Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

[DK 699]

I now suffer as well. JUST BECAUSE TIM POOL PLAYED CLASSIC WOW TOO DOES NOT MEAN WE ARE BESTIES YOUTUBE, TAKE ME OFF THIS ALGORITHM

This is why you use private mode for this sort of stuff, friend.

 

[Christ crown of porns]

I agree with everything else you said, but this is pretty exceptional. Abortion and gun control/socialized healthcare/the war on terror/climate change/ police brutality/illegal immigration/ whatever lefties are angry about this week are two separate issues. I hate this meme and I don't even care about abortion.

I don't care about abortion either, just used it as an example of hypocrisy. If it pleases you, replace it with anti fag right wingers that blow rails of meth of giant cocks.

 

[DK 699]

I don't care about abortion either, just used it as an example of hypocrisy. If it pleases you, replace it with anti fag right wingers that blow rails of meth of giant cocks.

Evangelocons that are secretly massive fags is a good example of hypocrisy, but the abortion thing isn't. I'm sorry I'm being a dick about this, it's just that that one thing (comparing Abortion to X) is stupid and pisses me off.

 

[ES 195]

Tim Pool has a thread here? I've always found him too bland and to have too intentionally flaccid opinions. Guy is the definition of milquetoast.

 

[physcor]

I will say Tim is one of the few left leaning people who can provide me news with a leftist bent that doesn't make me want to Pinochet a commie.
There is also something incredibly enjoyable about him slowly getting more and more frustrated and depressed about the Democrats.

 

[Hellbound Hellhound]

It's a game alt-media people like to play, they claim that leftism has gone mad, etc, and that they are the only true woke leftists who see through the idpol and communists. Sargon is the same, the only self-identifying leftist libertarian unicorn.

It's either because they are insecure about being seen as a fence-sitting centrist, or that they want to shed the stigma of being centre-right. Sometimes they're so stupid they only use it as gotchas in debates.

Most of them are just tedious status quo peddlers who mistake their lack of imagination for hard-learned realism. In some cases, they're not even knowledgeable or honest enough with themselves to know where they sit on the political spectrum (see: Sargon and Dave Rubin).

 

[Quasar]

... Tim is one of the few left leaning people who can provide me news ...

Tim doesn't provide news. Tim provides vlogs about articles other people have written that he quickly skimmed over, and then formed a sensationalist clickbait-y opinion based on the headline and maybe the first paragraph. It's ludicrously obvious that he's actually reading many of those articles for the very first time while he makes the video. He also has to include all of his favorite buzzwords, as well as repeat whatever half-assed analogy he came up with over several videos, all after his now-standard request for money and complaint that Youtube is mean to him.

Hell, the least he could do would be to rotate out the stupid beanie. Sure, wear a hat to reduce the glare from going bald if you want, but at least go with different colors, different styles

 

[The Pink Panther]

Tim doesn't provide news. Tim provides vlogs about articles other people have written that he quickly skimmed over, and then formed a sensationalist clickbait-y opinion based on the headline and maybe the first paragraph. It's ludicrously obvious that he's actually reading many of those articles for the very first time while he makes the video. He also has to include all of his favorite buzzwords, as well as repeat whatever half-assed analogy he came up with over several videos, all after his now-standard request for money and complaint that Youtube is mean to him.

Hell, the least he could do would be to rotate out the stupid beanie. Sure, wear a hat to reduce the glare from going bald if you want, but at least go with different colors, different styles

Guys, we all know that Reactor is the superior brother. Reactor has ideas and creates shit, unlike Tim....and plus is a pretty good troll.

 

[Shady Attorney]

Hell, the least he could do would be to rotate out the stupid beanie. Sure, wear a hat to reduce the glare from going bald if you want, but at least go with different colors, different styles

It’s always the same fucking two-tone grey beanie in every video and interview. You’d think he’d wear different ones if he was such a fan of them

 

[Haramburger]

It’s always the same fucking two-tone grey beanie in every video and interview. You’d think he’d wear different ones if he was such a fan of them

He's Meg Griffin but he has a penis.

