You been saying that same shit for 18 months now.... And yet your public defender in all that time hasn't filed a single motion to dismiss, just endless delays. If what you saying is true, a real defense lawyer would have filed that 18 months ago in the court and with a federal injunction and you wouldn't have to keep worrying.... But NO!!!!!
So either......
1. Your public defender thinks you're full of shit or....
2. She enjoys you having emotional breakdowns all the time over the case...so delays in purpose
So which is it Toad??? The endless delays by her are really funny
And I still like his FBI told him they didn't find TOR on his computer story in April 2018 after he was released. He just makes up shit on purpose to get attention.
Todd
I told you before that Judge Spears and I go elsewhere to eat at Golden Corral to laugh about your case. Get your pasty ass prepped to be spanked cherry red
Todd
I told you before that Judge Spears and I go elsewhere to eat at Golden Corral to laugh about your case. Get your pasty ass prepped to be spanked cherry red
First off there is no golden corral, the closes golden corral is 30 miles, why go that far when there are plenty of restaurants in this town to eat out. I don't give a shit about you or some retired judges opinion.
It's also a short drive to Golden Corral from Taylorville.
Judge Spears is an honorary nimbuster for sentencing him to the max fine when he was convicted in 2010 and then declared that he violated his probation in 2012. Daugherty also likes to get violently angry when he's alone with women. The female though had no problems restraining him physically. He's a nice guy who now runs a consulting and arbitration business.
02/27/2012
DEFT, SA. PD APPOINTED SUBJECT TO REIMBURSEMENT. CCPD ADVISES DEFT BECAME PHYSICALLY VIOLENT AND HAD TO BE RESTRAINED. DEFT ADMONISHED. PD APPOINTED 3/23/12 @ 10 A.M.
You see homosexuality in everything now even asking begging for KiwiFarmers to suck your dick. If you had simply stuck with your homosexuality urges, you wouldn't be in the trouble you are now.
Again, not go happen, they went through those computers without a valid search warrant, which means this case is going dismissed. In April of 2018 the state filed a motion to dismiss and on page 2 of that motion it state "Any warrants or summons previously issued are hereby quashed"
Sorry to break it little manlet but they won't throw a child porn case out on a technicality, Your fat ass is going to prison and you'll likely die there.
by child porn you're referring to the ONE image they found of a naked girl standing with her arms spread out holding a blanket.
I suggest you read People of the State of Illinois v Drew W Barger (Illinois Court of Appeals 2020). In Illinois a child nude is not necessary child pornography. There has to be more there than her being just nude to make it child porn, according to Illinois court of appeals, and later upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court. either way case is done.
by child porn you're referring to the ONE image they found of a naked girl standing with her arms spread out holding a blanket.
I suggest you read People of the State of Illinois v Drew W Barger (Illinois Court of Appeals 2020). In Illinois a child nude is not necessary child pornography. There has to be more there than her being just nude to make it child porn, according to Illinois court of appeals, and later upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court. either way case is done.
An ONE image I might add that I do know where it came from. I have not seen the image. The information I have is what I was told in court as far as the description of the image.
Which the FBI, State Police, and District Attorney all said was child porn and the judge TWICE declared it was probable cause.
For someone who claims to have never saw the image, you sure are an expert on what it contained.
BTW - Berger died before the case made it's way through the court, that's why it was dismissed.. And he died from a mysterious car crash where he was talking to the police while on the street walking... Just a clue what your future might hold if the locals think you got off on a technicality.
BECAUSE THEY TOLD ME WHAT IT IS....THEY ARE REQUIRED BY FUCKING LAW ASSHOLE!!
BTW - Berger died before the case made it's way through the court, that's why it was dismissed.. And he died from a mysterious car crash where he was talking to the police while on the street walking... Just a clue what your future might hold if the locals think you got off on a technicality.
NO, HE DIDN'T HE DIED AFTER DUMBASS, TWO YEARS LATER. The Case was in 2020 he died in 2022 from a person in a car with a DUI. nowhere in that case does it state that the case was dismissed because of a technicality. better read the case again JACKASS!
The state was appealing that decision when he died. Thus automatically acquits him and stops the state from appealing. Plus I keep telling you, court rulings are not absolute (see Roe v Wade as an example).
But boy, how many times do you keep describing that child porn you are charged with, like it sexually turns you on to describe it in detail.....
The prosecution isn't going to describe the child porn in detail to you get sexually aroused in court, they only presented enough evidence to get probable cause, something TWO different judges have agreed on a year apart.
09/14/2022
SA PROFFERS; PC FOUND; WARRANT $250,000 10% TOA.
09/21/2023
SA MCWARD PRESENT; DEFENDANT WITH ATTY SENGER; DEFENDANT HAS MOTION
TO COMPEL ON FILE; COURT ORDERS STATE TO ATTEMPT EFFORTS TO FIND DEFENDANT'S FEDERAL FILE AS REQUESTED BY DEFENDANT; MOTION TO COMPEL RESET FOR HEARING ON OCTOBER 5, 2023 AT 8:30 A.M.; AS TO ISSUES OF PT RELEASE CONDITIONS, COURT HEARS "PROBABLE CAUSE" STATEMENT FROM STATE REGARDING BACKGROUND OF CASE; COURT DENIES DEFENSE REQUEST TO MODIFY PT CONDITIONS ORDER.
WRONG The state did appeal it to the Illinois Supreme Court and agreed with the appeals court. In Illinois child porn the child has to be under the age 18 engaged in a sexual act or the image or video must be LEWD. it's even its law. Your making shit up, you are a fucking liar. I do know what the image is because officer Dorwart testified in court what the image was. Again, you are getting that information off of a commercial website, that isn't giving you all the details.
The judge has not looked at the affidavit for the warrant nor the warrant itself. The Judge is agreeing based on what the state as had told him, and the state is wrong.
by child porn you're referring to the ONE image they found of a naked girl standing with her arms spread out holding a blanket.
I suggest you read People of the State of Illinois v Drew W Barger (Illinois Court of Appeals 2020). In Illinois a child nude is not necessary child pornography. There has to be more there than her being just nude to make it child porn, according to Illinois court of appeals, and later upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court. either way case is done.
You had child porn on your computer you sick little shit. You don't even deny it. Prison will make you sorry, little man.
You're going to go "whoooosh" when you fart Toad.
WRONG The state did appeal it to the Illinois Supreme Court and agreed with the appeals court. I do know what the image is because officer Dorwart testified in court what the image was. Again, you are getting that information off of a commercial website, that isn't giving you all the details.
The Judge is agreeing based on what the state as had told him, and the state is wrong.
Nope. Never got heard by the Illinois Supreme Court, just a low level appeals court where the ruling was 2-1. The state was appealing that decision but Barger died which nullifies the case in Barger's favor. So yes, if you appeal and kill yourself, you'll win the appeal automatically. But his case has nothing to do with yours because yours is actual real child pornography, with a victim they know the identity of. A jury will believe the FBI and State expert witnesses and your lawyer knows it.
N9OGL said:
I do know what the image is because officer Dorwart testified in court what the image was
So you say but you're a proven liar over and over here. Show actual proof that is exactly what he said. You got the discovery. Share it. I notice you didn't deny being sexually aroused by talking about the details.
N9OGL said:
The judge has not looked at the affidavit for the warrant nor the warrant itself.
You been saying that same shit for 18 months now.... And yet your public defender in all that time hasn't filed a single motion to dismiss, just endless delays. If what you saying is true, a real defense lawyer would have filed that 18 months ago in the court and with a federal injunction and you wouldn't have to keep worrying.... But NO!!!!!
So either......
1. Your public defender thinks you're full of shit or....
2. She enjoys you having emotional breakdowns all the time over the case...so delays in purpose
The PD has other cases to go through first. It's one of the reasons why they also delay shit. His case isn't important and they know he'll lose it. They certainly aren't doing it to get more evidence because it's all been provided. They don't need any more witnesses. His PD is being nice and giving Todd time to spend with his family before he's locked up for a few years. Instead he's repaying that kindness by "digging his own grave" so to speak.
