Here is him in all his illiterate glory writing out his lawsuit that he is going to file for false arrest.
https://archive.li/ngXi0 - archive
Pursuant to 42 USC 1983 Plaintiff is seeking injunction relief against Defendants, who continue to violate Plaintiff constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment.
1. History
Prior 2010 Plaintiff had never been in trouble with the law. In fact Plaintiff had been an outstanding citizen. The only fracture Plaintiff ever had with law enforcement, was a speeding ticket of doing 36 in a 30 zone. On March 17 2018 on the website Hate and Flame someone pretending to be Plaintiff posted a threat against the local school. On Saturday morning the FBI hand delivered the threat to the local police and that afternoon Plaintiff was arrest. The police when they arrived at Plaintiff house told plaintiff he was being arrest for something he posted on his website. Plaintiff does not own the website Hate and Flame, nor does plaintiff post on that site. The only connect between plaintiff and that website was in 2016 when Plaintiff sent a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notice to the owner when someone on that site posted one of plaintiff's works on there without his permission in violation of US Copyright law.
The police took plaintiff to the police station where they interrogated him regarding the threat. Plaintiff informed the police that 1. he doesn't own that site 2. that the site requires no login and that anyone can pretend to be anyone, Plaintiff even told the officer that he (plaintiff) can get on that site post a threat as the officer and as far anyone is concern, he posted the threat. The officer stated he would posted there which plaintiff replied well neither do I. The police charged plaintiff with making a terrorist threat against a school based on the fact that post was a threat and the post had plaintiff name. Plaintiff's IP address was not on that post and police didn't investigate plaintiff claim that anyone can post on that site as anyone because of lack of login. Plaintiff was in jail for a month.
This is not the first time plaintiff was arrested, in 2015 plaintiff was arrested after someone complained to the police that plaintiff threatened the chief of police. The threat was a lawsuit under 42 USC 1983. In 2010 plaintiff was arrested after threatening the local telephone company, after one of their employees email plaintiff twice, the first email was a threat to “cut off he testicle and watch him bleed to death” the second was with a lawsuit. When plaintiff told his lawyer Scott Sabin that he received the email with the threat, his lawyer told plaintiff that it would cost plaintiff hundreds of thousands of dollars to prove that the person from the telephone company sent the email. But apparently all the police has to do is see a person name on a threat on a website that require no login and throw someone in jail for a month. Plaintiff believe or was at least taught that the law should apply equally to all, but apparently in Taylorville Illinois that is not the case.
When plaintiff was in jail individuals began posting on the web again pretending to be plaintiff making more threats, this while plaintiff was in jail with no internet access. Proven what plaintiff told the judge, that Plaintiff was being setup. Plaintiff has also repeatedly stated that none of this would of happened if the police would of let him file a complaint back in the early 2000's Plaintiff went to the police in 2006 – 2007 to file a complaint and tell the police that this was going to happened. The police chief at the time told Plaintiff that they couldn't talk to him and to leave and never come back in violation of Plaintiff 14th amendment right of equal protection of the law.
Plaintiff is seeking a injunction relief against the police and state. This relief is needed because the police continue to not allowing plaintiff to file any complaints in violation of plaintiff 14th amendment right. Plaintiff can also show that this is still going on. The individuals on the internet are going to continue to try to get the plaintiff arrested on frivolous claims and the police will continue to entertain these individuals. The police still believe that plaintiff made the threat, regardless that all evidence has pointed otherwise. In fact the Police chief stated to the news that “once those computer (plaintiff's computers) have been analyzed it will come clear on who posted that threat” Plaintiff reputation within the community has been ruin, In fact Plaintiff is unable to get a job and has been suffering on and off depression, as well as nightmares because of these events. Plaintiff's friends and even some family member do want anything to do with him because of this. Plaintiff is constantly worried that the police will once again arrest him on trump up charges Plaintiff can also show that the individuals who are getting plaintiff arrest are doing so the stifle plaintiff free speech. In 2012 Plaintiff Amateur radio license went up for renewal and was hold for seven year because these same individuals went to the FCC claiming that plaintiff 2010 charge was a felony, when in fact it was a Class B misdemeanor. The FCC can revoke licenses if the licensee has a felony conviction. Plaintiff believes that these individuals will go to the FCC in 2021 and claim that plaintiff has a felony conviction over this “terrorist” charge although it was dismissed. Plaintiff wants the charges removed so these individuals can not do that. The state court gave the state time to continue the investigation, it has been three years and nothing has shown that the plaintiff made the threat. Plaintiff wants his computer equipment returned, inducing a laptop that was taken and doesn't even belong to plaintiff.
