💰 Grifter Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1000137395.jpg
1000137391.jpg
 

On 20 April, Tim had Justin Martin, a trucker-turned-online personality, as the guest.
Ian, & Tate the producer, were the co-hosts.

Unlike the bucolic landscapes of a certain Austrian painter whose birthday this episode aired on, this was a fully unpleasant viewing experience. While I have come to expect a certain level of ignoble disdain from Tim, he has certainly begun pushed the boundaries of it, over the last week, or so.

Clip Collection:
-Tim believes the F-15 is a stealth aircraft. It is not. He, also, said people did not formally refer to the Second World War as such, until it was over. He argues it only became official after a bureaucratic decision to ease record keeping. The reason for this pedantic exercise is because Tim made another, in the long string of his declarations of World War III beginning. This being accusing China & Russia of sending devices to defeat U.S. stealth technology, amidst the airstrikes:


-Tim decides to use The Daily Mirror as a reliable source for news, saying it is trustworthy because it is not "some random unknown blog". For those unfamiliar, it is a British tabloid magazine which has a history of questionable quality:


-Tim actually gives Ian praise for coming up with a good idea, which can be seen as the monkey's paw wish being granted, this episode:


-& the price is paid for the beanie boy's praise. Ian begins discussing his concerns about large corporations owning intellectual property, & gaining control of likeness rights, in perpetuity. Rather than engage with what Our Graphene Guy is worried about, Tim decides to become argumentative. He makes the case for how corporations are good, because they can protect an individual from losing everything in a lawsuit. This was not Ian's point, & fails to address his concerns:


Ian reiterates his dislike is for companies owning likenesses, & the laws around signing over that right did not exist at a time when CGI or AI could puppeteer a dead person about. Tim just flatly says "They bought it", it is legal, & mocks Ian for being upset that a corporation "purchased something, via agreement". As Ian tries to respond, noting what is legal is not necessarily ethical, the beanie boy cuts him off . Tate steps in to address Ian's concerns, but Tim persists in his antagonistic approach. Ian mentions that making unfair contracts, taking advantage of a person's ignorance or vulnerability, is a terrible thing. The beanie boy decides this means Ian is arguing for "free stuff from corporations":


Ian continue to be confused by Tim's approach, but repeats that there should be legal protections against corporations making predatory contracts, e.g. a starving man signing over the rights to his image, in perpetuity, to afford food. Tim interprets this as not permitting "giving something of value, in exchange for something of value". Our Graphene Guy calls out Tim's prior outrage over Chinese nationals buying farmland, despite it being the same kind of fair exchange permitted under the law. The beanie boy says it "has nothing to do with what we're talking about". Ian notices Justin wishes to chime in, & gives him the chance. The guest offers examples where foreign truckers are brought to the United States, & giving terrible contracts to work. But due to their limited understanding of English, & lawyers on the side of the companies, the truckers are launching a class action lawsuit against their employers. Justin also steps in to explain how IP laws can protect the individual, & as Ian seems more accepting of this, Tim returns to be combative, once more. He bullies Ian over not understanding what corporate personhood is, & how it allows Timcast to operate, despite what Our Graphene Guy is upset with is the malicious use of it:


The beanie boy keeps needling Ian, accusing him of being a communist because Our Graphene Guy does not wanting corporations to have a monopoly upon common resources, like water. Ian repeats, once again, how it is the scale of the issue that worries him, but Tim keeps rounding back to how communist his co-host is. Ian brings up company towns, & Tim uses the same argument deployed against Jay Dyer, in a previous episode. All throughout, Tim has been needlessly escalatory with Ian over this, even when the other panelists were trying to calmly lay out Our Graphene Guy's errors to him:



On 21 April, Tim had Donnie Discerned, whom previously appeared as Donnie Darkened, on The Culture War, as the guest. He is an online personality focused upon Christian eschatology.
Elaad, & Ian, were the co-hosts.

This is the second guest who is black, & has a name with the word "Dark" in it. But if you were hoping to hear Donnie bring up his theories about Pres. Donald Trump being the anti-Christ, you should know better by now. The guest got to be the captive audience as Tim lectured everyone about how correct his analysis is. Thankfully, Donnie manages to push through a bit, at the very end.

