US "The Squad" Megathread - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib Derangement Syndrome

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I honestly only know about American politics from what I read on the Internet but since we all love shitting on leftists I figured we'd get a kick out of this. Also it's trending on Twitter so you know it's important.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...irect=on&noredirect=on&utm_term=.960552c9ba53

NEW YORK — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old political novice running on a low budget and an unabashedly liberal platform, upset longtime U.S. Rep. Joseph Crowley on Tuesday in the Democratic congressional primary in New York.

The surprise victory by the community organizer in a district that includes parts of the Bronx and Queens came after an energetic, grassroots campaign that mustered more than enough support in a low-turnout race that many had expected to be an easy win for Crowley, a member of the Democratic House leadership.

“The community is ready for a movement of economic and social justice. That is what we tried to deliver,” said Ocasio-Cortez, who has never held elected office and whose candidacy attracted only modest media attention.

She told The Associated Press after her victory that she didn’t have enough money to do polling in the race, but felt in her gut that her message had a chance to connect.

“I live in this community. I organized in this community. I felt the absence of the incumbent. I knew he didn’t have a strong presence,” she said.

Crowley has been in Congress since 1999 and hadn’t faced an opponent in a primary election since 2004, when Ocasio-Cortez was just a teenager. He was considered a candidate to become the next House speaker if Democrats win the majority.

“It’s not about me,” Crowley, 56, told his supporters at a campaign party following his loss. “It’s about America. I want nothing but the best for Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. I want her to be victorious.”

He later played guitar with a band at the election night gathering, and dedicated the first song, Bruce Springsteen’s “Born to Run,” to Ocasio-Cortez.

Crowley represents New York’s 14th Congressional District, where he is also the leader of the Queens Democratic party.

Ocasio-Cortez was outspent by an 18-1 margin during her race but won the endorsement of some influential groups on the party’s far left, including MoveOn, as well as the actress Cynthia Nixon, who is running for governor. She defeated Crowley by 15 percentage points.

Born in the Bronx to a mother from Puerto Rico and a father who died in 2008, Ocasio-Cortez said she decided to challenge Crowley to push a more progressive stance on economic and other issues.

She attended Boston University, where she earned degrees in economics and international relations, and also spent time working in the office of the late U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.

After graduating, she returned to the Bronx where she became a community organizer. In the 2016 presidential campaign she worked for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Among her issues is expanding the Medicare program to people of all ages and abolishing Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. She recently went to Tornillo, Texas, to protest against policies that have separated parents from their children at the southern U.S. border.

Ocasio-Cortez gained some internet attention for a campaign video called “The Courage to Change,” a two-minute spot for which she wrote the script and featured footage from her own home.

Crowley is chair of the House Democratic Caucus, the fourth-highest ranking position in Democratic leadership in that chamber of Congress.

His loss drew the attention of President Donald Trump.

“Wow! Big Trump Hater Congressman Joe Crowley, who many expected was going to take Nancy Pelosi’s place, just LOST his primary election. In other words, he’s out! That is a big one that nobody saw happening. Perhaps he should have been nicer, and more respectful, to his President!” he tweeted.

The Republican candidate for the office, Anthony Pappas, is running unopposed and had no primary. Pappas teaches economics at St. John’s University.

She was a Bernie campaigner, is supported by BLM, and wants to abolish Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Also this was in a solid-blue Congressional District so you know she's a shoo-in for next Congress.

But hey, we did get to see Trump laugh at Crowley on Twitter.
 
The Bush Administration is where comedy went to die. It was funny at first but after the second term it was just everyone copying the Daily Show's jokes over and over.
Comedy in general, and standup comedy specifically, died on January 20, 2009. It has yet to be resuscitated.
 
Folks, AOC has shot past stupid to being utterly delusional. You can't make this shit up. Her IQ cannot exceed her bust size. And the pic...OMG.

Good lord, you weren't kidding about that picture, I couldn't help myself.

736796


On the one hand, it's not entirely fair, nobody looks amazing in every picture they're featured in, and AOC looks perfectly fine normally. On the other hand, photoshop's fun.

View attachment 736095

Jeffrey Sachs is the guy that sent Russia to the Stone Age.

Having read his op-ed, it doesn't seem like he's agreeing with all the suggestions enshrined in the GND (his op-ed is a bit vague in places), but that he thinks decarbonization is a necessity and that a carbon tax alone will not be enough to prevent climate change.

