility. Their duty as a parent is partly pedagogical, i.e., to especially to explain to her in an age-appropriate way why it is not acceptable to cross certain boundaries with another person, more so a baby who cannot even give consent. As a teen or youth, unfortunately, Dunham did not stop violating her sister's boundaries and inability to consent. This means she had entered the stage before adulthood, but maintained her relationship with her sister as a sexually and psychologically dominant older sibling. Dunham, in the present and recent past, can be seen as grooming (and being allowed to groom by her parents) her sister. The six years age difference marks a substantial a difference in power between the two girls, now young women. Dunham, by defending herself against all criticism, can be seen as normalising all such activities between teens and their younger siblings, not only as part of pop culture but as part of feminism itself.
... I actually agree with this. Stopped clock?
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
Yeah, stopped clock, definitely. Lena Dunham is a pedo freak who molested her own sister and bragged about it. She's practically a female Nick Bate, minus the scat fetish. Usually, social justice types defend her because she's a woman and a prominent feminist. It's actually kind of nice to see that even the SJWiki is against her.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I agree with that one tiny section. Immediately, the next section goes back to full moonbat about how Matt Taylor's shirt is worse than the Holocaust.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2015
It's rather cliché, but this is a case of "it's more difficult to find something they support, than it is to find something the loathe." I'm not even sure of their intent or message other than "trans are the master genders, but there are truscum trans and you should totally hate them, too. White, cis males need not apply."
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Yeah, but the first and second sentence do not flow together. They should have described the comments in the video before making a rebuttal to them.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
I've started to have more respect for Bronies as of late. Sure, they're responsible for probably 30% of this site's Horrifying ratings, but let's face facts: They've accomplished some serious victories against the SJWs, and that I can respect. First they opposed the PC police during previous attempts to "clean up" MLP and turn it into a safe space (nice bit of not bringing up that SJWs threatened the show's maker if that gray pony Chris was all up in arms about wasn't fixed - shit I knew about specifically from watching Chris), then they were there for when an episode essentially went directly against the grain and called out the dangers of cults of personality, and finally they became the nemesis of SJWiki.
Rock on, you magnificent horse-fuckers. You may traumatize onlookers, but that's a small price to pay for pissing off one of the worst communities on the interwebs. And you give us plenty of content in the process, so fair enough.
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
It's a sad day when these people have gotten bad enough that they're starting to make bronies look good in comparison.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
Oh shit! I dislike the Young Turks and Lena Dunham, but I also dislike SJWiki. It's like trying to decide whether or not I should side with the fresh pile of dog poo or the 2-week-old, uncleaned catbox.
http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Trigger#.VahYYvlViko
How come the most basic word in a SJW vocabulary doesn't have a page yet?
How come the most basic word in a SJW vocabulary doesn't have a page yet?
- Joined
- May 23, 2015
Because they would have to reveal that their "triggers" don't actually mean anything.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
The best part is that humans have nothing to do with why Communism doesn't work. Communism requires a centrally planned economy, and thanks to the Economic Calculation Problem, such economies will always be extremely inefficient compared to other economies, so even if you could get rid of all human vice, you would have to completely eliminate all human diversity and even differing "non-problematic" human preferences in order to make a centrally planned economy work.
And even then, it only works in theory, it probably still wouldn't work.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
Even relatively successful examples of Socialized industry need constant oversight and enough wiggle room to adapt for emergencies, which is something a lot of SJWs simply don't understand. A nationalized industry can work, and can even compete with other, non-nationalized alternatives, but it does not do this in a vaccuum: regulation, oversight, and careful planning are the watchword here, all of which goes over these idiots' heads.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2015
Thanks, guys. When my brain finally decides to sue for emancipation from my body, SJWiki will be the evidence it uses against my eyes.
Seriously, I think the biggest point of equality is being gloriously missed by SJWs. I don't care if you're gay, straight, bisexual, trans, "cis", black, white, purple or polkadotted. And I shouldn't. Because you don't need my fucking approval. Don't be a douchebag, don't tell me that every sentence I utter is in some way oppressive or privileged and we're aces. But I'm not gonna call you a faggot for being gay. I'm gonna call you a faggot if you're acting like a whiney little faggot. And yes, I stole that from Louis CK (I wonder what they think of him!!)
The dude (and I use that in a broad way, not a gendered one, untwist your genderdivergent undergarments) is clearly a faggot.
Seriously, I think the biggest point of equality is being gloriously missed by SJWs. I don't care if you're gay, straight, bisexual, trans, "cis", black, white, purple or polkadotted. And I shouldn't. Because you don't need my fucking approval. Don't be a douchebag, don't tell me that every sentence I utter is in some way oppressive or privileged and we're aces. But I'm not gonna call you a faggot for being gay. I'm gonna call you a faggot if you're acting like a whiney little faggot. And yes, I stole that from Louis CK (I wonder what they think of him!!)
The dude (and I use that in a broad way, not a gendered one, untwist your genderdivergent undergarments) is clearly a faggot.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
Hahahahah so I'd like to say that lauralei told me trans people are trans because of their prenatal brain development. She seemed very careful to keep her tucute views to herself, I'd been waiting to hear some evidence she was a tucute. I guess she always tells people what they need to hear at the moment.
Also someone please fucking tell me that this sack of shit wasn't able to somehow mooch off the army for 10 years?
- Status