US "The Squad" Megathread - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib Derangement Syndrome

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I honestly only know about American politics from what I read on the Internet but since we all love shitting on leftists I figured we'd get a kick out of this. Also it's trending on Twitter so you know it's important.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...irect=on&noredirect=on&utm_term=.960552c9ba53

NEW YORK — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old political novice running on a low budget and an unabashedly liberal platform, upset longtime U.S. Rep. Joseph Crowley on Tuesday in the Democratic congressional primary in New York.

The surprise victory by the community organizer in a district that includes parts of the Bronx and Queens came after an energetic, grassroots campaign that mustered more than enough support in a low-turnout race that many had expected to be an easy win for Crowley, a member of the Democratic House leadership.

“The community is ready for a movement of economic and social justice. That is what we tried to deliver,” said Ocasio-Cortez, who has never held elected office and whose candidacy attracted only modest media attention.

She told The Associated Press after her victory that she didn’t have enough money to do polling in the race, but felt in her gut that her message had a chance to connect.

“I live in this community. I organized in this community. I felt the absence of the incumbent. I knew he didn’t have a strong presence,” she said.

Crowley has been in Congress since 1999 and hadn’t faced an opponent in a primary election since 2004, when Ocasio-Cortez was just a teenager. He was considered a candidate to become the next House speaker if Democrats win the majority.

“It’s not about me,” Crowley, 56, told his supporters at a campaign party following his loss. “It’s about America. I want nothing but the best for Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. I want her to be victorious.”

He later played guitar with a band at the election night gathering, and dedicated the first song, Bruce Springsteen’s “Born to Run,” to Ocasio-Cortez.

Crowley represents New York’s 14th Congressional District, where he is also the leader of the Queens Democratic party.

Ocasio-Cortez was outspent by an 18-1 margin during her race but won the endorsement of some influential groups on the party’s far left, including MoveOn, as well as the actress Cynthia Nixon, who is running for governor. She defeated Crowley by 15 percentage points.

Born in the Bronx to a mother from Puerto Rico and a father who died in 2008, Ocasio-Cortez said she decided to challenge Crowley to push a more progressive stance on economic and other issues.

She attended Boston University, where she earned degrees in economics and international relations, and also spent time working in the office of the late U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.

After graduating, she returned to the Bronx where she became a community organizer. In the 2016 presidential campaign she worked for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Among her issues is expanding the Medicare program to people of all ages and abolishing Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. She recently went to Tornillo, Texas, to protest against policies that have separated parents from their children at the southern U.S. border.

Ocasio-Cortez gained some internet attention for a campaign video called “The Courage to Change,” a two-minute spot for which she wrote the script and featured footage from her own home.

Crowley is chair of the House Democratic Caucus, the fourth-highest ranking position in Democratic leadership in that chamber of Congress.

His loss drew the attention of President Donald Trump.

“Wow! Big Trump Hater Congressman Joe Crowley, who many expected was going to take Nancy Pelosi’s place, just LOST his primary election. In other words, he’s out! That is a big one that nobody saw happening. Perhaps he should have been nicer, and more respectful, to his President!” he tweeted.

The Republican candidate for the office, Anthony Pappas, is running unopposed and had no primary. Pappas teaches economics at St. John’s University.

She was a Bernie campaigner, is supported by BLM, and wants to abolish Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Also this was in a solid-blue Congressional District so you know she's a shoo-in for next Congress.

But hey, we did get to see Trump laugh at Crowley on Twitter.
 
I can't think of a more disastrous week and a half for the media ever. From their shitty tactics getting turned against them to O'Donnell having to retract his fake news to their melting down over Dave Chappelle's Netflix special to the Bret Stephens bedbugs fiasco. They've really taken a licking recently.
Man, this comment aged like a feminist's unwanted full term fetus.

So this past week we had:
-Countless Kavanaugh story screwups and failed spin attempts, including the mother of all Twitter ratios.
-Covering for Justin Trudeau's blackface by calling it "face darkening makeup."
-Having to admit Corey Lewandowski humiliated the House Democrats.
-Broadcasting the disaster that was the third round of debates.
-Sperging out over the opening of a Chick-Fil-A.

They might legitimately need a hug.
 
