TheyCallMeTevin is a garbage troll

[Gramh]

I love learning new things! just in this thread, I learned what preponderance of evidence meant in a civil case, and the meaning of burden of proof. Seems like people in this thread didn't appreciate it when I used it against their argument

Which argument are you talking about? That the WWE Champions account is DSP's? There is a mountain of evidence, so both preponderance of the evidence and burden of proof are met. You had decided that the only one you cared to debunk on that list was a textual analysis tool, which is the smallest of the evidences against him and mostly just a quaint coincidence at worst and funny circumstantial evidence at best. You seem to have given up on neither DSPs giving up info regardless of it being beneficial to either of them as being something you want to discuss.

Edit: Also where the fuck are you getting the concept of unfairly hated on? That is a huge assumption on your part that without learning a thing about Philip Paul Burnell that any of the people on this forum hated him.

 

[Zappin’ And Spazzin’]

I don't know how familiar you are with the english language but colloquially "you" can be used as a collective "you" to refer to a group of people. And multiple people mentioned that you all shared the same goal, which is laughing at people you never met.

Yes, clearly the bizarre part I was referring to was the "person you never met" part, and not the "120k posts about a single person".

So you are aware we are a collective! I don't know why you insist on the "120k posts" comment then, as it's hardly evident of anything but the thread's existed a long time.
I still don't see why you're not allowed to have incredulous thoughts against people you've never met.

 

[TheyCallMeTevin]

I get the feeling you enjoy the idea that you are getting under people's skin. That's okay, we all need hobbies.
May I ask what you were really trying to accomplish here today beyond starting an argument? (and spare me the whole 'I didn't come looking for a fight', you knew what you were doing)

"getting under people's skin is a hobby" odd insult coming from a guy participating in a forum dedicating to hating someone they probably never met, trolling them, encouraging hurtful behavior, and encouraging that harm befall that person for no reason other than "well 10 years ago they said CHICKY CHANG WANG". I'm not sure if anyone ever told you this, but your "hobby" isn't exactly the same as collecting stamps or playing tennis.

I have watched dsp's streams and watched several of the meme videos and found the meme videos fairly funny (except for snort burnell who's ridiculous attempts to avoid getting copyright striked for fair use make the videos unwatchable). I also enjoyed the psuedo docs about phil because they were entertaining. I also enjoyed some videos about phil that documented phil over multiple years, again because they were entertaining. So I had "seen" phil in some capacity for quite some time. I started watching his streams to see what it was like. I never saw him as a great guy and understood a lot of the criticism against him but other criticisms didn't make sense or I thought were fairly weak. I never saw him as particularly bad either. I kept watching cause the chat is funny and entertaining. I posted here because on youtube I saw a comment saying there was 100% evidence it was him. The guy mentioned that a statistical analysis tool proved they were the same person. All the other pieces of evidence he gave were fairly weak (same things that you guys said "oh well he didn't DISPROVE it", "oh well who else would use that name??"). I was curious what this tool was. I always felt fairly bad for phil because I felt that he was being blamed for things he did 10 years ago. I also enjoyed the memes and participated in several of them as well.

@TheyCallMeTevin is a really exceptional individual. And he’s fucking weird.

His mannerisms, his overall use of the language, and certain idioms seem peculiar and almost crafted to portray himself as someone else.

Especially the overuse of the words “mate” or “m8” made me raise an eyebrow. His first posts start off as using very basic, unstructured and unrefined American English and all of a sudden, he starts dropping British English lingo. And the use of words from different cultural vocabularies are just odd; they don’t fit with his overall use of the language. Another odd thing is how anal he is about insulting spergs, autists, and retards. He does tick off almost every box regarding autism so he may very well be one himself but that’s also something Phil (publicly at least) goes out of his way to decry to portray himself as a better person.

He also flies off the handle easily and isn’t even here to argue on valid grounds but instead just attempts to ruffle some feathers but fails miserably at it. If this was any other forum, maybe he’d have some success, but he literally joined a forum of online voyeurs and has become an object of interest himself. If he thinks he’s pissing us off, not only is he stupid but naive as well. I think we’re all enjoying the show and once again marvel at the literal human garbage that Phil’s ‘tism vortex continuously spews out on a consistent basis. Leave it to Phil to attract some of the most exceptional people on the internet, that’s really the thing he’s best at.

I really don’t think he’s Phil but his obvious misuse of certain British English words is fucking odd and seems as an attempt to deflect from his real origins and a person would only do this if they were wary of having their identity revealed or if they had something to hide.

Anyways, I’m not even reading what he’s writing but I’m having fun reading others shit on this fucking retard.

