🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

[N9OGL]

For someone who says ham radio is a hobbv and shouldn't be taken seriously, you sure were taking it seriously with your mental breakdown. Or is this your normal behavior?

5'4 manlet N9OGL Todd Daugherty of Taylorville, Illinois has mental breakdown on ham radio

Mugshot obtained from Christian County Illinois from his arrest in 2015 for threatening to kill his police chief. This is the infamous N9OGL Todd Daugherty o...

www.youtube.com

And you never sent any classified information nor relaying anything on the MARS net. K4YZ, a real marine with a real pilots license, proved that. Because it would be a security risk, all someone would have to do is change a few letters around to espionage the message. You never held any security clearances at all, all you did is get membership into MARS, something any ham radio operator can do. And Toad, since callsigns are used on MARS net, do you think they would be receiving classified messages using their HAM RADIO CALL SIGN, so that everyone can know exactly who is receiving the message? Toad, you really need to stop the lying. didn't use our ham callsign

For someone who says ham radio is a hobbv and shouldn't be taken seriously, you sure were taking it seriously with your mental breakdown. Or is this your normal behavior?

5'4 manlet N9OGL Todd Daugherty of Taylorville, Illinois has mental breakdown on ham radio

Mugshot obtained from Christian County Illinois from his arrest in 2015 for threatening to kill his police chief. This is the infamous N9OGL Todd Daugherty o...

www.youtube.com

And you never sent any classified information nor relaying anything on the MARS net. K4YZ, a real marine with a real pilots license, proved that. Because it would be a security risk, all someone would have to do is change a few letters around to espionage the message. You never held any security clearances at all, all you did is get membership into MARS, something any ham radio operator can do. And Toad, since callsigns are used on MARS net, do you think they would be receiving classified messages using their HAM RADIO CALL SIGN, so that everyone can know exactly who is receiving the message? Toad, you really need to stop the lying.

I didn't use my ham callsign, I had a military callsign. As for K4YZ he's dead I'm not

Again, as long as hams aren't interfering with radio communications outside their band the FCC doesn't give a crap what hams do in their band. What I wonder is why some anonymous jackass on the internet named "Todd_is_Autistic" is so concerned over a radio transmission that happened 14 years ago.

 

[Dirty Harry]

Yet you got two warning letters from the FCC for just doing such things. Both are here

http://www.ve7kfm.com/n9ogl.html

But you haven't been on HF in over ten years, your parents made you remove your HF equipment 10 years ago and as you have proven, your parents are your legal guardians while you are 52 years of age or they wouldn't have been able to do this..

I mean seriously, you are 52 years of age, still live with your parents, AND YOUR PARENTS STILL CONTROL WHAT YOU CAN DO????

 

[N9OGL]

Wrong, I've been on the HF a number of times. Do you know how many frequencies there are on the amateur HF bands? Because apparently you don't. Just because I'm not on the frequencies, YOU and your friends cause chaos on doesn't mean I'm not on the ham bands. The only thing that was "removed" was my antenna because we torn down our garage, I'm planning to put it back up as soon as the weather gets nice, right now it's been raining. As for flying, they didn't stop me, I can still fly. They did stop me buying a trike from Australia because they are still a little new to buying stuff online especially over seas. I, on the other hand buy stuff from all the seas all the time, including China. It's cheaper to buy stuff over seas then it is here in the US.

One finally thing, as for those warning letters from the FCC; Riley Hollingsworth doesn't know shit when it comes to Part 15. According to him the field strength on 13.556 was suppose to be 30 uV (microvolts) per meter at 3 meters, when it's actually 15,848 uV per meter at a distance of 30 meters. For those on here, that more then what a walkie - talkie on 49 MHz, put out. 49 MHz. walkie - talkies put out 10,000 uV per meters at 3 meters (or 1/4 of watt) Finally Riley was going after me for posting my name as Todd O'Dochartaigh on the internet. Tell me when did the FCC begin regulating the internet and tell people how they should post their name, because if that the case then this site is in violation of the FCC policies. The fact is the FCC does not regulate the internet and Riley Hollingsworth of the FCC exceeded his authority.

 

[Spasticus Autisticus]

As for my "rant" on the ham band; Ham radio is a hobby and shouldn't be taken to seriously. Unless your causing malicious interference to another radio service, the FCC don't give a shit what you do on the ham bands. Ham radio is not a broadcast service so all those rules like obscenity and indecent language that broadcaster have to follow we don't.

