‘Traditional TV is dying’: can networks pivot and survive?

1723238384214.png

Warner Bros Discovery’s announcement this week of a $9bn (£7bn) writedown in the value of its TV networks is a stark acknowledgment of the damage the streaming wars are inflicting on traditional broadcasting models.

The astonishing figure, which pushed the US entertainment group to a quarterly net loss of $10bn (£7.9bn) and sent shares sliding 12% in early trading on Thursday, lays bare how channels such as CNN, TLC and the Food Network can no longer rely on a captive cable subscriber base.

The rapid consumer shift away from high-priced TV packages, coupled with the inexorable decline in advertising, has forced traditional TV companies to invest billions in low-cost streaming services to catch up with first movers such as Netflix.

The question is now whether companies such as WBD – home to TV and film content including Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire, The Big Bang Theory, Succession, Friends and all Olympics events – can build the scale and make significant profits from their streaming operations before the death of linear television delivered by cable, satellite or aerial.

“Traditional TV is dying, or at least in zombie mode,” says Alex Degroote, a media analyst. “It is being replaced by a combination of services such as short-form video players like YouTube and TikTok, and the top streamers such as Netflix. WBD’s $9bn impairment is a real hammer blow and will reverberate across all traditional media assets.”

The market value of WBD, home to assets including the Warner Bros film studio, HBO and CNN, has plunged almost 70% in the two years since the group was formed in a $40bn (£31.5bn) merger between WarnerMedia and Discovery intended to help both businesses survive the transition to a streaming future.

“Unfortunately, the stock performance is a clear indication that investors see little optimism that the tides may soon start to turn,” says Robert Fishman, senior analyst at MoffettNathanson.

Earlier this week, Disney disclosed that its streaming operations – which include the global Disney+ service, Hulu and ESPN+ in the US and Hotstar in India – achieved profitability for the first time in the quarter to the end of June.

However, the milestone of $447m (£352m) in operating profit, which was above management projections, has come at a huge cost, with its streaming services running up $11bn (£9.2bn) in losses since Disney+ was launched in 2019.

Disney has more than 200 million global streaming subscribers, and WBD exceeds 100 million globally, with Discovery+ now the fastest-growing service in the UK thanks to winning the rights to show every Olympic discipline. But the battle is not just to continue to drive scale.

Boosting revenue and profits per subscriber has become critical through strategies including rapid rounds of price increases – Disney has just announced a set of price rises for later this year – as well as driving slightly cheaper ad-funded tiers to pull in cost-conscious consumers.

While traditional TV companies struggle with managing the decline in their legacy businesses, with drastic rounds of cost-cutting after a decade of profligate spending on content in the first decade of the streaming wars, Netflix points to a viable future.

The streaming giant, which once struggled with mounting losses running into tens of billions of dollars, has seen its market value surge by more than 50% over the past year after turning the profitability corner while continuing to see significant growth in subscribers.

WBD’s chief executive, David Zaslav, who has considered breaking up the company but concluded that is not currently the best option, said the market was being hit by a “generational disruption” that requires traditional TV companies to take “bold, necessary steps”.

Richard Broughton, director at Ampere Analysis, said: “Legacy TV businesses are in decline but the shift is not so rapid that it can’t be managed. There are still a lot of broadcast TV viewers, they have the time to pivot to profitability in the streaming world.”

The Guardian
Archive [August 9 2024]
 
No one watches traditional TV because it's fucking gay.

Make actually interesting, non-globohomo shows and air them weekly. I think that this is a very simple prospect, but you present this to show business and you'd think you were asking them to solve calculus problems while hanging from their balloon knot suspended over a pit of burning cobras.
 
There are still a lot of broadcast TV viewers, they have the time to pivot to profitability in the streaming world.”
Lmao at that cope, the electric jew will pretty much die with boomers. At best, legacy media will limp along with retarded consoomers that want to condo on the same garbage as their parents. Even normalfags are starting to notice how pozzed it’s getting. Every relationship is interracial, only fags/troons/non whites/women, if there’s ever a straight white guy they’re fat/incompetent or evil. Rest in piss TV.

(edit: accidentally capitalized jew)
 
When I moved into my first house, my parents told me all about how one of my living room walls was just perfect for a bigass TV/entertainment center megaplex. I told them I wasn't really into TV and if I got one it'd be on the smaller wall and for vintage video games with friends exclusively, and otherwise the "tv space" would be used for other hobbies. Reading, miniature painting, etc. They told me I'd soon want that bigass TV, they knew I would, everyone wants one.

Nope! Don't got a single TV in the house and it's just wonderful.
 
I actually miss watching TV occasionally. Being able to just sit down and mindlessly channel surf with convenient ad breaks that allow me to indulge my ADD impulses on my phone or with a game sounds like heaven. Unfortunately, it’s not worth the hundreds of dollars they charge and the programming has been watered down and cucked beyond all recognition so it’s not really an option.

Also unfortunately for them, in their rush to get those some of those streaming bucks to compensate for their losses they’ve just shattered the market into a million discrete platforms and jacked up prices, making the difference between streaming and cable completely negligible. So now whenever they rarely put out something that interests me I just watch it for free, and they get absolutely nothing from me.
 
One thing I liked about TV over streaming is that it kept everyone more connected on the same thing. If something good was on Saturday at 8pm, everyone would be watching it at the same time and have something to talk about on Monday. With streaming everyone just watches different things at different paces; when they drop a whole season at a time you can't really discuss each episode individually like you used to.
 
Ahem. Ads, Ads and pozzed everything. Ads back then at the very least were barely noticeable. But with the rate it was going, Ads are as long as the show or even longer.

And as for the latter, no-one wants a weirdo telling parents that they should give up their children to be sold to rich fags. And many are waking up to the reality that TV is a mindrape machine as well.

Mastermind World Conqueror.jpg
 
I don't watch TV because Youtube offers quality programming made by passionate creators for free. I might go back to TV if it offered me the chance to watch any movie (new or vintage) that I wanted for free with a reasonable amount of ads. TV Streaming services got greedy by demanding that I either buy into a service or fork over 3.99 to "rent" movies on demand. Nigga, "renting movies" died with the Blockbuster age. We spent decades watching "free" TV and putting up with ads, so I know a system like this is possible. Seeing as how nearly everybody has the option to sail the high seas, it serves broadcasters no purpose to be stingy with their content.
 
Back