The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

I don't know what planet you would have to live on to say that you own CP to bait pedos and then expect people to believe you.
The "fine" lads over on reddit's AgainstHateSubreddits seem proud of their curation of a CP collection suitable for anonymously spamming on subreddits they're targeting for purging (they report the subs to the admins for CP after they've done it).
 
The "fine" lads over on reddit's AgainstHateSubreddits seem proud of their curation of a CP collection suitable for anonymously spamming on subreddits they're targeting for purging (they report the subs to the admins for CP after they've done it).
Fun fact, they got up in arms and crusaded against this sub about rape porn called "strugglefucking", and despite one of my friends saying "it was shitty acting most of the time tho lol" got it banned.

Fine, reddit has advertisers with cocks they gotta suck in order to make money. However, guess what stayed up? "gaystrugglefucking." You can't even argue that it's rough play or something since the pinned post is literally "Admin Team Note: FYI: The 'Struggle' in strugglefuck means RAPE."

If there was a more obvious double standard on reddit (besides how decent art gets 500~1k upvotes by itself, but is propelled into the 10k~25k range whenever a woman happens to be holding it), please inform me.
 
Why do half decent artists have such awful critical thinking skills? He's not even trying to make a point here with his intellectually dishonest strawman. He's not going "Oh, this is bad because it makes you a pedo", or "we need to do this in order to stop children from being harmed", it's just "You're a bad person!"

hypocrisy.jpg
compensate.JPG
I guess it's more rewarding for this person to feel good about himself by willfully ignoring the difference between thoughts and actions. Aelg Lingo wouldn't give a single crap if real children were getting raped: his ego matters more.
 
Why do half decent artists have such awful critical thinking skills? He's not even trying to make a point here with his intellectually dishonest strawman. He's not going "Oh, this is bad because it makes you a pedo", or "we need to do this in order to stop children from being harmed", it's just "You're a bad person!"

View attachment 2689692I guess it's more rewarding for this person to feel good about himself by willfully ignoring the difference between thoughts and actions. Aelg Lingo wouldn't give a single crap if real children were getting raped: his ego matters more.
He's talking an awful lot of shit for someone who isn't backing up any of it with any kind of source.

If this were true why do several psychologists and therapists not see a problem when people who do think they have a problem with this actually go and seek help? This is all coming from a guy who doesn't seem to have any professional credentials whatsoever.

Just seems to be another holier-than-thou Twitter artist that's more comfortable preaching about it without actually doing anything to help solve the issue, ironic given what he's written in the post.
 
Why do half decent artists have such awful critical thinking skills? He's not even trying to make a point here with his intellectually dishonest strawman. He's not going "Oh, this is bad because it makes you a pedo", or "we need to do this in order to stop children from being harmed", it's just "You're a bad person!"

View attachment 2689692I guess it's more rewarding for this person to feel good about himself by willfully ignoring the difference between thoughts and actions. Aelg Lingo wouldn't give a single crap if real children were getting raped: his ego matters more.
Yeah, that above image is literally going "No, THIS is what you really feel!" I don't care how much pysch bullshit you pull out of your ass, if you argue with this "type" of image/rhetoric, (my fucking god, nazi shitters, actual bootlickers, delusional leftists, schizos, fucking morons and the like love that argument) you're not worth dignifying with a response.

Also, I don't care how well researched or WHAT your opinion is, if you want me to take your seriously, don't post shitty useless anime blue things or anime ghosts from a fandom that still likes to roleplay as some sort of hidden gem to make yourself seem "smug" or "badass."

And that fucking closing argument is ridiculous, it's the equivalent of shitty parents shaming kids for getting into something fun instead of locking themselves into a "grindset" since "you'll regret it when you're older and all you know is BLANK." I know this is some random ass shit, but I remember this quote that went something along the lines of "you're not trying to actually understand how I feel, you're just laying out a bunch of statements about how I feel. and acting like they're true."
 
Yeah, that above image is literally going "No, THIS is what you really feel!" I don't care how much pysch bullshit you pull out of your ass, if you argue with this "type" of image/rhetoric, (my fucking god, nazi shitters, actual bootlickers, delusional leftists, schizos, fucking morons and the like love that argument) you're not worth dignifying with a response.
If the Social Justice crowd can't prove that you aren't sincere with your words and actions, they can just chalk it up to your "subconscious", top it off with a few layers of "if you argue against me then you're just being defensive", and then strut around as if they actually proved anything.
 
Notorious Black Wojak meme creator "AfroAmi" joins the ring.

https://twitter.com/_AfroAmi/status/1457115477998776320 (a)

At this point, I think she deserves a thread (or at least a few mentions in the SJW Art thread). Her sperging about art (just like in her tweet) could make for some good lolcow content.
Always funny to me how the most insufferable artists on the internet always seem to have the shitty art to match but I suppose you have to get the views somehow.

I'll just let someone else explain this because it's getting tiring at this point:
Capture.PNG

Tweet:
https://twitter.com/Hello_Mr_Radio/status/1457387802493009923
Archive:
https://archive.md/q4roP

A minor back and forth then occurred between the two before eventually Ami stopped with the bullshit:
Capture 2.PNG
Capture 3.PNG
Capture 4.PNG

Ami's tweets:
https://twitter.com/_afroami/status/1457391892090478595
https://twitter.com/_afroami/status/1457398446864936969
Archives:
https://archive.md/bqweq
https://archive.md/qMq90

Jim's tweets:
https://twitter.com/Hello_Mr_Radio/status/1457395526379339779
https://twitter.com/Hello_Mr_Radio/status/1457400735818149889
Archives:
https://archive.md/hPGVK
https://archive.md/rXzYk
 
The "fine" lads over on reddit's AgainstHateSubreddits seem proud of their curation of a CP collection suitable for anonymously spamming on subreddits they're targeting for purging (they report the subs to the admins for CP after they've done it).
What is wrong with these psychos owning actual CP and then having the balls to try to highroad people just jerking it to cartoons? How can you ever justify that while trying to maintain any sort of moral high ground? One of these is FAR FAR worse than the other. Starting to think Nova Prime has a point and lolicons only get a-logged by morons.