Clip Collection:
-Tim seemingly cannot keep straight whether the actions in Iran are part of some intricate strategy, orchestrated by Pres. Donald Trump, as he told Tom Renz; or things are a chaotic mess which no one can figure out. He even claims that if someone says they know what is happening, they are lying. Which indicts Tim's remarks from earlier this week:


-Tim has to make any news about him, if there is even a tangential connection to the story. In this, the beanie boy makes a report on the Justice Department indicting the Southern Poverty Law Centre for sending money to White supremacist groups about how it maligned him in the past. The best part is Tim trying to take credit for starting the SPLC's downfall:


-Tim kept going on about how there is a conspiracy to have a Tulsi Gabbard/Joe Kent Democrat ticket running against Marco Rubio in 2028, to enforce stability after Trump's departure. But when Elaad proposes a leftist being vice president to a Republican, the beanie boy rejects this as "ridiculous, & makes no sense...that's just made up". Then the two go back & forth over whether Tucker Carlson shall run for office, with Tim coming around to it, but still rejects Tucker doing so as a Republican:


-Donnie finally gets a chance to discuss Christ's return, & Tim just has to turn it into discussing Naruto & Dragon Ball Z:



On 22 April, Tim had Nick Sortor, a conservative on-the-ground reporter, as the guest.
Ian, & Tate, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim is tickled pink that a court injuncted the new congressional district map for Virginia, & treats this as some surprise outcome. Though months ago, the state's supreme court had ruled the vote could go forward, but were the new map approved, it would be immediately challenged:


-Rather than make the story of the SPLC helping to fund transport for the 2017 Unite the Right rally into one about the death of Heather Heyer, how this became a cudgel to beat down any right-leaning movements for years on end, etc.; Tim has to make the story about himself, again. Meanwhile, Ian notes how this revelation can open the system up to dismantling, & Tate makes the collapse of the Charlottesville narrative the centre of conversation as it should have been:


-In discussing a proposed return of parts of Washington D.C. carved off in the 1840's, Tim criticises Pres. James K. Polk, because "he gave back Mexico". The beanie boy thinks that the United States "could have taken large chunks of Mexico" as part of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, ending the Mexican-American War. Both Tate, & Tim, believe that the additional territory would have bolstered Confederate chances for victory, as it was geographically closer to the South, as Texas was. Putting aside the question of whether the Anglo-Protestant U.S. would desire to add a huge amount of Spanish-speaking Catholics to their nation of about 17 million, slavery was a major bone of contention between the Mexican government & American settlers in what was then Coahuila y Tejas. How eager newly conquered people would be to undoing abolition, for the benefit of a foreign elite, is up for debate:


-Nick makes the mistake of using a metaphor which Tim dislikes. So, the beanie boy has to roll out his enhanced interlocution tools to torture a metaphor for the panel:


-Discussion of recent remarks by online personalities come up. This includes denouncements of Valentina Gomez, a perennial Republican candidate whom decided to make a scene before going to the United Kingdom, leading to her travel visa being revoked. Tim says that Valentina should be more like Laura Loomer, "the best at PR" & he doesn't know "anyone whose better at getting press, & generating attention". Though the beanie boy has turned on Tucker Carlson, after his remarks about being "tormented" over supporting Trump:


-The subject of corporations comes up, & Ian refines his point by highlighting the ability for them to spend money on campaigns, just as individuals can. Tim, again, seems to misconstrue the argument, because he claims that without corporate personhood, the show could not exist. The beanie boy believes that positively talking about a candidate could be seen as an in-kind donation, & see his show penalised. Though FEC rulings on what qualifies as corporate-funded election time ads, & a Washington State Supreme Court Case made prior to Citizens United v. FEC, ruled talk show hosts could endorse candidates, ballot measures, etc., without fear. The only way IRL could be sanctioned would be if an explicit quid pro quo could be established between the speaker & the candidate, as far as I can tell. The only way Tim could run afoul of regulations, prior to Citizens United, would be if the show did not regularly produce content in that form as part of its business operation. Also the beanie boy argues that the Branch Timidian operation can only work as a corporation, not a sole proprietorship, because it is employing 40 people:


-A super-chatter brings up Zach "Asmongold" Hoyt's criticism of Mary Morgan, & Tim continues to stand by her. The beanie boy claims that people are taking it "to the extreme end of her argument", & Mary remains "right, in tendency". To him, Sleepless is being made into a scapegoat for the critics' inability to start a family:



On 23 April, Tim had Rep. Randy Fine, a notably pro-Netanyahu, pro-Israel, & anti-Palestine Republican congressman from Florida's 6th district; & Lydia Moynihan, a New York Post columnist, as the guest.