Tim Pool has a thread here? I've always found him too bland and to have too intentionally flaccid opinions. Guy is the definition of milquetoast.

It's not so much that he's a cow right now, but he's an autism magnet with his coverage and has all the signs of being the same sort of trainwreck Sargon or Ethan Ralph became. He just hasn't spilled his spaghetti yet.

 

[The Pink Panther]

It's not so much that he's a cow right now, but he's an autism magnet with his coverage and has all the signs of being the same sort of trainwreck Sargon or Ethan Ralph became. He just hasn't spilled his spaghetti yet.

Honestly, he's very easy to make fun of. He's a broken record, he has the worst case of balding for a 33-year-old (worse than Doug Walker back in the day), he thinks the end of the world is coming and all that shit. It's just plain funny.

 

[Haramburger]

Honestly, he's very easy to make fun of. He's a broken record, he has the worst case of balding for a 33-year-old (worse than Doug Walker back in the day), he thinks the end of the world is coming and all that shit. It's just plain funny.

Agree on all those points, he just gives off a normie vibe, rather than a "deranged social reject with extreme internet sexual fetishes and on the spectrum/has a mental disorder" one unlike most of the thread topics on this site.

 

[DK 699]

Watching Nick Rekieta's stream right now and laughing so hard. If they individual who posted the superchat about 'Tim Pool's titillating new action game Subverse' is reading this then I would like you to know that I salute you.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Timmy Ol'Poole is fear-mongering again. (and he even lampshades this at the beginning of the video until he said "no, it's true, because a professor from Princeton says so")

Also, there seems to be no difference between his main channel vids and his second channel vids apparently nowadays. I guess he's following in the steps of his old friend Smuckles of Akkad.

 

[break these cuffs]

Timmy Ol'Poole is fear-mongering again. (and he even lampshades this at the beginning of the video until he said "no, it's true, because a professor from Princeton says so")

Also, there seems to be no difference between his main channel vids and his second channel vids apparently nowadays. I guess he's following in the steps of his old friend Smuckles of Akkad.

Yuppies getting their vegan organic groceries delivered by Amazon drone in San Francisco do not start a revolution. Rednecks sipping a Budweiser by grill while they watch NASCAR on their smartphone don't either. I'm not even sure the amount of strife it would take to make people in a First World nation take to the streets. Their lives are just too comfy.

 

[Rekkington]

Yuppies getting their vegan organic groceries delivered by Amazon drone in San Francisco do not start a revolution. Rednecks sipping a Budweiser by grill while they watch NASCAR on their smartphone don't either. I'm not even sure the amount of strife it would take to make people in a First World nation take to the streets. Their lives are just too comfy.

Well you don't really need for things to be that bad to have a revolution, there's lots of revolutions that happen in relatively well-off countries which have about as much money as your average redneck town. America has had numerous race riots in the past few years alone and across the planet people are doing mass shootings backed by various ideologies. Also the demographic shift in America is unprecedented in its entire history, and that more than anything will have drastic effects down the line as cultures and identities continue to balkanize.
Also, you don't need the majority of people to even participate in a revolution, every political upheaval in the 20th century was done by a minority of people or some relatively small rebel/splinter/revolutionary group, and then everyone else ended up picking a side.

I believe it's incorrect to look at this like the average person doesn't care about this, either. I think it's extremely online people like us who have this idea that everyone's just laughing at this shit. Go to any ghetto or small town and your average person will be bursting at the seams with opinions on what is wrong with the country.
And here's the problem that leads to revolution: all of them, on all sides, have come to the conclusion that the media is bullshit and there is no way to vote these problems away. This would be a different story if the population was at least united in believing the political system could help them, but everyone on every side is flirting with ideas on throwing metaphorical grenades into everything that exists now and people would be incorrect in thinking the same rhetoric existed in the 90s and 80s.
That right there is where revolutions and armed conflicts happen, when people believe the entire thing is too corrupt and if they're so comfy they have nothing else to think about and they are too distanced from what life would be like during one of these revolutions. Nobody has the context to say "let's not do that again" so it seems all the more attractive.

