the world doesn't need lawyers

[Cemetery Support]

every single lawyers publicly executed

lawyers are the buffer between the power of the state and the little man. the state has a bunch of men with guns that can make me do whatever they want me to unless I kill myself before they get to me. God forbid I ever need one, but if I do, I would like someone versed in the language of the state (talmudic nonsense) to argue for me in said langauge.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

we have made the legal system overly complicated talmudic nonsense.

That's pretty much the logical result of 200+ years of laws being passed. You could argue that laws need to be stripped down, but that would give way to much overreach for the judges to decide what they want. Not to mention making eventual exceptions harder to iron out.

minded me of one of the reasons that a lot of Supermarket chains don't give out a lot of the out-of-date food to Charities because they would be sued which is patently ridiculous that you can sue a food bank for giving you free food because you may have gone sick from them I honestly think the entire world would be better off if we had every single lawyers publicly executed

This is the exact same case that seems extremely simple on the surface but has a lot of ifs that make it complicated:
* What is considered out of date? One day? One month? One year?
* If the bad food causes you monetary harm (going to doctor, missing work) then you need to get fucked for being poor?
* What if the bad food was purposely given due to neglect/malice?

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

* What is considered out of date? One day? One month? One year?
* If the bad food causes you monetary harm (going to doctor, missing work) then you need to get fucked for being poor?
* What if the bad food was purposely given due to neglect/malice?

People know what riding food looks like and smells like it's not that complicated i've worked in soup kitchens and I've discussed this a lot with people it's a liability issue and here's the thing if you're getting a free lunch don't complain about it.
That also reminds me that a church I worked in the soup kitchen nearly got sued for discrimination because the person was an hour late and they were Hispanic family rude **** they lost a lawsuit luckily one of our parishioners is a lawyer but just shows the type of people who file these really ridiculous lawsuits.
Back when I was younger I used to dump the dive for food not because I needed it to survive because there was so much wasted food you could get perfectly good cheesecakes hell I once found six cases of lunch meat and sausages that was still ice cold.
I still occasionally dumps the dive do that for a bit and you will see how much waste there is in this country and that the idea that starving people need to exist in America is patently absurd

lawyers are the buffer between the power of the state and the little man. the state has a bunch of men with guns that can make me do whatever they want me to unless I kill myself before they get to me. God forbid I ever need one, but if I do, I would like someone versed in the language of the state (talmudic nonsense) to argue for me in said langauge.

Bring back judicial dueling people should settle the legal disputes with guns that is the ultimate equalizer a swords

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

@Potentially Criminal would you like to speak in defense for yourself?

 

[cigint]

Whether the laws of the United States (or any modern society) are convoluted, too numerous, or bad, is a separate debate from whether legal systems and lawyers are necessary.

When human beings live in proximity with each other, they will end up in disputes. A modern, highly ordered society requires a lot of people to live in close proximity to each other, because there are many processes that require productive individuals to live near where productive processes take place. Disputes between these people are an inescapable result, and there are essentially two options. You can either force them to argue for their viewpoint in a structured way, have someone rule on it, and apply that ruling to similar disputes later. OR you can just have a shithole country where every dispute is a niggerfest where people attack each other and then their family members go on a revenge raid etc.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

People know what riding food looks like and smells like it's not that complicated i've worked in soup kitchens and I've discussed this a lot with people it's a liability issue and here's the thing if you're getting a free lunch don't complain about it.

Issue is that all it takes is one bad actor to fuck things up for everyone.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

When human beings live in proximity with each other, they will end up in disputes. A modern, highly ordered society requires a lot of people to live in close proximity to each other, because there are many processes that require productive individuals to live near where productive processes take place. Disputes between these people are an inescapable result, and there are essentially two options. You can either force them to argue for their viewpoint in a structured way, have someone rule on it, and apply that ruling to similar disputes later. OR you can just have a shithole country where every dispute is a niggerfest where people attack each other and then their family members go on a revenge raid etc.

If you have a dispute with someone you duel at dawn if not shut the **** **** about it

 

[WillyPete]

The world wouldn't need lawyers if laws weren't intentionally written in a confusing and often contradictory way in order to make you unable to defend yourself if you're poor and cant afford one.

Also how else would billionaires, and trillion dollar corporations not get any consequences when they break it? How else would the poor pedophiles and CP distributors only get minimal sentences?

 

[Gender: Xenomorph]

I am filing a lawsuit...

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

The world doesn't need you either

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

The world wouldn't need lawyers if laws weren't intentionally written in a confusing and often contradictory way in order to make you unable to defend yourself if you're poor and cant afford one.

You know who hated Justinian the second the most the blood sucking legal scholars because he simplified the Roman law system it fit in four 900 page books instead of mountains and mountains of books

 

[plastic Consumer]

The problem is we moved away from the "spirit of the law" to "word of the law". "Spirit of the law" could only be understood if everyone has similar ethics, culture, and ideals, if we had a generally homogeneous society. The problem is we don't have that anymore which almost requires moving to "word of the law" which never works, its like arguing with a genie with another genie. It just forms a reliance on these genie jews. Theres not much one can do.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

The problem is we moved away from the "spirit of the law" to "word of the law". "Spirit of the law" could only be understood if everyone has similar ethics, culture, and ideals, if we had a generally homogeneous society. The problem is we don't have that anymore which almost requires moving to "word of the law" which never works, its like arguing with a genie with another genie. It just forms a reliance on these genie jews. Theres not much one can do.

Same thing happened in the eastern Roman Empire sadly America would never have an absolute powered monarch like Justinian the second to clean up the legal system