Three years left to limit warming to 1.5C, leading scientists warn

Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4l927dj5zo
Credit: Mark Poynting, Climate Reporter, BBC News
Archive: https://archive.ph/BY8ep

54e69b00-4c27-11f0-ac5b-1dcff18d9d54.jpg.webp

The Earth could be doomed to breach the symbolic 1.5C warming limit in as little as three years at current levels of carbon dioxide emissions.

That's the stark warning from more than 60 of the world's leading climate scientists in the most up-to-date assessment of the state of global warming.

Nearly 200 countries agreed to try to limit global temperature rises to 1.5C above levels of the late 1800s in a landmark agreement in 2015, with the aim of avoiding some of the worst impacts of climate change.

But countries have continued to burn record amounts of coal, oil and gas and chop down carbon-rich forests - leaving that international goal in peril.

Climate change has already worsened many weather extremes - such as the UK's 40C heat in July 2022 - and has rapidly raised global sea levels, threatening coastal communities.

"Things are all moving in the wrong direction," said lead author Prof Piers Forster, director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at the University of Leeds.

"We're seeing some unprecedented changes and we're also seeing the heating of the Earth and sea-level rise accelerating as well."

These changes "have been predicted for some time and we can directly place them back to the very high level of emissions", he added.

At the beginning of 2020, scientists estimated that humanity could only emit 500 billion more tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) - the most important planet-warming gas - for a 50% chance of keeping warming to 1.5C.

But by the start of 2025 this so-called "carbon budget" had shrunk to 130 billion tonnes, according to the new study.

That reduction is largely due to continued record emissions of CO2 and other planet-warming greenhouse gases like methane, but also improvements in the scientific estimates.

If global CO2 emissions stay at their current highs of about 40 billion tonnes a year, 130 billion tonnes gives the world roughly three years until that carbon budget is exhausted.

This could commit the world to breaching the target set by the Paris agreement, the researchers say, though the planet would probably not pass 1.5C of human-caused warming until a few years later.

a8cfc080-4c44-11f0-a466-d54f65b60deb.png.webp

Last year was the first on record when global average air temperatures were more than 1.5C above those of the late 1800s.

A single 12-month period isn't considered a breach of the Paris agreement, however, with the record heat of 2024 given an extra boost by natural weather patterns.

But human-caused warming was by far the main reason for last year's high temperatures, reaching 1.36C above pre-industrial levels, the researchers estimate.

This current rate of warming is about 0.27C per decade – much faster than anything in the geological record.

And if emissions stay high, the planet is on track to reach 1.5C of warming on that metric around the year 2030.

After this point, long-term warming could, in theory, be brought back down by sucking large quantities of CO2 back out of the atmosphere.

But the authors urge caution on relying on these ambitious technologies serving as a get-out-of-jail card.

"For larger exceedance [of 1.5C], it becomes less likely that removals [of CO2] will perfectly reverse the warming caused by today's emissions," warned Joeri Rogelj, professor of climate science and policy at Imperial College London.

'Every fraction of warming' matters​


The study is filled with striking statistics highlighting the magnitude of the climate change that has already happened.

Perhaps the most notable is the rate at which extra heat is accumulating in the Earth's climate system, known as "Earth's energy imbalance" in scientific jargon.

Over the past decade or so, this rate of heating has been more than double that of the 1970s and 1980s and an estimated 25% higher than the late 2000s and 2010s.

"That's a really large number, a very worrying number" over such a short period, said Dr Matthew Palmer of the UK Met Office, and associate professor at the University of Bristol.

The recent uptick is fundamentally due to greenhouse gas emissions, but a reduction in the cooling effect from small particles called aerosols has also played a role.

This extra energy has to go somewhere. Some goes into warming the land, raising air temperatures, and melting the world's ice.

But about 90% of the excess heat is taken up by the oceans.

That not only means disruption to marine life but also higher sea levels: warmer ocean waters take up more space, in addition to the extra water that melting glaciers are adding to our seas.

The rate of global sea-level rise has doubled since the 1990s, raising the risks of flooding for millions of people living in coastal areas worldwide.

72d5e860-4d02-11f0-9d3e-6149fb67e70c.jpg.webp

Sea-level rise increases the chances of coastal flooding during storms

While this all paints a bleak picture, the authors note that the rate of emissions increases appears to be slowing as clean technologies are rolled out.

They argue that "rapid and stringent" emissions cuts are more important than ever.

The Paris target is based on very strong scientific evidence that the impacts of climate change would be far greater at 2C of warming than at 1.5C.