I'd say that if you want to see where things are headed, look to Europe and especially look at gangs. Gangs already segregate along racial lines but when you hear about militia groups walking the streets looking for fights or training in fields, again people can laugh at that but it's literally the first rumblings of armed insurrection. Everyone knows these groups recruit from prisons, and they tend to be the shock troops for this sort of shit. To me it's not even a question of if it's a question of when, it's just a thing that is currently happening and only the most irony-poisoned and culture-fatigued of us are thinking this is one amusing horrorshow.

 

[break these cuffs]

Well you don't really need for things to be that bad to have a revolution, there's lots of revolutions that happen in relatively well-off countries which have about as much money as your average redneck town. America has had numerous race riots in the past few years alone and across the planet people are doing mass shootings backed by various ideologies. Also the demographic shift in America is unprecedented in its entire history, and that more than anything will have drastic effects down the line as cultures and identities continue to balkanize.
Also, you don't need the majority of people to even participate in a revolution, every political upheaval in the 20th century was done by a minority of people or some relatively small rebel/splinter/revolutionary group, and then everyone else ended up picking a side.

I believe it's incorrect to look at this like the average person doesn't care about this, either. I think it's extremely online people like us who have this idea that everyone's just laughing at this shit. Go to any ghetto or small town and your average person will be bursting at the seams with opinions on what is wrong with the country.
And here's the problem that leads to revolution: all of them, on all sides, have come to the conclusion that the media is bullshit and there is no way to vote these problems away. This would be a different story if the population was at least united in believing the political system could help them, but everyone on every side is flirting with ideas on throwing metaphorical grenades into everything that exists now and people would be incorrect in thinking the same rhetoric existed in the 90s and 80s.
That right there is where revolutions and armed conflicts happen, when people believe the entire thing is too corrupt and if they're so comfy they have nothing else to think about and they are too distanced from what life would be like during one of these revolutions. Nobody has the context to say "let's not do that again" so it seems all the more attractive.

I'd say that if you want to see where things are headed, look to Europe and especially look at gangs. Gangs already segregate along racial lines but when you hear about militia groups walking the streets looking for fights or training in fields, again people can laugh at that but it's literally the first rumblings of armed insurrection. Everyone knows these groups recruit from prisons, and they tend to be the shock troops for this sort of shit. To me it's not even a question of if it's a question of when, it's just a thing that is currently happening and only the most irony-poisoned and culture-fatigued of us are thinking this is one amusing horrorshow.

Name a revolution or civil war within the last 50 years where the country had one third of America's population and GDP. Shit, take that down to one fifth, one tenth. Hell, use figures from the period. Did any of those countries have a stable government for 200 years prior to the violence which wasn't a colonial overlord? Comparing the US to nations in Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, or the Ex-Soviet Bloc is disingenuous. None of those countries are like the United States. Have you ever been to any of those places? I have. People want to be comfortable. Most people don't have the stomach for violence. Sure in a revolution most won't have to, but they have to stand by and tolerate it.

Could some Three Percenters start bombing statehouses, sure. Would they get cheers and supporters, yep. Would they get utterly crushed and their supporters keep quiet, you betcha. You repeat that cycle a few dozen times while the economy and society devolves and now you might be getting somewhere. Ghettos have been rioting for decades including back when black militantism and black nationalism was popular. Where is the revolution? Shit, what happened to BLM after Dallas? There was a targeted campaign of violence against police in its wake including outright assassination. Normal people, likely casual BLM supporters, got outraged. It became bad optics. The money dried up and their coverage stopped. BLM cost tens of millions of dollars in direct funds I don't even know how to calculate it in terms of MSM coverage and it was dropped quick as shit. They could kept whipping niggers up into a frenzy. Now who cares?

There is no force internally or externally which can cause enough widespread violence for a sustained enough period to cause a civil war in the US as it stands.