Incorrect. From FCC §97.113:

(a) No amateur station shall transmit:
...
(4) Music using a phone emission except as specifically provided elsewhere in this section; communications intended to facilitate a criminal act; messages encoded for the purpose of obscuring their meaning, except as otherwise provided herein; obscene or indecent words or language; or false or deceptive messages, signals or identification.

The FCC has taken enforcement actions against hams violating this policy.

 

[N9OGL]

The FCC has fined people, but if it was to go court it probably be thrown out; simply put the FCC rules regarding 97.113 has never been challenged. The rules are overbroad and would pass the "constitutional muster" 97.113 states amateurs aren't allowed to broadcast, however under 97.111(b)(6) states

"(b) In addition to one-way transmissions specifically authorized elsewhere in this part, an amateur station may transmit the following types of one-way communications:

(6) Transmissions necessary to disseminate information bulletins.

an information bulletin is define in Part 97.3(a)(26)

"(26) Information bulletin. A message directed only to amateur operators consisting solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service."

on the FCC website:
https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau...dio-service/amateur-communications-operations

it states "The term is defined in Section 97.3(b). It is a message directed only to amateur operators and consists solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service. The control operator of the station transmitting an information bulletin is responsible for determining that the subject matter is of direct interest to the amateur service."

So what I was doing on the ham bands with my bulletin was legal. The difference between a information bulletin and a broadcast is a information bulletin is directed to hams, while a broadcast is directed to the general public.

there is also this: 47 USC 326 (Section 326 of the communication act of 1934 as amended)

Section 326 (47 USC 326) states

"Nothing in this chapter shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of censorship over the radio communications or signals transmitted by any radio station, and no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of radio communication."

Sorry they wouldn't pass the "constitutional muster"

Free Speech does apply to radio, including ham radio. Hams have more free speech then broadcasters, simply because they (broadcaster) have limited band space while hams have a lot more space, and that's due to the part that broadcast stations are coordinated to a frequency, while hams aren't. broadcasts have to run 24/7 a day 365 days a year, hams do not. So our free speech is greater then theirs

 

[Dirty Harry]

Toad when caught lying, always goes "they have never been challenged in courts" argument. Well Toad, go challenge it in court and get it overturned but until then, it's the rule and regulation. Of course, Toad has threatened 100s of lawsuits, including one against KiwiFarms, but never has filed a single one yet.

And Toad is lying, the courts have heard it, your own friend Billy Crowell W6WBJ challenged it in court and lost. Glenn Baxter challenged it in court and lost. And dozens of others.

And you don't have "more" free speech rights. You can't broadcast on ham radio for example, something which you were caught doing by your own admission. Toad is just making up more stuff again. Toad, tell us again how many times the FCC turned you down for a broadcast license waiver?? Eight times was it???

 

[Spasticus Autisticus]

Free Speech does apply to radio, including ham radio. Hams have more free speech then broadcasters, simply because they (broadcaster) have limited band space while hams have a lot more space, and that's due to the part that broadcast stations are coordinated to a frequency, while hams aren't. broadcasts have to run 24/7 a day 365 days a year, hams do not. So our free speech is greater then theirs

Obscenity is not protected speech, the FCC does have the ability to restrict obscene and indecent material on radio frequencies and this has all been upheld by the courts, even if the exact definitions of obscenity and indecency are vague. Just because the specific clause of Part 97 hasn't been adjudicated on doesn't mean it's not a priori valid. I would argue that amateur radio deserves as much regulation, if not even more so than broadcast radio, for the following reasons:

• The FCC does not require a license to receive transmissions on the amateur radio bands. Unlicensed people, including minors, can and do monitor the ham bands.
• There is no minimum age requirement to receive an amateur radio operator license. Minors can and do get licensed and transmit on ham bands.
• The HF bands can propagate worldwide, and with interlinked networks like IRLP, Allstar, Echolink, and the various digital radio networks, even VHF+ have potentially worldwide reach. For the simple reason of maintaining international goodwill, which is expressly stated as a purpose for the amateur radio service, the FCC has an interest in limiting obscenity.
• Allowing obscene and indecent communication does not fit with the purpose of the amateur radio service, and even inhibits it. Why would you get a ticket or encourage others to get one if the bands are filled with basement-dwelling manchildren calling everyone cunts and faggots? It's already hard enough to encourage people to get into the hobby with all the OMs acting as repeater cops and bitching about their health problems.

