Horrorcow Todd Nickerson - Hypocritical Virped Staff Member Who Breaks their ToS and Pedo Outcasted by Other Pedos

upload_2017-2-22_3-46-38.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Coach Kreeton Of All That, vhstape, spiritofamermaid and 4 others
meretseger said:
So, what's his disability? Being a pedophile?
Click to expand...

He has a gimp hand. It's more of an appendage than a hand. I'm pretty sure he wants to stroke small children with that scary ass thing, as if just being molested by a guy who looks like a wanted poster isn't bad enough.

Bitch I Might Be said:
I'm so shocked and completely surprised that Vice is defending a pedophile.
Click to expand...

Ow, the edge!
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Coldgrip and From The Uncanny Valley
AnOminous said:
He has a gimp hand. It's more of an appendage than a hand. I'm pretty sure he wants to stroke small children with that scary ass thing, as if just being molested by a guy who looks like a wanted poster isn't bad enough.



Ow, the edge!
Click to expand...

How the fuck does he have eye bags like Alison Rapp, is it a paedo mating strategy?
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Blarmination, Hanamura and Uncanny Valley
r2D16Qh.jpg

for someone that's claiming to be a "good pedo" that doesn't diddle children, I think posing with children in nearly every photo is probably the worst thing to do on fb
1Ra7YPV.png

he looks like if the vegas shooter was a sex offender

o0x1WwQ.png

his graphic designing is also laughably bad, regardless of him being a pedophile, I can't believe anyone would pay him to make this shit
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Coach Kreeton Of All That, Philosophy Zombie, Mrs Paul and 7 others
Thread hasn't been active in a while, but have found stuff from the last year which I thought should be posted here.
Found the sick fucker talking about why he outed himself as pedo. He really should have done the world a favour and necked himself like he was thinking about.
https://twitter.com/toddnickerson1/status/922309163581169670?lang=en
https://twitter.com/toddnickerson1/status/922313400335650816?lang=en

also a video he made on twitter justifying him being a sick fuck
https://twitter.com/toddnickerson1/status/923292411207368704?lang=en-gb

In 2017 he tried to start a pedo youtube series, didn't make more than 1 episode, as of one month ago he is still removing comments that call him out as the sick fuck he is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vj3z6iLsz3M

The twat is also still writing on his blog articles such as this gross mess
https://notamonsterblog.wordpress.c...pedophilia-is-inherently-wrong-is-well-wrong/
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Wärring Ornac
upload_2018-12-6_8-19-39.png

upload_2018-12-6_8-20-7.png

upload_2018-12-6_8-21-38.png
upload_2018-12-6_8-22-11.png

vhstape said:
The twat is also still writing on his blog articles such as this gross mess
Click to expand...
here's an archive link
https://archive.fo/yTDXn