Ian, & Libby, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim brings up the high rate of first, & second, cousin marriages in Somalia. Randy says "This is the difference between a family tree & a helix", calling out how inbreeding leads to more negative traits emerging. Which is funny, because both Jews & Somalis could bond over their shared history of consanguinity.


-Tim denigrates Republicans for failing to stand up & fight. Puffing out his chest, the beanie boy declares how much better he would be, dealing with the inaction. Add this to the long list of times Tim fantasises about holding power, but never doing anything to actually take it. I can at least respect venal politicians for campaigning & risking a loss, instead of hunkering away in a remote compound impotently whinging into a microphone:


-The beanie boy explains that he is not willing to run for Congress, because his current representative, Riley Moore, is doing well. When Libby asks about running for state-level office, Tim says he sees no point. Which is funny, considering how much of a tantrum he threw over West Virginia tax laws, a ways back. & as to moving elsewhere to run for office, Tim says he is unwilling to relocate for that sole purpose. No mention is made of attempting a Senate run, which would also represent his locale at the federal level, which Tim sees as more valuable. What irks me the most is that Tim could have afforded to mount a mostly self-funded campaign for the U.S. Senate, or House, in 2024. But instead, the beanie boy chooses to spend millions of dollars making an indoor skate park for his compound. As usual, Tim refuses to actually put himself out there, just complain about it online, until someone else does the work for him:


-Randy complains that Congress is focused on helping Haitians when the U.S. is in trillions of dollars of debt. Just imagine a congressman prioritising foreigners, spending hard-earned American tax dollars on them:


-As Randy complains about the rules of the Congress, Ian decides to put his thinking cap on, asking if the kosher congressman is part of the body, he can work to change things. Randy demurs, saying he is but one of many, & has no control over the rules, but is fighting to change them:


Tim segues into talk about a ceasefire between Israel & Lebanon, where the kosher congressman says extremists are unified not in hating Israel, but despising Jews. He contends that it is foreign money driving the rise in this talk, & the Jewish State is America's greatest ally, because "we don't give Israel any money". Randy finagles this by saying the U.S. pays American weapons manufacturers to build, or ship, products to Israel. Tim chimes in to discuss people with "Israel Derangement Syndrome" (IDS), because any conversation on the topic would be incomplete without him mentioning the term he minted:


But the beanie boy does say "my libertarian friends" are citing serious issues, like West Bank settlers attacking Palestinians, which counts as legitimate criticism of Israel to him. Randy says denouncing the settlers is okay, but it shows hypocrisy & anti-semitism to not call out attacks against the Druze in Syria with the same fervour. Lydia & Randy bring up the case of an IDF soldier desecrating a Crucifix in southern Lebanon, & how Israel swiftly condemned this, replacing the cross, straight away. This is partly wrong, because it was Italian UN peacekeepers which did the replacing, though they are correct PM Benjamin Netanyahu said he would take swift action over the incident. The kosher congressman even brings up how no one cares that the Hagia Sophia was converted into a mosque in the same way people did about this crucifix, as another what-aboutism:


This rounds back to Tim denigrating prior guest, Leonarda Jonie, over her claims that Jews placed Vladimir Zelenskyy in Ukraine to gain control over it. When it goes back to West Bank settlers being a genuine point of criticism, Randy downplays it & says that Hamas are the real villains. By putting people in jeopardy, it is them, not Israel, to blame for the civilian death toll in the recent conflict. The beanie boy keeps lambasting people uneducated on the Middle East, blaming Israel for everything going on in the world. Which is backed by strawmen of the arguments made on prior shows. Tim is boggled as to why young people, across the political spectrum, care so much about Israel's actions:


Again, Ian makes an inciteful point, the U.S. gifts weapons to Israel, which are being used in the Gaza strikes, & for that people can be upset. Tim agrees that is an acceptable argument to him, but not the IDS positions. Randy says that is fine to say, but argues that because Christianity originates in the lands of Israel, the Jewish State is protecting "what it means to be Christian" by maintaining secure holy sites. Tim asks why leftists hate Israel, if it is holding a large homosexual pride event near the site of Sodom & Gomorrah. Randy credits this to them having a pathological hatred of the Jewish State:


-As Randy & Tim commiserate over people's derangement about Israel, & joke about how poorly Jews are controlling the media; Ian steps in to ask if there are Jews trying to build the Third Temple, to usher in the End Times. Randy denies that it is anyone in Israel's government pushing such a thing, but there is a minority in the Jewish State that would like to see it happen. Our Graphene Guy asks why Jews would want to usher in the return of Christ, because it means wiping out any non-believers, including unrepentant Jews. Randy deflects, saying he is not Israeli, & never went there prior to taking office, so he cannot speak for them. But the kosher congressman does say that anti-semitism is "the canary in the coalmine", & societies that embrace it fall due to "brain-rot". Which has not really been the case, if you look across history for spikes in anti-semitism & declines, eg the English post-expulsion, Spain after the Reconquista ended, etc.:

-Tim tries to get Ian to say that there is more money in being anti-Jew than pro-Jew, because there are far more Muslims in the world. Our Graphene Guy asks whom is printing the money, which is the real question. After that based remark, the beanie boy's counter is that if all 1.2 billion Muslims gave $1 it would be more than if all 16 million Jews did the same, & thinks Ian is stupid for not seeing that. Randy argues that racism & anti-semitism are perfectly useful terms, but islamophobia is bunk, used as a cudgel to suppress genuine criticism:


-Ian seems to be doing his best to ask all the funny questions, tonight. This time he asks Randy about Greater Israel, which Tim immediately jumps in to call a conspiracy theory. Despite the current U.S. ambassador to Israel endorsing such an expansion of the Jewish State. Randy claims that Israel has consistently traded territory for treaties, citing withdrawals from the Sinai peninsula & Gaza. Ian notes one theory, that removing the Jews from Gaza, & elevating Hamas, permitted aggressive action to remove all the Palestinians without risk to Jews. The kosher congressman disagrees with those assertions. Tim decides to ask his hypothetical about what would happed if the border barriers between Gaza & Israel disappeared, with the natural answer being 7 October. Ian admits that peace may have been possible before, but cannot say specifically when as he is unlearned enough about the year-by-year specifics. Randy, unsurprisingly, says that it would never have been possible, as Palestinians only want a one-state solution. Tim goes on about how ambivalent he is about Israel-Palestine, but sees the Jewish State's opponents as pushing for complete destruction. Ian tries to argue that destroying Israel does not mean killing all the Jews, but the panel rejects this. Libby & Randy both note how after Israel was created, Muslim states banished their Jewish populations, & no one cares about that:



On 24 April, Tim had James Klug, a conservative personality that does street interviews, as the guest.
Ian, & Tate the producer, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-While uncertain about Nick Fuentes, Tim believes Candace Owens is an op to draw off conspiracy-obsessed loonies from being associated with Pres. Donald Trump:


-Tim gets into a pedantic argument about how writing down laws is the "signals of a dying society". Ian, rightly, notes that establishing laws are usually seen as being foundational to having a strong society. The beanie boy proceeds to have a petulant tantrum when his co-host refuses to accept his premise. Tim decides to pivot onto saying it is the mark of a low-trust society, but does not give anyone the chance to challenge him on this alteration to his argument. Instead, the beanie boy claims Ian does not understand "macro-level stats" & is "making up fake reasons" to disagree with Tim's assertion. That being Seamus Coughlin, one of the occasional co-hosts & a practicing Catholic, has a zero percent chance of ever committing a crime. Ian says that is impossible, as there is always a chance something could happen, & there has never been a time where a society has not had to have some laws in place, but Tim says there was. He does not name that place, merely blowing past it to demean Our Graphene Guy for not simply accepting his unsubstantiated claims. The beanie boy seethes about how Ian "is too stupid to understand". In an attempt to have a gotcha, Tim argues that Ian has no fire extinguishers around, because he is so trusting. Only for Our Graphene Guy to tell Tim off about how his father was a fireman & taught him the risks, which why he understands needing a fire extinguisher in his home, & laws in society. So, rather than accept he made a bad analogy, the beanie boy changes it to being Ian having numerous fire extinguishers around his bed, out of paranoia. Naturally, Ian is confused on how Tim could flip on a dime, like that, as if it does not undermine the beanie boy's contention:


Tim claims he has facts on his side, not "fake arguments", like Ian does. His argument now is that high-trust societies do not need laws, because if someone steps out of line, "You string him up". Tate tries to offer an example, using an Icelandic tradition of leaving children outside of store, in their strollers, but there is no law specifically banning "stealing babies from in front of the grocery store". Though such a thing would be covered under general kidnapping laws, which do exist. Tim steps back in to say that in a high-trust society, outsiders committing crime are brutalised, whilst insiders would be offered warnings. His position has now transformed into how writing down laws comes about as different cultures meet, & one side has to enforce its morals, via written law, to maintain power:


Tim keeps on about how written laws, even the written Constitution, is "not a real thing". After claiming that during the early Republic, blasphemy was outlawed, & firearms had to be handed over, despite these being violations of the Bill of Rights; the beanie boy says during the Founding Fathers' day, "two Protestants walk up to each other, & go, 'I don't want to be condemned for eternity, so I'm not going to wrong you'", so laws were unnecessary. He compares this to today, where so many groups are vying to pick & choose what parts of the Constitution profit their faction. As if interpreting the Bill of Rights as only applying to the federal government is not a case of doing that. Ian agrees that excess laws are bad, but not laws, themselves. Tim persists, claiming that if everyone shared the same morals as Seamus, there is no need for laws against assault. But the beanie boy knew people that would punch him, regardless of any social compact, so that makes him right:


In the wake of another attempted assassination of Pres. Donald Trump, Tim makes sure to only elevate the most level-headed of conspiracies. Such as gawping at how a Twitter account made only one post, & the name was the same as the accused shooter:
conikidink.png
(archive)

Afterwards, the beanie boy bemoans how evil is rising, & will not stop attacking people like Charlie Kirk, & Trump, implicitly adding himself to that pair:
conikidink1.png
(archive)
 
Last edited:
Dude is still going on about Animal Farm when it has been clear that it's shit regardless of the ideology it's trying to satirize. He's now going after all the other grifters taking money to promote the film.


Does he know that Orwell was a socialist who was not only against the rise of Stalin but hated capitalism too? I mean, if anything, he's just more pissed about changing the message to an anti-capitalist slant.
 
Lemmingwiser said:
Leonarda Jonie: "Tim, stop being disingenuous"
Tim: "No!"
Click to expand...
Tim is simply a terrible debater, & cannot keep himself from either endlessly interrupting, or making unforced errors, like that.

Gregar.io said:
Dude is still going on about Animal Farm when it has been clear that it's shit regardless of the ideology it's trying to satirize. He's now going after all the other grifters taking money to promote the film.
Click to expand...
Part of it may be that Angel Studios, & the production team for Animal Farm, "cancelled" on Tim, when he challenged them to come on one of his shows to discuss the film. Tim is also gobsmacked that people in the political sphere can be bought with sponsorships.


This is a collection of clips, & social media posts, between 27 April to 1 May, of the Branch Timidians.



On 27 April, Tim had Adam Weiss, CEO of AMW PR, & Robert White, known under the troon title of Blaire, as the guests.
Ian, & Tate the producer, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-In discussing Ashley "Sexlaptop" St. Clair, Tim treats her with kid gloves, as he considers her a friend. The beanie boy gently chides her, whilst giving some agreement to her points on how group chats can coordinate messaging. Meanwhile, Robert is in catty mode, denigrating Elon's former breeder sow for even making a video implying conservatives pushing for a ballroom placed on the secure White House grounds is loony, after an assassination attempt:


Adam opens with admitting he had done business with Ashley before, but agrees the group chats are not proof of anything. The Timidian-approved troon goes on to argue that Sexlaptop is only aware of "an orgy at CPAC" because she is the type on woman to be invited to one. Robert does note that he was never invited to any such debauched event. The beanie boy says Ashley is a consequence "of what happens when you refuse to forgive people", saying that she was the target of unwarranted attacks & disinvitations, which pushed her into being anti-conservative:


-In contrast to Ashley, Tim labels Tucker Carlson "a liar, & a hypocrite" for turning on Pres. Donald Trump. The beanie boy goes so far as to label all the people turning on Trump over Israel as "liars, every single one of them". He is fine with criticism of Trump's actions, but not ignorance of Miriam Adelson openly backing Trump's campaigns. Robert notes that people seem more focused upon Israel than in the first term, which helps explain the plethora of posts on it. Tate is about to discuss how going to war in Iran is a big part of the added attention, but Tim cuts him off:


This is all so the beanie boy can accuse people of having "mass formation psychosis", & using "illegitimate criticisms" of Israel. He digs into one of the former guests of the show, Clint Russell, whom made a video on the IRL episode with Rep. Randy Fine. In summary, Tim claims he was insulting the Israel Derangement Syndrome (IDS) sufferers, not people like Clint, with his statements. Despite having a rather mild exchange about having him on the show to talk about it, the beanie boy smugly concludes that he looks forward to having Clint "be forced to agree with me, because you know I'm right". Tate comes in to note that Israel criticism has been part of the national conservative right for some time, citing Pat Buchanan as an example. The recent uptick is more driven by those chasing an anti-Zionist algorithm, per the producer. Tim regards the conspiracies blaming Israel for killing Charlie Kirk as loony, because nothing is happening to Candace Owens, a major Israel critic. Tim is unable to find someone he believes suffers IDS that can answer for this:


As his video is almost an hour long, I wanted to offer the cliff notes to Clint's response. He chose several point where Rep. Randy Fine either misrepresented things, or Tim failed to hold Randy to account. Clint asks how it is that Tim was so dogged about cutting off Ukraine, without caveats, but always deflects to the most out-there criticisms of Israel to cite. The former guest asks if Tim is attempting to secure a spot on Fox News, because Clint cannot imagine the beanie boy being so blind. But the former guest does hope to make another appearance to ask these questions of Tim, directly, despite allegedly not being invited on for some time.

-Tim is disappointed no one got his epic gamer reference to the Legend of Zelda Moblin's classic line, & goes on a tangent about how poorly translated it was:


-Tim reveals that "The Animal Farm production crew would not come to the debate, & the Angel Studios would not come to the debate, either" to discuss the film. The mind boggles as to why, after Tim has spent the last few weeks berating, & belittling, anyone whom disagrees with him:


A hypothetical went viral on Twitter, asking users if everyone was made to vote, whether they would if you press a red button, which guarantees their survival. Or would they press a blue button which requires 50%, or more, support for those choosing it, to survive. If less than 50% votes blue, those that picked it die:
hot button issue.png
(archive)

Tim declared that he would not hire anyone that chose the red button:
hot button issue 1.png
(archive)


On 28 April, Tim had Cliff Maloney, founder of PA Chase, a Pennsylvania-based ballot chasing initiative; & Joshua Lisec, a ghostwriter, as the guests. The two teamed up to compose a new book, which Ian desperately tries to learn more about, but you know how Tim has to make the conversation all about himself.

Ian, & Tate the producer, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim sees the rest of the panel as his audience, rather than people with which to converse. The beanie boy spends five minutes laying out how he witnesses viewership of political content ebb & flow, to now having creators"Erika Kirk posting, Israel posting, & now anti-Trump" to make up the shortfall. He finally yields the floor to someone else, which Ian wisely hands over to the guests, so they can speak. Cliff gets to talk for about one & a half minutes, before Tim decides to reclaim the mic:


-Ian notes that Israel forced the United States into striking Iran, by attacking amidst negotiations. The beanie boy claims that it was done in a way to protect American assets in the region from Iranian retaliation to the Jewish State's strikes. Because the U.S. was always going to war in Iran, this merely jumpstarted it. Ian, again, recalls that there is a guest present, & asks Cliff what he thinks of the Iran War impacting the midterms:


While allegedly not in the Trust-the-Plan camp, Tim argues that people whom are feigning surprise by the Iran War are "grifters & liars". The beanie boy says there have been tremendous victories at home, as well, when Joshua explains young people are dissatisfied with the focus on overseas affairs, not the economy. Tim claims that defunding USAID was tremendous, & few people recognise it. Ian lays out that people need to see tangible results to feel the impact of policy, so Tim decides to explain how there appears to be a plan, which he trusts must exist, because there is no way all this could be accidental. Mind you, last week, in the episode with Donnie Discerned, the beanie boy claimed anyone promising there was a plan in motion around Iran was selling you a bill of goods. Or listen to the week before, with Tom Renz, where Tim pushed for there being a broader plan around these actions:


