The whole discourse on circumcision is fucked up.

[Sarcastic sockpuppet]

It was a joke mate. A show of not having hard feelings or whatever. But clearly the feelings not mutual.

Why are your knickers so bunched up?

I guess they removed your foreskin... but also half of your brain, and now you can't make a funny joke to save your life.
You truly are a victim sorry I doubted you.

 

[Weed Eater]

I guess they removed your foreskin... but also half of your brain, and now you can't make a funny joke to save your life.
You truly are a victim sorry I doubted you.

The biggest takeaway when it comes to the circumcision discussion should be the fact that yeah, unless a guy had so much of a botched circumcisions, usually the loss of said foreskin isn't really much of a "trauma" for them. By that point, that's their dick. Yeah for the uncut community and the anti community it seems like a travesty, but seriously, in the end that's what those men have to deal with and for the most part they've not overanalyzing or overthinking about their loss. Not to say that there aren't men who are cut who do think like that, I've talked to a friend about this topic before and he really believes his lack of sensitivity/issues with pleasure stem from being circumcised. So, kudos to whoever's beliefs are, ultimately.

But seriously, acting like cut men have had their foreskins ripped off by the devil doesn't add to the argument of the conversation. Those men get to live their lives being cut, they don't need to be ridiculed, let alone pitied and seen like a victim. Their dicks are more than likely working just fine, and if anything the biggest thing they should takeaway from this thread are three things:

One, use lubricants in sexual activities. Sex or masturbation, doesn't matter. Don't callus your cock.
Two, if using condoms, lube that condom up. Drop of lube in the reservoir, slide on, apply lube on outside. Reduce friction.
And lastly, if you're thinking about kids or your wife has a son on the way, consider not circumcising him so they don't go through the same bullshit.

 

[Kermit Jizz]

Their dicks are more than likely working just fine, and if anything the biggest thing they should takeaway from this thread are three things:

One, use lubricants in sexual activities. Sex or masturbation, doesn't matter. Don't callus your cock.

These two statements are in direct contrast.

Yeah for the uncut community and the anti community it seems like a travesty, but seriously, in the end that's what those men have to deal with and for the most part they've not overanalyzing or overthinking about their loss.

You're not wrong, but does that really make the situation better? Doing something awful to someone and having them retroactively accept it happens with a lot of fucked up shit, Stockholm syndrome comes to mind.

Alternatively, what choice does anyone have but to accept situations like these? The alternatives are live a deeply miserable life or kill yourself. Denial is a powerful force, I'm pretty certain the only reason men (anecdotally it's usually dad's) get their son's cut is because to not would mean they'd have to accept that what happened to them was fucked up. Always easier to live in denial.

I guess they removed your foreskin... but also half of your brain, and now you can't make a funny joke to save your life.
You truly are a victim sorry I doubted you.

I just wanted to talk about genital mutilation and make frens , why must you be so mean

 

[grimacefetishist]

No, i'm not making shit up, it happens in africa too. the procedure of flaying is really common and in a lot of tribes or even modern setting they flay the skin when they are teenagers as a "passage" to adulthood, it's just that there isn't any laws against it to catch the retards who do it unlike FGM (which needs more laws against the practice of flying to another country to do FGM in all of the states).

Even more to this, no, they lose their sensitivity and only ejaculation remains, something that is very minimal and it's reflected to that destroyed sexuality, even more when most FGM is more similar to removing the foreskin, where they can still orgasm but lose a lot of sexual function and suffer pains through it (being more difficult and being an abusive aspect which is undeniable).

The worst of FGM and MGM destroys all of orgasm and function, all MGM and FGM destroys sexual pleasure for reproduction, you need one for the other, for opening and making the destructive procedure of FGM, you need MGM to make the penis have the capacity to break these damaged parts, instead of functioning normally.

Both are made to decrease sexual pleasure specifically, they are destructive, just represent that reproductive and abusive aspect and cause more troubles, you can see this because men who have their foreskin left overs destroyed cannot orgasm and can only ejaculate, something that just exist to reproduce.

The only way to show the case is showing that they are mutual and that we should stop both, there isn't any other way because they work together to undermine anything related to these aspects, this is undeniable.

You seem pretty assured that FGM doesn't intentionally remove the glans, however you need to be aware that that isn't the common perception of the procedure. And I don't really see how removal of the clitoral hood is possible without also removing the glans, especially in the conditins associated with fgm, but you seem pretty convinced of this.

Face it, this talking point as stupid. Even if it turns out you're right, most people aren't that interested in the subject and won't care that you just meant the ones where they only slice off the hood

 

[Yarp64371234]

You seem pretty assured that FGM doesn't intentionally remove the glans, however you need to be aware that that isn't the common perception of the procedure. And I don't really see how removal of the clitoral hood is possible without also removing the glans, especially in the conditins associated with fgm, but you seem pretty convinced of this.

Face it, this talking point as stupid. Even if it turns out you're right, most people aren't that interested in the subject and won't care that you just meant the ones where they only slice off the hood

the procedure is normally done like that (cut of the clitoral hood, which still damages it and normally hurts you for life, for type 1b it's more similar to total skinning of the penis and that's the one who cuts it off.), it's awful but that's what is done, nothing more nothing else.
the point is that we shouldn't do those things on the first place, not mattering if it's done on females or males, even if most of FGM is small in comparison, the simple fact that it's the same as MGM and it's a mutilation which damages a kid for life should make it equally illegal.

 

[Drael]

Didn't see this mentioned already so I'll just leave it here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc

 

[teriyakiburns]

(Give or take that weird appendice at the end of our intestine)

The appendix is now known to be a save-haven reservoir for gut flora to repopulate from when your intestines are flushed out by food poisoning or an intestinal problem. It also forms part of the immune system.

 

[JoshPlz]