The argument that pedophilia is inherently wrong is . . . well, wrong
In my encounters with Twitter trolls I’ve been seeing the argument more and more that pedophilia is somehow inherently wrong, so I decided to make a post to address this argument in-depth because it has become quite clear to me that most of the people making it do not really understand morality. To be sure, it’s not always an easy thing to grasp, and anyone who believes it is clearly hasn’t thought about it very much.
Unfortunately, there are tons of people who haven’t, and it’s not difficult to understand why: many people want their moral decisions to be simple, which is why they gravitate to preconceived moral codes like the Ten Commandments. Having a few short, straightforward, easily remembered rules to live by makes life soooo much simpler, doesn’t it? No need to deliberate, or cause ourselves cognitive dissonance over a moral quandary when we can just refer to the existing rule book handed down by some ultimate authority, right?
Yet ethical problems invariably butt up against each other, which creates more complex ethical problems. Sure, thou shalt not kill, but what if the person we are faced with killing is trying to kill an innocent child right in front of us? Thou shalt not bear false witness, okay, but what if your government is murdering innocent people and you know you can protect them by lying?
Psychologist Abraham Maslow, perhaps best known for conceptualizing the hierarchy of needs, famously defined a cognitive bias called the law of the instrument, or the law of the hammer. Maslow said that if the only tool one has is a hammer, then one tends to treat every problem he encounters as if it were a nail. Which is to say, our capacity to solve problems—including the problem of making sense of reality—is necessarily restricted by our own limitations.
Children certainly have many limitations compared to adults. For example, it’s well known that newborn babies see in black and white, or at least they only see black and white distinctly while the few other colors they might be able to see (there’s some debate about this) will be fuzzy and ill-defined. By design, they must see the world either fully or predominantly in black and white. Their eyes have not yet developed the nuance to discern sharp colors, and certainly not to pick up various shades of the same color. In their next stage of growth, babies can begin to see red and yellow, or red and green, very well, until they finally are able to pick the full color spectrum around three months of age.
But what’s really eye-opening to me (no pun intended) is that this phenomenon is not limited to individual humans. The most primitive human societies only had words for black and white. Not surprisingly, the next most advanced societies had words for black, white, red and yellow or black, white, red and green. And so forth. The recognition of colors in various societies was studied extensively by Brent Berlin and Paul Kay and discussed in their 1969 book Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. What they found was that there was a definite evolution in color conceptualizations in the languages of the most primitive extant societies to the most advanced.
Now, this may at first seem completely irrelevant to an understanding of morality, but I beg to differ. I propose that it’s no accident that the most basic (and therefore most limited) form of morality is often framed in terms of colors, namely black and white. Indeed, popular entertainment regularly traffics in it, which is why so many people find such entertainment appealing. In a world of uncertainties, it’s comforting to know exactly who to root for and exactly who to boo and hiss in our favorite movies and television programs.
But that’s the thing: no matter how much we’d like it to be, reality is never as simple as those TV shows with clearly defined heroes and villains. Even as the political landscape becomes increasingly polarized (I suspect in part because this simplistic hero & villain mentality has now taken over the news, and the line between entertainment media and informative media have blurred to the point where in some cases they are one and the same), it’s more important than ever that we come to scrutinize these issues with a critical eye.
Which brings us back round to the matter of pedophilia as a psychological phenomenon and its relationship to morality. Of course, it is first important that we establish in the minds of the public exactly what pedophilia is and what it is not. Pedophilia is, of course, a clinical term, not a legal one, and defines a primary or exclusive attraction to prepubescent children. At the basic level, that’s it. One need not molest children or consume child pornography to be a pedophile; I knew I was a pedophile long before I ever fantasized sexually about children, and even when I did, I knew it would be wrong to act on it. To this day I do not look at child porn, and I do not sexually abuse children, nor do I want to.
I’d say to you that you’d be surprised how many people don’t know that pedophilia and child sexual abuse are not interchangeable terms, but if you’ve followed me so far then you probably wouldn’t be surprised by that at all. Even when the people I’m debating are aware that these are not the same thing, I often see them make an argument which tends to go something along these lines: “Yeah, but you’re attracted to children. That’s just wrong and always will be. So you should be _________ [fill in the blank here: ashamed/arrested/hanged/castrated/stuck in a rocket and shot into the sun/etc.]”
Now here’s the part where we critically dissect this nonsense, and it isn’t all that hard to do, honestly. Pedophilia, whether you consider it a mental aberration or a sexuality, cannot be designated as inherently immoral without rendering the entire concept of morality meaningless. To understand why, we need to understand what moral agency is. Wikipedia describes it thusly:
Moral agency is an individual’s ability to make moral judgments based on some notion of right and wrong and to be held accountable for these actions. A moral agent is “a being who is capable of acting with reference to right and wrong.”
What that all boils down to is knowing what right and wrong are and being able to perform some action accordingly. In other words, for morality to have any real meaning, there must be some ability to act on one’s knowledge of right and wrong. Conversely, assigning a ‘morally inferior’ status to an unchosen condition cannot be right, since there was no moral agency involved.
And yet, that is exactly how a hefty percentage of people approach this issue. Such thinking is dangerous in a number of ways. For one thing, in the past this sort of viewpoint has fueled some of the worst atrocities humans have ever committed against each other. This is the sort of belief that led to most historical genocides, most notably the Holocaust, in which Nazis justified their mass murder of the Jews by first preaching that Jews were inherently corrupt and immoral just by being genetically Jewish, a condition they were born into. American slavery was likewise justified on these grounds: that blacks were amoral savage animals by nature and thus enslaving them was no different than domesticating dogs or cows.
Another problem with this line of reasoning is that it reduces or eliminates the incentive among pedophiles to behave, since they are essentially damned if they do and damned if they don’t. If the moral status of pedophiles in society is largely considered the same whether or not they offend against children and a pedophile takes that message to heart, then the only incentive he really has not to engage is to avoid arrest and/or public shaming. Considering how often people commit sex crimes against kids despite both the powerful social taboos against it and the severe legal consequences, that is not going to be effective enough to significantly curb sexual abuse. Now, some have said that this is victim blaming. It isn’t. Nowhere in that entire point did I mention the condition of victims in relation to rates of sex offending. No, the condition which I’m claiming affects the rates of sex offending by pedophiles is societal perceptions of them as a population.
The biggest problem with the notion that pedophilia is intrinsically wrong, however, has already been mentioned: it essentially renders the entire concept of morality irrelevant, for if one innate, unchosen and unchangeable condition can be deemed immoral, then it’s a short leap from there to deeming another one so, and another one, and another one. The Nazis didn’t just murder Jews after all. They also killed gypsies, lesbians and gays, and yes, pedophiles. And unsurprisingly, the most vicious critics of NOMAPs on Twitter and elsewhere have been members of the far right, many of whom also support treating all minorities as subhumans who are worthy of everything from verbal degradation to execution. You see, this sort of thinking never stops with one unpopular minority. Look at history.
That’s not all. Over the last two years we have seen Trump and his far right base attack and begin to break down the very bedrock principles of all free and democratic cultures: those of fairness, universal freedom, morality and most importantly, truth. Those of us who care about these things cannot allow that to happen. And so, we cannot let intellectual infants define morality by unchosen traits, for that way lies Orwellian madness. The less evolved among us, who can only perceive morality in the simplest black and white terms, might assure you that no, they only think of pedophiles as bad to the core, but you should know from experience that this simply isn’t true. Given leave to proclaim that this group is naturally evil, they will inevitably gravitate to affirming that that one is as well, and then that one, and that one, until no one is left but those who look, talk and behave exactly as they do.
And what is right and wrong must be defined not by unchosen conditions but only by chosen actions, or morality ceases to have any real value, and we step over the threshold from punishing wrongdoersto punishing wrongbe-ers, and those can and will be determined by whatever faction happens to hold power in the moment.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Uncanny Valley, ObsoleteMediaFormat, Portajohn and 2 others
I think pedos forget, gay, straight black white, tall short everyone fucking hates pedos, and for good reason.
Sure we may disagree with a lot on this site personally, we don't let it get in the way of the laughter we have and disgust we share.