Jeffrey Sachs said:
As with every great engineering challenge our nation has faced — the Erie Canal, the 20th-century power grid, the Interstate Highway System, the civil aviation system and the moonshot — we need bold timelines, clear milestones, breakthrough engineering and public-sector leadership.

No doubt, when properly regulated and guided by engineering plans, the private sector will do its part with excellence and timeliness. In that regard, a carbon tax may play a modest supporting role. Yet it need not and should not be the first-line policy for the Green New Deal.

I'd say that she's fallen for a touch of clickbait.
 
More idiocy, this time by AOC's chief of staff. Just how fucking stupid can these people be? I've shit things smarter than AOC and her staff.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/4638...tm_content=042519-news&utm_campaign=position3


AOC's Chief-of-Staff: Criminals In Prison Should Vote Because They Are 'Most Affected By Unjust Laws'
ocasio-cortez_3.jpg
Zach Gibson/Bloomberg via Getty Images


ryan_saavedra.jpg

By RYAN SAAVEDRA
@REALSAAVEDRA
April 24, 2019
Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's (D-NY) chief-of-staff Saikat Chakrabarti suggested on Wednesday that incarcerated criminals should be able to vote in U.S. elections because they are "the people most affected by unjust laws."


Daily Wire TV

Unmute

Pause
Current Time 0:21
Loaded: 100.00%


Duration 0:39
Fullscreen
Trump: Obama's Border Chief Told Me To 'Stay The Course'



Chakrabarti's comments came after Democratic presidential candidates came out in favor of allowing terrorists, murderers, rapists, and pedophiles to vote in U.S. elections during a series of CNN town halls on Monday night.
"What's the reason NOT to let incarcerated people vote?" Chakrabarti tweeted. "Shouldn't the people most affected by unjust laws have some say in electing people to change them?"

Saikat Chakrabarti@saikatc

https://twitter.com/saikatc/status/1121029236607864832

What's the reason NOT to let incarcerated people vote? Shouldn't the people most affected by unjust laws have some say in electing people to change them?

2,458

5:32 AM - Apr 24, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

4,110 people are talking about this



Here are some of the responses Chakrabarti's tweet received:
Dana Loesch: "Who knew the law against putting a bomb by an 8-year-old and blowing people up was unjust?"

2,332 people are talking about this



Kurt Schlichter: "Unjust laws"

23 people are talking about this



Jeryl Bier: "Why is it that the default assumption is that most people in prison are there unjustly?"



37 people are talking about this



Andrew Follett: "Are you implying that the Boston marathon bomber was unjustly incarcerated? As that was the explicit question that prompted this?"

Andrew Follett

@AndrewCFollett

https://twitter.com/AndrewCFollett/status/1121031021355511809
Replying to @saikatc

Are you implying that the Boston marathon bomber was unjustly incarcerated?

As that was the explict question that prompted this?

1,139

5:39 AM - Apr 24, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

107 people are talking about this



Stephen Miller: "Restore Dylan Roof’s voting rights immediately. It must be done."

148 people are talking about this



Chakrabarti has been weighed down by scandals since entering the public spotlight with Ocasio-Cortez.
He has been accused of funneling over $1 million in political donations to his own private companies. And Ocasio-Cortez and Chakrabarti also "obtained majority control of Justice Democrats PAC in December 2017, according to archived copies of the group’s website, and the two appear to retain their control of the group," according to The Daily Caller.


"If the Federal Election Commission (FEC) finds that the New York Democrat’s campaign operated in affiliation with the PAC, which had raised more than $1.8 million before her June 2018 primary, it would open them up to 'massive reporting violations, probably at least some illegal contribution violations exceeding the lawful limits,' former FEC commissioner Brad Smith said," The Caller added. "Ocasio-Cortez never disclosed to the FEC that she and Chakrabarti, who served as her campaign chair, controlled the PAC while it was simultaneously supporting her primary campaign, and former FEC commissioners say the arrangement could lead to multiple campaign finance violations. The group backed 12 Democrats during the 2018 midterms, but Ocasio-Cortez was the only one of those to win her general election."