 

[Rekkington]

Name a revolution or civil war within the last 50 years where the country had one third of America's population and GDP. Comparing the US to nations in Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, or the Ex-Soviet Bloc is disingenuous. None of those countries are like the United States. Have you ever been to any of those places? I have. People want to be comfortable. Most people don't have the stomach for violence. Sure in a revolution most won't have to, but they have to stand by and tolerate it.
There is no force internally or externally which can cause enough widespread violence for a sustained enough period to cause a civil war in the US as it stands.

It has nothing to do with population size, what sort of bizarre metric is that? Also GDP doesn't matter in terms of revolution or desire for revolution, Brazil was one of the wealthiest nations in the region but the income disparity was too great and when when you have the super right living beside the super poor that creates con flict. What matters is where the money is allocated. This is why you're more likely to see civil wars in places where people feel plutocrats or ruling classes are hoarding all the wealth.

Shit, take that down to one fifth, one tenth. Hell, use figures from the period. Did any of those countries have a stable government for 200 years prior to the violence which wasn't a colonial overlord?

Define "stable." You mean countries being at war with its neighbors or abroad, like America? You mean countries where there is literal political violence in the form of assassinations and mass shootings, like America? You mean countries that can't even agree on where their borders ought to be and are being flooded with outsiders trying to subversively undermine the sovereignty of their lands, like America? The fact that this doesn't remind you of Haiti doesn't matter.
I can't believe I need to say this in 2019, but here goes: flooding a country with money does not make it more peaceful.
There was no such thing as the cold war before the cold war, if this were the 50s we'd have someone like you talking about how there's no way we would ever go to war with the Communists because of nukes. And then it took a new form. And here you are saying "what, do you expect us to start digging trenches again?" No, it's evolved, it's not going to look like whatever dipshit colonial conflict you have in your head, it's not going to look like the American civil war, and I have outlined why.

Could some Three Percenters start bombing statehouses, sure. Would they get cheers and supporters, yep. Would they get utterly crushed and their supporters keep quiet, you betcha. You repeat that cycle a few dozen times while the economy and society devolves and now you might be getting somewhere. Ghettos have been rioting for decades including back when black militantism and black nationalism was popular. Where is the revolution? Shit, what happened to BLM after Dallas? There was a targeted campaign of violence against police in its wake including outright assassination. Normal people, likely casual BLM supporters, got outraged. It became bad optics. The money dried up and their coverage stopped. BLM cost tens of millions of dollars in direct funds I don't even know how to calculate it in terms of MSM coverage and it was dropped quick as shit. They could kept whipping niggers up into a frenzy. Now who cares?

I love this sort of argument because you agree with everything I am saying, you are agreeing with the racial balkanization and political violence, you agree with race riots and that the only thing keeping anyone in line is an ever-evolving and militarized police force (direct reaction to what I am talking about, like we haven't seen that before,) extremist groups recruiting aggressively in prisons and online, but because they're not walking around with heads on sticks there's nothing to worry about.
"Well YEAH there's political terrorism and riots and voter intimidation and literal revolutionary groups and giant marches being held for these groups, increasingly militarized police being required to deal with it all along with rapidly changing demographics and sharp upticks in mass shootings, but who cares?"

 

[SinbadFromHouseguest]

Timmy Ol'Poole is fear-mongering again. (and he even lampshades this at the beginning of the video until he said "no, it's true, because a professor from Princeton says so")

Also, there seems to be no difference between his main channel vids and his second channel vids apparently nowadays. I guess he's following in the steps of his old friend Smuckles of Akkad.

Wow, not clickbaity at all Mr. Pool.

He's been going on about CIVIL WAR for awhile but it seems unlikely. He doesn't factor in most Americans are too out of shape to do anything.

 

[break these cuffs]

It has nothing to do with population size, what sort of idiotic metric is that? Also GDP doesn't matter, the Soviet Union had a good enough GDP and they still experienced a revolution and total breakdown of their system. What matters is where the money is allocated. This is why you're more likely to see civil wars in places where people feel plutocrats or ruling classes are hoarding all the wealth.

So you don't think that it's easier to start a revolution in Haiti than in America and you think the average American is as bad off as your average Soviet citizen in Uzbekistan? Good God. I'm not even going to try to bother reading any farther. You are too stupid to have this conservation with.