Maybe it's "far right" to line up the pedos and shoot them, but "far left" has done that exact same thing. It's almost like skipping horseshoe theory and everyone finds people who harm children dangers and unsavable.

This nigger also just said 7-10 year old girls have good conversations, let me tell you this very simply if you consider a 8 year old girl able to converse well to you an adult, you are fucking dumb as rocks.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, cuddle striker, Clones of Alex Jones and 4 others
There is so much shit about this dude online, shame this thread is so dead because everyday he is saying something else fucked up or doubling down
Some more highlights from his Q&A site

Him and other pedo, coming up with reasons why people hate pedos
gWnHcp.jpg


LrzHUu.jpg


05xZE1.jpg


GDRgSk.jpg


4 years old, fucking hell. Why can't one of these crazy terrorist go after the pedos and do something good for once.
D3BUYT.jpg


TPNU85.jpg


hNysl1.jpg


0oJVuz.jpg


SAmZtN.jpg


8rj4DP.jpg


DI03Sg.jpg


ZzOehg.jpg


Z20Dv4.jpg


TzX9ig.jpg


Ap49yE.jpg


Honestly this is the most batshit crazy thing he has said by far.
YzEIA3.jpg


He is talking to kids online
92rqbg.jpg


It keeps getting worse
TmqndC.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Hanamura, Uncanny Valley and 2 others
Okay, so let's pretend that his story about the 13-year-old "about to be sex trafficked" girl is true. (Because it sounds a lot like thathappened.txt) Okay, even giving him the benefit of the doubt here, there is a pretty horrifying little tell in his story that I haven't seen pointed out yet.

92rqbg.jpg


He called a friend of his who lives in another city and is connected to CPS/Welfare. This guy is an out-and-proud pedophile, and he (allegedly) has friends in places that deal with the welfare of children. Now, I don't know about you, but being in a position that would put me in VERY FREQUENT CONTACT with kids who are oftentimes victims of sexual abuse would probably make me hate pedophiles a lot. Being sexually abused as a child is one of the worst things, and it fucks you up majorly. If I knew a friend of mine turned out to be a loud and proud pedophile, I'd probably NOT BE FRIENDS WITH THEM ANYMORE, especially given this guy is open and shameless about his..."orientation". The implications here are scary- if this story is true, and this guy is actually friends with someone who is connected with the welfare/cps system, is his friend a pedophile too? Is his friend using his connections to the welfare agency to access and possibly abuse kids?

That's all assuming this happened. Which it probably didn't, because pedophiles are notoriously full of shit and bad narrators. (See- "She came onto me!!! I SWEAR!")
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Biffo, spiritofamermaid, cuddle striker and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back