Former FEC commissioner Brad Smith told The Caller: "If this were determined to be knowing and willful, they could be facing jail time. Even if it’s not knowing and willful, it would be a clear civil violation of the act, which would require disgorgement of the contributions and civil penalties. I think they’ve got some real issues here."
"At minimum, there’s a lot of smoke there, and if there are really only three board members and she and [Chakrabarti] are two of them, sure looks like you can see the blaze. I don’t really see any way out of it," Smith continued. "The admission makes it open and shut if someone wants to file a complaint with the FEC. I don’t see how the FEC could not investigate that. We’ve even got their own statement on their website that they control the organization. I don’t see how you could avoid an investigation on that."
 
View attachment 736095

Jeffrey Sachs is the guy that sent Russia to the Stone Age.
Did she quote at all this new study from the American Enterprise Institute, whatever that is, that determined the GND would have no effect and "is not to be taken seriously?"

 
D5A18w8XsAEC9iS.jpg


Ocasio-Cortez ID’s Democrat lawmaker as Republican in tweet

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fired off a tweet on Thursday calling out Kentucky Republicans for posting a photo of an older GOP lawmaker posing with a cutout of her — turns out the politician was a Democratic colleague.

“GOP: Let’s post our older male members next to cardboard cutouts of young female legislators,” the freshman Democrat wrote in the now-deleted tweet.

The problem is that the lawmaker in the photo is Rep. John Yarmuth, a Democrat from Kentucky.

The National Republican Congressional Committee, which works to elect Republican members of the House, quickly pointed out the mistake.

“Maybe if @AOC spent more time interacting with lawmakers and less time making coloring books, she’d recognize the other socialist Democrats in her caucus,” the NRCC wrote in a tweet, linking to Ocasio-Cortez’s posting.

The Kentucky Republican Party tweeted the photo of Yarmuth standing next to the cutout to accuse radical Democrats “like @AOC and #socialism” of “calling the shots for @KyDems now!”

Twitter users offered their criticism — and advice.

”.@AOC has deleted her tweet calling @RepJohnYarmuth a Republican,” wrote Philip Bailey. ”But nothing dies on the internet.”

Chris Ehrick said “Ugh. That’s unfortunate.”

”I’m a fan of AOC, but ’think before you tweet’ is a rule for all of us to live by,” she said.

Ocasio-Cortez has gotten into hot water before for her gaffes.

Last December, she said accounting errors at the Pentagon could fund Medicare for All, a claim in which the Washington Post fact-checker awarded her four Pinocchios.

A spokesman for Ocasio-Cortez didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
 

Did she seriously try to delete the Tweet? Goodness, that's not a good look for her, especially considering that she's called out other users on Twitter for trying to do the same thing in her replies.
 
Two Women on the Verge of a Party Takedown
American political superstars Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez made political history last November. The two political neophytes trounced the establishment’s sure fire bets in long shot bids for national office. Big name talk show hosts, Madison Avenue glossies, hipster blogs, podcasts, pundits, and political gadflies are all clamoring for a piece of Omar and AOC’s indisputable, incandescent, irresistible charisma — along with entre to their social media empires. But can the power of new celebrity bend the Democratic Party? DIE WELTWOCHE pulls back the curtain to find out.

24.04.2019
By Amy Holmes

Like meteors hurtling to Earth from the vast cosmic unknown, two new politicians have crashed the Washington status quo and are threatening to vaporize the political establishment. Congresswomen Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez of New York are igniting heated debate over their uncompromising progressive politics.

Omar, the first Somali-American to be elected to national office, is confounding Democratic party leaders with her aggressive, and many say anti-Semitic, views bashing Israel and its American defenders. The most recent controversy swirls around her highly criticized reference to the traumatic 9-11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington as “some people did something.” The New York Post immediately blasted Omar’s remarks on its front page with a photo of the Twin Towers engulfed in flames headlined, “Here's your something... 2,977 people dead by terrorism.”

Ocasio Cortez, or “AOC” as she and her legions of fans dub her, vigorously defends Omar. She is also pushing a “Green New Deal” — a radical global warming action plan that seeks to transform American life, including ending airplane transport, fossil fuel extraction, and malodorous bovine gases all in the next ten years. Mindful that AOC’s Millennial embrace of the Democratic Socialist label jeopardizes the traditional Democratic party’s viability with centrist voters, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has dismissed AOC’s global warming “moonshot” as “the green dream or whatever they call it. Nobody knows what it is. But they’re for it, right?”

President Trump, ever vigilant for foils to taunt and enemies to troll, is zeroing in on the shiny, new renegades. He’s working to cast them as the “real” faces of the Democratic party. The original master disrupter, Trump knows a rich political target when he sees it. And in Omar and AOC, he has two.

Back in 2016, before the glare of national stardom, Ilhan Omar was a young mother of three seeking to represent marginalized voices in the Minnesota state capital. “Time for Ilhan,” a newly released political documentary by director Norah Shapiro, lovingly chronicles the community organizer’s fledgling foray into electoral politics. The Hollywood Reporter enthuses that the soft focus hagiography “feels like manna from heaven for liberals and progressives who have been in a state of despair since the last [2016] presidential election.”

The film opens with a wintery shot of a modest, Minneapolis suburban, beige stucco and red trimmed home. Thick snow blankets the front yard, and sounds of contented domesticity burble within. It then cuts to interior shots of stuffed animals, a primer on Islam on a cluttered bookshelf next to an action figure and cupcake wrappers. The camera finally settles on the candidate for the Minnesota state legislature as she braids her youngest daughter’s long, silky curls.

“My mom is president!” Ilwad delightedly squeals.

“What makes me president?” an amused Omar purrs.

Ilwad pauses a beat. “You take care of your kids!”

Smiling, Omar says to her precocious, pre-school aged daughter (and one suspects to the camera just off to the side), “Let me tell you a story. You know, when I was little like you, my sisters would cut off my hair and make me bald all the time. You know why? Because I didn’t have a mommy, and no one had the patience to do this crazy business.”

In that small, gentle, congenial living room vignette, the viewer learns that not only is the Somali-born refugee a doting mother who, as a child, suffered devastating tragedy and loss, she is a shrewd politician who knows how to frame a moment for maximum effect — a skill that will ultimately take her all the way to United States Congress.

Phyllis Kahn, the longest serving woman in American electoral politics, who Omar goes on to spectacularly defeat in the 2016 local race, tells Die Weltwoche, “She has a compelling life story, and she speaks very well if you ever see her on something like the Daily Show.” Kahn, a Feminist pioneer with a Yale University Ph.D. in biophysics, was first elected to the Minnesota legislature in 1972 and proceeded to win all of her races for the next 44 years. She recalls her final match up against Omar. “One of the things I said during the campaign was, ‘She’s younger than me. She’s prettier than me, and she appears to be nicer than me because she agrees with anything anyone ever says to her.’ And that was considered a sexist comment. I don’t understand how it could be sexist when it’s true.”

Fast forward to the 2018 mid-term elections. Omar sweeps her Congressional district with 78.2% of the vote to become the first black woman to represent Minnesota on Capitol Hill and one of only two Muslim women elected to the halls of Congress. Her rise from abject poverty in a Kenyan refugee camp, having fled the Somali civil war, to the center of American power on the swell of Minnesota pride is what former Vice President Joe Biden might call, “storybook, man.”

Meanwhile, across the country, in Bronx, New York City, another petite, telegenic, sharp witted woman of color (also partial to fire engine red lipstick) challenges a long time Democratic party incumbent. In a stunning primary upset, 28-year-old AOC defeats twenty year Congressional veteran Joe Crowley to become the youngest woman ever elected to Congress.

It is a race that “until the very last moment, no one thought was winnable,” Michael Tobman, a former aide to New York’s United States Senator Charles Schumer, explains to me. Crowley was a classic, political machine power broker “who made city council speakers, and judges, and more legislators than we have fingers and toes to count.”

Carrying aloft the torch of Democratic Socialism, AOC’s improbable victory inspires countless magazine covers, fawning television profiles, and millions of social media fans. Her first speech on the floor of the House of Representatives becomes the most watched video in the history of the official Congressional broadcast service. Netflix snatches up an AOC documentary at Sundance for a breathtaking $10 million confident that millions will tune in.

Reveling in her new celebrity, AOC sends out a cheeky tweet to a hapless Twitter critic using a line from the “Watchmen” graphic novel: “To quote Alan Moore: None of you understand. I’m not locked up in here with YOU. You’re locked up in here with ME. [Crying laughter emoji]”. Her fans go wild.

AOC is an undisputed master of Millennial Twitter-speak. To the delight of her online audience, she regularly “owns” detractors with ripostes like her tweet breezily dismissing former US senator and vice presidential candidate Joe Lieberman who dared publicly question her political savvy. In a mere seven characters, the congresswoman kneecaps the elder statesman, snarking, “Who dis?”

Her social media followers eat up her every virtual morsel. And she feeds them a constant live stream of personal Instagram videos and Twitter deep thoughts documenting her inner and outermost struggles. She recently invited viewers to watch her attempt to build IKEA furniture in her empty, luxury, downtown Washington apartment — but not without delivering a passionate sermon on the “hatred” and “cruelty” of Trump allegedly drugging illegal immigrant children at the southern border with psychotropic drugs.

Religious imagery often bubbles up when speaking of the IKEA progressive and her self-described “girl squad.” Kahn describes the “worshipful attachment” to Omar “from young people” who propelled Omar’s first, historic victory in 2016. Tobman casually refers to AOC’s “acolytes.” James Rhodes, writing for the hipster, what’s hot right now, culture magazine Paste, promises that, “The moment that you accept that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is cooler than Barack Obama is the day you begin to truly live. It is the exact moment your progressive soul stops dying.” Worshipful, indeed. Even the staid and starchy New Yorker magazine is dazzled by “How Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Allies Supplanted the Obama Generation.” The highbrow, literary weekly approvingly quotes a twenty-something AOC environmental adviser who insists, “It sounds like hyperbole, but we are fighting to preserve life as we know it.” AOC, herself, paints an apocalyptic hellscape of the very near future if her grand, green new vision does not immediately become the bible of all American national policy.

But beneath the public adulation, party resentment is brewing. Some party members are starting to feel uncomfortably trapped in Omar and AOC’s graphic novel world. The two, fiery freshman — who Tobman describes as “absolutely convinced of their righteousness” — are threatening to fracture the national party.

The Green New Deal “is a perfect example of what frustrates longer serving legislators and activists and committed issue advocates so much,” Tobman sighs. “If the issue benefits from [AOC’s] attention, and the issue benefits from her energy, that’s great. But let’s not pretend that other people haven’t been talking about this for a long time.”

Pelosi’s own frustration is spilling into public view. Two weeks ago, during an interview on CBS News’ flagship broadcast “60 Minutes,” an obviously exasperated Pelosi slapped down the interviewer’s suggestion that AOC and her cohorts comprise “a wing” of the Democratic party. Through a clenched smile, she snapped, “That's, like, five people.”

Then, last week, during a trip to the U.K., the San Francisco Democrat took direct aim. Speaking to the London School of Economics, the 79-year-old party leader explained, “When we won this election, it wasn’t in districts like mine or Alexandria’s” — conspicuously using AOC’s first name rather than an honorific. “This glass of water would win with a ‘D’ next to its name in those districts.”

Pelosi’s second in command, Maryland Congressman Steny Hoyer, also appears to be losing patience with the party’s new Instagram and Twitter stars. Last month, at a hotly anticipated and widely attended, bi-partisan conference in Washington hosted by AIPAC (Israel advocacy group that Omar has specifically condemned), the twenty term congressman pointedly noted that there are 62 new members of the House, “not three.”

His remarks are widely interpreted as a stinging rebuke of Omar who, in February, tweeted that support for Israel is “all about the Benjamins, baby” — a hip hop reference to one hundred dollar bills that seemed to imply that nefarious Jewish money is buying off American public officials. A few weeks later, at a political coffee klatch at a Washington book store, Omar insisted that advocates for the Jewish state “push for allegiance to a foreign country” — another attack that, to many observers, summoned the ancient slur of Jewish dual loyalty.

Kahn, the child of Eastern European Jewish immigrants, is not surprised by Omar’s outbursts. She warned in 2016 that she suspected Omar harbors anti-Semitic impulses. Kahn recounts an incident at a Minneapolis polling station during the 2014 local election where a Somali-American election judge was allegedly instructing voters in Somali that one voting line was for “our Somali brother” and the other for “the old Jewish lady,” meaning Kahn. The Star Tribune reported at the time that a Somali-American Kahn supporter submitted an affidavit accusing Omar — then, a city council aide — of “shouting instructions” to the election judge at the polling station. Kahn’s campaign filed a formal complaint. Omar denied the allegations.

More recently, Omar has raised the eyebrows of local community leaders for her apparent about face on the anti-Israel “Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions” (BDS) movement. During a primary debate last August, the candidate told a Jewish audience that BDS was “not helpful in getting that two-state solution.” But only days after winning election, her office told the website MuslimGirl.com that Omar did, in fact, support the punitive measures.