That has often been oversimplified as meaning below 1.5C of warming is "safe" and above 1.5C "dangerous".

In reality, every extra bit of warming increases the severity of many weather extremes, ice melt and sea-level rise.

"Reductions in emissions over the next decade can critically change the rate of warming," said Prof Rogelj.

"Every fraction of warming that we can avoid will result in less harm and less suffering of particularly poor and vulnerable populations and less challenges for our societies to live the lives that we desire," he added.
 
Unless your solution to the quote-unquote "climate crisis" is nuking china and india into a giant parking lot, I don't wanna hear it. The west could be carbon negative and it wouldn't matter. China and India easily make up for it. Probably parts of Africa too.

Seriously, China and India do way more polluting than the west, combined. They might even rival or surpass the pollution the west did during its polluting peak.
 
Until these fucks start suggesting we crack down on the Jeets or the Chinks, who make 75% of all pollution, I will continue to ignore them

If we are all going to burn because we know that India and China will just ignore any restrictions then there is no chance I will give up what little comfort I have just to drag out the extinction for a few years longer.

Until the Global Warming Elites come up with a plan to deal with the Jeets and the Chinks I am 100% out and not caring. Deal with the real issue and stop trying to punish me just because you can.

TLDR: Deal with the Jeets and the Chinks or get fucked Globalists
 
Last edited:
they come up with new climate change "deadlines" every other second or so. No wonder anybody takes this shit seriously when it's all so inconsistent.
Lines on charts! I draw lines on charts and predict the future! I draw lines and they go up when my mood go up, down when I'm sad! My crypto shitcoin go up to the moon! :D
 
And they've been doing this for decades. First it was Ice Age, and they're going with Global Laming.

If they actually want a solution, do something about China and India first.

India over the years.webp

This is the real Global Warming they're not talking about. And guess which race has spread all over the globe like a plague?
 
This is such an obvious pagan religious cult that I don't know why everyone lets it larp as science.

Tithing - carbon taxes, gas taxes
Sacrifice - abort your kids, freeze instead of using oil or natural gas, stop driving cars, sterilize yourself, live in a box and eat bugs, euthanize yourself and others
Theology - misanthropy. We are scum and do not belong in nature. Anything bad that ever happens naturally is now just the fault of humans.

Do all of these things for the belief that we won't have inclement weather or natural disasters anymore as long as we're following the religion.

Don't believe our religion? Now when bad weather happens anyway, it's not our religion that's wrong, it's your personal fault that a natural disaster happened or it got too hot in July. You and everyone who voted like you or is remotely skeptical deserves to die in the natural disasters. Die, heretic.
 
This is such an obvious pagan religious cult that I don't know why everyone lets it larp as science.

Tithing - carbon taxes, gas taxes
Sacrifice - abort your kids, freeze instead of using oil or natural gas, stop driving cars, sterilize yourself, live in a box and eat bugs, euthanize yourself and others
Theology - misanthropy. We are scum and do not belong in nature. Anything bad that ever happens naturally is now just the fault of humans.

Do all of these things for the belief that we won't have inclement weather or natural disasters anymore as long as we're following the religion.

Don't believe our religion? Now when bad weather happens anyway, it's not our religion that's wrong, it's your personal fault that a natural disaster happened or it got too hot in July. You and everyone who voted like you or is remotely skeptical deserves to die in the natural disasters. Die, heretic.
The only difference between a religious doomsday cult, and the cult of climate doomers, is that the smart religious ones stopped giving dates and timelines. "Any day now" vs: The hole in the ozone layer was supposed to give us cancer 20 year ago, the polar ice caps were supposed to have melted a decade ago, Florida was supposed to be under water 5 years ago, etc.

If the average Twitter user can understand vague posting, I have no hope for these "experts"
 
I'm not concerned about this shit and I'm still not convinced it's even a problem. I'm MUCH more concerned about how badly we're polluting the planet with trash and chemicals and microplastics and decimating local ecosystems causing plant and animal extintions. These are tangible concerns that we can tackle literally right now to preserve what little of Earth we can for the future. Who the fuck cares about carbon in the atmosphere when there's fucking volcanos pouring tons of CO2 into it every day. Fuck off
 
Been listening to every possible variation of this verbal masturbation for a good 60 years now. See...the Earth is cooling...we won't be able to grow enough food to feed everyone...pollution will kill us all...the Earth is warming....on and on.

It's all so fucking tiresome.
 
Back