Looks like someone is trying to do to AOC what AOC did to her predecessor. Khan is a woman, more ethnic(Bengali) AND a muslim so things might get tough.



From another article.


Called it.

2019 isn't even over yet and already AOC is about to be primaried.

Either the DNC is even more worried about The Squad and considered them a bigger liability than I thought, or AOC really has alienated that much of her constituency.

I'd believe either one of those reasons and it's probably a mix of both.

This year has not been a kind one to the Left, and I have a feeling it's gonna get worse as the 2020 Election cycle goes on.
 
Man, this comment aged like a feminist's unwanted full term fetus.

So this past week we had:
-Countless Kavanaugh story screwups and failed spin attempts, including the mother of all Twitter ratios.
-Covering for Justin Trudeau's blackface by calling it "face darkening makeup."
-Having to admit Corey Lewandowski humiliated the House Democrats.
-Broadcasting the disaster that was the third round of debates.
-Sperging out over the opening of a Chick-Fil-A.

They might legitimately need a hug.

1568934788171.png

edit: lol the responses in general are great, even rita panahi is throwing some jabs

1568934866542.png
 
From Badrun's site:
Badrun Khan for Congress

Badrun Nahar Khan, is a first generation immigrant and the eldest daughter of Bangladeshi born parents who migrated to the United States in search of a better life and greater opportunity. Badrun was born in New York and raised on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. She is married and is a proud mother of two beautiful teen-age daughters.

As a child growing up in NYC during the 1970s, Badrun experienced her family's struggles to provide a good life for their children. Badrun's parents were hard working individuals, they worked countless hours in their own small business and instilled the value of education and hard work to their children.

Social life was not always easy and Badrun experienced how difficult it was being the lone Bangladeshi Muslim in her class. Badrun fully understands that her life’s experiences and the benefits of living in a culturally diverse community offered invaluable lessons that stay with her today.

Badrun is no stranger to hard work. As a teenager she studied hard and worked in her parents’ restaurant after school. On the weekends she found time to serve as a translator to the emerging Bangladeshi community. Her passion was her service, and her service was to work in hospitals in Manhattan.

Badrun took full advantage of each and every opportunity and her hard work allowed her to be the first woman of her family to go to college and graduate with a Bachelors of Arts from Marymount Manhattan College.
Her education paved the way for others in her family to do so as well.

Badrun has worked as a financial officer for a large school for the past seven years. Family is so important to Badrun and she often acknowledges her debt to her parents and her firm belief that her success is due to her devoted and selfless parents.
The value of hard work and dedication is instilled in Badrun and resonates as she passes on the same values to her two daughters, one of whom is about to enter college this fall.

Despite working full time, raising a family and working hard as her husband achieves his own Culinary degree, Badrun remains heavily involved in her Bangladeshi Community throughout the city, but primarily in Queens. Badrun was recently elected the President of the Jalalabad Association, whose members number well over 14,000 people.

As President, She raised money for the needy and helped alienated Bangladeshi wo-men in the community. She also organized cultural events and encouraged first and second generation Bangladeshis to learn more about their heritage. Badrun has worked towards political and social empowerment for her community. Her service has gone well beyond the Bangladeshi community. She is an active presence in schools and service to all the residents in her Queens community.

She has volunteered and served with honor as a member of Community Board 2. Badrun continues to works diligently each day to help her community and the people of Queens.

As a daughter of immigrants who has lived through so much change in the United States, Badrun has a strong vision for the future, not only for her beloved Bangladeshi community but for all New Yorkers.

Badrun’s dream is to be a uniter, someone who hopes to build bridges so that no community, regardless of their ethnicity or religion will ever be left behind. Badrun believes that all people should get more involved in mainstream politics and become more integrated as American citizens.

Badrun is considered by many as a tireless advocate for those who cannot advocate for themselves. Her voice will be heard not only in the halls of government but on each and every street in our district. She will clearly become the voice that will represent all New Yorkers.
 
Whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do
When they come for you?
Badrun, Badrun.

She should probably use a different name, too. I'm sure it sounds fine in the native language, but it's kind of unfortunate when running for office in an English speaking country.
 
There's a thread on r/ukpolitics fawning over She Guevara because she thanked Labour for being the first major party to include planks of the Green Nude Eel in their manifesto.

