Things people pretend to know but in reality know shockingly very little - Its easier to pretend you are smart than to actually be smart.

The Science.

Honestly, the way a lot of people talk about how various things in biology, chemistry, pharmacology, engineering, etc. work, without actually understanding how they work, what scientific papers are ACTUALLY saying, whether the conclusions actually make sense or not, etc.

It makes me want to throw my degrees in engineering into a fire, because it makes it clear all the work people do in these fields means nothing to a public who'll take one sentence outta their conclusion (in many cases, out of context) and run with it.

And this is especially true whenever it's the media reporting on this kinda shit. No reading or studying the papers, just putting up a headline and if they're charitable, linking the papers.
 
Medicine & Healthcare

Stop, just stop, you're just embracing yourself, and fooling no one.
The Science.

Honestly, the way a lot of people talk about how various things in biology, chemistry, pharmacology, engineering, etc. work, without actually understanding how they work, what scientific papers are ACTUALLY saying, whether the conclusions actually make sense or not, etc.

It makes me want to throw my degrees in engineering into a fire, because it makes it clear all the work people do in these fields means nothing to a public who'll take one sentence outta their conclusion (in many cases, out of context) and run with it.

And this is especially true whenever it's the media reporting on this kinda shit. No reading or studying the papers, just putting up a headline and if they're charitable, linking the papers.

The last two-three years were very eye opening that the average joe truly knows literally nothing about biology and medicine (and hospitals, and experts and the list goes on).

I recall that during the high of the pandemic, I showed a video about a guy going to a supposedly "packed" hospitals with a camera and showing it was mostly empty while the medical staff demanded he leave. I legit asked "how can the hospitals be packed? Whee are the lines? Why the doctors give a shit if he is recording or not?"
And my pea sized friend said "Well, its because they have protocols and dont want him possibly contaminating someone or being contaminated himself".

They literally defend the lie even tho Im raising fucking good questions instead of giving a good answer or at least be humble and say "idk how to explain that" because that would demonstrate to yourself you need to rethink and re consider things.

And now we are in the "this is normal" phase with all these healthy people dropping like flies out of nowhere. And they are trying to hide statistics that showed this sort of thing was very rare and now its suddenly "normal".

Its easier to trick the fool than convince him he has been tricked.
- Film making, tons of people seriously underestimate how much time, planning and organization goes into making even a short low budget film and have it turn out to be somewhat decent. Yet so many young "creative" types think they can just throw a film together like its no trouble at all.

When you have movies made by people who dont know the first thing about movie making you get the channel awesome anniversery specials.

Even James Rolf who has film making experience ended falling into some basic traps in movie making because he really wanted to record it in Hollywood LA, somehow not knowing its extremely expensive to work there (also the story was kind of trash and felt like it didnt want to pick if it wasnted to be something easier for the mainstream or strictly for fans of AVGN). He hasnt truly recovered since, which is sad but he really should have known better.
Aquariums! Just because a goldfish can survive in a ten gallon tank doesn’t mean it’s ok to put them in one. It’s cruel and results in a deformed fish being burned by it’s own ammonia output. Let your goldfish live a happy life in a 30-50 gallon tank (that’s for ONE goldfish) or don’t get a goldfish. Bettas should have at least five gallons. Don’t buy iridescent sharks or common plecos unless you’re willing to buy a monster tank.

Buy a water test kit and cycle your tank before putting fish in! So many people complain their fish die the first week, it’s because the tank isn’t cycled.

Society understands that it’s wrong to keep a dog in a tiny cage, but it’s socially acceptable to keep a fish in an undersized tank. The fish become physically stunted and deformed. Everything a person needs to know about basic fishkeeping can be learned from their phone, but most people choose ignorance (and unhappy/dead fish).

My theory is that they assume fishes are lesser beings than dogs and cats and thus require less effort.
- Economics has been mentioned already but the fact that most economists are usually wrong in their predictions just shows that even they don't know what they're talking about most of the time.

The actual truth is more akin to that South Park episode...no one really knows fully how the fuck the system works, its all predictions at most. Even the ones responsible for the economy really make it clear through their actions they have no idea what they are doing.