-Again, how is it that Ian, the supposedly worst panelist, is the one trying to get the guests to speak. The general purpose of having a show with guests is to have them contribute, after all. Our Graphene Guy asks to know more about Cliff & Joshua's book. Tellingly, as Joshua begins talking, Tim cannot help but jump in to make a terrible joke:


-Tim claims there is going to be "a massive White identitarian movement, in the United States, that is mainstream, in the next, maybe, 5 to 10 years". When Ian, & Tate, do not agree with this prediction, the beanie boy oscillates between flatly declaring they are wrong, & qualifying his position. His evidence boils down to Nick Fuentes "gets a million views on his podcast", & Tim says the Cum Hunter is White identitarian. Though my personal take upon Nick's position is he is more anti-Israel than pro-White, based upon some of his remarks & choice of allies. Though he has a rather fluid stance, so you may find statements to the inverse, elsewhere:


Tim goes on an anti-White screed, complaining that they do not have the sense of racial primacy that his Asian ancestors did. It is almost as if there was something present in ethnically White nations which undermined that sense of identity. He declares half of White America is opposed to the other, & such a nation cannot stand for long. But any race discussion would be incomplete without Tim going back to the well of the South Side of Chicago:


-Tim divulges he was asked to recant his criticism of the new Animal Farm movie, in exchange for a sponsorship, & rejected the offer. While dinging people that may have taken the deal, such as Riley Gaines, the beanie boy also calls out people doing promotions without having actually seen the movie:



On 29 April, Tim had Alex Stein, as the guest.
Brett, & Ian, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim asks Alex if he still works with TPUSA. The comedian says he does, but support for the organisation is waning after the assassination of Charlie Kirk. However, things take a turn when Alex says that Tim claims Israel has no influence over U.S. policy, which the beanie boy takes offence to. Even if he previously argued as such, but only recently changed his tune. This lets Tim vent his spleen about how the Israel critical people drive him away with their tactics. An example given is Clint Russell, a former guest, making a video "with a picture of me in the thumbnail, yelling at the camera", allegedly lying about Tim's positions. Having watched it, I did not get that impression. Tim claims that "normies" from the poker tables came away from the episode with Rep. Randy Fine thinking it was the Israel critics being the crazy ones. Meanwhile, when Alex brings up how Laura Loomer & Mark Levin do the same from the other end, the beanie boy says Laura is not as bad, because she is "pro-Trump" more than pro-Israel:


-The comedian thinks that due to the number of Muslims around the world, there is unlikely to be audience loss from people posting anti-Israel content, because it is overseas & unaffected by election cycles. Tim says that with the start of U.S. primaries, that shall change. He makes note of how much Michael Bloomberg spent on ads, alone, & how the Timcast channels were inundated with them, despite being critical of his run. Tim's argument was that it got Michael's message out to an audience not hearing his stances on issues. So, Alex decides to mention how ads for Ben Shapiro have been appearing on Tucker Carlson's videos, implying something similar is going on, but naturally Tim thinks that is impossible:


After saying the comedian does not understand how ad placement works, Tim digs in on how ineffective it is to spend advertising money on a non-receptive audience. Alex retorts how the Ellisons are buying stakes in platforms known for their anti-Israel bias, & placing pro-zionist figures in editorial control of others, regardless of cost. Alex goes into the price of being anti-Israel, noting the change between a more permissive comedy environment where ribbing of the chosen people could be done, to now facing labels of anti-semitism for the same bits. Tim pivots to Myron Gaines doing an offensive stereotype of a Jew turning off average people. One of Clint's big criticisms of Tim, from his response video, is that the beanie boy uses the most unpleasant anti-Israel people as a foil:


-Alex appears nervous when confronting Tim about the rise in anti-Israel sentiment amongst young people, & that the beanie boy's assertion that it is astro-turfed is off the mark. Tim interrupts Ian mentioning concerns about funding the Jewish State's war machine, to keep repeating how Alex is wrong. After some time, the comedian pivots to talk about Erika Kirk being an organic point of discussion, not artificial, but Tim is not having it:


Tim reiterates several times how Erika "is not passing laws" & has no influence, despite being the leader of TPUSA. A point the beanie boy keeps going over is how it is not Erika making content, but people making it about her. Then talk of Candace Owens accusing Erika of murdering Charlie Kirk arises. Alex, again, seems hesitant to set Tim off, but the beanie boy refuses to indulge in any of the nutty negress' explanations or excuses the comedian mentions, however tacitly:


-A super-chatter makes a joke about future Martian colonists claiming Earth, because it was promised to them "2,000 years ago", presumably referencing Jews's arguments about Abraham's covenant with God. But Tim either fails to catch this, or intentionally misconstrues this into talk about Native American-stand ins from Futurama:



On 30 April, Tim had Theo Wold, former Solicitor General of Idaho, as the guest.
Elaad, & Ian, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim complains how Thomas Sowell-loving blacks are lumped in the same district as "a communist", solely based upon their race. Though the plethora of based blacks appearing on IRL are more the exception to the rule when it comes to that race voting conservative. Ian mixes up blockbusting, & redlining, which Tim corrects in a non-condescending way, which was nice to see. But for some reason, the beanie boy decides that he needs to hair-split over Our Graphene Guy using "location" as the driver of how to shape districts. Instead it is "economics, it is economic standing, it is industry", which could be combined under a catch-all of location:


-Tim elevated the Democrats are the real racists accusation to a new level. He alleges that Graham Platner, the candidate for Maine's U.S. Senate seat, is secretly a Nazi, & is running for that party due to alignment with the Democrats' position on POC-only spaces, being anti-Jew, etc., because they are the real Nazis. Ian does make Tim clarify that being anti-Israel is not anti-Jew, which sees the beanie boy say how all that was actually "being facetious":


On 1 May, Tim had Tyler O'Neil, senior editor at The Daily Signal; & Olivia Dasovic, whom manages the Branch Timidian Discord, as the guests.
Ian, & Tate the producer, were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tyler is discussing an ongoing lawsuit with the SPLC, & the troubles with pinning them down. So, naturally, Tim changes the subject to talk about Pres. Donald Trump planning a new bunker under the White House. Ian mishears the acronym for the bunker as "POC", but is pleased when that is not the case. Inadvertently based Ian is best Ian:


-One more reason Tim is upset at Angel Studios & Animal Farm, is the usage of the phrase "sound of freedom", the title of another film produced by the company & the beanie boy fundraised for, as a punchline for a fart joke. He proceeds to pick apart a response video made by the studio, & alleges that children will be inculcated with anti-capitalist ideas because parents were hornswoggled by the advertising:


Then, Tim leaps to thinking Angel Studios, itself, was some form of op & he was deceived into supporting it. Ian tries to separate remarks by the film's director Andy Serkis, & the intentions of Angel Studios, noting they may not have seen it. But the beanie boy just keeps interrupting, shouting "He said it like seven times!". Ultimately, Ian considers that the advertising efforts may have been due to contractual obligations, & Angel Studios is trying to salvage what they can. Tyler & Tim go over many of the missing elements, & changes in the movie:


Again, Tim circles back to accusing Sound of Freedom being an op organised to help Angel Studios get funding & notoriety to make films like Animal Farm. Then, the beanie boy claims "We are the only real company that exists in this space", because others are getting paid "$50,000 per post" to promote certain things, which Tim claims he does not do. The beanie boy is shocked that people in the political space, & social media, are up for sale:
 
“We don’t need to rewrite one of the few stories criticizing communism into an attack on capitalism.” This just confirms my point that Tim only cares about the message of Animal Farm than the quality of the film as a whole. As for the marketing, I'd say that Angel knows the movie is bad, and they're just leaning into a style in which Napoleon would market the film. Hell, Angel has a joke donation page from a QR code titled "Never Do This Again!" when asked about their "farming".

They've been pretty much ragebaiting Tim into talking about the film and signaling to producers that they're no longer a "conservative" distribution studio. Anyone who doesn't understand that the movie is shit regardless of the message and that Angel knows this is being obtuse.
 
TrainWreckWatcher said:
Blue button really proves how letting everyone vote is a mistake and also proves what a midwit Tim is.
Click to expand...

The funniest part of it is it illustrates how out of touch he is with his own audience and political side. They overwhelmingly went with Red.

However, in his variant where everyone could risk themselves towards some actual meaningful accomplishment rather than risking themselves for the people that decided to put themselves in danger, they are willing to take the risk then.

Yeah, having cheap energy forever that could let us solve more problems and progress humanity? Most people would see that as reasonable thing to risk their lives on. Saving idiots from themselves? Not a convincing motivator to people who believe in individual accountability.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom