The TRUE and HONEST reason for the Diversity Effort in America - M. Rasheed knows

[DeusDry]

"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

Reminder this quote was written of as a "hoax" at the time, but read it and tell me it isn't happening right now.

 

[Non-Expert!]

The True and Honest Reason for the Diversity Effort in America:

Money and marketing.

When the Alabama bus boycott happened, they (policy makers) figured out just how much money black cleaning ladies, laborers and church people were bringing back into the system, simply by handing that nickel (or whatever it was at the time) bus fare to the driver.

Flash forward to the 1980's. How much money would be earned, if Mattel etc. designed black, Chinese and Latina dolls? Sure, black kids can play with a fleet of Lily-white Barbies, but the parents who buy them might be a little bit more enthusiastic and subsequently, eager to spend surplus income on dolls of color. With that, of course, accessories like Barbie horses, cars, playhouses etc.

Move into the 2000's ..... sure, Mexicans can drink Budweiser and Coors. But a lot MORE Mexicans will drink Corona and Tecate.

And what do these minorities do, when they spend more money on consumer items that are marketed just to them?

They add a second income to the house and subsequently spend more money on more consumer items, marketed just for them.

There are other, completely practical reasons, for inclusion. Let's say blacks have to have their special airlines because white ones won't allow them. That is a lot of lost business for American Airlines. And if blackfolks want to fly American Airlines to visit family stationed in Germany, they have to book with the competition, Lufthansa.

Also where would the US army be, if they had a "Negros to the left, Whites to the right" policy? How can we win wars overseas, when we can't win a racial one at home?

Not to be cynical, but I would throw my bet in, that a mainstream push for integration has very little to do with overcoming racial oppression, and more to do with what is practical and profitable.

ADDED:

This Mohammed cartoonist is totally off. We are not including slave blood blacks in society because we are afraid of having to pay something they are not entitled to, in the first place. We have an inclusive society because we want a stable one. Who wants to live in a state of fear, that rightfully angry, systematically oppressed minorities will burst out from behind their barbed wire fence and give us what we have coming to us?

If some blacks think we owe them reparations, they are allowed to believe that. Except a huge fallacy in their thinking, is that most Americans, of all colors, are not plantation owner descendents. Many were actually, poorer then freed blacks, others were living in Poland, Mexico, Ireland or the Philippines at the time of slavery and the Reconstruction ... also, hungrier than black chattel and freedmen were, so nonsense to all of this.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

The true reason is that after Communism failed to take hold in the First World (like Marx predicted it would), Communism had to transform. In the Third World (and Russia) it took on a more agrarian and nationalist character. In the First World, it instead shifted its focus from class conflict to destroying the things which create false consciousness, the societal superstructure which consists of things like race, sex, and religion. Creating equality in these was considered to be an important step to equality in general. This ties in with the Frankfurt School (what some edgy conservatives call Cultural Marxism).

After several generations, the original point of it was just kind of forgotten and it took on a life of its own, to where they're now focused on race/sex/religion/nation struggle for its own sake.

Non-Communist Leftists are, like always, pawns of Communist intellectuals.

The true reason is that the reformist communists won out over the revolutionary communists in the West (Europe and the US) and gave society labor laws, solid unions, better wages, and the welfare state. Even before the welfare state was truly established revolutionary communism was fucked because the commies who split and joined the Third International (Comintern) weren't winning, the social democrats of the Second International were winning and most people realized that.

Not to be cynical, but I would throw my bet in, that a mainstream push for integration has very little to do with overcoming racial oppression, and more to do with what is practical and profitable.

This is absolutely true. This is behind every racial, gender, sexuality, etc. issue since first wave feminism back in the early 20th century. Corporations and banks like to make money, and marketing to oppressed (or "oppressed") classes wins. Like why black people like to drive Cadillacs and lesbians drive Subarus, because that's a demographic they've been marketing for (in the case of blacks and Cadillacs it was since the 50s). And once you start marketing toward a demographic, you really have to start supporting causes for that demographic because it's good for their pocketbook. Like integration for blacks (more money for them) or gay marriage for lesbians (more household income). You can see this in action right now with Big Pharma and their hormones. They created a market and now they need to expand both the market and the market's purchasing power for more sales, hence the push for troons everywhere. This of course is also behind why rainbow flags are everywhere in Pride Month, since even corporations not actively courting the market need to pay their respects to it.

 

[Non-Expert!]

This is absolutely true. This is behind every racial, gender, sexuality, etc. issue since first wave feminism back in the early 20th century. Corporations and banks like to make money, and marketing to oppressed (or "oppressed") classes wins. Like why black people like to drive Cadillacs and lesbians drive Subarus, because that's a demographic they've been marketing for (in the case of blacks and Cadillacs it was since the 50s). And once you start marketing toward a demographic, you really have to start supporting causes for that demographic because it's good for their pocketbook. Like integration for blacks (more money for them) or gay marriage for lesbians (more household income). You can see this in action right now with Big Pharma and their hormones. They created a market and now they need to expand both the market and the market's purchasing power for more sales, hence the push for troons everywhere. This of course is also behind why rainbow flags are everywhere in Pride Month, since even corporations not actively courting the market need to pay their respects to it.

I actually wasn't even thinking about the Gay and Lesbian crowd but you are so right. The ones who have it together and have gained mainstream acceptance, have a tremendous amount of purchasing power. These are folks who generally (generally!) not going to be spending money on kids so they have more disposable income for everything else.

So all the money that the breeding population puts into consumer items for their kids, can go into home remodeling, expensive sportswear, vacations, high end shoes, top shelf booze, ...

So why would any company prefer to see gays and lesbians cowering in the closet, as they face the world outside it where they are not employable, can't find housing and considered undesirable customers?

Besides, discriminating against people actually takes effort, and generally sucks.