Retards like @Kovachs probably believe that our behaviors and potentials are socially influenced because their dogma relies on this form of "social construction"; otherwise biological reality would interfere with their utopian ideals of "one race the human race" and "universal equality"
It's a complete strawman. I firmly reject egalitarianism and "universal equality". My comment within this thread was constrained to matters of cultural critique and/or personal understanding. You're a bigot, so I guess I don't know how much the latter would appeal to you. How've you arrived at this conclusion I am some sort of progressive liberal and social constructivist is by misinterpreting and assuming other positions from a small collection of posts I made in another thread which were concerned more specifically with whether the "white" race is objectively superior. I don't think it is, or that it is even possible to have an objectively superior race.
For the record, I think that differences in behavior and life outcome between racial groups are partly genetic, but that it is a mixture of genetics, environmental factors like nutrition, and socialization. I accept the reality of human biological diversity, and that entails differential outcomes. I oppose civil rights legislation on the grounds that differential outcome standards are unconstitutional and threaten basic liberties I see as important, such as the right to free association.
What an exhausting person to deal with.
Edit: Also, at a certain point, I have to ask: "Why make a principle of it?" Accepting that certain peoples have been the most successful, because they don't agree with you, even though that disagreement is the result of their own "racial consciousness", seems to suggest that there is a non-identity between the success of a racial group and believing that success is based on racial consciousness. You've admitted it yourself when you say that only "white" people are capable of certain moral frameworks. Well, if those moral frameworks reject people like you... what does that say about you? It's laughable. It's like you're trying to contest the very morality you see as proof of the superiority of the "white" race, in order to argue that the "white" race is superior because those beliefs are the result of their "racial conscousness". To be so outwardly against miscegenation and committed to the idea of the superiority of the "white" race is, in a way, transracial. There is a reason neo-nazis and white supremacists are often far more fetishistic about other racial groups than the general public, and certainly more than most "white" people. This kind of attitude is a way of immediately signalling to other "white" people that you are not part of the ingroup. "White" culture abhors you. This sick desire for "truthfulness" (assuming this were all true, of course) is to your own detriment.