 

[Dirty Harry]

Sorry they wouldn't pass the "constitutional muster"

Well Autistic Boy, go file a lawsuit. Which again as I have stated, you have never done. You're not a lawyer. Even a real lawyer in Billy Crowell, lost his case against the FCC.

Obscenity is not protected speech, the FCC does have the ability to restrict obscene and indecent material on radio frequencies and this has all been upheld by the courts, even if the exact definitions of obscenity and indecency are vague

Exactly. But the one thing the Autistic Toad said that was right, the FCC doesn't give a shit about profane language on amateur radio. They got more things prioritized like fining pirate radio stations in major markets on FM.

And forgot about this, Toad just yesterday taunted his local police again. And he wonders why he gets visits from them.

 

[N9OGL]

Obscenity is not protected speech, the FCC does have the ability to restrict obscene and indecent material on radio frequencies and this has all been upheld by the courts, even if the exact definitions of obscenity and indecency are vague. Just because the specific clause of Part 97 hasn't been adjudicated on doesn't mean it's not a priori valid. I would argue that amateur radio deserves as much regulation, if not even more so than broadcast radio, for the following reasons:

• The FCC does not require a license to receive transmissions on the amateur radio bands. Unlicensed people, including minors, can and do monitor the ham bands.
• There is no minimum age requirement to receive an amateur radio operator license. Minors can and do get licensed and transmit on ham bands.
• The HF bands can propagate worlwide, and with interlinked networks like IRLP, Allstar, Echolink, and the various digital radio networks, even VHF+ have potentially worldwide reach. For the simple reason of maintaining international goodwill, which is expressly stated as a purpose for the amateur radio service, the FCC has an interest in limiting obscenity.
• Allowing obscene and indecent communication does not fit with the purpose of the amateur radio service, and even inhibits it. Why would you get a ticket or encourage others to get one if the bands are filled with basement-dwelling manchildren calling everyone cunts and faggots? It's already hard enough to encourage people to get into the hobby with all the OMs acting as repeater cops and bitching about their health problems.

Obscenity is a very limited unprotected speech, For something to be obscene it must fail all three prongs of the Miller Test those three prongs are:

(1) whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ appeals to ‘prurient interest’
(2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law.
(3) whether the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The speech must be all three to be deemed obscene. meaning only hardcore pornography is obscene.
As for indecent language that the one that is vague and has yet to be readdress by the US Supreme Court.

• "The FCC does not require a license to receive transmissions on the amateur radio bands. Unlicensed people, including minors, can and do monitor the ham bands."

The problem with that is amateur's aren't "Broadcasting" are transmissions are person to person communication like a cell phone. I would also like to point out the sales of scanner and Shortwave radio receivers has actually gone down in years, in fact Shortwave broadcasters themselves has seen their listenership gone down and lot and Shortwave broadcast radio is hurting thinks to FM / satellite and internet broadcasting. Secondly minors only make 1% of the amateur / listener viewership so claiming minors can listen doesn't hold water. for a minor to listen they have to have a radio to receive those frequencies like a scanner and Shortwave radio and again as I stated above sales for those has gone down over the years. The courts have actually point out the fact that minors only make up 1%. so again that claim doesn't hold water.

"The HF bands can propagate worlwide, and with interlinked networks like IRLP, Allstar, Echolink, and the various digital radio networks, even VHF+ have potentially worldwide reach. For the simple reason of maintaining international goodwill, which is expressly stated as a purpose for the amateur radio service, the FCC has an interest in limiting obscenity."

Again obscenity is based on the miller test and unless it's hardcore porn it's not obscene.

"Allowing obscene and indecent communication does not fit with the purpose of the amateur radio service, and even inhibits it. Why would you get a ticket or encourage others to get one if the bands are filled with basement-dwelling manchildren calling everyone cunts and faggots? It's already hard enough to encourage people to get into the hobby with all the OMs acting as repeater cops and bitching about their health problems."

it's called free speech and again obscenity only applies if it fails under the miller test and indecency only applies to broadcast because they ARE broadcasting to the general public, ham aren't. just like people can cuss and swear on the cordless phones and cell phones...don't you know those are radio's too??

 

[Dirty Harry]

The courts have actually point out the fact that minors only make up 1%. so again that claim doesn't hold water.