Seems i struck a nerve, "m8". Weren't you the guy who went ballistic and posted 4 links for Coeus that were absolutely wrong? And then cried even more about "fake technical bullshit" when I pointed out there wrong? LOL. also "I'm not even reading what he's writing" yet you've done a thorough analysis of my writing?

You are legit the funniest person in this entire thread. It's like watching the 3 stooges but their combined stupidity in one person.

So you are aware we are a collective! I don't know why you insist on the "120k posts" comment then, as it's hardly evident of anything but the thread's existed a long time.
I still don't see why you're not allowed to have incredulous thoughts against people you've never met.

Yes, I never said you weren't a collective. But being part of a collective doesn't absolve you of personal responsibility.

Which argument are you talking about? That the WWE Champions account is DSP's? There is a mountain of evidence, so both preponderance of the evidence and burden of proof are met. You had decided that the only one you cared to debunk on that list was a textual analysis tool, which is the smallest of the evidences against him and mostly just a quaint coincidence at worst and funny circumstantial evidence at best. You seem to have given up on neither DSPs giving up info regardless of it being beneficial to either of them as being something you want to discuss.

Edit: Also where the fuck are you getting the concept of unfairly hated on? That is a huge assumption on your part that without learning a thing about Philip Paul Burnell that any of the people on this forum hated him.

bro, relax. You keep saying "debunk debunk debunk". I came and said that the tool was not found anywhere and that to me delegitamizes an argument. I didn't come here with a strong purpose like you do. i came because I wanted to know what this tool was and why there was no mention of it online. And again, you keep arguing a point I have dropped literally hours ago.

 

[Zappin’ And Spazzin’]

for no reason other than "well 10 years ago they said CHICKY CHANG WANG".

You're beyond help

 

[Forbidden Math]

"getting under people's skin is a hobby" odd insult coming from a guy participating in a forum dedicating to hating someone they probably never met, trolling them, encouraging hurtful behavior, and encouraging that harm befall that person for no reason other than "well 10 years ago they said CHICKY CHANG WANG".

This sounds so familiar...

 

[Gramh]

Yes, I never said you weren't a collective. But being part of a collective doesn't absolve you of personal responsibility.

Personal responsibility to what exactly?

 

[MoonRocker]

Seems i struck a nerve, "m8". Weren't you the guy who went ballistic and posted 4 links for Coeus that were absolutely wrong? And then cried even more about "fake technical bullshit" when I pointed out there wrong? LOL

No faggot, it wasn’t me. Nice try acting like you don’t know who it was. I linked you Google’s ML SDK since you’re willing to throw around beginner-level programming buzzwords and gauge if you wanted to back up your chest thumping by writing your own text analysis AI tool but since you’re a fucking bitch, we all know you can’t do it. Why are you even asking for this specific piece of software when it’s obvious you wouldn’t even know how to analyze, let alone debug or compile it.

You’ve yet to respond to any of my posts in a relevant manner without disregarding the content and directly insulting me because you know there’s no rebuttal there.

The truth is a bitter pill to swallow but in your case it’s more like a gigantic black cock being shoved down your throat.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

"getting under people's skin is a hobby" odd insult coming from a guy participating in a forum dedicating to hating someone they probably never met, trolling them, encouraging hurtful behavior, and encouraging that harm befall that person for no reason other than "well 10 years ago they said CHICKY CHANG WANG". I'm not sure if anyone ever told you this, but your "hobby" isn't exactly the same as collecting stamps or playing tennis.

I have watched dsp's streams and watched several of the meme videos and found the meme videos fairly funny (except for snort burnell who's ridiculous attempts to avoid getting copyright striked for fair use make the videos unwatchable). I also enjoyed the psuedo docs about phil because they were entertaining. I also enjoyed some videos about phil that documented phil over multiple years, again because they were entertaining. So I had "seen" phil in some capacity for quite some time. I started watching his streams to see what it was like. I never saw him as a great guy and understood a lot of the criticism against him but other criticisms didn't make sense or I thought were fairly weak. I never saw him as particularly bad either. I kept watching cause the chat is funny and entertaining. I posted here because on youtube I saw a comment saying there was 100% evidence it was him. The guy mentioned that a statistical analysis tool proved they were the same person. All the other pieces of evidence he gave were fairly weak (same things that you guys said "oh well he didn't DISPROVE it", "oh well who else would use that name??"). I was curious what this tool was. I always felt fairly bad for phil because I felt that he was being blamed for things he did 10 years ago. I also enjoyed the memes and participated in several of them as well.

