EU TikTok tells European users its staff in China get access to their data - "The other countries where European user data could be accessed by TikTok staff include Brazil, Canada and Israel as well as the US and Singapore, where European user data is stored currently."

Privacy policy update confirms data of continent’s users available to range of TikTok bases including in Brazil, Israel and US

TikTok is spelling out to its European users that their data can be accessed by employees outside the continent, including in China, amid political and regulatory concerns about Chinese access to user information on the platform.

The Chinese-owned social video app is updating its privacy policy to confirm that staff in countries, including China, are allowed to access user data to ensure their experience of the platform is “consistent, enjoyable and safe”.


The other countries where European user data could be accessed by TikTok staff include Brazil, Canada and Israel as well as the US and Singapore, where European user data is stored currently.

TikTok’s head of privacy in Europe, Elaine Fox, said: “Based on a demonstrated need to do their job, subject to a series of robust security controls and approval protocols, and by way of methods that are recognised under the GDPR [the EU’s general data protection regulation], we allow certain employees within our corporate group located in Brazil, Canada, China, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, and the United States, remote access to TikTok European user data.”

Data could be used to conduct checks on aspects of the platform, including the performance of its algorithms, which recommend content to users, and detect vexatious automated accounts. TikTok has previously acknowledged that some user data is accessed by employees of the company’s parent, ByteDance, in China.

In a letter to Republican senators disclosed in July, TikTok’s chief executive, Shou Zi Chew, said a “narrow set of non-sensitive” US user data could be viewed by foreign employees if approved by a US-based TikTok security team. He added that none of the data were shared with Chinese government officials.

The privacy policy update, which applies to the UK, the European Economic Area, and Switzerland, and which goes live on 2 December, takes place against a backdrop of political and regulatory pressure over use of data generated by the app, which has more than a billion users worldwide.

The US President, Joe Biden, has scrapped executive orders from his predecessor, Donald Trump, ordering the sale of TikTok’s US business, but in their place he has asked the US commerce department to produce recommendations to protect the data of people in the US from “foreign adversaries”. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, which scrutinises business deals with non-US companies, is also conducting a security review of TikTok.

Ireland’s data watchdog, which has jurisdiction over TikTok across the EU, has also launched an investigation into “transfers by TikTok of personal data to China”.

Michael Veale, an associate professor in digital rights at University College London, said that under a recent EU ruling data transfers between the bloc and China would have to be vetted for security. “It is extraordinarily difficult to routinely send EU user data to China because contracts between a Chinese and a European company can’t prevent state access.”

Under an European Court of Justice ruling dubbed Schrems II, certain data transfers outside the EU must take account of “the level of protection”, with particular focus on access by state authorities, afforded to the user’s data at the other end.

Veale said China’s data laws could lead to questions being raised over the security of even limited data transfers. However he added: “I’m not convinced that the Chinese government’s focus is currently on spying on individuals’ TikTok data. They have other means to obtain private information. Growing and deepening an influential platform is itself a powerful goal.”

In a blog post last year TikTok said it was “aligned” with the regulatory direction set out by the Schrems II ruling.

In the UK, the Information Commissioner’s Office, the country’s data watchdog, is consulting on new guidance for data transfers post-Brexit. However, the government has paused a new data reform bill.

In October, TikTok denied a report in the business publication Forbes that it was used to “target” US citizens. Forbes had reported that it planned to track the location of at least two people via the video-sharing app.

In the privacy policy update Fox said TikTok did not collect “precise location information” from users in Europe, whether based on GPS technology or otherwise. In its current iteration the privacy policy states: “With your permission, we may also collect precise location information (such as GPS).”

Article
 
You mean that doesn't go without saying?
Apparently we're supposed to still be shocked, mouths agape at this news every two seconds some other company / governing body / hacker says they have information they 'aren't supposed to'. I guess maybe they want you to believe the weak ass regulations from the EU are working perfectly to stop this in the two minute intervals there isn't another article about massive amounts of personal info owned by some random.
 
Apparently we're supposed to still be shocked, mouths agape at this news every two seconds some other company / governing body / hacker says they have information they 'aren't supposed to'. I guess maybe they want you to believe the weak ass regulations from the EU are working perfectly to stop this in the two minute intervals there isn't another article about massive amounts of personal info owned by some random.
Correction: you're still supposed to be shocked, mouth agape at this news every two seconds that something that was self evident but not officially disclosed was in fact true. You'd never even considered this self evident fact, OMG how long has this been going on??? This is news to everyone because we're all good little sheep who lack critical thinking skills, not conspiracy theorists, plsnogulags.

20220521_203543.jpg

This, regarding the concept of innocent until proven guilty. Unless the suspect is white of course, in which case they're guilty of doing it both premeditatively and involuntarily.

But chinks aren't white, banning them from bringing diseases into the country is racist. Terminating their spyware in the US is racist. Orange man bad.
 
How would this not already be clear when a Chinese company owns the service? It doesn't matter if there are local servers for each country.
You mean that doesn't go without saying?
President Trump said as much and even tried to do something about it and he and his supporters were called racist by big business, the political class and the media.
 
I honestly don't care.
The CCP already knows how much KMs I run for years, how and when I sleep (although the algorithm SUCKS, I'm gonna buy a Fitbit, you hear me Huawei???), and what are my best marathon timers. They have my heart data for like 4-5 years now, and the last generation of Huawei Watch can pair to my Polar H10 too and has an optical sensor on par with the Apple Watch, so suck on these dick Euros, as long as you don't gibs me proper cheap training tech, I'm gonna have my data with the CCP and the Glorious Han Empire.
PS; some of my PCs are also protected by Kaspersky, do better Amerifats.
 