Stop lying and making shit up Toad. Show us where a court ruled that "one percent of listeners are minors".

That's why no one believes a word you say.

 

[Spasticus Autisticus]

Obscenity is a very limited unprotected speech, For something to be obscene it must fail all three prongs of the Miller Test those three prongs are:

(1) whether ‘the average person, applying contemporary community standards’ would find that the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ appeals to ‘prurient interest’
(2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law.
(3) whether the work, ‘taken as a whole,’ lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The speech must be all three to be deemed obscene. meaning only hardcore pornography is obscene.
As for indecent language that the one that is vague and has yet to be readdress by the US Supreme Court.

You have no basis for your assertion that only hardcore porn meets the Miller test. Even if your rants might not meet the Miller test, they are still patently indecent and offensive to the average person and I am confident that if an enforcement action was taken against you for them, and you challenged it, the action would be upheld. That's not even taking into consideration the purpose of the amateur radio service which any court is also going to consider.

I would also like to point out the sales of scanner and Shortwave radio receivers has actually gone down in years, in fact Shortwave broadcasters themselves has seen their listenership gone down and lot and Shortwave broadcast radio is hurting thinks to FM / satellite and internet broadcasting. Secondly minors only make 1% of the amateur / listener viewership so claiming minors can listen doesn't hold water. for a minor to listen they have to have a radio to receive those frequencies like a scanner and Shortwave radio and again as I stated above sales for those has gone down over the years. The courts have actually point out the fact that minors only make up 1%. so again that claim doesn't hold water.

None of this is relevant. The mere fact that there is no license requirement to Rx and that minors do get licenses means that the standards for the content of transmissions on amateur bands are going to be held to a stronger standard of decency than late-night HBO programs. These days you don't even need a radio to monitor the ham bands. There are dozens of SDRs accessible on the web and there are streams of repeaters on Broadcastify.

"The HF bands can propagate worlwide, and with interlinked networks like IRLP, Allstar, Echolink, and the various digital radio networks, even VHF+ have potentially worldwide reach. For the simple reason of maintaining international goodwill, which is expressly stated as a purpose for the amateur radio service, the FCC has an interest in limiting obscenity."

Again obscenity is based on the miller test and unless it's hardcore porn it's not obscene.

it's called free speech and again obscenity only applies if it fails under the miller test and indecency only applies to broadcast because they ARE broadcasting to the general public, ham aren't. just like people can cuss and swear on the cordless phones and cell phones...don't you know those are radio's too??

There is no expectation of privacy on ham bands. Anyone is free to listen to any ham band frequency at any time. You can't even encrypt your transmissions except in very limited circumstances. If I eavesdropped on a cordless phone frequency and I overheard two people having phone sex and I reported them to the FCC for indecency, they'd just laugh at me. And if I did that with a cell phone conversation I'd go to jail.

I will quote in full FCC §97.1, which defines the basis and purpose of the amateur radio service:

The rules and regulations in this part are designed to provide an amateur radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the following principles:

(a) Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications.
(b) Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art.
(c) Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which provide for advancing skills in both the communication and technical phases of the art.
(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts.
(e) Continuation and extension of the amateur's unique ability to enhance international goodwill.

There is absolutely no reasonable interpretation of that that could lead one to determine that your profane rants and abusive conduct serve that purpose. But you could always sue the FCC and find out for yourself.

 

[N9OGL]

"You have no basis for your assertion that only hardcore porn meets the Miller test."

The miller test is mostly used on works that have some sexual nature to them and therefore pornography. But each case is based on case by cases bases.

"None of this is relevant. The mere fact that there is no license requirement to Rx and that minors do get licenses means that the standards for the content of transmissions on amateur bands are going to be held to a stronger standard of decency than late-night HBO programs. These days you don't even need a radio to monitor the ham bands. There are dozens of SDRs accessible on the web and there are streams of repeaters on Broadcastify."

No the point is not many children listen to the radio. serious how many kids do you know that listen to radio? with internet radio, Netflix, Hulu, Disney and such why would kids listen to some old guys talking on the radio. Perhaps before the internet was big there was probably a lot but today there is next to nothing, that IS a fact. Again only 1% is what it is...that isn't shit. like I said before the internet was big there probably was, but the internet and the age mass media where you can watch tv and movies anywhere has pretty much killed it.
My argument with cellphone and cordless phone is most people are unaware that they operate on radio frequencies. they themselves are nothing more then radios. You couldn't even listen to a cell phone; cell phones use Spread Spectrum with CDMA (Code Division Multiplexing Access) with an encryption system.
97.1 is shit, it nothing but the purpose of the service. The FCC rules are supposes to be the "lease restrictive means necessary to substantiate a compelling government interest."

Finally I received NOTHING from the FCC regarding that "rant" as you claim. The reason for that is because of a first amendment issue. Section 326 of the communication act also applies to ham radio. So why would I sue them? I have my license I've never lost my license.

Stop lying and making shit up Toad. Show us where a court ruled that "one percent of listeners are minors".

That's why no one believes a word you say.

It had do with a convicted pedophile that was trying to get his license renewed. it was brought up that children only make 1% of the amateur radio service.

One of the cases to look up to see what real obscenity is would be United States v Extreme Association (2005)

 

[Dirty Harry]

So, show us where the JUDGE RULED that one percent of amateur radio listeners are minors. Go on, Toad, the burden is on you.

EDIT: and as mentioned, it's irrelevant what the percentage is.

 

[N9OGL]

You show me that kids are listening. The truth is to claim that we have to watch what we say on ham radio because kids might be listening is an arsine excuse. Kids can listen to language worse on music, at school on the internet, and in video games. like I said perhaps long ago before the internet that excuse would hold water but not today with technology as it.

 

[Spasticus Autisticus]

No the point is not many children listen to the radio. serious how many kids do you know that listen to radio? with internet radio, Netflix, Hulu, Disney and such why would kids listen to some old guys talking on the radio. Perhaps before the internet was big there was probably a lot but today there is next to nothing, that IS a fact. Again only 1% is what it is...that isn't shit. like I said before the internet was big there probably was, but the internet and the age mass media where you can watch tv and movies anywhere has pretty much killed it.
My argument with cellphone and cordless phone is most people are unaware that they operate on radio frequencies. they themselves are nothing more then radios. You couldn't even listen to a cell phone; cell phones use Spread Spectrum with CDMA (Code Division Multiplexing Access) with an encryption system.
97.1 is shit, it nothing but the purpose of the service. The FCC rules are supposes to be the "lease restrictive means necessary to substantiate a compelling government interest."

Finally I received NOTHING from the FCC regarding that "rant" as you claim. The reason for that is because of a first amendment issue. Section 326 of the communication act also applies to ham radio. So why would I sue them? I have my license I've never lost my license.

I understand your point. It's irrelevant. Not many kids watch MeTV but that doesn't mean Svengoolie has the green light to start showing uncensored grindhouse flicks. Just because the FCC hasn't taken action against you doesn't mean that it's allowed or that an action won't be taken if you continue this conduct. Your rants where you've called people cunts, motherfuckers, bitchwhores, etc. are clearly in violation of both the letter and spirit of Part 97. The FCC has limited resources, they've taken a stance that amateur radio should be self-policing and typically only take action in egregious cases of deliberate interference. But by all means continue. I'm sure SCOTUS is just itching to take up your case.

 

[N9OGL]

Pal your talking about something that happened 14 years ago. don't be ham...move on with life.

 

[Dirty Harry]

You show me that kids are listening.

No problem. I can post dozens of similar videos.

9 Year Old Grace KM4TXT Working VA4EEE, KC1CWF, and AC9ED on 20 Meters with an Icom IC 7300

Amateur radio is fun for all ages! In this video, newly-upgraded General Class amateur radio operator Grace (KM4TXT) makes contacts with three other amateur...

www.youtube.com

Pal your talking about something that happened 14 years ago. don't be ham...move on with life.

You're a ham so you are telling us not to act like you??

Just like your claim that the police violated your 14th amendment rights 14 years ago. (which they never did) Move on Toad, follow your own words of wisdom.

NOTE: How pedotoad changes the subject when he's proven wrong. For the last time PedoToad, tell us where a judge RULED that one percent of amateur radio listeners are minors. Don't change the topic again.

 

[Cask of Amontillado]

Not true, the information we get and sent is already encrypted, we have have no idea what in those messages. FYI there are different levels of "classified"

First people who pass the traffic do not know if the messages are coded or decoded information, only the station who sent it and who is receiving it knows that. So we operators don't if the message is encoded or decoded.

