حلال TranLord - Let me preface this by saying I like the idea of fucking dogs

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe he meant to post this to beastforum.com (warning: the phrase "Cat Party" means something completely different there) instead of kiwifarms.net and just got the 2 URL's mixed up. Happens all the time.
I doubt that it was an accident.

Either way, that's a stupid, and gross, thing to admit. No means no in any language you moron. Even when it regards animals.
 
I'm still fucking trying to wrap my head around how you can be 100% serious when you basically type "I'm better than Vade, oh by the way I want to fuck dogs".

1386365771590.jpg
 
When I started the Vade thread, I figured we'd get Tumblrites and furries that might be awkward on a forum like this.

I would have never in a million years thought that an admitted zoophile would come in and be stupid enough to defend Vade's pedo tendencies while still trying to assure us that they're better.

I'm so sorry.

I never asked for this.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the logic that drove him to post that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Giovanni
Well I see someone came out of the closet as a dog fucker while I was sleeping today. Also what's with the new banner, does it say Jihad or something?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Dude
To be fair to the guy, he did say "i would never actually fuck a dog in real life (or look at bestiality porn involving real things) as that is animal abuse and the very idea of it happening irl makes me feel sick." I mean it's still fucking weird to come out and say this just like that, but it's a key point.

^What I was thinking.

Though as a pretty-much vegan I could make some choice comments also. :P
 
^What I was thinking.

Though as a pretty-much vegan I could make some choice comments also. :P
To be fair to the guy, he did say "i would never actually fuck a dog in real life (or look at bestiality porn involving real things) as that is animal abuse and the very idea of it happening irl makes me feel sick." I mean it's still fucking weird to come out and say this just like that, but it's a key point.
Except that doesn't make it ok. And his other point about it, pedophilia, etc being legitimate sexual orientations that should be declared unfixable is abhorrent. They are mental illnesses that should be treated. One could argue that the porn OP says helps pedos stay on the "straight and narrow" actually furthers the fantasy in the subjects head until they do act on their urges.

And while I'm at it, I would like to note the example at the end of OPs post about Jeffery Dahmer doesn't represent all gays is completely irrelevant. Dahmer was a sick individual with various psychological issues. Being gay isn't what drove him to strangle, rape, and eat his victims, but zoophilia does encourage one to molest animals and pedophilia does encourage one to molest kids. OPs attempt at white knighting is complete bullshit, their arguments are paper thin, and this whole thing could have been completely avoided if they had ever bothered to ask "should I really be posting this?"
 
Except that doesn't make it ok. And his other point about it, pedophilia, etc being legitimate sexual orientations that should be declared unfixable is abhorrent. They are mental illnesses that should be treated. One could argue that the porn OP says helps pedos stay on the "straight and narrow" actually furthers the fantasy in the subjects head until they do act on their urges.

And while I'm at it, I would like to note the example at the end of OPs post about Jeffery Dahmer doesn't represent all gays is completely irrelevant. Dahmer was a sick individual with various psychological issues. Being gay isn't what drove him to strangle, rape, and eat his victims, but zoophilia does encourage one to molest animals and pedophilia does encourage one to molest kids. OPs attempt at white knighting is complete bullshit, their arguments are paper thin, and this whole thing could have been completely avoided if they had ever bothered to ask "should I really be posting this?"

It would have been funnier if they said Dahmer doesn't represent all cannibals.

"Just because I'm aroused at the thought of luring someone into my home so I can cook and eat them, doesn't mean I'm a bad person! I don't act on my urges! And at least I'm not Vade!"
 
Except that doesn't make it ok. And his other point about it, pedophilia, etc being legitimate sexual orientations that should be declared unfixable is abhorrent. They are mental illnesses that should be treated. One could argue that the porn OP says helps pedos stay on the "straight and narrow" actually furthers the fantasy in the subjects head until they do act on their urges.

Based on what I've read on porn affecting heterosexuals (and personally experienced with masturbation), it probably depends, but may be more likely to enhance the urge. There's a ton more research to do on that though.

It doesn't really matter though unless the risk increase is significant enough to worry about. And then there's my own opinions on pedophilia, but I'll probably get a lot of hate for THAT...

And while I'm at it, I would like to note the example at the end of OPs post about Jeffery Dahmer doesn't represent all gays is completely irrelevant. Dahmer was a sick individual with various psychological issues. Being gay isn't what drove him to strangle, rape, and eat his victims, but zoophilia does encourage one to molest animals and pedophilia does encourage one to molest kids. OPs attempt at white knighting is complete bullshit, their arguments are paper thin, and this whole thing could have been completely avoided if they had ever bothered to ask "should I really be posting this?"

Is it true that a pedophile can choose not to molest kids? Is it true that someone into bestiality can choose not to molest animals?

Grouping them with those that do might be a sore point, here.

Also, I find a lot of the ideas behind the concept that minors can't consent to be pretty damn offensive and debatable, but...
 
Seriously what the fuck is going on in that Vade thread? I remember a short time after the thread was made, I made a post noticing how autistic the thread was getting and I just knew it was going bring in SJW tumblr shits like this. I ended up not following the thread anymore becasue I thought it was becoming a circle jerk and then months later I end up seeing shit like this that makes me think I was right.
 
Seriously what the fuck is going on in that Vade thread? I remember a short time after the thread was made, I made a post noticing how autistic the thread was getting and I just knew it was going bring in SJW tumblr shits like this. I ended up not following the thread anymore becasue I thought it was becoming a circle jerk and then months later I end up seeing shit like this that makes me think I was right.

This was pretty much unprompted. Somebody posted an old screenshot of Vade talking to a blog that was something along the lines of "ask a real pedophile" where she was sympathizing with him. Then this guy comes out of nowhere and starts the dog-fucker talk. Not even sure this guy is from Tumblr at all. Even if someone wanted to debate fantasy vs. reality or paraphilias, this isn't the time or place and there was waaaay too much detail, especially about subjects that are pretty heinous.

Also, I find a lot of the ideas behind the concept that minors can't consent to be pretty damn offensive and debatable, but...

Woah, woah, woah. Stop. Regardless of your feelings on whether a minor can be "mature for their age" or not, there's still an inherent power imbalance between an independent adult and a dependent minor, one that can be, and MUCH more often than not is, abused. Barring all moral arguments, it's still very much against the law and that should be more than enough to put your "offense" to the curb even despite everything else wrong with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back