Culture The World Doesn't Seem To Understand What American Food Really Is

Link (Archive)
The World Doesn't Seem To Understand What American Food Really Is

To a lot of people from other countries, the idea that American food belongs in the same class as the great cuisines of the world — Italian, French, Japanese, Mexican, and so forth — is abject blasphemy. (It's not just Europeans, but they seem overrepresented here.) American food? Isn't that just McDonald's and KFC? The sentiment seems like it runs along illogical lines: "Dumb Americans with unhealthy fried foods; they can't possibly compete with the culinary creative genius that provided us with ortolan or the toast sandwich." Others, in particular, seem to believe the only type of cheese we have here is Kraft singles — as if your average Kroger cheese aisle in rural America doesn't feature a selection that would drive Chester Cheetah to go lie down until the room stopped spinning.

The confusion over American food is understandable. But non-Americans who believe American food is just fast food simply do not understand what it is, nor do they care to try it. These same people often wrongly insist America doesn't have a culture, even though the U.S. is clearly dozens of cultures stacked on top of each other in a trench coat. (Which, to wit, is how you get a country that can produce both the Chicago-style hot dog and jambalaya.) In fact, therein lies the secret of what makes American cuisine so special.

Sometimes critics forget the actual origins of American food

The biggest problem with declaring that American cuisine is "just burgers" is it ignores the galactic-sized culinary contributions made by Native Americans and how they impacted food on a gargantuan, global scale. Corn, tomatoes, peppers, pumpkins, turkey, peanuts, and potatoes are all foods that are now integral to myriad cuisines on a worldwide scale; every last one of them came from the Americas and were first domesticated by indigenous peoples. Depending on who you ask, it might be less common for a specific dish created by North American Indigenous peoples to make it into the broader modern American culinary lexicon (though it does happen, as in the case of popcorn), but to deny their influence is to erase a titanic culinary legacy. And there are indeed popular Native American foods prevalent in areas of the U.S. regardless — fry bread, anyone?

But therein lies the problem. To many outside the U.S., "America" is only white, Anglo-Saxon America. Given the long history of colonialism and its refusal to acknowledge the validity of Indigenous peoples, it's perhaps unsurprising that they do this with non-white aspects of American culture and cuisine, but they'll even do it to other European-influenced foods. Watching someone deny that New Orleans cuisine – probably the jewel in America's culinary crown, a magnificent melding of Afro-Caribbean, Native American, and French influences — is American "because New Orleans was a French colony" boggles the mind. The irony is the blending of culinary influences they deride is far more emblematic of the best parts of American food than McDonald's.

Americans edit and refine food with a passion

While a lot of other cuisines are tied to "that's just how it's done" dogma, Americans, at least food-wise, have two culinary superpowers: fusion and editing. Because our history is shorter than most countries and we're not as dogmatically tied to tradition, Americans (particularly those in more marginalized communities) are often the only ones creative enough to think something like, "Hey, what if we combined Vietnamese food with hot dogs?"

We might not be the only ones to try out fusion (for instance, the U.K.'s classic fish and chips have some pretty significant Jewish roots), but Americans tend to go at the idea hard. We've created foods like sushi rolls (California rolls, unsurprisingly, aren't a thing in Japan), Tex-Mex, and American Chinese food, let alone the 2010s' trend towards new fusions.

Editing is more subtle, but possibly even more important: nobody can take an existing food and make it better like Americans. We didn't invent the hamburger, but we edited it into something far greater than its original form since the original version of the hamburger wasn't served on a bun and resembled Salisbury steak more than anything else. The same phenomenon has happened with plenty of other foods — notably pizza, whose original Neapolitan form is eaten with a knife and fork and only nominally resembles what you'll find in an American pizzeria.

American food is a sum of its parts

It should therefore go without saying that American food is also far more than hamburgers, fried chicken, and pizza. The Reuben sandwich, king of all sandwichdom, was invented in Omaha. Spam musubi, the signature dish of Hawaii, was probably created as a result of the prevalence of canned U.S. military meat products in Hawaii during World War II. A bagel with lox and cream cheese is probably the other iconic New York dish alongside pizza, and it was invented in the Big Apple in the early 20th century.

There are also dozens of lesser-known but brilliant American regional dishes. Ever heard of crab pretzels? They're soft pretzels topped with crab dip and cheese and baked, and they are sold absolutely everywhere in Maryland (even at the Maryland Ren Faire). However delicious you think they are, trust that they will exceed your expectations. Conch fritters, a legendary food of Key West, is by all accounts the best seafood item you've probably never eaten. Taylor ham is one of many signature New Jersey eats, but don't hold that against the Garden State — it's delicious.

This goes back to the lack of one unified American culture. America is a wildly varied country, with dozens of cultures and subcultures stacked on top of each other, and since food is culture, culinary diversity is only inevitable. Combine that with our proclivity for fusion cuisine and you wind up with creations unlike anything anywhere else in the world.

American food is improvisational in a way other cuisines often aren't

Our abilities to harness fusion and editing within the culinary sphere make it clear: America is able to take influences from every other possible global source and use them to create something wholly new and unexpected. Just because our cuisine hasn't remained largely unchanged for hundreds of years doesn't mean it's somehow lesser than a recipe eaten by King So-and-So XVI at his coronation feast centuries ago. People from other countries often seem either unwilling or unable to understand that America's penchant for trying something wholly new and unexpected is what makes our food great.