As for my "rant" on the ham band; Ham radio is a hobby and shouldn't be taken to seriously. Unless your causing malicious interference to another radio service, the FCC don't give a shit what you do on the ham bands. Ham radio is not a broadcast service so all those rules like obscenity and indecent language that broadcaster have to follow we don't. Ham radio is a point to point radio service, like your cellphone you use. It has always been a point to point service since radio began in 1895. In fact ham radio is the oldest radio service out there.
If it wasn't for these "Ham fag" as you call us, you wouldn't have half the shit you have to day. A lot of the technology you uses today was invented by ham operators. because although ham radio is a hobby, a lot of hams go off into the commercial services and invent things for those services or invented things for a new service.
As for pissing off the FCC I did no such thing and I still ham license. The only reason my license was on hold for five years was because someone went to FCC and lied. They claiming I had a felony, which I do not, that's the reason it was held up

Well guess who's talking, @N9OGL. Your reply got narrated.

 

[Syaoran Li]

Not true, the information we get and sent is already encrypted, we have have no idea what in those messages. FYI there are different levels of "classified"

First people who pass the traffic do not know if the messages are coded or decoded information, only the station who sent it and who is receiving it knows that. So we operators don't if the message is encoded or decoded.

As for my "rant" on the ham band; Ham radio is a hobby and shouldn't be taken to seriously. Unless your causing malicious interference to another radio service, the FCC don't give a shit what you do on the ham bands. Ham radio is not a broadcast service so all those rules like obscenity and indecent language that broadcaster have to follow we don't. Ham radio is a point to point radio service, like your cellphone you use. It has always been a point to point service since radio began in 1895. In fact ham radio is the oldest radio service out there.
If it wasn't for these "Ham fag" as you call us, you wouldn't have half the shit you have to day. A lot of the technology you uses today was invented by ham operators. because although ham radio is a hobby, a lot of hams go off into the commercial services and invent things for those services or invented things for a new service.
As for pissing off the FCC I did no such thing and I still ham license. The only reason my license was on hold for five years was because someone went to FCC and lied. They claiming I had a felony, which I do not, that's the reason it was held up

Liar! Liar! Pants on fire!

I didn't use my ham callsign, I had a military callsign. As for K4YZ he's dead I'm not

You lie! Why must you lie?

Wrong, I've been on the HF a number of times. Do you know how many frequencies there are on the amateur HF bands? Because apparently you don't. Just because I'm not on the frequencies, YOU and your friends cause chaos on doesn't mean I'm not on the ham bands. The only thing that was "removed" was my antenna because we torn down our garage, I'm planning to put it back up as soon as the weather gets nice, right now it's been raining. As for flying, they didn't stop me, I can still fly. They did stop me buying a trike from Australia because they are still a little new to buying stuff online especially over seas. I, on the other hand buy stuff from all the seas all the time, including China. It's cheaper to buy stuff over seas then it is here in the US.

One finally thing, as for those warning letters from the FCC; Riley Hollingsworth doesn't know shit when it comes to Part 15. According to him the field strength on 13.556 was suppose to be 30 uV (microvolts) per meter at 3 meters, when it's actually 15,848 uV per meter at a distance of 30 meters. For those on here, that more then what a walkie - talkie on 49 MHz, put out. 49 MHz. walkie - talkies put out 10,000 uV per meters at 3 meters (or 1/4 of watt) Finally Riley was going after me for posting my name as Todd O'Dochartaigh on the internet. Tell me when did the FCC begin regulating the internet and tell people how they should post their name, because if that the case then this site is in violation of the FCC policies. The fact is the FCC does not regulate the internet and Riley Hollingsworth of the FCC exceeded his authority.

You know what?

Chicken Butt.

You know why?

Chicken Thigh.

Free Speech does apply to radio, including ham radio. Hams have more free speech then broadcasters, simply because they (broadcaster) have limited band space while hams have a lot more space, and that's due to the part that broadcast stations are coordinated to a frequency, while hams aren't. broadcasts have to run 24/7 a day 365 days a year, hams do not. So our free speech is greater then theirs

Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?

4210 Wolfetown Rd
Cherokee, NC 28719

Bring all your cowardly pedophile friends with you, I'll go to prison but you'll go to the morgue!

 

[Cask of Amontillado]

Care to put your money where your mouth is, faggot?

4210 Wolfetown Rd
Cherokee, NC 28719

Bring all your cowardly pedophile friends with you, I'll go to prison but you'll go to the morgue!

To @N9OGL:

"Roll the dice, you ashy motherfucker. Start the game."