To be a leftist, is reality a threat to them?

Is this Wraith's worst thread yet?


  • Total voters
    48

Wraith

Made pure again from the hardest game on earth.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 5, 2017
Good ol' Wraith needs your help again. Something occurred to me and it's bothering me. Check out this old 4chan post:
1547934491854.jpg


Yeah this is an old picture, but this has been bothering me. When you look at various issues, the left acts a lot like these fatties.

Trannies want to be trannies, they attack you if you bring up DNA, bone structure, hormones and reality.
Socialists want to bring that to the US. You bring up the over 100 million dead and billions that did and currently live in terror and slavery to socialist / communist governments, and they attack history.
Bring up crime statistics, same thing.
Bring up who primarily owned slaves in the US and had a huge hand in the slave trade, especial the white slave trade and (((some people))) lose their collective schizo minds.
Bring up stats on the reality of gun violence being about character and suicides, and anti-gun nuts crap themselves.
Bring up stats on the sexual degeneracy / open-minded bitch parade and their history of horrific behavior like child abuse and such, and they ignore it and attack you.
Bring up how it was proven Trump didn't collude with Russia but dear ol' Hil-dawg did, and they ignore it and scream.

Just about every issue you can think of, you go through immeasurable work to prove their claims and accusations are false, and they try to shut you down. So it dawned on me about Google, Wikipedia, Getty images, Facebook, Twitter and the like banning people and posts under false headings of hate and the like. Is this some sort of mass delusion, some self-created schizophrenia based on the desire in many cases to plainly get away with bad behavior, sin, evil, in some points pure stupidity?
There is nothing about the left that allows for freedom of thought or expression or even the research that there might be conflicting evidence to what they want and want to accomplish.
I just remembered that Larry Summers guy, I think he worked for a university. He wrote a paper I think and he referenced how he tried to give his little daughter boy's toys like trucks and she immediately started playing with them like a girl plays house with dolls, and the left tried to crucify him. Every single issue it's the same thing, be it science, religion, morality, history, human experience, anything that keeps them from living in their dream world, they have a literal conniption fit and try to shut it down.

My parallel is actually Chris in this. What is going to happen when his mom dies, and all hell breaks loose for him? All that delusion about combining a make believe dimension with a real one- he's going to end up in a straight jacket.

TL;DR: Like the picture above, are the left so far gone that literal reality is a threat to them, so that's why they smash and burn?

Fat Google and such angry at the facts.jpg


If I'm too wordy about this or whatever you'll let me know. It's just the connection kind of shook me tonight. Liberals (trannies, tech companies, people with TDS, etc.) are angry fat chicks smashing their Rock Band guitar on the fundamental aspects of reality itself. They want to live in their fantasy world so bad it's too late for them.
Maybe someone can say this better, but I'm just shooting at the hip. Any thoughts?
 
Look, I get what you’re saying OP, because there are people that deny facts and statistics. There are also people that twist those two for nefarious purposes. If you bring up the facts, and if they scream and ignore the facts, ignore them, don’t talk to them. They’re not your problem. You can also just relax, because most people aren’t as insane as the Far Right or the Far Left.

TL;DR: Don’t talk politics, and get out and get a damn hobby, man.
 
The first and simplest stage in the discipline, which can be taught even to young children, is called, in Newspeak, crimestop. Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.

Good luck with your book report OP.
 
I feel you OP, I actually have observed this myself. It's amazing how badly people react when their worldview is challenged. I'm just trying to redpill people on crime statistics + the JQ, but people in public actually get violent with me and threaten to call the cops.

In all seriousness though OP your post was dumb.
 
Cognitive dissonance and reality denial in general happen all over the political spectrum. I mean fuck just look at ancaps and their entire ideology.

That said the reason it seems like it's a uniquely leftist thing at the moment is they're currently at the helm of society. As @CheezzyMach pointed out, back during the heyday of the "Moral Majority" the same ol' shit was going on on the right, if you want a good comparison Anita Sarkeesian is basically a bizarro Jack Thompson.
 
Your observation is correct, but I think is incomplete. It isn't that they hate reality because they're left wing, but they're left wing because they hate reality.
To expand - reality can be viewed as an evaluation engine. For every input (action) there is a consequence.
Consequences can be negative or positive.
Since reality is consistent, similar actions will yield similar consequences.
i.e. there is a category of actiong which can be recognized to yield better results than another category.
Once you recognize such a pattern regarding a category, you can model it as a judgement, or evaluation, of the entire category.
Hence, you can colloquially say "reality judges this action to be less meritotious than that action" maybe that's the original abstraction from which god was derived
Now, although they're quite disgusting, take a good look at the left. Look beyond all the words and at what they're aiming at:
The removal of judgement, the dissolution of categories, arbitrary predation. Anything which invalidates the judgement property of reality, either at the results stage (judgement) or analysis stage (categories, equality). If they can't do either they will try to engineer reality so you can't take any action to change it in a meritorious fashion (gun control).
They hate reality, because they hate judgement. They hate that reality evaluates them by way of their actions producing lesser results than their neighbors. They resent reality and want to tear down anything about it, anything which makes thinking about it possible. That is why the left exists.
 
It isn't that they hate reality because they're left wing, but they're left wing because they hate reality.

This. I would add that violent people tend to gravitate leftward because the ideology allows them to be what they already naturally are. If violence became a part of the right's way of doing things, and that violence was as openly permitted as leftist violence is, a lot of them would switch sides. Some people just love forcing themselves on unwilling people.
 
This. I would add that violent people tend to gravitate leftward because the ideology allows them to be what they already naturally are. If violence became a part of the right's way of doing things, and that violence was as openly permitted as leftist violence is, a lot of them would switch sides. Some people just love forcing themselves on unwilling people.
I don't think we'll ever see violent people go towards the right as violence to the right is always used in a justified and codified manner. Always sticking to rules on engagement, not kicking an enemy when they're down, that sort of thing. Not something a violent person would enjoy. The only possibility in which I see the right abandoning their principles regarding violence is dealing with thee very people.
The right has no reason to permit violence because they want to live in a civil society, not lord it over others.
 
Back