It's funny being an American seeing their evaluations of our politicians. It reminds me of when I went to Spain and saw a restaurant advertising 'Real American Hamburgers.' I was intrigued, so I went inside and ordered one. That shit had an egg on it. I thought to myself 'Umm, y'all's image of what an American experiences is kinda off. By a lot.'

Granted, r/ukpolitics is every bit as left wing as r/politics, but still. That airheaded bimbo ain't gonna be the first woman President. Even on r/politics they're way more likely to say that would be Pocahontas.
 
There's a thread on r/ukpolitics fawning over She Guevara because she thanked Labour for being the first major party to include planks of the Green Nude Eel in their manifesto.

It's funny being an American seeing their evaluations of our politicians. It reminds me of when I went to Spain and saw a restaurant advertising 'Real American Hamburgers.' I was intrigued, so I went inside and ordered one. That shit had an egg on it. I thought to myself 'Umm, y'all's image of what an American experiences is kinda off. By a lot.'

Granted, r/ukpolitics is every bit as left wing as r/politics, but still. That airheaded bimbo ain't gonna be the first woman President. Even on r/politics they're way more likely to say that would be Pocahontas.
I traveled to Belgium for work once. They have these french fry shops everywhere. They all have a variety of sauces for dipping. One of those, the most popular apparently, was called "American sauce" because it's supposedly what Americans put on their fries.
When I said as an American I had never heard of or seen this sauce, they told me it was very popular in America...

The us is really big. Who knows what weird regional things these people think is Nationwide. Those kinds of misunderstandings are funny.
 
I traveled to Belgium for work once. They have these french fry shops everywhere. They all have a variety of sauces for dipping. One of those, the most popular apparently, was called "American sauce" because it's supposedly what Americans put on their fries.
When I said as an American I had never heard of or seen this sauce, they told me it was very popular in America...

The us is really big. Who knows what weird regional things these people think is Nationwide. Those kinds of misunderstandings are funny.
Was it "fry sauce"/mayochup? It's pretty good, it's what Inn-n-out uses.
 

AOC needs to testify, explain her decision to block ex-politician from her Twitter feed, federal judge says

Before a federal judge decides if it’s A-OK for AOC to block nettlesome Twitter followers, he wants to hear from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — and not via the internet.

“I think she has to testify here,” declared Brooklyn Federal Judge Frederic Block during a Thursday hearing in the lawsuit brought by ex-politician Dov Hikind over his ban from AOC’s feed.

Block, after seeing hundreds of pages of tweets entered into evidence, said he believed hearing from the freshman member of Congress was necessary to decide whether to toss the suit or let the case proceed. Ocasio-Cortez boasts a staggering 5.4 million Twitter followers — even without Hikind.

The former state Assemblyman took on the media-savvy Ocasio-Cortez when she gave him the Twitter boot in a spat over her description of federal immigration detention centers as “concentration camps.” He griped that AOC was violating his First Amendment rights, citing a recent decision declaring President Trump’s blocking of Twitter trolls was unconstitutional.

Hikind testified Thursday that he doesn’t personally send the tweets in his account — one of his staffers handles the “clicking” once he’s taken care of “the wording.” There was also discussion about the difference between AOC’s two Twitter accounts: One government-issued, the other her personal/campaign feed.

Lawyers for AOC also noted that Hikind did not live in her Bronx-Queens district, but rather in the Manhattan-Brooklyn area represented by Jerrold Nadler.

“So you’re not a constituent of Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez?” asked her attorney Joseph Sandler.

“I’m a citizen of the United States,” he replied.

“So you’re not directly ...” continued Sandler.

“Not technically, yes,” said Hikind.

Block did assure both sides that his decision won’t be released in the 140-character format,.

“I don’t think I will,” he said. “I’m afraid to use it. I haven’t posted anything on it. It scares me.”



A Federal Judge Wants AOC To Explain Why She Blocks Twitter Critics In Court

A federal judge in New York City ordered Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to give testimony in a lawsuit alleging she violated the First Amendment by blocking critics on Twitter.

U.S. District Judge Frederic Block asked for the congresswoman’s testimony during a Thursday hearing in a Brooklyn federal court. After accepting evidence and hearing witness testimony, the judge said the hearing would continue when he could hear from Ocasio-Cortez.

The plaintiff is former Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind, a Jewish community leader who criticized the freshman Democrat for comparing migrant detention facilities at the border with concentration camps. Hikind alleges the congresswoman blocked him because of his tweet.

“AOC’s actions violate the First Amendment rights of Mr. Hikind, others like Mr. Hikind, and those who follow the @AOC account and are now deprived of their right to read the speech of the dissenters who have been blocked,” Hikind’s complaint reads.

A group of Twitter users blocked from the @realDonaldTrump account sued President Donald Trump on a similar First Amendment theory. They prevailed before the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 9, when a three-judge panel ruled that the interactive digital space attending particular tweets is a public forum where the First Amendment applies.

As in the Trump case, Ocasio-Cortez counters that her @AOC handle is a personal account, while a separate @repaoc account is an official platform open to all comers.

Joseph Sandler and David Mitrani of Sandler Reiff Lamb Rosenstein & Birkenstock, who represent Ocasio-Cortez in the litigation, said her conduct on both accounts is consistent with congressional rules.

“We are pleased that at [Thursday’s] hearing the court provided both sides a full and fair opportunity to present the facts regarding the use of the two separate Twitter accounts by the congresswoman — one that is for her official use (@repaoc) and the other for her campaign/personal use (@AOC),” Sandler and Mitrani said.

“Significantly, we were able to bring the court’s attention to the House rules that put up a solid wall between social media accounts used for official purposes and those used for campaign/personal purposes — and to other very significant differences between the use of congresswoman’s personal/campaign account and the clearly official Trump account that was the subject of a court ruling precluding the president from blocking followers on that account,” they added.

The Knight First Amendment Institute, a public interest law practice specializing in free speech issues, warned Ocasio-Cortez in an Aug. 28 letter that blocking her social media critics is viewpoint discrimination, a cardinal First Amendment sin. The Institute said the distinction between professional and personal accounts is immaterial if a personal account functions as an extension of a public official’s office.


“While we understand that you have another account that is nominally your ‘official’ one, the fact remains that you use the @AOC account as an extension of your office,” the Knight Institute wrote. “Notably, the 2nd Circuit rejected President Trump’s argument that his account is a personal one even though he has other accounts — @POTUS and @WhiteHouse — that are nominally official,” they wrote.

The case is Hikind v. Ocasio-Cortez in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
 
She so often refers to herself as representing the United States, but falls back on claiming only her specific district's constituents have a right to hear what she has to say.

I guess she is learning to be a politician.
 
There's a thread on r/ukpolitics fawning over She Guevara because she thanked Labour for being the first major party to include planks of the Green Nude Eel in their manifesto.

It's funny being an American seeing their evaluations of our politicians. It reminds me of when I went to Spain and saw a restaurant advertising 'Real American Hamburgers.' I was intrigued, so I went inside and ordered one. That shit had an egg on it. I thought to myself 'Umm, y'all's image of what an American experiences is kinda off. By a lot.'

Granted, r/ukpolitics is every bit as left wing as r/politics, but still. That airheaded bimbo ain't gonna be the first woman President. Even on r/politics they're way more likely to say that would be Pocahontas.
There is nothing wrong with putting an egg on a burger.

It just has to be medium so it isn't a mess.
 

AOC needs to testify, explain her decision to block ex-politician from her Twitter feed, federal judge says

Before a federal judge decides if it’s A-OK for AOC to block nettlesome Twitter followers, he wants to hear from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — and not via the internet.

“I think she has to testify here,” declared Brooklyn Federal Judge Frederic Block during a Thursday hearing in the lawsuit brought by ex-politician Dov Hikind over his ban from AOC’s feed.

Block, after seeing hundreds of pages of tweets entered into evidence, said he believed hearing from the freshman member of Congress was necessary to decide whether to toss the suit or let the case proceed. Ocasio-Cortez boasts a staggering 5.4 million Twitter followers — even without Hikind.

The former state Assemblyman took on the media-savvy Ocasio-Cortez when she gave him the Twitter boot in a spat over her description of federal immigration detention centers as “concentration camps.” He griped that AOC was violating his First Amendment rights, citing a recent decision declaring President Trump’s blocking of Twitter trolls was unconstitutional.

Hikind testified Thursday that he doesn’t personally send the tweets in his account — one of his staffers handles the “clicking” once he’s taken care of “the wording.” There was also discussion about the difference between AOC’s two Twitter accounts: One government-issued, the other her personal/campaign feed.

Lawyers for AOC also noted that Hikind did not live in her Bronx-Queens district, but rather in the Manhattan-Brooklyn area represented by Jerrold Nadler.

“So you’re not a constituent of Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez?” asked her attorney Joseph Sandler.

“I’m a citizen of the United States,” he replied.

“So you’re not directly ...” continued Sandler.

“Not technically, yes,” said Hikind.

Block did assure both sides that his decision won’t be released in the 140-character format,.

“I don’t think I will,” he said. “I’m afraid to use it. I haven’t posted anything on it. It scares me.”



A Federal Judge Wants AOC To Explain Why She Blocks Twitter Critics In Court

A federal judge in New York City ordered Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to give testimony in a lawsuit alleging she violated the First Amendment by blocking critics on Twitter.

U.S. District Judge Frederic Block asked for the congresswoman’s testimony during a Thursday hearing in a Brooklyn federal court. After accepting evidence and hearing witness testimony, the judge said the hearing would continue when he could hear from Ocasio-Cortez.

The plaintiff is former Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind, a Jewish community leader who criticized the freshman Democrat for comparing migrant detention facilities at the border with concentration camps. Hikind alleges the congresswoman blocked him because of his tweet.

“AOC’s actions violate the First Amendment rights of Mr. Hikind, others like Mr. Hikind, and those who follow the @AOC account and are now deprived of their right to read the speech of the dissenters who have been blocked,” Hikind’s complaint reads.

A group of Twitter users blocked from the @realDonaldTrump account sued President Donald Trump on a similar First Amendment theory. They prevailed before the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 9, when a three-judge panel ruled that the interactive digital space attending particular tweets is a public forum where the First Amendment applies.

As in the Trump case, Ocasio-Cortez counters that her @AOC handle is a personal account, while a separate @repaoc account is an official platform open to all comers.

Joseph Sandler and David Mitrani of Sandler Reiff Lamb Rosenstein & Birkenstock, who represent Ocasio-Cortez in the litigation, said her conduct on both accounts is consistent with congressional rules.

“We are pleased that at [Thursday’s] hearing the court provided both sides a full and fair opportunity to present the facts regarding the use of the two separate Twitter accounts by the congresswoman — one that is for her official use (@repaoc) and the other for her campaign/personal use (@AOC),” Sandler and Mitrani said.

“Significantly, we were able to bring the court’s attention to the House rules that put up a solid wall between social media accounts used for official purposes and those used for campaign/personal purposes — and to other very significant differences between the use of congresswoman’s personal/campaign account and the clearly official Trump account that was the subject of a court ruling precluding the president from blocking followers on that account,” they added.

The Knight First Amendment Institute, a public interest law practice specializing in free speech issues, warned Ocasio-Cortez in an Aug. 28 letter that blocking her social media critics is viewpoint discrimination, a cardinal First Amendment sin. The Institute said the distinction between professional and personal accounts is immaterial if a personal account functions as an extension of a public official’s office.


“While we understand that you have another account that is nominally your ‘official’ one, the fact remains that you use the @AOC account as an extension of your office,” the Knight Institute wrote. “Notably, the 2nd Circuit rejected President Trump’s argument that his account is a personal one even though he has other accounts — @POTUS and @WhiteHouse — that are nominally official,” they wrote.

The case is Hikind v. Ocasio-Cortez in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

The judge in a lawsuit over AOC blocking an ex-politician is named Frederic Block; what kind of amateurish writing is this?

Will Block's decision get appealed to Judge Jack Dorsey?
 

AOC needs to testify, explain her decision to block ex-politician from her Twitter feed, federal judge says

Before a federal judge decides if it’s A-OK for AOC to block nettlesome Twitter followers, he wants to hear from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — and not via the internet.

“I think she has to testify here,” declared Brooklyn Federal Judge Frederic Block during a Thursday hearing in the lawsuit brought by ex-politician Dov Hikind over his ban from AOC’s feed.