American food creativity isn't slowing down, either. The more recent rise in popularity of Korean food in the U.S. has led to some truly interesting ideas, including Roy Choi's efforts to combine Korean and Mexican food with Korean BBQ tacos. Vietnamese and Cajun cuisine is another natural combo, considering both areas have histories of French colonialism. And more and more restaurants are embracing "chaos cooking," with menus containing dishes from a variety of cuisines.

American food is experimentation, it is boundary-breaking, it is culinary jazz. It pushes the very frontiers of what's possible to do in a kitchen. Does it always work? Of course not, Cincinnati chili exists, so yeah, sometimes we're so preoccupied with whether or not we could that don't stop to think about whether we should. (Only joking, Cincinnati! You do you.) But we'll never stop trying, even if the world doesn't want to understand that's what makes it great.
 
I’ve had some pretty good food in the states. Louisiana in particular. Also some amazing steak - I was always shocked at the portion sizes though. Maybe that’s changed with inflation etc but the first time I was given a steak in America it could have fed a whole family.
 
it's because of different foreign restaurant presence in europe.
as a european, what's your reference point for chinese/thai/japanese/mexican food? most likely your local chinese/thai/japanese/mexican restaurant, which usually is an actual restaurant, fine dining, high quality, table service, etc.
but, what is your reference point for 'american food'? burger king and mcdonalds, and maybe kfc, that's it. it's short sighted and dumb to judge a countrys food based on that, but that's how people are.
 
The vast majority of foods immigrants have brought to the United States have been changed, so much so that they may not even resemble the original foods in their home countries. Those are as much American as anything from the British Isles.

What's really funny is the hambuger didn't even exist in its current form until at least the latter part of the 19th century, after the Civil War and the country's existence for about 80-90 years. At the earliest.

Of course not, Cincinnati chili exists, so yeah, sometimes we're so preoccupied with whether or not we could that don't stop to think about whether we should. (Only joking, Cincinnati! You do you.)
Lies, Cincinnati chili is amazing on hot dogs and chili cheese fries. I have never actually gotten the spaghetti at a single one any time I have been in an area with one.
 
it's because of different foreign restaurant presence in europe.
as a european, what's your reference point for chinese/thai/japanese/mexican food? most likely your local chinese/thai/japanese/mexican restaurant, which usually is an actual restaurant, fine dining, high quality, table service, etc.
but, what is your reference point for 'american food'? burger king and mcdonalds, and maybe kfc, that's it. it's short sighted and dumb to judge a countrys food based on that, but that's how people are.
And there are very few actual Mexican restaurants outside of Mexico and places with large first-generation Mexican immigrant populations. Or they're things like tacos and tortas which are just street foods on the level of a local burger place.

If there are fajitas and burritos on the menu, it's 100% Tex-Mex. A fusion of American and Mexican foods that developed in Texas going back centuries and especially early on hardly any different from any peasant/middle-class cuisine in Mexico or other countries in the Americas.
 
Just remember that whenever you eat carrots, and those carrots are orange, it's because the dutch seed selected them until all the carrots were orange in honor of the dutch royal house of oranje (orange).

The best of american food is cajun cuisine, proving once again that the french are better with food than the brits.
 
I do say it is mostly burgars and such. But we do get such innovative and horrifying culinary wonders as the deep fried Mars bar out of it.

It may give you five heart attacks, but the sheer creativity of dipping a bar of candy in fat to try it is just impressive.
 
Also, burgers are fucking good, and Europoors are just jealous that they can't afford to make a meat sandwich with half a pound of ground sirloin on it.

Article was overall pretty good, but should have at least pointed out that if American food doesn't count because "muh colonialism," where exactly do you think Mexicans got chicken and beef?
 
fried chicken
Fried chicken is not American. A certain style could be considered American but as with a lot of food preparation it is not unique to anywhere. I guarantee some motherfucker in China was frying meat in animal fat in some form before the US existed.

Okay there is my picked nit picking for the article.
 
Americans make really good meat and various ranges of comfort food that's definitely not healthy in the long term but pretty tasty.

The biggest problem with declaring that American cuisine is "just burgers" is it ignores the galactic-sized culinary contributions made by Native Americans and how they impacted food on a gargantuan, global scale. Corn, tomatoes, peppers, pumpkins, turkey, peanuts, and potatoes are all foods that are now integral to myriad cuisines on a worldwide scale; every last one of them came from the Americas and were first domesticated by indigenous peoples. Depending on who you ask, it might be less common for a specific dish created by North American Indigenous peoples to make it into the broader modern American culinary lexicon (though it does happen, as in the case of popcorn), but to deny their influence is to erase a titanic culinary legacy. And there are indeed popular Native American foods prevalent in areas of the U.S. regardless — fry bread, anyone?
Having a plant grow in your region doesn't automatically make it "your" food. It's just insane logic to coddle the Indians who probably didn't cultivate the local plants as much as the Americans. Also out of everything the journo chose fucking bread.

American food creativity isn't slowing down, either. The more recent rise in popularity of Korean food in the U.S. has led to some truly interesting ideas, including Roy Choi's efforts to combine Korean and Mexican food with Korean BBQ tacos. Vietnamese and Cajun cuisine is another natural combo, considering both areas have histories of French colonialism. And more and more restaurants are embracing "chaos cooking," with menus containing dishes from a variety of cuisines.
Fusion is not American and it's usually extremely bugman level food that works on concept/spice but not taste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Back