Facts aren't insults, friend.
And since you just keep deflecting and changing focus, I'm goi g to leave you with this last thought: using words and phrases you've looked up to sound educated isn't the same as being educated. Please, do continue to have a good time in this pointless fight. Riches and fame await you, I'm sure.

 

[Kosher Dill]

assumed i must be donating phil my life savings

I promise you nobody here assumed that. Phil's paypigs are typically on meager fixed incomes (such as the disability programs in their various countries) and don't have savings.

 

[TheyCallMeTevin]

No faggot, it wasn’t me. Nice try acting like you don’t know who it was. I linked you Google’s ML SDK since you’re willing to throw around beginner-level programming buzzwords and gauge if you wanted to back up your chest thumping by writing your own text analysis AI tool but since you’re a fucking bitch, we all know you can’t do it. Why are you even asking for this specific piece of software when it’s obvious you wouldn’t even know how to analyze, let alone debug or compile it.

You’ve yet to respond to any of my posts in a relevant manner without disregarding the content and directly insulting me because you know there’s no rebuttal there.

The truth is a bitter pill to swallow but in your case it’s more like a gigantic black cock being shoved down your throat.

My bad, It was @Prince Lotor. Nah sorry "mate", I don't memorize thousands of users like the back of my hand like you do. Congratulations on 488 messages!

Point out exactly where I "thew beginner level programming buzzwords" around, dipshit. You can't, because you wanted to pretend that your butt buddy's argument was real even though every single link he posted was irrelevant and comically wrong.

The truth is a bitter pill to swallow but in your case it’s more like a gigantic black cock being shoved down your throat.

Also, you're bawling about me not responding to your post, yet you haven't addressed any of my points other than "if the tool doesn't exist write it yourself". Care to explain that? Seems like "there was no rebuttal there".

 

[The Goutsketeer]

I don't know how familiar you are with the english language but colloquially "you" can be used as a collective "you" to refer to a group of people. And multiple people mentioned that you all shared the same goal, which is laughing at people you never met.

Yes, clearly the bizarre part I was referring to was the "person you never met" part, and not the "120k posts about a single person".

So people sharing the "goal" of laughing at "someone we've never met" is wrong in your opinion? I guess people who laugh at comedians are really bizarre.

I mean, isn't that the same logic you used against me? "Anybody who doesn't hate phil must be a paypig/mentally challenged/mentally ill/furry/detractor". And if I'm wrong, where was anyone even considering the opposing viewpoint?

In my very first post here, I said that I tended to play devil's advocate and kept an open mind. Where was any person in this thread keeping an open mind? You all dogpiled on me, assumed i must be donating phil my life savings, and assume I "dickride" phil and am part of a massive collective that does the same.

Again putting words into my mouth that I've never used. Infact that statement alone seems quite emotionally charged and puzzling, don't know if you've confused me for someone else but there are alot of adlibs there.
As far as considering the opposing viewpoint, that's like saying: "Why did you try and eat me when, you're all lions, and I just jumped into the lion's den smeared in blood and hot sauce?"
Surely you knew what you were getting into when you came here. You weren't even civil about your opinions infact you were very obtrusive and irritating, disrupting the thread, not for a few posts, but literally 10+ whole pages across the better part of 8 hours.

You keep using this argument of "defend phil", even though I already addressed that I was curious about the tool and I also don't like people being unfairly hated on. I find it bizarre that you're unable to comprehend tht someone can have a different opinion than you and not being a superfan of phil.
It's sad that you feel that if someone defends against being unfairly hated on, they must be a superfan. And yeah, I mean how are you not brainwashed? You assumed that just because I am not attacking phil, I must be a scary "KOH user" and mentally challenged and mentally ill. You all are like a lost tribe that hasn't received human contact in 10s of thousands of years and the moment you see a human not from the tribe you treat him/her as hostile. Whether that's a result of brainwashing or fear, I'm not sure. But the effects are the same: hostility.

The very phrase "unfairly hated on" suggests some sort of bias you have. Do you have proof that the "hatred" is unwarranted? You come into a thread full of evidence, I mean years and years of accumulated evidence, and expect people to immediately adapt and embrace your viewpoint which has been heavily debated far longer than your time here. There have been several civil disputes an infighting between detractors over the years. Not everyone on this forum has the same opinion, and never will.

 

[D_Tractor]

Stop pretending to be a nigger you kike faggot.

 

[Zappin’ And Spazzin’]

My bad, It was @Prince Lotor. Nah sorry "mate", I don't memorize thousands of users like the back of my hand like you do. Congratulations on 488 messages!