Block, after seeing hundreds of pages of tweets entered into evidence, said he believed hearing from the freshman member of Congress was necessary to decide whether to toss the suit or let the case proceed. Ocasio-Cortez boasts a staggering 5.4 million Twitter followers — even without Hikind.

The former state Assemblyman took on the media-savvy Ocasio-Cortez when she gave him the Twitter boot in a spat over her description of federal immigration detention centers as “concentration camps.” He griped that AOC was violating his First Amendment rights, citing a recent decision declaring President Trump’s blocking of Twitter trolls was unconstitutional.

Hikind testified Thursday that he doesn’t personally send the tweets in his account — one of his staffers handles the “clicking” once he’s taken care of “the wording.” There was also discussion about the difference between AOC’s two Twitter accounts: One government-issued, the other her personal/campaign feed.

Lawyers for AOC also noted that Hikind did not live in her Bronx-Queens district, but rather in the Manhattan-Brooklyn area represented by Jerrold Nadler.

“So you’re not a constituent of Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez?” asked her attorney Joseph Sandler.

“I’m a citizen of the United States,” he replied.

“So you’re not directly ...” continued Sandler.

“Not technically, yes,” said Hikind.

Block did assure both sides that his decision won’t be released in the 140-character format,.

“I don’t think I will,” he said. “I’m afraid to use it. I haven’t posted anything on it. It scares me.”



A Federal Judge Wants AOC To Explain Why She Blocks Twitter Critics In Court

A federal judge in New York City ordered Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to give testimony in a lawsuit alleging she violated the First Amendment by blocking critics on Twitter.

U.S. District Judge Frederic Block asked for the congresswoman’s testimony during a Thursday hearing in a Brooklyn federal court. After accepting evidence and hearing witness testimony, the judge said the hearing would continue when he could hear from Ocasio-Cortez.

The plaintiff is former Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind, a Jewish community leader who criticized the freshman Democrat for comparing migrant detention facilities at the border with concentration camps. Hikind alleges the congresswoman blocked him because of his tweet.

“AOC’s actions violate the First Amendment rights of Mr. Hikind, others like Mr. Hikind, and those who follow the @AOC account and are now deprived of their right to read the speech of the dissenters who have been blocked,” Hikind’s complaint reads.

A group of Twitter users blocked from the @realDonaldTrump account sued President Donald Trump on a similar First Amendment theory. They prevailed before the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 9, when a three-judge panel ruled that the interactive digital space attending particular tweets is a public forum where the First Amendment applies.

As in the Trump case, Ocasio-Cortez counters that her @AOC handle is a personal account, while a separate @repaoc account is an official platform open to all comers.

Joseph Sandler and David Mitrani of Sandler Reiff Lamb Rosenstein & Birkenstock, who represent Ocasio-Cortez in the litigation, said her conduct on both accounts is consistent with congressional rules.

“We are pleased that at [Thursday’s] hearing the court provided both sides a full and fair opportunity to present the facts regarding the use of the two separate Twitter accounts by the congresswoman — one that is for her official use (@repaoc) and the other for her campaign/personal use (@AOC),” Sandler and Mitrani said.

“Significantly, we were able to bring the court’s attention to the House rules that put up a solid wall between social media accounts used for official purposes and those used for campaign/personal purposes — and to other very significant differences between the use of congresswoman’s personal/campaign account and the clearly official Trump account that was the subject of a court ruling precluding the president from blocking followers on that account,” they added.

The Knight First Amendment Institute, a public interest law practice specializing in free speech issues, warned Ocasio-Cortez in an Aug. 28 letter that blocking her social media critics is viewpoint discrimination, a cardinal First Amendment sin. The Institute said the distinction between professional and personal accounts is immaterial if a personal account functions as an extension of a public official’s office.


“While we understand that you have another account that is nominally your ‘official’ one, the fact remains that you use the @AOC account as an extension of your office,” the Knight Institute wrote. “Notably, the 2nd Circuit rejected President Trump’s argument that his account is a personal one even though he has other accounts — @POTUS and @WhiteHouse — that are nominally official,” they wrote.

The case is Hikind v. Ocasio-Cortez in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

This is amazing, because they sued Trump for this exact thing. They didn't fucking realize it set precedent and they can't go around blocking everyone like they used to because they're public officals.
 
Back
Top Bottom