Thunderf00t / Phil Mason - Single manbaby, angry atheist/anti-feminist Youtuber, attention whore

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I agree with this, except I do think he is just about pompous enough to be a cow in his own right. I've watched a lot of his content, and while he does make valid points, he can also come across as extremely malicious at times. Despite being a learned man, he treats his audience like goldfish by constantly re-using the same pieces of footage over and over again, and it often seems as if he courts controversy just for the sake of self-aggrandizement. I don't hate him, but I don't particularly like him either.

He has the same annoying feature as Sargon, where he pompously takes a fucking half hour to say something that basically amounts to "hurr durr Anita Sarkeesian stupid" and then acts like he's a deep thinker when everyone knows that cunt is stupid and could say it in like three seconds.
 
I've noticed he has had interviews with Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins which is kind of impressive. I'll have to watch his "Why do people laugh at creationists," videos because I laugh at them too.

He also interviewed members of the Westboro Baptist Church, trolled them by asserting that Jesus endorsed homosexuality, and then got called a "deeply corrupted pervert."

 
He has the same annoying feature as Sargon, where he pompously takes a fucking half hour to say something that basically amounts to "hurr durr Anita Sarkeesian stupid" and then acts like he's a deep thinker when everyone knows that cunt is stupid and could say it in like three seconds.
It's all about the Youtube bucks. They do it just to increase the length and time watched of their videos. That's why Thunderf00t makes multiple videos commenting on the same issue, and repeats the same lines, graphs and graphics 3-4 times per video.

I wouldn't say it's too bad in comparison to everyone else, since most people on Youtube increases the video length with bullshit. The fact that he acts so smug about his superior intellect and reasoning skillz when he spends twenty minutes of not saying anything doesn't make him look good, though.
 
The fact that he acts so smug about his superior intellect and reasoning skillz when he spends twenty minutes of not saying anything doesn't make him look good, though.
This is pretty much the "skeptic community" in a nutshell, though. That, and the fact that they operate on a basis of "I am a rationalist. Therefore, everything I say is rational. Therefore, my opinions are automatically correct."

I used to follow this guy when his stuff was primarily debunking creationism. Then just about every video became some rant about feminism and I just got bored. The skeptic community has this real chip on their shoulder about women.
 
Nothing says loser with a lack of social skills more than 'I am always right, I talk to people to prove that I'm always right, I do not care for people to learn things or to debate, I just want to look like I'm right' and any pro-science or atheist community is filled with guys like him.
Sadly, a phd can't cure your autismo.
 
Nothing says loser with a lack of social skills more than 'I am always right, I talk to people to prove that I'm always right, I do not care for people to learn things or to debate, I just want to look like I'm right' and any pro-science or atheist community is filled with guys like him.
Sadly, a phd can't cure your autismo.

Sounds like Kiwi Farms.
 
This is pretty much the "skeptic community" in a nutshell, though. That, and the fact that they operate on a basis of "I am a rationalist. Therefore, everything I say is rational. Therefore, my opinions are automatically correct."

I used to follow this guy when his stuff was primarily debunking creationism. Then just about every video became some rant about feminism and I just got bored. The skeptic community has this real chip on their shoulder about women.
It was amazing how quickly it all fell apart and right along the same idealogical lines as gamergate. There was this golden age of internet skepticism where everyone got along and it was all about coming together and making fun of internet jesus spergs. It was basically low yield trolling. And then it shattered and everyone's inner exceptional came out almost at the exact same minute.
 
So, nobody has mentioned it yet, so I'll point out that he's well known for having a massive fucking neck. Just watch the neck for the first 5 seconds of this:


sac-capitals-noah-freeman-allegedly-had-an-interesting-way-of-insider-trading-using-sounds-and-pictures.jpg
 
I just remembered, normally I agree with Thunderf00t in his disputes with Kevin Logan, but at one point Thunderf00t was mocking examples of non-rape that feminists call rape, he was like (in a mocking tone) "I consented, then told him to stop mid sex and he finished anyways."

And Kevin Logan rightfully was like "actually that is rape..."

I actually thought it was stupid that all of these SJWs condescendingly push education about consent as if everyone but them is too dumb to understand such a basic concept, but ironically TF actually legitimized that SJW feminist opinion that I had disagreed with before, by proving that apparently even some PhD scientists don't understand basic elements of what consent is.
 
The Same shitlord that tried starting controversy with Lauren Southern too (does she also have a lolcow thread?) Either way, he came out looking even more desperate in that video with the reaching he did in it.
 
I just remembered, normally I agree with Thunderf00t in his disputes with Kevin Logan, but at one point Thunderf00t was mocking examples of non-rape that feminists call rape, he was like (in a mocking tone) "I consented, then told him to stop mid sex and he finished anyways."

And Kevin Logan rightfully was like "actually that is rape..."

I actually thought it was stupid that all of these SJWs condescendingly push education about consent as if everyone but them is too dumb to understand such a basic concept, but ironically TF actually legitimized that SJW feminist opinion that I had disagreed with before, by proving that apparently even some PhD scientists don't understand basic elements of what consent is.

He got intellectually bested by Kevin Logan of all people? That's the saddest thing I've ever heard.
 
Why does it matter if he's single? It seems like your nitpicking a little.

Yeah, it would seem a little bit sadder to me if, given his above mocking of basic consent issues, he did have a girlfriend. She'd have to have self-esteem a little lower than the current position of the Titanic for various reasons. (Including what I suppose is the rather frivolous holy fuck, dude, it's called a hairbrush, try one.)
 
Back