Instead of publishing these stupid articles, they should report on when our data ISN'T being accessed by those who shouldn't.

I hate the modern internet so goddamn much it's unreal. You access some bullshit page and it reads every single cookie in your browser and saves a fingerprint of it somewhere. Is that necessary for me to look at a recipe on your ad-infested blog? And don't get me started on passwords. You have to input a 10 character string with upper case, lower case, super-script and only 2 vowels so that the service gives you some placebo that it's protecting your data... and then they store your password in plaintext on a notepad document titled "PasswordsDoNotSteal.txt"

And that's the data that gets STOLEN, and not the gigabytes of data they willingly sell. I don't know who in the chinese government needs to know how much time I've spent looking at explicit pictures of Chun Li, but apparently that data is not only incredibly important, but incredibly profitable.

I hope everyone in tech gets done in by a combination of the jab and deep vein thrombosis.
 
EU commission vs CCP, 2 broken commie regimes fighting over ownership of their subjects data...
 
I suppose if you are retarded enough to read the guardian, you are also retarded enough to not know that all social media is examining every damn thing you do.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toolbox

Exclusive: TikTok Confirms Some U.S. User Data Is Stored In China

Archive

TikTok has said under oath that Americans’ data has always been stored outside China. Now it’s saying there are big exceptions for creators—who it claims it treats differently than “typical users.”

TikTok has acknowledged to the U.S. government that sensitive information about American creators who sign up to earn money through the app is stored in China.

The company responded Friday to a letter that bipartisan Senate leaders sent recently to TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew that raised concerns about his “incorrect claims” to Congress regarding where TikTok has stored the data of its U.S. users. Weeks after Chew testified to a House committee that “American data has always been stored in Virginia and Singapore,” a Forbes investigation found that TikTok has stored the financial information of its biggest American and European stars—including those in the TikTok Creator Fund—on servers in China. In the wake of those revelations, Senate Democrat Richard Blumenthal and Republican Marsha Blackburn demanded answers.

In TikTok’s response to their questions, the company said there is a difference between “U.S. user data collected by the TikTok app” and information that creators give to TikTok so they can be paid for content they post. The former is stored in TikTok’s data centers in the U.S. and Singapore, TikTok said. It did not explicitly state where the latter is stored. A trove of internal documents obtained by Forbes, and several people across different parts of the company familiar with the matter, have shown that tax forms, social security numbers and other information from creators and outside vendors has been stored in China; payments to both are managed through tools from TikTok’s China-based parent ByteDance.

“We were asked about, and our testimony focused on, the protected user data collected in the app—not creator data.”
TikTok’s June 16 response to Senate leaders



“We stand by the statements made by our company executives to Congress,” TikTok wrote in the letter. “We were asked about, and our testimony focused on, the protected user data collected in the app—not creator data.”

Creator data, it explained, is often an exception.

“Protected data” is “user data identified by the U.S. Government as needing additional protection,” the letter said. But it emphasized that there are “limited exceptions” that it said “were determined as part of TikTok's extensive, multi-year negotiations with CFIUS”—the government body working on a national security deal that would allow the app to keep operating here.

The letter claimed those “limited exceptions” include all of the following categories: “Public data, business metrics, interoperability data, and certain creator data, if a creator voluntarily signs up for a commercial program to be supported by TikTok in reaching new audiences and monetizing content.”

“TikTok believes that the Forbes article cited in your letter was referencing certain creator data such as signed contracts and related documents for U.S. creators who enter into a commercial relationship with TikTok—information that is collected outside of the standard app experience,” the company wrote to the Senators. “Like most companies, we enter into commercial relationships with businesses and individuals, and collect and retain certain information to comply with applicable audit, accounting, tax, and other regulations.”

CFIUS did not respond to questions about whether these exceptions for creators are part of a yet-to-be-released national security contract with TikTok.

Asked about TikTok’s distinction between what it claimed are “two different categories of data: protected data and data that falls under an exception,” Blumenthal and Blackburn told Forbes they were not convinced.

“We are extremely concerned that TikTok is storing Americans' personal, private data within the reach of the Chinese government,” the Senators said in a joint statement. “TikTok executives appear to have repeatedly and intentionally misled Congress when answering how the company secures and protects the data of Americans. TikTok’s response makes it crystal clear that Americans’ data is still exposed to Beijing’s draconian and pervasive spying regimes – despite the claims of TikTok’s misleading public relations campaign.”

They are not the only congressional leaders that have raised alarms about claims made under oath by TikTok top brass that appear to run counter to findings in the Forbes report. Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Marco Rubio earlier this month asked Attorney General Merrick Garland to open a Justice Department investigation into whether TikTok’s CEO committed perjury in his testimony; a week later, 13 House Republicans followed suit.

Asked by Senators Blumenthal and Blackburn if TikTok has taken steps to investigate whether TikTok Creator Fund data stored or accessible in China has been shared with officials in Beijing, the company said: “TikTok has not been asked for this data by the Chinese government or the CCP. TikTok has not provided such data to the Chinese government or CCP, nor would TikTok do so.”

And asked whether TikTok Creator Fund data stored in China has been or would be removed from servers there, the company said deletion was underway for “protected data.” That does not, according to TikTok, include personal information top creators hand over to get paid.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Toolbox
Back