Also why is that subreddit allowed to exist if they apparently admitted to false flagging with CP?
 
Because the powermods on Reddit are all covering for one another.
Have Reddit mods ever done anything useful, ever? I see people praising them for "having to put up with all the bigoted manbabies and dudebros" but from my experience, Reddit mods do nothing but hut down threads at the first sign of trouble because they can't be bothered to moderate comments manually.
 
Have Reddit mods ever done anything useful, ever? I see people praising them for "having to put up with all the bigoted manbabies and dudebros" but from my experience, Reddit mods do nothing but hut down threads at the first sign of trouble because they can't be bothered to moderate comments manually.
To my recollection, no. As far back as the time when young teen subreddits were legal and largely run by the somewhat infamous violentacrez. It took a combination of something awful calling them out as well as a segment by anderson cooper (I think it was him I may be wrong) before they finally did something. And even then there were leaked chatlogs of other discord mods trying to console violentacrez and expressing sympathy and remorse as well as dragging their feet. And all that did was ultimately push that shit under the radar, I'm pretty sure the dude never got any sort of backlash either on reddit or even legally. But again I could be wrong on that so correct me if I am.
 
funnily enough reddit moved to ban "child-like" drawings of anime characters a couple years ago, changing their terms of service supposedly and banning a fan artist for drawing a 17yo in a fuckin swimsuit, not even in a sexual position, in the process.

while ahs gets to run free, taking down gc and women's spaces all the way down to even tumblrinaction now with actual child porn. thank you reddit, very cool!
 
I've been thinking about this and the backlash that one Korean PS5 game in development was getting and I realize it's all virtue signalling. They're not actually offended, they just know certain thing are "against the rules" and that it makes them a "good person" to call it out. OMG! ATTRACTIVE WOMEN?! THAT'S SEXISM!!! Am I a good boy? Can I have my nuggies now?
There’s this thing some people do (I’m sure you’ve all met one) where they don’t actually seem to understand the concept behind certain accusations, they just know that “this is a bad thing, and accusing my opponent of it means I win the argument”. The kind of person who learns the term “gaslighting” and then starts throwing it around every time someone disagrees with them, or calls everyone they don't like a "narcissist".

That's the impression I get from these anti-loli crusaders. They're so fixated on letter of the law (this character MUST be canonically said to be over 18 and not a day sooner!) that I get the distinct impression that they don't actually understand what child molestation is or why it's bad. Like you said, they're just flipping out because they think accusing someone of breaking a major rule makes them a better person.
 
There’s this thing some people do (I’m sure you’ve all met one) where they don’t actually seem to understand the concept behind certain accusations, they just know that “this is a bad thing, and accusing my opponent of it means I win the argument”. The kind of person who learns the term “gaslighting” and then starts throwing it around every time someone disagrees with them, or calls everyone they don't like a "narcissist".

That's the impression I get from these anti-loli crusaders. They're so fixated on letter of the law (this character MUST be canonically said to be over 18 and not a day sooner!) that I get the distinct impression that they don't actually understand what child molestation is or why it's bad. Like you said, they're just flipping out because they think accusing someone of breaking a major rule makes them a better person.
The way I see it a lot of them just want the dopamine rush from accusing someone they think is a pedophile but don't want to actually put in any effort to get them arrested, possibly because something in the back of their mind is telling them that they're not really righteous, but that sweet, sweet dopamine rush is too much to resist for some of them.
 
That's the impression I get from these anti-loli crusaders. They're so fixated on letter of the law (this character MUST be canonically said to be over 18 and not a day sooner!) that I get the distinct impression that they don't actually understand what child molestation is or why it's bad. Like you said, they're just flipping out because they think accusing someone of breaking a major rule makes them a better person.
You forgot the flipside of the coin. The guys who see a character who has tits smaller than C-cup and immediately start screaming about pedophilia regardless of the character's age, mental age, or maturity. I'll be the first to say that 800-year old lolis are fucking dumb, but these people seem to think they're a criminal offense.

And then there are the idiots who think Hana Uzaki is pedo-bait. Yes, the college student with huge fucking tits, is thought by some people to be pedo-bait. Let that sink in.
 
You forgot the flipside of the coin. The guys who see a character who has tits smaller than C-cup and immediately start screaming about pedophilia regardless of the character's age, mental age, or maturity. I'll be the first to say that 800-year old lolis are fucking dumb, but these people seem to think they're a criminal offense.

And then there are the idiots who think Hana Uzaki is pedo-bait. Yes, the college student with huge fucking tits, is thought by some people to be pedo-bait. Let that sink in.
I distinctly remember a few years ago a few people on Twitter tried to claim that the Sorceress from Dragon's Crown was designed to appeal to pedophiles. Despite the fact that the character in question looks like a middle-aged woman with absurdly large breasts. If I could find those tweets, I'd post them.
 
I distinctly remember a few years ago a few people on Twitter tried to claim that the Sorceress from Dragon's Crown was designed to appeal to pedophiles. Despite the fact that the character in question looks like a middle-aged woman with absurdly large breasts. If I could find those tweets, I'd post them.
I don't understand the argument there either. I think it's two degrees of pedophilia? She's a very motherly character, that reminds them of children, and that would be attractive to pedos. It was bizarre.
 
Last edited:
Back