- Parenting, oddly a lot of people who don't have kids and express no desire to have kids like to lecture people on how to raise their kids.

"We dont have kids of my own and I find the concept of adding another being to this Earth disgusting but I demand that your child be exposed to my ideologies because thats how kids should be raised."
 
Aquariums! Just because a goldfish can survive in a ten gallon tank doesn’t mean it’s ok to put them in one. It’s cruel and results in a deformed fish being burned by it’s own ammonia output. Let your goldfish live a happy life in a 30-50 gallon tank (that’s for ONE goldfish) or don’t get a goldfish. Bettas should have at least five gallons. Don’t buy iridescent sharks or common plecos unless you’re willing to buy a monster tank.

Buy a water test kit and cycle your tank before putting fish in! So many people complain their fish die the first week, it’s because the tank isn’t cycled.

Society understands that it’s wrong to keep a dog in a tiny cage, but it’s socially acceptable to keep a fish in an undersized tank. The fish become physically stunted and deformed. Everything a person needs to know about basic fishkeeping can be learned from their phone, but most people choose ignorance (and unhappy/dead fish).
This
I got a goldfish in a campus giveaway once on an impulse. As I was looking up what to do with at home I came across that it needed a much larger tank because they can live decades and the only reason they die so quickly is that they choke on their tanks. I then panicked and called in a favor from a guy I helped move for his girlfriend (who had a larger tank) to take my goldfish.
 
Quoting @The handsome tard because I can't use the reply function (reply bug).
Why the doctors give a shit if he is recording or not?
This is not unusual imo. For years now my local doctor's office has had signs asking patients not to use their phones, I think it is a concern about protecting patients' privileged information. For what it's worth I do agree with the rest of your post though.
 
All things having to do with the stock market.

Nobody knows what they’re talking about. The smartest people in this environment are the ones who realize how little they can accurately predict (despite the years of experience) and act accordingly. The difference between being in favor of or against a particular stock is almost completely subjective, sans obvious scam penny stocks and their ilk. Billion-dollar hedge funds will put relatively paltry amounts of money (~$10k) into hundreds of different NASDAQ stocks because they have just as much notion of what will/won’t work as the average retail investor, which is close-to-none.
 
even though it's worse than sociology.
Not fucking hardly. Economics main working assumption (people are behaving optimally given their knowledge) isn’t always the best one for a job, but in the situations where it is (which takes in a lot of ground) it’s axiomatic approach gives it a degree of rigor sociology and political science could never hope for. It’s a lot tougher empirically, too.
 
Not fucking hardly. Economics main working assumption (people are behaving optimally given their knowledge) isn’t always the best one for a job, but in the situations where it is (which takes in a lot of ground) it’s axiomatic approach gives it a degree of rigor sociology and political science could never hope for.
What's rigorous about basing everything on shit you made up?

It’s a lot tougher empirically, too.
Who runs more controlled experiments? Hint: It's sociologists.
 
Some people will do it with quite literally anything, doesn't matter the topic they have an opinion on it, and not only is it an opinion it's the best gosh darn opinion you'll ever hear!!!!
 
All things having to do with the stock market.

Nobody knows what they’re talking about. The smartest people in this environment are the ones who realize how little they can accurately predict (despite the years of experience) and act accordingly. The difference between being in favor of or against a particular stock is almost completely subjective, sans obvious scam penny stocks and their ilk. Billion-dollar hedge funds will put relatively paltry amounts of money (~$10k) into hundreds of different NASDAQ stocks because they have just as much notion of what will/won’t work as the average retail investor, which is close-to-none.
Warren Buffett is famous for comparing and publishing how leading actively managed hedge funds perform against an S&P 500 index fund. Aside from a one or two year blip here and there, they always underperform. I’ve known many people who became flat ass broke day trading or timing the market; they’re just like gamblers where they will share the time they made big money but not share all the many other times they lost.
 
This is not unusual imo. For years now my local doctor's office has had signs asking patients not to use their phones, I think it is a concern about protecting patients' privileged information. For what it's worth I do agree with the rest of your post though.
Dude if you started recording at a Taco Bell and started wandering around the kitchen the manager would tell you to get the fuck out.