The rabbi of the Minneapolis synagogue where Omar made her original, benign, campaign trail remarks says, “She’s either misrepresenting or misunderstanding... [T]his starts her tenure off on the wrong foot.”

Between Omar’s inflammatory foreign policy pronouncements and AOC’s neo-Socialist fervor, the Democratic party and its moderate members risk being dragged off of a political cliff. As one congressman anonymously complained to the New York Post, progressive purity is “wrong and shows a lack of understanding for moderate leaning districts... Our districts don’t look like theirs, and if we’re going to keep the majority, we have to protect these moderate seats.” In February, Missouri Congressman Emanuel Cleaver fired a warning shot to AOC and her band of revolutionaries hopped up on media hype. The Congressional Black Caucus member told Politico, “I’m sure Ms. Cortez means well, but there’s almost an outstanding rule: Don’t attack your own people. We just don’t need sniping in our Democratic caucus.”

Tobman — who honed his political instincts under the tutelage of Schumer, one of the most powerful and canny politicians in the country — warns that Omar and AOC need to be “careful about believing their own press.” After years in the New York and national political trenches, Tobman observes, “It becomes an echo chamber of affirmation separate and disconnected from larger conversations about the direction of the party and the direction of the country.” But despite the rumblings of their disgruntled foot soldiers, Democratic party leaders seem powerless to pull in the reins.

Back home in Minnesota, Kahn reveals to Die Weltwoche that, “There are a couple of Somali guys who keep calling me and want my help in helping get rid of her.” According to Kahn, they are searching for a candidate to field against Omar in Minnesota’s 2020 Democratic primaries. “They don’t like what she’s doing to their reputations” as Muslim Americans.

Dr. Qanta Ahmed, a New York-based physician and prolific opinion journalist, shares their concern. A member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Ahmed has penned a series of passionate denunciations of Omar’s headline grabbing political musings. Ahmed tells Die Weltwoche that as an American Muslim and staunch supporter of the Jewish state, she feels honor bound to speak up. “I couldn’t ignore it any longer because most Americans do not know a Muslim person in the United States, whether a citizen or a migrant. And here she is, in the first two weeks of being in the Congress, expressing vituperative anti-Semitism.” Ahmed firmly believes that, “When you’re in Congress, you’re just an American serving everybody else. Your religion is immaterial.”

What is very much material, however, is the $830,000 in campaign donations Omar has raised in just the first three months since her November victory — more than even the ubiquitous AOC.

Two weeks ago, on a late night talk show, Omar was asked by the besotted host if she and her compatriots should lower their profile and temper their language for the sake of party comity. With an easy smile, Omar deftly reached into the identity politics rhetorical toolbox and replied, “Women have been told to go slow and not be seen and not be heard for many years. [Pelosi] wouldn’t have made it to where she is if she did. And it’s certainly the case for minority women… We are not there to be quiet. We are not there to be invisible. We are there to... make good trouble.”

As AOC has informed fellow Democrats and anyone else who doubts the inevitable triumph of the new Democratic Socialist revolution, “I am the boss!”
 
“What makes me president?” an amused Omar purrs.

Was it tingles running up and down Amy Holmes's leg, or something else?

Seriously, this drips with barely-concealed desire. I knew the press was in bed with the DNC but it's weird to see the desire be so literal.
 
People were stupid enough to vote for her once, I have no doubt they will do so again if only so they can signal virtue how progressive they are and to stick it to Trump.

Her Dem opponent can easily mouth some Orange Bad Man stuff too (hell there the Rep one could), and she's already pissed off her constituency pretty thoroughly by fucking the Amazon deal and by instantly abandoning all pretense of giving a shit about them to play to the national crowd.
 
abandoning all pretense of giving a shit about them to play to the national crowd.

This, quietly, but slowly and inexorably, will doom her. She doesn't seem aware that her national popularity means squat when it comes to getting reelected and ultimately the only people who matter are ones she has explicitly fucked with the Amazon no-deal.
 
Her Dem opponent can easily mouth some Orange Bad Man stuff too (hell there the Rep one could), and she's already pissed off her constituency pretty thoroughly by fucking the Amazon deal and by instantly abandoning all pretense of giving a shit about them to play to the national crowd.
MEME Magic will end her, she just looks like a crazy person, its very easy to go after her with pictures.
 
Back
Top Bottom