Point out exactly where I "thew beginner level programming buzzwords" around, dipshit. You can't, because you wanted to pretend that your butt buddy's argument was real even though every single link he posted was irrelevant and comically wrong.

The truth is a bitter pill to swallow but in your case it’s more like a gigantic black cock being shoved down your throat.

Also, you're bawling about me not responding to your post, yet you haven't addressed any of my points other than "if the tool doesn't exist write it yourself". Care to explain that? Seems like "there was no rebuttal there".

You are so fucking mad

 

[Scotsman]

My bad, It was @Prince Lotor. Nah sorry "mate", I don't memorize thousands of users like the back of my hand like you do. Congratulations on 488 messages!

Point out exactly where I "thew beginner level programming buzzwords" around, dipshit. You can't, because you wanted to pretend that your butt buddy's argument was real even though every single link he posted was irrelevant and comically wrong.

The truth is a bitter pill to swallow but in your case it’s more like a gigantic black cock being shoved down your throat.

You were trying so hard at the start, with your autistic walls of text and your moral superiority. Now you’re talking about black cocks.

 

[Forbidden Math]

a forum dedicating to hating someone they probably never met, trolling them, encouraging hurtful behavior, and encouraging that harm befall that person

Not sure how much more clear the rules could get at the bottom of the page:
"No trolling plans. We are not an autistic Illuminati. If you embarrass yourself or the forum trying to troll, we will ridicule you. "

 

[TheyCallMeTevin]

So people sharing the "goal" of laughing at "someone we've never met" is wrong in your opinion? I guess people who laugh at comedians are really bizarre.

Again putting words into my mouth that I've never used. Infact that statement alone seems quite emotionally charged and puzzling, don't know if you've confused me for someone else but there are alot of adlibs there.
As far as considering the opposing viewpoint, that's like saying: "Why did you try and eat me when, you're all lions, and I just jumped into the lion's den smeared in blood and hot sauce?"
Surely you knew what you were getting into when you came here. You weren't even civil about your opinions infact you were very obtrusive and irritating, disrupting the thread, not for a few posts, but literally 10+ whole pages across the better part of 8 hours.

The very phrase "unfairly hated on" suggests some sort of bias you have. Do you have proof that the "hatred" is unwarranted? You come into a thread full of evidence, I mean years and years of accumulated evidence, and expect people to immediately adapt and embrace your viewpoint which has been heavily debated far longer than your time here. There have been several civil disputes an infighting between detractors over the years. Not everyone on this forum has the same opinion, and never will.

I came in with no expectations for any of you to listen to me. I didn't come in to proselytize or convert any of you. But I do get your analogy. Thing is, you guys aren't a group of starving lions. You're people who voluntarily choose to be in this cage and you poke sticks and bite at at anyone else on the outside looking in that holds onto the bars. I did not come in with the intention of "derailing the thread", but I can see it clearly came across that way and I apologize for that. The reason the thread kept escalating is because I felt like people just kept insulting me without taking a few seconds to read what I was saying.

You are so fucking mad

yes, you're acting as if you've made a great discovery. I said 10 times I get angry when people insult me continuously and dogpile on me.

You were trying so hard at the start, with your autistic walls of text and your moral superiority. Now you’re talking about black cocks.

no moral superiority. just said that you probably shouldn't use mentally challenged as an insult.

 

[ReentryPhantom]

I came in with no expectations for any of you to listen to me. I didn't come in to proselytize or convert any of you. But I do get your analogy. Thing is, you guys aren't a group of starving lions. You're people who voluntarily choose to be in this cage and you poke sticks and bite at at anyone else on the outside looking in that holds onto the bars. I did not come in with the intention of "derailing the thread", but I can see it clearly came across that way and I apologize for that. The reason the thread kept escalating is because I felt like people just kept insulting me without taking a few seconds to read what I was saying.

Okay bye honey baby.

 

[Shirō Ishii]

yes, you're acting as if you've made a great discovery. I said 10 times I get angry when people insult me continuously and dogpile on me.

Your mother made 2 mistakes in her life:
1) She didn't swallow
2) She didn't consider having an abortion

 

[Kosher Dill]

I said 10 times I get angry when people insult me continuously and dogpile on me.

Don't worry, no one here would ever use this knowledge to intentionally make you angry.

 

[Scotsman]

yes, you're acting as if you've made a great discovery. I said 10 times I get angry when people insult me continuously and dogpile on me.

You’re getting dogpiled because you are a pretentious cunt. You’re either a desperate troll or one of the most retarded fanboys to ever crawl up Phil’s arse.

Either way, it’s funny as fuck watching you try so hard.