Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brass knuckles seem like a really bad idea. They require you to get very close to the zombie.homerbeoulve said:And of course, ol' reliable brass knuckles.
bradsternum said:By the way, hasn't this dumbass zombie shit run its course by now?
A-Stump said:The infection in Romero movies are only spread through bites and scratches. This would make the matter a disease in origin or a parasite dependent on the host for transmission. The parasite thing has always made a lot more sense in terms of zombies and the 'spooky radiation' and supernatural theories are just sort of lame in my opinion. A parasite hijacking it's host and using ravenous hunger as a way to spread seems an ingenious way to propagate.
And yes, turn this into a general zombie thread, I love me some zeds
caffeinated_wench said:Brass knuckles seem like a really bad idea. They require you to get very close to the zombie.homerbeoulve said:And of course, ol' reliable brass knuckles.
Depending on whatever lore and such you go by, zombies spread their virus through a bite. Also depending on lore, the zombie's grip could be pretty strong once they get a hold of you. You'd lose your arm pretty quickly.
Even if a virus isn't spread, you're still opening yourself up to getting torn apart. They could grab you much more easily and then it'd all be over.
Personally, I prefer to keep them at arm's length (or more), like with a bat or a gun.
I'd suggest any weapon with fire, but that could do no good and instead we get zombies on fire after us, which would be considerably worse than normal zombies. /captain obvious
I think I'd be dead first anyway, but give me a bat -- preferably wooden, but aluminum works fine as well... maybe both -- and maybe a shotgun and a pistol. Or a carbine. Something that would make it easier to destroy the brain, if that would work in this case. Definitely a bat, though.
Like I said, though, I'd probably be the first one to die, so it wouldn't matter much.
Carlson said:A-Stump said:The infection in Romero movies are only spread through bites and scratches. This would make the matter a disease in origin or a parasite dependent on the host for transmission. The parasite thing has always made a lot more sense in terms of zombies and the 'spooky radiation' and supernatural theories are just sort of lame in my opinion. A parasite hijacking it's host and using ravenous hunger as a way to spread seems an ingenious way to propagate.
And yes, turn this into a general zombie thread, I love me some zeds
I don't think the Romero movies have ever shown any consistence in whether the infection is purely spread by the zombies or if it's something that just infected everyone and the zombie bites are simply fatal.
The most devastating would be the Walking Dead explanation: literally everyone is infected by an airborne virus, and the zombie bites just kill the victim. Everyone who doesn't have their brain destroyed or head severed upon death will turn into a Walker, no matter what.
bradsternum said:By the way, hasn't this dumbass zombie shit run its course by now?
Picklepower said:I would happily take a Romero zombie apocalypse, over Return of the living Dead zombies. Return of the Living Deads scenario, was a no win situation.
Picklepower said:LOL wow, I only have seen the 1st Return movie. I mean to see the sequels eventually.