I don't know why these entitled mongoloids just thought they could walk into a place of business and start recording everything.
 
Warren Buffett is famous for comparing and publishing how leading actively managed hedge funds perform against an S&P 500 index fund. Aside from a one or two year blip here and there, they always underperform. I’ve known many people who became flat ass broke day trading or timing the market; they’re just like gamblers where they will share the time they made big money but not share all the many other times they lost.
That finding doesn’t surprise me at all. People have this idea in their heads that hedge funds are these corporations that profit billions from manipulating the stock market. While that might be true to some extent, people don’t realize just how much influence retail investors have as well. The GME debacle was basically a once-in-a-blue-moon occurrence where the internet found a blue chip stock being shorted at an abnormally high-risk leverage by a sizable hedge fund that just wasn’t ready for what was about to happen. I’m sure there are parameters nowadays to prevent GME 2: Electric Boogaloo, but the only reason it happened in the first place was because the managers at that hedge fund were retarded enough to make such a risky play with so much money in the first place. Everybody is retarded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: melty
The Science.

Honestly, the way a lot of people talk about how various things in biology, chemistry, pharmacology, engineering, etc. work, without actually understanding how they work, what scientific papers are ACTUALLY saying, whether the conclusions actually make sense or not, etc.

It makes me want to throw my degrees in engineering into a fire, because it makes it clear all the work people do in these fields means nothing to a public who'll take one sentence outta their conclusion (in many cases, out of context) and run with it.

And this is especially true whenever it's the media reporting on this kinda shit. No reading or studying the papers, just putting up a headline and if they're charitable, linking the papers.
I know people with degrees from good schools in engineering and science who don't know what falsifiability or falsification is. There are plenty who don't really understand the scientific method either. They think that the scientific method is only hypothesis, experiment, results. They are completely ignorant of reproducibility or critical review of studies. Most of these people aren't involved in research so there's some excuse there (though not much), but there's a couple that are. This makes me seriously concerned for the future if not all of us who were trained in the sciences understand what we're doing.
 
I know people with degrees from good schools in engineering and science who don't know what falsifiability or falsification is. There are plenty who don't really understand the scientific method either. They think that the scientific method is only hypothesis, experiment, results. They are completely ignorant of reproducibility or critical review of studies. Most of these people aren't involved in research so there's some excuse there (though not much), but there's a couple that are. This makes me seriously concerned for the future if not all of us who were trained in the sciences understand what we're doing.

Nah, man, it's perfect really. Thats exactly what the elites want. People to only know how to do the bare minimum without any knowledge on how the whole system works. They only know how to do their part and not much else.
 
Sort of repeated here, but I would specifically mention capitalism as opposed to economics or macroeconomics. understand. It seems people simply believe capitalism is nothing short of unbridled greed, let alone fraud, in a manner that is even more absurd than what you'll find in some cartoon. These people also tend to believe that government intervention, subsidies and corporate favoritism is all ingrained into the idea of capitalism when that couldn't be further from the truth.

Now that I think about, I'll also add democracy and the Constitution in the list of things people clearly don't understand (or for that matter are patently disingenuous about).
 
I’m gonna have to agree that hardly anyone knows dick about the scientific disciplines in general. Snooty leftists love to proclaim that they “listen to the science” but will just nod their heads and agree to whatever simplified drivel a pop scientist is saying, not knowing that science is always changing and new hypotheses are being proposed all the damn time. I don’t think most people in even supposed educated, Western countries even have solid foundations in biology, chemistry, physics, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Space_Dandy
Nuclear energy, nuff said. Their knowledge comes from The Simpsons and Godzilla movies.

Aka, nuclear energy bad. And apparently nuclear reactors are just nukes in disguise (there are people that legit believe that).
 
Nuclear energy, nuff said. Their knowledge comes from The Simpsons and Godzilla movies.

Aka, nuclear energy bad. And apparently nuclear reactors are just nukes in disguise (there are people that legit believe that).
And on the other side you get lolberts who think nuclear reactors are free money machines that never received government subsidies.
 
Back